Prehabilitation is gaining traction in complex oncological interventions and treatments. This CME article is focused on the basic principles of prehabilitation. We discuss the objective evaluation of physical fitness and how to improve it by physio- and speech therapy. Thereafter, we explain how to judge nutritional status, especially in oncological patients, and discuss modes of nutritional supplementation. Finally, the enhanced recovery after surgery concept is briefly explained and its current value in head and neck cancer patients discussed.

Post-polio syndrome (PPS) is a condition affecting individuals who have previously contracted and recovered from poliomyelitis. It is estimated that up to 20 million people worldwide are still living with the sequelae of polio, and 20-85% of these people may develop PPS. PPS, a diagnosis of exclusion, includes symptoms of new-onset muscle weakness, fatigue, pain, and muscular atrophy that occurs at least 15 yr after an acute polio infection. These patients may present for surgery with or without a formal diagnosis of PPS, requiring anaesthesia clinicians to understand the specific considerations for patients with, or at risk of, PPS. This review addresses specific anaesthetic concerns in PPS care, assessing current research to guide management and highlighting significant evidence gaps. The topics reviewed include the pathophysiology and characteristics of PPS with potential anaesthetic implications, and relevant outcomes data for patients with PPS undergoing anaesthesia. Key areas of concern in the PPS literature included respiratory function, dysphagia, cold intolerance, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents. Existing studies on patients with PPS receiving anaesthesia were primarily case reports, with a lack of large-scale, controlled studies. Areas of continued controversy include ambiguity regarding tolerance to opioids, the use of neuraxial anaesthesia, and sensitivity to anaesthetic agents and neuromuscular blocking agents. Preoperative evaluation should include careful assessment of respiratory and swallowing function, with advanced planning for intraoperative and postoperative management using a multidisciplinary approach. Further research is needed to understand anaesthetic risks and develop evidence-based guidelines for this unique patient population.

The efficacy of preoperative rehabilitation (prehabilitation) for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty remains controversial. Prehabilitation is defined as the implementation of functional exercises, health education, and preemptive medication before surgery to improve postoperative outcomes, typically compared to conventional care protocols. Existing studies have reported inconsistent results regarding its benefits. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the impact of prehabilitation on hospital length of stay, postoperative pain, and knee function in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from their establishment to 16 January 2024. An additional 19 articles were obtained by reading the relevant literature or by a reference search. All clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to the prehabilitation of total knee arthroplasty were included. All trials were analyzed by two independent reviewers, and the resulting data were analyzed using a random effects model and processed using Review Manager5.4 statistical software. The main outcome measures are as follows: visual analog scale(VAS), knee flexion and extension, and length of stay (LOS).

A total of 18 articles, encompassing 21 RCTs with 2,150 participants (1,167 in the prehabilitation group and 983 in the control group), were included. The analysis revealed that prehabilitation significantly reduced postoperative pain at 1, 3, and 6 months, as evidenced by lower VAS scores. Improvements in knee function were noted in terms of knee extension at 1 month and knee flexion at 3 months postoperatively. However, no significant difference was observed in the length of hospital stay.

Prehabilitation before knee arthroplasty effectively alleviates postoperative pain and partially enhances knee function in the early postoperative period but does not significantly affect the length of hospital stay.

Surgical intervention for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is common and associated with high rates of postoperative side effects or complications. Prehabilitation programs aim to reduce postoperative complications and enhance outcomes. However, the clinical effectiveness of prehabilitation programs for patients undergoing LSS surgery has yet to be fully investigated. A key part of this investigation is to gain insight into how to design these programs through an iterative process that includes feedback from patients' experiences.

To explore patients' experiences with a novel prehabilitation program: Pre-Operative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE-LSS).

Individual structured telephone interviews with pragmatic qualitative analysis.

Academic medical center.

Patients (n = 10) who underwent lumbar spinal stenosis surgery and completed the POSE-LSS program prior to their surgery were included (six women; four men, mean age: 62.3 years).

POSE-LSS is a novel multimodal, education-focused, time-efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) educational booklet and video, (2) in-person physical therapy (PT) session, and (3) telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.

One-on-one structured interviews to understand patients' experiences with a LSS prehabilitation program.

Participants in this qualitative study described a favorable, unique, and feasible experience associated with participation in the POSE-LSS program. Three main themes were developed from these interviews about POSE-LSS: (1) it helped patients to better prepare for their surgery and improved postoperative expectations, (2) it addressed modifiable psychological factors associated with the surgical intervention, and (3) it fits into a larger support system necessary to meet patients' needs.

The perspectives gained from this qualitative study can inform improved design and evaluation of LSS prehabilitation programs.

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a group of rare disorders characterized by multiple joint contractures present at birth. Early rehabilitation is essential to minimize joint contractures and maximize autonomy and participation among individuals with AMC. However, there is little robust scientific evidence to inform best practice. This project aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for the rehabilitation management of children with AMC in the following priority areas: early intervention and motor development, muscle and joint function, orthotics, mobility, participation in areas of life, pain, psychosocial wellbeing, and perioperative rehabilitation.

This multi-phase project used an integrated knowledge translation approach. Based on the results from scoping reviews on the priority areas identified for the rehabilitation of children with AMC, and a clinician survey describing current practices in AMC rehabilitation, three panels of expert clinicians in occupational therapy, physical therapy, orthopedics, physiatry, and social work, as well as people with lived experience and researchers from 10 countries developed consensus-based recommendations for rehabilitation, in concordance with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework (GRADE) criteria. A modified Delphi process was completed with a wider group of international AMC experts to revise and validate the recommendations (Round 1 = 41 and Round 2 = 37 experts). A five-member external review panel appraised the recommendations using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool. The final 16 recommendations reached a mean agreement rate of 96.6% after two Delphi rounds. The overall quality was rated at 96.6% on the AGREE II tool. Interviews with clinicians and managers identified facilitators and barriers to implementation of the recommendations in practice using the Theoretical Domain Framework.

Consensus-based, expert validated recommendations for the rehabilitation of children with AMC were developed by a wide range of stakeholders, healthcare users and providers. The proposed recommendations are expected to contribute to improving child- and family-centered practice and health outcomes. Future work includes a knowledge translation strategy to promote sharing and implementation of the recommendations in practice.

