The year 2024 marks the 60th anniversary of the discovery of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), the first virus confirmed to cause human cancer. Viral infections significantly contribute to the global cancer burden, with seven known Group 1 oncogenic viruses, including hepatitis B virus (HBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), EBV, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These oncogenic viruses induce cellular transformation and cancer development by altering various biological processes within host cells, particularly under immunosuppression or co-carcinogenic exposures. These viruses are primarily associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, gastric cancer, cervical cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Kaposi sarcoma, lymphoma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Understanding the mechanisms of viral oncogenesis is crucial for identifying and characterizing the early biological processes of virus-related cancers, providing new targets and strategies for treatment or prevention. This review first outlines the global epidemiology of virus-related tumors, milestone events in research, and the process by which oncogenic viruses infect target cells. It then focuses on the molecular mechanisms by which these viruses induce tumors directly or indirectly, including the regulation of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, induction of genomic instability, disruption of regular life cycle of cells, immune suppression, chronic inflammation, and inducing angiogenesis. Finally, current therapeutic strategies for virus-related tumors and recent advances in preclinical and clinical research are discussed.

Gastric cancer (GC) represents a global health-care challenge. Recent progress in immunotherapy has elicited attracted considerable attention as a viable treatment option through modulating the host immune system and unleashing pre-existing immunity, which has profoundly revolutionized oncology, especially GC. Nonetheless, low clinical response and intrinsic and acquired resistance remain persistently challenging. The microenvironment of GC comprising multifarious stromal cell types has remarkable immunosuppressive elements that may impact the efficacy of immunotherapy. Immunosenescence is increasingly regarded as a factor that contributes to cancer development, remodels the tumor microenvironment and affects the efficacy of immunotherapy. Natural products are at the forefront of traditional medicine. Senotherapeutics is a class of drugs and natural products capable of delaying, preventing, or reversing the senescence process (i.e., senolytics) or suppressing senescence-associated secretory phenotype (i.e., senomorphics). Emerging evidence supports that natural products can improve the efficacy of existing immunotherapy and expand their indications in GC mainly based upon remodeling the immunosuppressive microenvironment and reversing immunosenescence. The review provides an integrated review of previously reported and ongoing clinical trials with immunotherapeutic regimens in GC and discusses current challenges. Next, we focus on natural compounds that exert anti-GC functions and possess immunomodulatory properties. More attention is paid to the potential of these natural compounds in modulating the immune microenvironment and immunosenescence. Lastly, we discuss the nanomedicine that can overcome the deficiencies of natural products. Altogether, our review suggests the enormous potential of natural compounds in GC immunotherapy, and provides an important direction for future research.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy have become a new first-line treatment option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. However, it is still controversial whether to choose chemotherapy alone or ICIs plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment option due to a lack of ideal predictive biomarkers for the efficacy. This study intended to explore the predictive value of inflammatory markers for the efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in this disease.

This retrospective study included 131 patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who received first-line treatment between July, 2020 and June, 2023. Among them, 76 received first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy and 55 received chemotherapy alone. Firstly, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to explore the correlation between inflammatory markers and efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy. Subsequently, the predictive value of combined baseline and dynamic changes in inflammatory markers was explored. Moreover, the predictive value of baseline inflammatory markers was further verified by comparing efficacy of ICIs plus chemotherapy with that of chemotherapy alone.

In patients receiving first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy, low baseline monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in peripheral blood was significantly associated with better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and was an independent prognostic factor for OS. In addition, dynamic early changes of MLR also played predictive role. Patients whose MLR was lower at baseline and after two cycles of treatment had better OS (P = 0.009). Furthermore, compared to chemotherapy alone, patients with a lower baseline MLR were more likely to benefit from first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy.

