We sought to determine the significance of age and frailty in predicting peri-operative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD).

Data from our institution's prospectively collected robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy database was analyzed for the years 2018-2023. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used as a concise stratification tool for frailty. Predictive models for composite adverse event (CAE) variable were created using adjusted logistic regressions.

116 patients underwent RPD. Mean age of this cohort was 70.65 years (±11.44). The mean operative time was 311.47 min (±71.35) and the estimated blood loss was 107.07 mL (±128.49). The most common postoperative complications included in the CAE were pancreatic leak (n = 10, 8.62 %), delayed gastric emptying (n = 10, 8.62 %), bleeding (n = 5, 4.31 %), and atrial fibrillation (n = 2, 1.72 %). The 90-day mortality was 1.72 %. There was a gradual increase in the odds ratio of CAE with increasing mFI-5 score: OR 1.52 (95 % CI 0.25-9.20) for mFI-5 score of 1 and OR 31.92 (95 % CI 1.79-570.09) for mFI-5 score of 4 compared to score of 0.

Preoperative mFI-5 score may serve as a risk stratification tool for RPDs.

Background: The rate of morbidity after liver surgery is estimated at 30% and can be even higher when considering higher-risk subgroups of patients. Frailty is believed to better predict surgical outcomes by showcasing the patient's ability to withstand major surgical stress and selecting frail ones. Methods: This is a single-centre, observational case-control study on patients diagnosed with liver malignancies who underwent liver resections between 2013 and 2024. The five-item modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) was used to split patients into frail and non-frail. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative, operative and postoperative outcomes using a chi-squared and logistic regression model. Results: A total of 230 patients were included and split into two groups: non-frail, NF, n = 90, and frail patients, F, n = 140. Overall, F patients had a higher rate of morbidity (p = 0.04) but with similar mortality and length of stay. When considering only major liver resections, F patients had a higher probability of posthepatectomy liver failure (LR 6.793, p = 0.009), postoperative bleeding (LR 9.541, p = 0.002) and longer ICU stay (LR 8.666, p = 0.003), with similar rates of bile leak, surgical site infections, length of stay and mortality. Conclusions: Frailty seems to be a solid predictor of posthepatectomy liver failure in patients undergoing major liver resections and is associated with a longer ICU stay. However, mortality and surgical morbidity seem to be comparable between frail and non-frail patients.

Frailty has been associated with increased mortality among patients with surgery. However, evidence about the frailty prevalence and outcomes in frail populations with hepatectomy is inconsistent and has not been clarified. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively synthesize the prevalence of frailty and the role of frailty on mortality in patients with hepatectomy.

Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies that explored the prevalence and impact of frailty in hepatectomy from inception until January 24, 2024. The pooled prevalence of frailty and odds ratio (OR) corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) in mortality and major complications estimates were analyzed.

A total of 26 studies containing 128 868 patients with hepatectomy were included. The prevalence of frailty in hepatectomy was 23% (95% CI: 17-28; p = .000). Frailty was associated with an increased odds ratio for mortality (adjusted OR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.85-5.04; p = .000). Furthermore, frailty was significantly associated with an increased odds ratio for major complications (adjusted OR = 3.20; 95% CI: 2.04-5.04; p < .01).

The prevalence of frailty in patients with hepatectomy is prevalent, which has a significant adverse impact on the outcomes of patients with hepatectomy. These findings highlight the importance of frailty assessment in this population, which may provide prognostic details.

The rise of frail patients in the worldwide population poses a challenge in the prostate cancer surgical care. In this light, we aimed to compare perioperative and early surgical outcomes of Extraperitoneal Single Port (SP)- vs Transperitoneal Multiport (MP) - Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RALP) in different frailty settings.

Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated with RALP between March 2014 and October 2023 were gathered. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for potential baseline pre-operative confounders. The 5-miFI score was calculated for each patient and then five risk categories were identified (5-mFI score = 0, 1,2,3 and ≥ 4).

A total of 549 patients were assessed in the unmatched analysis. After the propensity score, 126 patients for each treatment group were matched. When stratified in different frailty-groups, 30-days postoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently in case of 5-mFI score=3 and >4 (p = 0.001). Moreover, higher rate of both overall (52 vs 23 %, p = 0.01) and major (19.6 vs 8.2 %, p = 0.02) postoperative complications was found in these patients in case of transperitoneal MP RARP as compared to the extraperitoneal SP procedures. Exploring predictors of postoperative early complications in patients with 5-mFI score = 3 and 4, extraperitoneal SP robotic approach showed a significant protective role on both overall (OR 0.21, p = 0.001) and major (OR 0.33, p = 0.001) complications occurrence.