Prehabilitation aims to enhance preoperative functional capacity through exercise, nutrition, and psychological programs. Home-based prehabilitation represents an alternative to hospital prehabilitation, with the advantage of not utilising hospital resources. This review aims to evaluate adherence and clinical effectiveness of home-based prehabilitation.

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase up to October 1, 2024 for randomised controlled trials comparing home-based prehabilitation with standard care. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included protocol adherence, and 6-min walking test. We used risk ratios (RR) and mean differences to summarise the results. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 tool.

We included 29 randomised trials for a total of 3508 patients. Median adherence to home-based prehabilitation programs was 82%. Home-based prehabilitation reduced the proportion of patients with postoperative complications (508/1322 [38.4%] vs 578/1335 [43.3%], risk ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.98, P=0.02, I2=44%, low certainty). After home-based prehabilitation, 6-min walking test performance was better compared with control (MD 28.2 m (95% CI 9.5-46.9; P<0.01, I2=48). Preoperative depression (MD -0.65, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.43; P<0.001, I2=0%), postoperative anxiety (MD -0.50, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.25; P<0.001, I2=0%, low certainty) and length of hospital stays (MD -0.32 days, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.03; P=0.03, I2=45%, low certainty) were lower with home-based prehabilitation.

Home-based prehabilitation reduced the proportion of patients with postoperative complications, but with low certainty of evidence. It also improved preoperative functional capacity, reduced hospital stays, depression and anxiety scores, with good adherence to the intervention.

PROSPERO (CRD42024591208).

This study investigates the global research landscape of prehabilitation, identifying current trends, dominant disciplines, collaborative networks, and prominent articles in the field.

For our analysis, we employed the published prehabilitation literature indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database, spanning from 2002 to 2022. In addition, we utilized CiteSpace (version 6.2; Drexel University), a widely used information visualization software to perform bibliometric analysis.

Analyzing 553 research articles, we observe a consistent upward trend in prehabilitation publication and citation activity. Interdisciplinary co-occurrence analysis highlights strong connections with fields such as surgery, rehabilitation, oncology, sports sciences, orthopedics, gastroenterology, and hepatology. Initially centered around postoperative outcomes in major abdominal surgeries, particularly for colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, prehabilitation research expanded to include thoracic surgeries, focusing on conditions like lung cancer and aortic valve replacement. Preoperative exercise remains a core area, with increasing interest in multimodal prehabilitation and its effectiveness based on patient group characteristics. North America and Western Europe emerge as primary contributors to prehabilitation research.

Current research concentrates on tailoring prehabilitation programs for specific groups, and broadening their geographical scope would enhance the studies, contributing valuable insights for medical practitioners shaping future research efforts.

A pilot randomized controlled trial.

To investigate the effects of a prehabilitation program on early postoperative outcomes in Japanese patients undergoing lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery.

Prehabilitation has shown promise for improving postoperative outcomes in various surgical populations. However, its effectiveness in Japanese patients undergoing LSS surgery has not been previously studied.

Thirty-two of 34 patients scheduled for LSS surgery (mean age: 69.3 y, 17 female) were randomly assigned to the prehabilitation group (15 patients) or control group (17 patients). The primary outcomes were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). The secondary endpoints were the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain, leg pain, and numbness. The intervention group received a 20-30-minute educational session from a physical or occupational therapist using a pamphlet 1 month before surgery, while the control group received a pamphlet handout. Assessments were conducted 1 month before surgery (baseline); 1 day before surgery; and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

All patients underwent preoperative educational sessions. The prehabilitation group showed significant improvements in 6MWD at 3 months postoperatively compared with the control group (446.8±48.9 m vs. 384.3±58.3 m, P=0.01, Hedges' g=1.11). ODI scores at 1 month postoperatively were lower in the prehabilitation group (10.2±10.9 vs. 19.0±10.7, P=0.04, Hedges' g=-0.77). Low back pain VAS at 3 months postoperatively was also lower in the prehabilitation group (12.5±14.8 vs. 27.5±20.8, P=0.04, Hedges' g=0.75). No adverse events were reported in either of the groups.

Prehabilitation may enhance postoperative recovery and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for LSS. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to establish the effectiveness of prehabilitation in this population.

Background Postoperative sleep disturbances and pain are common, negatively impacting recovery and quality of life. While various preventive strategies exist, the role of preoperative exercise in mitigating these effects remains underexplored. Objective This study evaluates the efficacy of preoperative exercise as a prehabilitation strategy to reduce postoperative sleep disturbances and pain in a rat model. Methods Male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: postoperative pain (PO) without preoperative exercise (N-group), PO with preoperative exercise (P-group), and a sham-operated control (S-group). Sleep patterns, including sleep duration and quality, were analyzed using EEG over a 72-hour period, starting at 8:00 a.m. on the first day of the experiment. Additionally, pain thresholds were assessed using the von Frey and Hargreaves tests. Results Compared to the N-group, the P-group exhibited reduced wake time and increased non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep duration. Additionally, the N-group showed increased wake time and decreased NREM sleep duration compared to the S-group, whereas no significant differences were observed between the P- and S-groups. The thermal allodynia test indicated a higher pain threshold in the P-group than in the N-group, although both remained lower than the S-group. Conclusions Our study demonstrates the efficacy of preoperative exercise as a nonpharmacological intervention for reducing postoperative sleep disturbances and alleviating pain. These findings highlight the potential benefits of prehabilitation for patients undergoing surgery.

Complications of oral cavity cancer (OCC) surgery have an impact on the quality of life. Therefore, evaluating hospital performance on complication rates can help identify best practices for improving the quality of OCC care. As patient and tumor characteristics also impact hospital results, case-mix adjustment should be considered to provide a valid hospital comparison. This study investigated hospital variation in the quality indicator "a complicated postoperative course" after OCC surgery.

This population-based cohort included all first primary OCC patients diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 who were surgically treated with curative intent. A complicated postoperative course was defined as 30-day mortality, unplanned readmission, surgical complications requiring reintervention or prolonged hospital stay, or fistula formation. Hospital performance was analyzed using funnel plots with case-mix correction.

A total of 2,266 OCC patients could be included. The distribution of case-mix variables varied significantly between hospital populations. Nationally, a complicated postoperative course occurred in 13.9% and uncorrected hospital rates ranged from 2.7% to 31.1%. A WHO performance score ≥2, cT3-T4 tumors, and floor-of-mouth tumors were associated with an increased risk of a complicated postoperative course, and non-squamous cell carcinoma with a decreased risk. Significant outliers remained after case-mix correction for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics.