MLR could serve as a new biomarker to predict the efficacy of first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. And it is helpful to select the candidates for first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy, which is worthy of further study.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and therapeutic vaccines have emerged as promising immunotherapeutic strategies for solid tumors. However, their comparative efficacy in improving overall survival (OS) remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs and therapeutic vaccines in improving OS in patients with solid tumors. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Clinical Trials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2024. Studies comparing ICIs or therapeutic vaccines against control treatments (placebo, standard of care, or active comparators) in adults with solid tumors were included. The primary outcome was OS, and data were pooled using RevMan (web). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 10,991 participants were included. A total of 5722 of them were treated with therapeutic vaccines or checkpoint inhibitors. Therapeutic vaccines demonstrated insignificant improvement in OS, with a pooled mean difference of 1.89 months (95% CI: -0.54-4.31; P = 0.13), although with homogeneity (I2 = 0%). ICIs showed a statistically significant OS benefit, with a pooled mean difference of 1.32 months (95% CI: 0.62-2.02; P = 0.0002) and low heterogeneity (I2 = 12%). Conclusions: Therapeutic vaccines provide a larger but less consistent benefit, whereas ICIs offer modest but more consistent survival advantage. These findings support the need for personalized immunotherapy approaches as well as further research to identify predictive biomarkers and optimize treatment strategies by acquiring deep insights into the TME dynamic and behaviors.

With the annual increase in the incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer, it has gradually become one of the significant threats to human health. Approximately 90% of gastric cancer patients are diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Although the 5-year survival rate for early-stage gastric cancer can exceed 90%, due to its concealed symptoms, less than half of the patients are eligible for radical surgical treatment upon diagnosis. For gastric cancer patients receiving palliative treatment, the current expected survival time is only about one year. In China, the majority of gastric cancer patients, accounting for about 80% of the total, are in the locally advanced stage. For these patients, radical surgery remains the primary treatment option; however, surgery alone is often inadequate in controlling tumor progression. In the pivotal MAGIC study, the recurrence rate was as high as 75%, and similar results were obtained in the French ACCORD07-FFCD9703 study. Numerous clinical trials are currently exploring preoperative neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced gastric cancer. Data indicates that preoperative neoadjuvant therapy can not only reduce the size of the local tumor but also shrink surrounding lymph nodes, thereby downstaging the tumor and improving the R0 resection rate. Additionally, it can decrease tumor cell activity and eliminate potential micrometastases. The emergence of various immunotherapies has ushered in a new era for neoadjuvant treatment options for gastric cancer.

Tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in progression and low responsiveness to chemotherapy of gastric cancer (GC). The cascade of events that culminate with a sustained and chronic activation of inflammatory pathways underlies gastric tumorigenesis. Infiltrating immune cells enrolling in crosstalk with cancer cells that regulate inflammatory and immune status, generating an immunosuppressive TME that influences the response to therapy. Here we discuss the role of TME and the activation of inflammatory pathways to comprehend strategies to improve drug response. Furthermore, we provides systematic insight the role of TME cytotypes and related signatures reinforcing the critical roles of TAMs and Tregs, in promoting GC chemoresistance and tumor progression.

Describe the characteristics, treatment patterns and outcomes of Chinese patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic (UAM) gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GA/GEJA).

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included adults diagnosed with UAM GA/GEJA in China from 2017-2020.

Among 2,745 patients, 1,902, 729, and 284 received first-, second- and third-line (1 L, 2 L and 3 L) therapy-respectively. Most patients received chemotherapy alone in 1 L (84.1%) and 2 L (63.6%), and targeted-therapy-based treatment in 3 L (49.2%). Median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 6.5, 4.2, and 3.2 months in 1 L, 2 L, and 3 L, respectively.

Chinese patients with UAM GA/GEJA mainly received chemotherapy alone in 1 L/2 L and targeted therapy in 3 L. Median rwPFS was short in all lines, highlighting the need for more effective treatments.

Protein kinases are essential cellular signal modulators involved in tumorigenesis, metastasis, immune response, and drug resistance. However, the comprehensive features and clinical significance of protein kinases in gastric cancer (GC) remain inconclusive.

We analyzed the transcriptional profiles of protein kinases in GC patients from the GEO and TCGA databases. Based on differentially expressed kinase genes (DE-KGs), a novel cluster was identified to assess its association with patient survival and the tumor microenvironment (TME) in GC. Subsequently, an optimal DE-KGs-based model (DE-KGsM) was determined using 101 machine-learning algorithm combinations. This model was evaluated using multi-omics data to investigate its associations with patient prognosis, clinical features, tumor microenvironment, tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs), and immunotherapy response. Furthermore, scRNA-seq analysis and TIMER algorithm were applied to determine the correlation between the hub gene (ABL2) in the DE-KGsM and Macrophages. Finally, in vitro experiments were performed to explore the immune-related mechanisms of ABL2 in GC.