In a matched cohort of patients treated with Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy, extraperitoneal Single Port approach significantly reduced the overall and major early complications rate in frail patients.

Background: The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.Results: A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; P = .003), Clostridium difficile infection (.9% vs .1%; P = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; P < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; P = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; P = .03).Conclusion: A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

Considered to reflect a patients' biological age, frailty is a new syndrome shown to predict surgical outcomes in elderly patients. In view of the increasing age at which patients are proposed oncological liver surgery and the morbidity associated with it, we attempted to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare morbidity and mortality between frail and nonfrail patients after liver resections.

The study was registered with PROSPERO. A systematic search of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all comparative studies examining surgical outcomes after liver resections between frail and nonfrail patients.

Ten studies were included based on the selection criteria with a total of 71,102 patients, split into two groups: frail (n = 17,167) and the control group (n = 53,928). There were more elderly patients with a lower preoperative albumin level in the frail group (p = 0.02, p = 0.001). Frail patients showed higher rates of morbidity with more major complications and a higher incidence of postoperative liver failure (p < 0.001). Mortality (p < 0.001) and readmission rate (p = 0.021) also was higher in frail patients.

Frailty seems to be a solid predictive risk factor of morbidity and mortality after liver surgery and should be considered a selection criterion for liver surgery in at-risk patients.

The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy is still unclear.

To study the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes, such as mortality, rate of complications, and length of hospitalization, following hepatectomy.

PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for observational studies with adult (≥ 18 years) patients after planned/elective hepatectomy. A random-effects model was used for all analyses, and the results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR), or hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Analysis of the 13 included studies showed a significant association of frailty with elevated risk of in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.76, 95%CI: 2.10-3.64), mortality at 30 d (RR = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.85-11.40), and mortality at 90 d (RR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.70-3.75) in the postoperative period. Frail patients had a poorer long-term survival (HR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.84-4.53) and higher incidence of "any" complications (RR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.40-2.03) and major (grade III or higher on the Clavien-Dindo scale) complications (RR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.85-3.92). Frailty was correlated with markedly lengthier hospital stay (WMD = 3.65, 95%CI: 1.45-5.85).

Frailty correlates with elevated risks of mortality, complications, and prolonged hospitalization, which need to be considered in surgical management. Further research is essential to formulate strategies for improved outcomes in this vulnerable cohort.

Morbidity for liver resection has decreased, and frail patients are undergoing surgery. The effect of minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of MILR on the outcomes in frail patients.

Elective hepatectomies from the 2014-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hepatectomy-specific Participant User File were reviewed. The 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) was used. It includes diabetes mellitus, hypertension, functional status, heart failure, and dyspnea. Patients were considered frail if their mFI-5 score was ≥2.

A total of 3116 patients were included: 2117 (67.9%) in the minor hepatectomy group and 999 (32%) in the major hepatectomy group. There were 2254 open cases and 862 MILRs. Postoperatively, patients in the minor hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, transfusion, major complications, and minor complications (P < .05). Postoperatively, patients in the major hepatectomy group who underwent MILR had lower rates of prolonged LOS and any complication (P < .05). In the minor hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of lower rates of prolonged LOS (odds ratio [OR], 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42), nonhome discharge (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), transfusion (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.96), major complication (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-1.00), and any complication (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.92). In the major hepatectomy group, MILR remained independently predictive of prolonged LOS (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89).

MILR resulted in lower rates of complications in the minor hepatectomy group and shorter LOS in the major hepatectomy group. The minimally invasive approach to hepatectomy may benefit frail patients with cancer.

The number of vulnerable patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has increased. This study aimed to clarify the relationship between perioperative activities of daily living (ADL) and clinical outcomes after hepatectomy for CRLM.

Consecutive patients undergoing resection of CRLM from 2004 to 2020 were included. Pre- or postoperative ADL was evaluated according to Barthel index (BI) scores, which range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent greater level of independence in ADL. Pre- or postoperative BI scores of ≤85 were defined as perioperative disabilities in ADL. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were utilised to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence interval (CI).

A total of 218 patients were included, 16 (7.3%) revealed preoperative BI scores of ≤85, and 32 (15%) revealed postoperative BI scores of ≤85. In multivariate analyses, the perioperative disabilities in ADL were independently associated with shorter overall survival (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.10-3.31; P = 0.023) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.29-3.92; P = 0.006).

Perioperative disabilities in ADL were associated with poor prognosis following hepatectomy for CRLM. Improving preoperative vulnerability and preventing functional decline after surgery may provide a favourable prognosis for patients with CRLM.