Complications after OCC surgery are prevalent, especially regarding extensive tumors and surgery. To identify best practices in OCC surgery, hospital performance on a complicated postoperative course should be adjusted for case-mix and treatment variables. Providing feedback on hospital performance for complications can instigate improvement plans for better outcomes.

3 Laryngoscope, 2025.

The study compares the body mass index (BMI), 10-m walk test results, and self-rated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients awaiting total knee or hip arthroplasty with age and sex-matched controls. Additionally, we investigated relationships between these variables to better understand how mobility impairments and HRQoL contribute to the need for surgical intervention. Forty-three patients (age: 66.7 ± 8.7 years) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (n = 23) or total hip arthroplasty (n = 20) and 54 healthy control individuals (age: 65.6 ± 1.5 years) participated in this study. Weight and height were measured, the BMI was calculated, the 10 m walk test was performed, and HRQoL was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Patients had a significantly higher BMI than controls (p = 0.037), with the majority of both groups classified as overweight or obese (patients, 86%; controls, 73%). Patients also walked significantly more slowly than controls (p < 0.001). HRQoL was significantly lower in patients across all dimensions (p < 0.001), with the greatest impairments observed in mobility, usual activities, and pain. Significant but weak correlations (p = 0.001-0.042, rs = 0.31-0.48) were found between the HRQoL, BMI, and 10 m walk test results. These findings confirm that patients awaiting total knee or hip arthroplasty exhibit an increased BMI, reduced locomotor function, and impaired HRQoL, highlighting the extent of functional limitations in individuals with end-stage osteoarthritis. The strong association between mobility impairments and HRQoL further underscores the impact of osteoarthritis on daily life and the increasing need for surgical intervention.

» Although spine surgery is effective in reducing pain and improving functional status, it is associated with unacceptably high rates of complications, thus necessitating comprehensive preoperative patient optimization.» Numerous risk factors that can impact long-term surgical outcomes have been identified, including malnutrition, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, substance use, and more.» Preoperative screening and personalized, evidence-based interventions to manage medical comorbidities and optimize medications can enhance clinical outcomes and improve patient satisfaction following spine surgery.» Multidisciplinary team-based approaches, such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and multidisciplinary conferences, can further facilitate coordinated care from across specialties and reduce overall hospital length of stay.

Lifestyle changes including reduced calorie intake and increased physical activity (PA) improve the prognosis associated with bariatric surgery (BS) and metabolic indices. Early implementation of exercise leads to improved physical performance, better glycemic control and lipid profile, reduces the risks associated with anesthesia, and accelerates recovery from surgery. Undertaking systematic exercise after BS is associated with a better quality of life, improves insulin sensitivity, results in additional weight loss, reduces adverse effects on bone mass, and results in better body composition. The aim of this review was to summarize recommendations for physical activity in patients undergoing BS and to highlight the key role of physical activity in this patient group.

Prehabilitation (preoperative rehabilitation) encompasses a range of patient health driven interventions with the potential to enhance surgical outcomes. This systematic review aims to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes across surgical specialties, focusing on physical functionality and postoperative length of stay (LOS).

Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were queried using the search terms prehabilitation, surgery, and related synonyms. Included publications were original, English-language, full-text studies conducted in the US with a cohort of ≥5 patients undergoing prehabilitation. After title (n = 1817), abstract (n = 1059), and full-text (n = 411) screens, 26 articles met inclusion criteria.

Of 26 included articles, 30.8% (n = 8) assessed oncologic surgeries, 34.6% (n = 9) assessed orthopedic surgeries, 19.2% (n = 5) assessed general surgery procedures, and 15.4% (n = 4) assessed cardiac, colorectal, urologic, and transplant surgeries. Physical function was the most common assessed primary outcome, with 46.2% (n = 12) of studies measuring physical activity, functional status, range of motion, or muscle strength. The outcomes of six-meter walk test, sit-to-stand test, and LOS were reported in 26.9% (n = 7), 23.1% (n = 6), and 19.2% (n = 5) of studies, respectively. Three studies found a significant improvement in the six-meter walk test, and four studies demonstrated a significant improvement in sit-to-stand test after prehabilitation. LOS outcomes had varied results across studies.

Prehabilitation interventions have the potential to improve postoperative outcomes, including physical function and LOS in surgical patients. Further research is necessary to identify the most efficacious prehabilitation protocols and determine their optimal impact within diverse surgical subpopulations.

Hip osteoarthritis and knee osteoarthritis cause significant disability and pain in older adults, often leading to hip or knee replacement surgery. Prehabilitation programs have been established for these surgeries, but there are few programs for orthogeriatrics. We evaluated the feasibility of a new multimodal prehabilitation program (MPP) for older adults before hip or knee replacement due to arthrosis: the Prehabilitation for Os (PRE4OS) study.

We conducted a multicenter feasibility study in the Greater Paris area.

Eligible adults were aged ≥75 years old awaiting hip or knee replacement with at least a 6-week delay before surgery and able to participate in the MPP follow-up. The MPP included weekly hospital sessions providing nutritional, psychological, functional, and cognitive support, along with weekly home sessions featuring physiotherapist visits.

The primary outcome was at least 80% of 1-day hospital (ODH) sessions performed by 80% of participants. Secondary outcomes included intervention achievement, quality of life, and nutritional and functional status changes. Participant's satisfaction was qualitatively assessed via structured phone interviews presurgery and at 30 days postsurgery.

From September 2021 to September 2023, a total of 27 individuals participated in the PRE4OS study. The mean (SD) age was 83 (4.3) years, with 7 males (26%) and median baseline Activities of Daily Living score 5.5 (interquartile range 5.5-6.0). Surgeries were for insertion of hip prosthesis in 17 participants (63%) and knee prosthesis in 10 (37%). The primary outcome was achieved in 89% of participants, with comparable rates for hip and knee prostheses. In total, 60% of participants rated the MPP as "excellent" presurgery and 100% at 30 days postsurgery, expressing a willingness to recommend the protocol to a friend or family.

The MPP was feasible for individuals before hip or knee replacement and was well received. Further randomized trials are needed to assess its clinical impact.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) and its treatments cause significant acute, chronic, or latent adverse effects, leading to decreased physical function and quality of life. Robust evidence supports the positive effects of physical activity (PA) on various health outcomes in CRC patients. However, there is limited understanding regarding the factors that influence PA engagement, including facilitators, preferences, and barriers in this population.