We identified two molecular subtypes of GC patients based on 64 DE-KGs expression. Significant differences were observed in overall survival and TIIC characteristics between Cluster 1 and Cluster 2. Among these 64 DE-KGs, we identified an optimal DE-KGsM that could be a prognostic indicator in GC. TIICs and TIDE analyses exhibited that GC patients in the high-DE-KGsM score group had a higher proportion of M2 macrophages and lower response rates to ICI treatment. scRNA-seq analysis indicated that ABL2 might play an indispensable role in tumor immunity. Furthermore, in vitro experiments demonstrated that ABL2 accelerated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of GC cells, as well as the polarization of M2 macrophages.

The DE-KGsM could be a powerful predictor of GC patients' survival and might facilitate the development of personalized therapy. Furthermore, as a hub gene in the DE-KGsM, ABL2 could be an immunological biomarker that modulates the polarization of M2 macrophages, thereby promoting GC progression.

Not applicable.

HER2-positive gastric cancer (GC), a unique molecular subtype, has garnered significant interest in recent years. Here, we review clinical trial data on advanced HER2-positive GC from the past 15 years. Trastuzumab plus standard chemotherapy remain the first-line treatment. The initial survival benefits conferred by immune checkpoint inhibitors plus trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy are encouraging. The combination of ramucirumab and mono-chemotherapy, as well as the antibody conjugated drug trastuzumab deruxtecan, is the recommended second-line regimen. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus ramucirumab and mono-chemotherapy shows promise. Despite the limited treatment options for third line and beyond, development of novel therapeutic strategies is expected. Although clinical cure of advanced HER2-positive GC is unlikely, current clinical studies offer valuable insight into regimens that prolong survival.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and therapeutic options for advanced GC are limited. Here, we observe that intratumoral microbiota controls chemokine expression, which in turn recruits immune cells into the tumor, and that immune infiltration is strongly associated with patient survival and disease attributes. Furthermore, microbiota regulation of chemokines is differentiated in GC patients with different survival risks. As seen in gastric tumors, in high-survival-risk patients, Pseudomonas regulates CCL4, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 accumulation to recruit immune cells such as CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and M1 macrophages. In low-survival-risk patients, Leptospira regulates CCL4, CCL5, CXCL9, and CXCL10 accumulation to recruit multiple types of immune cells. An independent single-cell dataset of GC verified the relationship between chemokines and immune cells. What's more, chemokines, including CCL4, CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, strongly influence the sensitivity of GC patients to potential drug candidates. This study demonstrates that intratumoral microbiota closely influences the gastric immune microenvironment and that this molding has prognostic heterogeneity, opening avenues for cancer prevention and therapy.

The administration of second-line or subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in previously treated patients with advanced solid cancers has been clinically investigated. However, previous clinical trials lacked an appropriate primary endpoint for efficacy assessment. This systematic review aimed to explore the most optimal early efficacy endpoint for such trials.

Phase 2 or 3 clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid cancers with disease progression following standard first-line therapy receiving second-line or subsequent ICI administration, with adequate survival outcome data, were included from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases before February 2023. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for Cohort Studies for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials, respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 3, 6, and 9 months were investigated as potential early efficacy endpoint candidates for 12-month overall survival (OS), with a strong correlation defined as Pearson's correlation coefficient r ≥ 0.8.

A total of 64 RCTs comprising 22,725 patients and 106 non-randomized prospective trials involving 10,608 participants were eligible for modeling and external validation, respectively. RCTs examined 15 different cancer types, predominantly non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 28%), melanoma (9, 14%), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (5, 8%). The median sample size of RCTs was 124 patients, and the median follow-up time was 3.2-57.7 months. The ORR (r = 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.54) and PFS (r = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.14-0.64) exhibited weak trial-level correlations with OS. Within ICI treatment arms, the r values of ORR and 3-, 6-, and 9-month PFS with 12-month OS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.37-0.79), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.62-0.88), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90), and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90), respectively. External validation of 6-month PFS indicated an acceptable discrepancy between actual and predicted 12-month OS.

In non-randomized phase 2 trials on second-line or subsequent ICI therapy in patients with advanced solid cancers, 6-month PFS could serve as an early efficacy endpoint. However, early efficacy endpoints are not recommended in RCTs to replace OS.

NALCN has been identified as a tumor suppressor gene, and its role in human cancer progression has garnered significant attention. However, there is a paucity of experimental studies specifically addressing the relationship between NALCN and immune cell infiltration in gastric cancer (GC).

The expression levels of NALCN in tumor tissues, peripheral blood and gastric cancer cells lines from patients with GC were assessed using RNA sequencing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining and RT-qPCR. Data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases were utilized to investigate the correlation between NALCN expression and immune cell infiltration in GC. Subsequently, the relationship between NALCN expression and infiltrating immune cells in GC tissues was examined through immunofluorescence method. Additionally, in vitro experiments were conducted to evaluate the impact of NALCN knockdown on T cells function in GC cell lines.

RNA sequencing analysis revealed that NALCN expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues. Specifically, NALCN levels were lower in GC tumor tissues and plasma compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues and healthy controls. Consistent with these findings, the expression trend of NALCN mRNA in the GEO database mirrored the experimental results. Mechanistically, NALCN knockdown markedly enhanced cell proliferation, colony formation and migration while reducing apoptosis rates in AGS and GES-1 cells. Analysis of the TCGA database indicated a positive correlation between NALCN expression and the infiltration of B cells, cytotoxic cells, immature dendritic cells (iDC) cells, CD8+ T cells, and others in GC tissue. Conversely, Th17 and Th2 cells infiltration exhibited a negative correlation with NALCN expression. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed that B cells and CD8 T cells were more abundant in GC tumor tissues with high NALCN expression, whereas Th17 and Th2 cells were less prevalent. Subsequently, we co-cultured GC cells transfected with NALCN knockdown or control vectors along with their supernatants with T cells. The results demonstrated that NALCN knockdown in GC cells or their supernatants inhibited T cell proliferation compared to control conditions. Moreover, NALCN may play a role in glucose and glutamine uptake.

NALCN facilitates immune cell aggregation in GC and has potential as a biomarker for immune infiltration.

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with limited treatment options in advanced stages. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD1/PD-L1, has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach. However, a significant proportion of patients exhibit primary or acquired resistance, limiting the overall efficacy of immunotherapy. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in GC, including the role of the tumor immune microenvironment, dynamic PD-L1 expression, compensatory activation of other immune checkpoints, and tumor genomic instability. Furthermore, the review explores GC-specific factors such as molecular subtypes, unique immune evasion mechanisms, and the impact of Helicobacter pylori infection. We also discuss emerging strategies to overcome resistance, including combination therapies, novel immunotherapeutic approaches, and personalized treatment strategies based on tumor genomics and the immune microenvironment. By highlighting these key areas, this review aims to inform future research directions and clinical practice, ultimately improving outcomes for GC patients undergoing immunotherapy.

Nivolumab-based therapies are efficacious with acceptable safety in patients with gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC). Novel nivolumab-based combination immunotherapies may offer enhanced efficacy in these indications. FRACTION-GC was a signal-seeking, randomized, open-label, phase II adaptive-design trial assessing efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab [cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) antibody], relatlimab (lymphocyte-activation gene 3 antibody), or IDO1i (BMS986205, an indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase-1 inhibitor) in patients with unresectable, advanced/metastatic GC/GEJC.

Previously treated patients with GC/GEJC were randomized to receive nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, or nivolumab + IDO1i across two tracks: anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1/anti-CTLA-4-naïve (track 1) and -experienced (track 2). Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by investigator per RECIST v1.1, duration of response, and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoint was safety.