This scoping review aims to document the breadth and depth of literature concerning the various aspects of PA participation among patients with CRC. We conducted a scoping review of PA among CRC patients.

We searched several databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane, from their inception to 25 July 2023. Multiple reviewers were involved in all screening and data abstractions. The search yielded 834 individual citations after removing duplicates. After screening the titles and abstracts, 20 articles underwent full-text review, and 11 were included.

Our research findings indicate that among CRC patients, the most prevalent facilitators/preferences for PA are understanding its importance and perceiving its benefits, whereas treatment-related effects and lack of time are the most common barriers.

CRC patients have unique facilitators and barriers concerning PA. Further research and clinical interventions are required to support and encourage this population to participate in and maintain regular PA.

Prehabilitation, an emerging strategy, prepares patients for elective surgery by encouraging healthy behaviors, including physical exercise and healthy nutrition, while providing psychological support, to improve postoperative outcomes and foster healthier lifestyles. Despite growing interest, there is little research on prehabilitation. Specifically, studies involving prehabilitation in vascular surgery are heterogeneous with small sample sizes. This review aimed to investigate the reported positive impact of prehabilitation on vascular surgery patients, discuss prehabilitation models, highlight prehabilitation program-associated challenges, and suggest appropriate interventions. Prehabilitation improves physical fitness, reduces postoperative complications, and enhances overall recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation programs can positively impact vascular surgery patients, with benefits including improved cardiovascular fitness, reduced postoperative complications, shorter postoperative hospital stays, enhanced overall recovery, and improved quality of life. The currently reported prehabilitation programs are heterogeneous, with limitations regarding patient adherence and lack of long-term outcomes, posing challenges to their widespread adoption. Overall, prehabilitation shows promise for improving vascular surgery outcomes and fostering long-term healthy behaviors. The systematic implementation of prehabilitation in vascular surgery care pathways, overcoming reported limitations, and integrating multimodal prehabilitation into routine preoperative care hold potential benefits. This review underscores the need for high-quality research to establish best practices in prehabilitation and integrate them into the standard of care for vascular surgery patients.

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a leading cause of chronic musculoskeletal pain among older adults. A common and costly intervention for the treatment of LSS is lumbar decompression with or without fusion (LSS surgery), which has mixed outcomes among patients. Prehabilitation is a strategy designed to optimize the consistency of positive surgical outcomes and promote patient self-efficacy, while attempting to mitigate postoperative complications. No efforts have investigated the prehabilitation strategies specifically for patients undergoing LSS surgery.

To determine the feasibility of delivery and acceptability by participants of a novel prehabilitation intervention for patients undergoing LSS surgery.

Feasibility study.

Outpatient orthopedic clinic at an academic medical center.

Patients at least 50 years of age, who were scheduled for LSS surgery between October 2020 and October 2021.

PreOperative Spinal Education for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (POSE-LSS), is a novel multimodal, education-focused, time-efficient prehabilitation program for patients undergoing LSS surgery. Participants received the following: (1) Educational booklet and video; (2) In-person physical therapy (PT) session; and (3) Telemedicine visit with a physiatrist.

The primary outcomes of interest were feasibility and acceptability of intervention by participants. Key potential surgical outcomes were length of stay and discharge disposition.

POSE-LSS was completed by all eligible participants enrolled (n = 15) indicating feasibility and acceptability. Potential effectiveness measures including length of stay and discharge disposition were positively associated with the POSE-LSS intervention.

This study demonstrates that a novel prehabilitation intervention is feasible, acceptable, and appears positively associated with important short-term measures of postoperative recovery that may impact the trajectory of patient care following LSS surgery.

High-impact surgery imposes a significant physiological and functional burden and is associated with substantial postoperative morbidity. Multimodal prehabilitation has demonstrated a reduction in postoperative complications and enhanced functional recovery, mainly in abdominal cancer surgery. Common preoperative risk factors shared among patients undergoing high-impact surgery, extending beyond abdominal cancer surgery procedures, suggest the relevance of multimodal prehabilitation to a broader patient population. This stepped wedge trial primarily aims to examine the hospital-wide effect of multimodal prehabilitation, compared to standard preoperative care, on the occurrence and severity of postoperative complications. Secondary and tertiary endpoints include length of hospital stay, physical fitness, nutritional status, mental health, intoxications, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention.

The Fit4Surgery (F4S) PREHAB trial is a monocenter stepped wedge trial in an academic hospital. Adult patients, divided into 20 health clusters based on specific diagnoses, will be assessed for eligibility and receive usual preoperative care or multimodal prehabilitation. Patient enrollment commenced in March 2021 and continues up to and including April 2024. The intervention consists of a high-intensity exercise program, a nutritional intervention, psychological support, and smoking and alcohol cessation. The primary outcome will be measured by the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade II or higher) and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).

Multimodal prehabilitation potentially reduces postoperative complications and enhances functional recovery. This is the first study to determine the hospital-wide effect and cost-effectiveness of multimodal prehabilitation in patients across various surgical specialties.

Meta-analyses have primarily focused on the effects of exercise-based prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes and ignored the role of nutritional intervention. In this study, we filled this gap by investigating the effect of nutrition-based prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy and gastrectomy.

Five electronic databases, namely, PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, were searched. Adults diagnosed with esophagogastric cancer who were scheduled to undergo surgery and had undergone uni- or multimodal prehabilitation, with at least a week of mandatory nutritional intervention, were included. Forest plots were used to extract and visualize the data from the included studies. The occurrence of any postoperative complication was considered the primary endpoint.

Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three cohort studies. In total, 661 patients were included. Any prehabilitation, that is, unimodal (only nutrition) and multimodal prehabilitation, collectively decreased the risk of any postoperative complication by 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.90). A similar effect was exclusively observed for multimodal prehabilitation (risk ratio [RR] = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66-0.93); however, it was not significant for unimodal prehabilitation. Any prehabilitation significantly decreased the length of hospital stay (LOS) (weighted mean difference = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.46 to -0.09).

Nutrition-based prehabilitation, particularly multimodal prehabilitation, confers protective effects against postoperative complications after esophagectomy and gastrectomy. Our findings suggest that prehabilitation slightly decreases LOS; however, the finding is not clinically significant. Therefore, additional rigorous RCTs are warranted for further substantiation.