Eighty-one patients in track 1 and 81 in track 2 received one combination therapy. With a median follow-up of 50.2 months, ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] by investigator for nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, and nivolumab + IDO1i in track 1 was 4% (0.1% to 21.9%), 5% (0.1% to 24.9%), and 13% (4.4% to 28.1%), and for track 2 was 9% (1.1% to 28.0%), 6% (0.7% to 18.7%), and 0% (0% to 15.4%), respectively. PFS rate at 24 weeks (95% CI) was 24% (11% to 39%) for nivolumab + IDO1i track 1, 17% (16% to 32%) for nivolumab + relatlimab track 2, and not estimable for other treatment arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 22%, 5%, and 18% of patients receiving nivolumab + ipilimumab, nivolumab + relatlimab, and nivolumab + IDO1i in track 1 and in 35%, 11%, and 18% of patients in track 2, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

While ORR did not meet prespecified expansion criteria in any treatment arm, the safety profile of the combinations was manageable. FRACTION-GC represents a novel adaptive protocol for testing multiple combination immunotherapies.

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.

Differences in demographics, medical expertise, and patient healthcare resources across countries have led to significant variations in guidelines. In light of these differences, in this review, we aimed to explore and compare the most recent updates to gastric cancer treatment from five guidelines that are available in English. These English-version guidelines, which have been recently published and updated for journal publication, include those published in South Korea in 2024, Japan in 2021, China in 2023, the United States in 2024, and Europe in 2024. The South Korean and Japanese guidelines provide a higher proportion of content to endoscopic and surgical treatments, reflecting their focus on minimally invasive techniques, function-preserving surgeries, and systemic therapy. The Chinese guidelines provide recommendations addressing not only surgical approaches but also perioperative chemotherapy and palliative systemic therapy. Meanwhile, in the United States and European guidelines, a higher proportion of the content is dedicated to perioperative and palliative systemic therapy, aligning with their approaches to advanced-stage disease management. All guidelines address surgical and systemic chemotherapy treatments; however, the proportion and emphasis of content vary based on the patient distribution and treatment approaches specific to each country. With emerging research findings on gastric cancer treatment worldwide, the national guidelines are being progressively revised and updated. Understanding the commonalities and differences among national guidelines, along with the underlying evidence, can provide valuable insights into the treatment of gastric cancer.

Accurately extrapolating survival beyond trial follow-up is essential in a health technology assessment where model choice often substantially impacts estimates of clinical and cost effectiveness. Evidence suggests standard parametric models often provide poor fits to long-term data from immuno-oncology trials. Palmer et al. developed an algorithm to aid the selection of more flexible survival models for these interventions. We assess the usability of the algorithm, identify areas for improvement and evaluate whether it effectively identifies models capable of accurate extrapolation.

We applied the Palmer algorithm to the CheckMate-649 trial, which investigated nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We evaluated the algorithm's performance by comparing survival estimates from identified models using the 12-month data cut to survival observed in the 48-month data cut.

The Palmer algorithm offers a systematic procedure for model selection, encouraging detailed analyses and ensuring that crucial stages in the selection process are not overlooked. In our study, a range of models were identified as potentially appropriate for extrapolating survival, but only flexible parametric non-mixture cure models provided extrapolations that were plausible and accurately predicted subsequently observed survival. The algorithm could be improved with minor additions around the specification of hazard plots and setting out plausibility criteria.

The Palmer algorithm provides a systematic framework for identifying suitable survival models, and for defining plausibility criteria for extrapolation validity. Using the algorithm ensures that model selection is based on explicit justification and evidence, which could reduce discordance in health technology appraisals.

In addition to blood test data, inflammation-based prognostic markers have been used to predict the prognosis of various types of cancer. However, several of these previous studies may be outdated, as they were conducted prior to the widespread adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors, leading to limited reports on their efficacy. The present study aimed to assess the accuracy of different inflammation-based prognostic markers in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer undergoing nivolumab monotherapy as salvage-line chemotherapy. In a retrospective cohort study across Japan, a total of 159 patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who were treated with nivolumab between September 2017 and March 2020 were selected. Blood test data were collected within 14 days of the start of chemotherapy and 17 inflammation-based prognostic markers were evaluated. Cox regression analysis was performed using all patient background factors. Subsequently, model selection was performed using backward elimination based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to obtain effective background factors which could be assessed for their impact on patient survival. For each marker, the magnitude of the impact on the survival rate, after adjusting for the background factors, was assessed using concordance and AIC analyses. A total of 159 patients (female, 30.2%; median age, 70 years) were included in the present study. Most patients received platinum, fluoropyrimidine and taxane treatment, with a median of three prior lines of systemic therapy. With a median follow-up of 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5-3.8), median overall survival and time to treatment failure were 3.8 months (95% CI, 3.3-4.5) and 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.3), respectively. Amongst the 17 markers analyzed, the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) was classed as the most useful factor that affected the survival rate of patients. Real-world data showed that mGPS, an inflammation-based prognostic marker, had the strongest correlation with prognosis in patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer receiving nivolumab monotherapy. The present study was registered as a clinical trial with the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm) under the trial registration number UMIN000050590 on 15th March 2023.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy holds promise in managing resectable locally advanced gastric cancer (GC), adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), and esophageal cancer (EC). However, consensus is lacking regarding the efficacy of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT). This study aims to assess the added benefit of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for these malignancies.