Prehabilitation, or "prehab," helps patients optimize strength, function, and nutrition before surgery. This evidence-based practice project presents strategies for implementing a prehab program to prepare patients for spinal surgery. Nurses play an integral role in educating patients preoperatively about the myriad lifestyle changes associated with spinal surgery.

To investigate the effect of a prehabilitation program on peri- and post-operative outcomes in adult cervical deformity (CD) surgery.

Operative CD patients ≥ 18 years with complete baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) data were stratified by enrollment in a prehabilitation program beginning in 2019. Patients were stratified as having undergone prehabilitation (Prehab+) or not (Prehab-). Differences in pre and post-op factors were assessed via means comparison analysis. Costs were calculated using PearlDiver database estimates from Medicare pay-scales.

115 patients were included (age: 61 years, 70% female, BMI: 28 kg/m2). Of these patients, 57 (49%) were classified as Prehab+. At baseline, groups were comparable in age, gender, BMI, CCI, and frailty. Surgically, Prehab+ were able to undergo longer procedures (p = 0.017) with equivalent EBL (p = 0.627), and shorter SICU stay (p < 0.001). Post-operatively, Prehab+ patients reported greater reduction in pain scores and greater improvement in quality of life metrics at both 1Y and 2Y than Prehab- patients (all p < 0.05). Prehab+ patients reported significantly less complications overall, as well as less need for reoperation (all p < 0.05).

Introducing prehabilitation protocols in adult cervical deformity surgery may aid in improving patient physiological status, enabling patients to undergo longer surgeries with lessened risk of peri- and post-operative complications.

Chronic Postsurgical Pain (CPSP) and the risk for long-term opioid dependency are known complications following major surgery. The idea of Transitional Pain Service (TPS) has been introduced as an interdisciplinary setting to manage pain in the perioperative continuum. We expand on the basic framework and principles of TPS and summarize the current evidence of the TPS and possible interventions to adress postoperative pain. Areas of future work in TPS-related research are discussed.

Several studies support the effectiveness of TPS in reducing opioid consumption in the perioperative period and following discharge. Some studies also show an improvement in functional outcome with TPS with patients reporting lower pain severity and pain interference. The TPS aims to halt the progress of acute postoperative pain to CPSP by providing longitudinal support with patient-centered care. While some studies suggest a positive impact of TPS implementation in terms of reduction in postoperative opioid consumption and improvement of some functional outcomes, direct evidence in terms of reduction in the incidence of CPSP is still missing. The cost-effectiveness of TPS and the expansion of TPS through e-health services and digital applications also need to be evaluated.

Despite a growing body of evidence for the effectiveness of prehabilitation, the uptake of prehabilitation in Europe remains low. Contributing factors range from limited awareness and understanding of prehabilitation to a lack of supporting infrastructure and reimbursement challenges. In this position paper, the authors propose a new comprehensive definition of prehabilitation and identify differentiated thyroid cancer as a type of cancer particularly well-suited for prehabilitation. To support clinicians with the implementation of prehabilitation programs in their clinics, the authors discuss the following practical solutions: a) find the most appropriate prehabilitation program for each patient; b) raise awareness among peers; c) develop evidence to demonstrate the effectiveness of prehabilitation; d) expand the interdisciplinary team; e) expand your network and make use of existing assets; f) utilize learnings from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary approach aimed at reducing the length of hospital stay, improving patient outcomes, and reducing the overall cost of care. Although ERAS protocols have been widely adopted in various surgical fields, their application in cranial surgery remains relatively limited.

Considering that the aging of the population presents significant challenges to healthcare systems, and there is currently no ERAS protocol available for geriatric patients over the age of 65 requiring cranial surgery, this article proposes a new ERAS protocol for this population by analyzing successful ERAS protocols and optimal perioperative care for geriatric patients described in the literature.

Our aim is to develop a feasible, safe, and effective protocol for geriatric patients undergoing elective craniotomy, which includes preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative assessments and management, as well as outcome measures.

This multidisciplinary and evidence-based ERAS protocol has the potential to reduce perioperative morbidity, improve functional recovery, and enhance postoperative outcomes after cranial surgery in elderly. Further research will be necessary to establish strict guidelines.

Retrospective cohort.

To investigate the impact of evolving Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on outcomes after cervical deformity (CD) surgery.

ERAS can help accelerate patient recovery and assist hospitals in maximizing the incentives of bundled payment models while maintaining high-quality patient care. However, there remains a paucity of literature assessing how developments have impacted outcomes after adult CD surgery.

Patients with operative CD 18 years or older with pre-baseline and 2 years (2Y) postoperative data, who underwent ERAS protocols, were stratified by increasing implantation of ERAS components: (1) early (multimodal pain program), (2) intermediate (early protocol + paraspinal blocks, early ambulation), and (3) late (early/intermediate protocols + comprehensive prehabilitation). Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, perioperative factors, and complication rates were assessed through Bonferroni-adjusted means comparison analysis.

A total of 131 patients were included (59.4 ± 11.7 y, 45% females, 28.8 ± 6.0 kg/m 2 ). Of these patients, 38.9% were considered "early," 36.6% were "intermediate," and 24.4% were "late." Perioperatively, rates of intraoperative complications were lower in the late group ( P = 0.036). Postoperatively, discharge disposition differed significantly between cohorts, with late patients more likely to be discharged to home versus early or intermediate cohorts [χ 2 (2) = 37.973, P < 0.001]. In terms of postoperative disability recovery, intermediate and late patients demonstrated incrementally improved 6 W modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores ( P = 0.004), and late patients maintained significantly higher mean Euro-QOL 5-Dimension Questionnaire and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores by 1 year ( P < 0.001, P = 0.026). By 2Y, cohorts demonstrated incrementally increasing SWAL-QOL scores (all domains P < 0.028) domain scores versus early or intermediate cohorts. By 2Y, incrementally decreasing reoperation was observed in early versus intermediate versus late cohorts ( P = 0.034).

The present study demonstrates that patients enrolled in an evolving ERAS program demonstrate incremental improvement in preoperative optimization and candidate selection, greater likelihood of discharge to home, decreased postoperative disability and dysphasia burden, and decreased likelihood of intraoperative complications and reoperation rates.

The association between frailty and short-term and long-term outcomes in patients receiving elective surgery for cancer remains unclear, particularly in those admitted to the ICU.