Up to October 2024, randomized controlled trials, case-control studies, and cohort studies that evaluated the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to NCT were systematically retrieved from electronic databases. The primary endpoints included pathologic complete response (pCR), major pathological response (MPR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Thirteen studies published between 2021 and 2024 were analyzed. Statistical analyses revealed significantly higher pCR rates (OR: 2.73, P < 0.001) and MPR rates (OR: 2.99, P < 0.001) in the NICT group compared to NCT group. The PFS was also higher in the NICT group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (HR: 0.50, P = 0.072).

This meta-analysis demonstrates that NICT enhances pathological response rates in patients with resectable locally advanced GC, AEG, and EC. However, no significant long-term prognostic benefits were associated with NICT.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42024545725.

*CoNivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has shown promise in treating advanced unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Nivolumab, alone and in combination with chemotherapy, in this patient population.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, using data from PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CNKI up to June 3, 2024. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3729 patients were included. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Effect sizes were measured using mean differences (MD) and relative risks (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Nivolumab significantly extended OS (MD = 2.29, 95% CI: 1.48, 3.09) and PFS (MD = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06) compared to controls. Subgroup analysis showed that both Nivolumab monotherapy (OS: MD = 2.52, 95% CI: 0.81, 4.23; PFS: MD = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.22) and Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy (OS: MD = 2.06, 95% CI: 0.56, 3.57; PFS: MD = 1.53, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.06) improved OS and PFS. While the overall risk of AEs was not significantly increased, Nivolumab monotherapy significantly increased the risk of AEs (RR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.87), whereas Nivolumab combined with chemotherapy did not (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09). Both treatments increased the risk of grade ≥ 3 AEs (RR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.36).

Nivolumab, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, improves OS and PFS in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. However, careful patient monitoring is necessary due to the increased risk of severe AEs, particularly with monotherapy.

The aim of this study is to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer (GC).

We enrolled patients diagnosed with unresectable advanced or metastatic GC who received nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first-line systemic treatment. The combined positive score (CPS), indicating the number of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-stained cells, was utilized. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were graded, and treatment was ceased upon disease progression or intolerance.

A total of 27 patients were included in the study, comprising 15 patients with CPS ≥ 5 and 12 patients with CPS < 5. The objective response rate (ORR) was 55.6%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 74.1%. Patients in the CPS ≥ 5 group exhibited higher ORR and DCR compared to those in the CPS < 5 group. Median PFS and OS were 6.1 months and 14.6 months, respectively; patients with CPS ≥ 5 showed a trend towards better PFS and OS than those with CPS < 5. Most AEs were grade 1-2, with a few instances of grade 3-4 toxicities reported, including neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and anemia. There were no grade 5 AEs reported in our cohort. Furthermore, 64.7% of patients received subsequent anticancer treatment following disease progression on nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

The results of our study demonstrate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus chemotherapy in real-world practice support its adoption as a new standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced HER2-negative GC, particularly those with CPS ≥ 5.

Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the treatment of gastric cancer, but only a minority of patients benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, numerous studies have been devoted to clarifying the mechanisms underlying resistance to immunotherapy or developing biomarkers for patient stratification. However, previous studies have focused mainly on the tumor microenvironment. Systemic immune perturbations have long been observed in patients with gastric cancer, and the involvement of the peripheral immune system in effective anticancer responses has attracted much attention in recent years. Therefore, understanding the distinct types of systemic immune organization in gastric cancer will aid personalized treatment designed to pair with traditional therapies to alleviate their detrimental effects on systemic immunity or to directly activate the anticancer response of systemic immunity. Herein, this review aims to comprehensively summarize systemic immunity in gastric cancer, including perturbations in systemic immunity induced by cancer and traditional therapies, and the potential clinical applications of systemic immunity in the detection, prediction, prognosis and therapy of gastric cancer.