In this multicentre retrospective cohort study, we included adults ≥16 yr old admitted to 158 ICUs in Australia from January 1, 2018 to March 31, 2022 after elective surgery for cancer. We investigated the association between frailty and survival time up to 4 yr (primary outcome), adjusting for a prespecified set of covariates. We analysed how this association changed in specific subgroups (age categories [<65, 65-80, ≥80 yr], and those who survived hospitalisation), and over time by splitting the survival information at monthly intervals.

We included 35,848 patients (median follow-up: 18.1 months [inter-quartile range: 8.3-31.1 months], 19,979 [56.1%] male, median age 69.0 yr [inter-quartile range: 58.8-76.0 yr]). Some 3502 (9.8%) patients were frail (defined as clinical frailty scale ≥5). Frailty was associated with lower survival (hazard ratio: 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.59-1.86 compared with clinical frailty scale ≤4); this was concordant across several sensitivity analyses. Frailty was most strongly associated with mortality early on in follow-up, up to 10 months (hazard ratio: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.03-1.86), but this association plateaued, and its predictive capacity subsequently diminished with time up until 4 yr (1.96, 95% CI: 0.73-5.28). Frailty was associated with similar effects when stratified based on age, and in those who survived hospitalisation.

Frailty was associated with poorer outcomes after an ICU admission after elective surgery for cancer, particularly in the short term. However, its predictive capacity with time diminished, suggesting a potential need for longitudinal reassessment to ensure appropriate prognostication in this population.

Wait time for surgeries can be lengthy and its effect on postoperative outcome remains largely unknown.

We evaluated the effect of wait time on postoperative outcome and on clinical course while awaiting surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

This was a retrospective cohort study.

A convenience sample (n=134) from prospective longitudinal studies that provided preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data at two different time points and follow-up of ≥12 months.

Wait time was the period between the initial consultation and immediately preoperatively.

The primary outcome was the ODI minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (<30% vs ≥30% improvement) at 1 year.

The median wait time was 5.9 (interquartile range (IQR) 8.2) months and postoperative follow-up was 19.2 (IQR 8.1) months. Wait time was not associated with absolute postoperative change in ODI scores, but patients with wait times <12 months were significantly more likely to reach the ODI MCID at last follow-up (66 (73.3%) for <12 months versus 13 (46.4%) for ≥12 months, p=.008; odds ratio=0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.12-0.75), p=.011). During wait time, there was no difference in patients deteriorating above the MCID for each time point (10 [9.7%] versus 5 [16.1%], p=.320).

Longer wait times did not negatively influence postoperative outcome in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis using absolute values, but may impact individual patients' ability to achieve MCID. Patient-reported pain-related disability from the initial surgical consultation to surgery is relatively stable in most patients for at least 6 to 12 months.

Over the last decade, the number of prehabilitation randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has increased significantly. Therefore, this review aimed to describe the outcomes reported in prehabilitation RCTs in patients undergoing cancer surgery.

A search was conducted in Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception to July 2021. We included RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of preoperative exercise, nutrition, and psychological interventions on postoperative complications and length of hospital stay in adult oncology patients who underwent thoracic and gastrointestinal cancer surgery. The verbatim outcomes reported in each article were extracted, and each outcome was assessed to determine whether it was defined and measured using a validated tool. Verbatim outcomes were grouped into standardized outcomes and categorized into domains. The quality of outcome reporting in each identified article was assessed using the Harman tool (score range 0-6, where 0 indicated the poorest quality).

A total of 74 RCTs were included, from which 601 verbatim outcomes were extracted. Only 110 (18.3%) of the verbatim outcomes were defined and 270 (44.9%) were labeled as either "primary" or "secondary" outcomes. Verbatim outcomes were categorized into 119 standardized outcomes and assigned into one of five domains (patient-reported outcomes, surgical outcomes, physical/functional outcomes, disease activity, and intervention delivery). Surgical outcomes were the most common outcomes reported (n = 71 trials, 95.9%). The overall quality of the reported outcomes was poor across trials (median score: 2.0 [IQR = 0.00-3.75]).

Prehabilitation RCTs display considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting, and low outcome reporting quality. The development of standardized core outcome sets may help improve article quality and enhance the clinical utility of prehabilitation following cancer surgery.

The care of patients with complex postsurgical pain can be challenging and burdensome for the healthcare system. Transitional pain service (TPS) is a relatively new concept and has not been widely adopted in the USA. This article explores the benefits and barriers of transitional pain services and describes the development of a TPS at our institution.

Evidence from a few institutions that have adopted TPS has shown decreased postsurgical opioid consumption for patients on chronic opioids and decreased incidence of chronic postsurgical opioid use for opioid-naïve patients. The development of a transitional pain service may improve outcomes for these complex patients by providing longitudinal and multidisciplinary perioperative pain care. In this article, we describe the implementation of a TPS at a tertiary medical center. Our TPS model involves a multidisciplinary team of anesthesiologists, pain psychologists, surgeons, and advanced practice providers. We provide longitudinal care, including preoperative education and optimization; perioperative multimodal analgesic care; and longitudinal follow-up for 90 days post-procedure. With our TPS service, we aim to reduce long-term opioid use and improve functional outcomes for our patients.

Frailty is more reliable than chronological age in predicting the effectiveness and tolerability of treatments in cancer patients. An increasing number of screening tools have been proposed, however none have received unanimous consent or been specifically designed for women with gynecological malignancies.This study's aim was to develop a clinical application of a screening tool to identify frail patients >70 years old diagnosed with either ovarian or endometrial cancers.

A 20 item questionnaire was developed and administered to the cohort before surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A cut-off for frailty definition was determined by analyzing the correlation of questionnaire scores with the completion of treatments. The association between frailty and treatment related complications was assessed using a Chi-squared test for categorical variables and a t-test for continuous variables.

Our study included 100 patients, 50% diagnosed with endometrial cancer and 50% with ovarian cancer. A questionnaire score of 4 was the best cut-off for frailty definition (sensitivity 77%, specificity 100%). Surgical grade III and grade IV complications were observed only in frail patients (p=0.01) and hospitalization was significantly longer in frail women affected by ovarian cancer (p=0.01). Frail patients were more exposed to chemotherapy administration delay (p=0.0005), treatment discontinuation (p=0.001) and hematological toxicities, especially anemia ≥grade 2 (p=0.009) and thrombocytopenia any grade (p=0.0001).

With a cut-off score of 4, our tool can identify frail patients with significantly higher incidence of grade III-IV postoperative complications, length of stay, medical treatment discontinuation rates and hematological toxicities.

Despite a lack of evidence that intentional weight loss reduces the risk of postoperative complications, adults with obesity are commonly asked to lose weight before elective surgery. We hypothesized that patients undertaking dietitian-led preoperative, very low calorie diet treatment could reduce perioperative surgery risks, as per validated risk scoring systems. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a dietitian-led preoperative very low calorie diet clinic on the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator scores for patients with obesity awaiting non-bariatric elective surgery.

This retrospective cohort study included patients referred to the preoperative dietitian-led very low calorie diet clinic before elective surgical procedures over a 2-year-9-month period. The dietitian prescribed individualized, very low calorie diet-based treatment. Primary outcomes were changes in the American Society of Anesthesiologists and Surgical Risk Calculator scores from pretreatment until surgery.

A total of 141 eligible participants (48 ± 13.4 years, 76% women, body mass index 41.7 ± 6.3 kg/m2) demonstrated clinically significant weight loss (mean 7.1 ± 6.1kg, 5.2% body weight, P < .001). Median treatment duration was 13 weeks (interquartile range 6.2-19.2 weeks). Five participants (3.5%) avoided surgery due to weight loss-related improvements in their condition. American Society of Anesthesiologists scores improved for 16% (n = 22/141) of participants. Overall, the median surgical risk calculator estimated risk of 'serious' and 'any' postoperative complication reduced from 4.8% to 3.9% (P < .001) and 6% to 5.1% (P < .001), respectively. Reduction in all Surgical Risk Calculator scores occurred, including surgical site infection, re-admission, and cardiac events (P < .05).

The dietitian-led preoperative, very low calorie diet clinic improved American Society of Anesthesiologists and Surgical Risk Calculator scores for non-bariatric elective surgery patients with obesity. Randomized controlled trials comparing this approach with a control group are warranted.

Women have classically been excluded from the development of normal data and reference ranges, with pregnant women experiencing further neglect. The incidence of Caesarean section in pregnant women, and of general operative management in young women (both pregnant and non-pregnant), necessitates the formal development of healthy baseline data in these cohorts to optimise their perioperative management. This systematic review assesses the representation of young women in existing reference ranges for several functional exercise tests in common use to facilitate functional assessment in this cohort.

Existing reference range data for the exercise tests the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT) and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) in young women of reproductive age were assessed using the MEDLINE (Ovid) database, last searched December 2023. Results were comparatively tabulated but not statistically analysed given underlying variances in data.

The role of exercise testing in the perioperative period as an assessment tool, as well as its safety during pregnancy, was evaluated using 65 studies which met inclusion criteria.

There is a significant lack of baseline data regarding these tests in this population, especially amongst the pregnant cohort, which limits the application of exercise testing clinically.

Cancer symptoms negatively affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with cancer awaiting liver resection. Prehabilitation maintained HRQoL after surgery. Future studies should test whether relieving cancer symptoms can improve HRQoL.

To describe the current practices in rehabilitation for the evaluation and treatment of children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC).

Rehabilitation practitioners worldwide with at least 2 years of experience with AMC were invited to complete an electronic survey on the evaluations and treatments used with children with AMC within five areas: muscle and joint function, self-care, mobility, pain, participation and psychosocial wellbeing.

Sixty five participants from nine countries completed the survey. Participants completed the sections applicable to their practice. Number of participants within each area varied between 24 and 53. Over 80% of participants used non-standardized evaluations across areas while <50% used patient-reported or standardized measures. Stretching of upper and lower limbs was reported by >80% across ages and clinical presentation severity. Strengthening reported by >70% was mainly used among children >3 years old with less severe contractures. Other interventions used across areas included orthotics (>70%), positioning (>80%), activity-based training (>80%), assistive devices for self-care (>50%) and mobility (>80%), and energy conservation (>70%). Over 70% of participants were involved in perioperative rehabilitation.

Knowledge of current pediatric rehabilitation practice in AMC, together with empirical evidence, may guide clinical decision-making and identify avenues for future research.

Increasing evidence suggests that multimodal prehabilitation programs reduce postoperative complication rates and length of stay. Nevertheless, prehabilitation is not standard care yet, also as financial consequences of such programs are lacking. Aim of this study was to analyse clinical outcomes and effects on hospital resources if prehabilitation is implemented for patients who are planned for colorectal surgery.

Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and who received either prehabilitation or standard care between January 2017 and March 2022 in a regional Dutch hospital were included. Outcome parameters were length of hospital stay, 30-day postoperative complications, 30-day ICU admission, readmission rates and hospital costs.

A total of 196 patients completed prehabilitation whereas 390 patients received standard care. Lower overall complication rates (31 % vs 40 %, p = 0.04) and severe complication rates (20 % vs 31 %, p = 0.01) were observed in the prehabilitation group compared to standard care. Length of stay was shorter in the prehabilitation group (mean 5.80 days vs 6.71 days). In hospital cost savings were €1109 per patient, while the calculated investment for prehabilitation was €969.

Implementation of a multimodal prehabilitation program in colorectal surgery reduces postoperative complication rates, length of stay and hospital costs.

Perioperative mobilisation and physical activity are critical components of postoperative rehabilitation. Physical inactivity is a significant risk factor for complications and prolonged hospitalisation. However, specific recommendations for preoperative and postoperative physical activity levels are currently lacking. Evidence suggests that daily step count before and after surgery may impact the length of hospital stay and complication rate.The goal of this study is to determine the effectiveness of perioperative step volume recommendations, measured by pedometers, in reducing the length of hospital stay and complication rate for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

This study is a single-centre randomised controlled trial with two arms, allocated at a 1:1 ratio. The trial includes individuals undergoing colorectal surgery for either suspected or confirmed colorectal malignancy. A total of 222 patients will be randomly assigned to either an intervention or a control group. Step counts will be measured using a pedometer. Patients assigned to the intervention group will be given a predetermined preoperative and postoperative step count goal. The analysis will be conducted on preoperative and postoperative physical activity, quality of life, health, duration of hospitalisation, complication rate and bowel function, among other factors.

The trial was approved by the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich, Germany (reference number: 22-0758, protocol version 2022.02). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and shared at academic conferences. After the publication of the results, a fully anonymised data set and the statistical code can be made available on justified scientific request and after ethical approval has been granted.

DRKS00030017.

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a preoperative and postoperative (in- and outpatient) physical rehabilitation program, the Heart-ROCQ-pilot program.

This cohort study included patients undergoing cardiac surgery (including coronary artery bypass graft surgery, valve surgery, aortic surgery, or combinations of these surgeries) and participated in the Heart-ROCQ-pilot program. Feasibility involved compliance and characteristics of bicycle and strength training sessions in the three rehabilitation phases.

Of the eligible patients, 56% (n = 74) participated in the program (41% of exclusions were due to various health reasons). On average across the rehabilitation phases, the compliance rates of bicycle and strength training were 88% and 83%, respectively. Workload to heart rate (W/HR) ratio and total absolute volume load for bicycle and strength training, respectively, improved in each rehabilitation phase (P < 0.05). The W/HR-ratio was higher during the last postoperative session compared to the first preoperative session (0.48 to 0.63 W/beat, P < 0.001) and similar to the last preoperative session (0.65 to 0.64 W/beat, P < 0.497). During less than 1% of the bicycle sessions, patients reported discomfort scores of 5 to 6 (scale 0-10, with higher scores indicating a higher level).

The Heart-ROCQ-pilot program was feasible for patients awaiting cardiac surgery. Patients were very compliant and were able to safely increase the training load before surgery and regained this improvement within eight weeks after surgery.

Higher levels of preoperative physical activity are associated with improved outcomes after pancreatectomy, but it remains unclear if preoperative activity levels are modifiable.

Patients undergoing pancreatectomy were randomized 1:1 to a telephone-based intervention at least one week before surgery or to control. All patients wore wearable devices to remotely collect physical activity and clinical data.

In total, 152 patients were enrolled and 83 completed the study (41 intervention and 42 control). The intervention group walked 4568 (SD 2522) average daily steps pre-intervention, which increased to 5071 (SD 3055) post-intervention (p = 0.042) (11.0% increase). The control group walked 5260 (SD 2795) average daily steps. There were no differences in the rate of severe complications between groups (intervention 22.9% vs control 20.5%, p = 0.807).

A telephone-based intervention increased average daily step count in patients scheduled to undergo pancreatectomy, demonstrating physical activity is a modifiable target for surgical prehabilitation protocols.

Prehabilitation is a multidimensional and multidisciplinary approach, to prepare patients for surgery, with the aim of improving postoperative outcomes. Worldwide, healthcare systems are facing challenges with a gap between demand and supply of healthcare services. Telehealth is seen as a solution for delivering sustainable and efficient treatments. The effect of providing prehabilitation using telehealth solutions is unclear.

This systematic review investigated the existing literature regarding the effects and feasibility of technologies for remotely supporting home-based prehabilitation compared to standard care on pre- and postoperative outcomes in adults undergoing elective major surgery.

A literature search identified relevant studies published between 1 January 2012 and December 2022 in PubMed, PsychInfo, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library. We included RCTs, feasibility and pilot studies. The quality of studies was evaluated using Cochrane's Risk of bias assessment and by narratively rating the certainty of evidence.

Six randomized controlled trials and 20 pilot/feasibility studies were included. The number and content of the interventions varied, depending on context and resources. Multiple approaches in the use of digital healthcare solutions were applied and the results highlight the potential of providing health services remotely.

The use of technologies to support remote home-based prehabilitation in patients undergoing elective major surgery is feasible and has high acceptability, though telehealth is a broad term and wide-ranging strategies are used. Digital technologies for supporting home-based prehabilitation are likely to play an essential role in future health care as resources are scarce and innovative solutions are needed.

A retrospective cohort.

We utilize big data and modeling techniques to create optimized comorbidity indices for predicting postoperative outcomes following cervical spine fusion surgery.

Cervical spine decompression and fusion surgery are commonly used to treat degenerative cervical spine pathologies. However, there is a paucity of high-quality data defining the optimal comorbidity indices specifically in patients undergoing cervical spine fusion surgery.

Using data from 2016 to 2019, we queried the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) to identify individuals who had received cervical spine fusion surgery. The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (JHACG) frailty-defining indicator was used to assess frailty. To measure the level of comorbidity, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores were queried. Receiver operating characteristic curves were developed utilizing comorbidity indices as predictor variables for pertinent complications such as mortality, nonroutine discharge, top-quartile cost, top-quartile length of stay, and 1-year readmission.

A total of 453,717 patients were eligible. Nonroutine discharges occurred in 93,961 (20.7%) patients. The mean adjusted all-payer cost for the procedure was $22,573.14±18,274.86 (top quartile: $26,775.80) and the mean length of stay was 2.7±4.4 days (top quartile: 4.7 d). There were 703 (0.15%) mortalities and 58,254 (12.8%) readmissions within 1 year postoperatively. Models using frailty+ECI as primary predictors consistently outperformed the ECI-only model with statistically significant P -values for most of the complications assessed. Cost and mortality were the only outcomes for which this was not the case, as frailty outperformed both ECI and frailty+ECI in cost ( P <0.0001 for all) and frailty+ECI performed as well as ECI alone in mortality ( P =0.10).

Our data suggest that frailty+ECI may most accurately predict clinical outcomes in patients receiving cervical spine fusion surgery. These models may be used to identify high-risk populations and patients who may necessitate greater resource utilization following elective cervical spinal fusion.

Prehabilitation, which involves improving a patient's physical and psychological condition before surgery, has shown potential benefits but has yet to be extensively studied from an economic perspective. To address this gap, a systematic review was conducted to summarize existing economic evaluations of prehabilitation interventions.

The PRISMA Protocols 2015 checklist was followed. Over 16,000 manuscripts were reviewed, and 99 reports on preoperative interventions and screening tests were identified, of which 12 studies were included in this analysis. The costs are expressed in Pounds (GBP, £) and adjusted for inflation to December 2022.

The studies were conducted in Western countries, focusing on specific surgical subspecialties. While the interventions and study designs varied, most studies demonstrated cost savings in the intervention group compared to the control group. Additionally, all cost-effectiveness analysis studies favored the intervention group. However, the review also identified several limitations. Many studies had a moderate or high risk of bias, and critical information such as time horizons and discount rates were often missing. Important components like heterogeneity, distributional effects, and uncertainty were frequently lacking as well. The misclassification of economic evaluation types highlighted a lack of knowledge among physicians in prehabilitation research.

This review reveals a lack of robust evidence regarding the economics of prehabilitation programs for surgical patients. This suggests a need for further research with rigorous methods and accurate definitions.