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) represent a crucial component of targeted therapies in gastric cancer, potentially altering traditional treatment paradigms. Many ADCs have entered rigorous clinical trials based on biological theories and preclinical experiments. Modality trials have also been conducted in combination with monoclonal antibody therapies, chemotherapies, immunotherapies, and other treatments to enhance the efficacy of drug coordination effects. However, ADCs exhibit limitations in treating gastric cancer, including resistance triggered by their structure or other factors. Ongoing intensive researches and preclinical experiments are yielding improvements, while enhancements in drug development processes and concomitant diagnostics during the therapeutic period actively boost ADC efficacy. The optimal treatment strategy for gastric cancer patients is continually evolving. This review summarizes the clinical progress of ADCs in treating gastric cancer, analyzes the mechanisms of ADC combination therapies, discusses resistance patterns, and offers a promising outlook for future applications in ADC drug development and companion diagnostics.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogenous group of rare tumors, primarily treated with surgery. Preoperative radiotherapy is often recommended for extremity high-risk STS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, typically based on doxorubicin with ifosfamide, has shown efficacy in limbs and trunk wall STS. Second-line chemotherapy, commonly utilized in the metastatic setting, is mostly histology-driven. Molecular targeted agents are used across various histologies, and although the use of immunotherapy in STS is still in its early stages, there is increasing interest in exploring its potential.

This article involved an extensive recent search on PubMed. It explored the current treatment landscape for localized and metastatic STS, focusing on the combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for both extremity and retroperitoneal tumors, and with a particular emphasis on the most innovative histopathology driven therapeutic approaches. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials identified via clinicaltrials.gov are included.

Recently there have been advancements in the treatment of STS, largely driven by the outcomes of clinical trials. However further research is imperative to comprehend the effect of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy in various STS, as well as to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from these treatments.

Most patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEA) progress on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Novel approaches to overcome resistance to ICI in mGEA are needed. Cabozantinib is a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor thought to enhance the immunomodulatory effects of ICI. This study evaluated the combination of cabozantinib and pembrolizumab in ICI refractory or resistant mGEA.

Investigator-initiated, single-arm, single institution, and phase II study in patients with mGEA. Patients had progressed on ICI and/or had PD-L1 CPS score ≤10%. Cabozantinib dose was 40 mg p.o. daily on days 1-21 of a 21-day cycle, with pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. on day 1. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS-6).

Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Median age 58 years (24-87), female (n = 14), ECOG 0/1 = 13/14, GC/GEJ = 16/11, and non-Hispanic White/Hispanic/Asian = 12/8/7. The primary endpoint was met. After a median follow-up of 31.4 months (range 3.3-42.5), PFS-6 was 22.2% (95% CI 9.0-39.0). The median PFS and OS are 2.3 months (95% CI 1.7-4.1) and 5.5 months (3.1-14.0), respectively. The most common mutations were TP53 (78.3%) and CDH1/PIK3CA/CTNNB1 (17.4% each). The most common grade (G) treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were diarrhea (25.9%), fatigue (18.5%), hypertension, and muscle cramps (14.8% each). G3-4 TRAE were seen in n = 3 patients (hypertension, thromboembolic event, esophageal perforation; each n = 1). No G5 was observed.

The addition of cabozantinib to pembrolizumab shows clinical benefit in ICI-resistant or refractory mGEA with a tolerable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04164979. IRB Approved: UCI 18-124, University of California Irvine IRB#20195426.).

This prospective observational study evaluated the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated advanced gastric cancer (GC). A preplanned 2-year final analysis was performed to confirm survival and tumor behavior with nivolumab monotherapy.

The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The data regarding tumor size were prospectively collected and evaluated using the RECIST criteria. Exploratory analyses were performed for survival according to the tumor response and depth of response (DpR) in patients with measurable lesions who were receiving nivolumab monotherapy as third- or later-line therapy.

In 487 patients, the median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were 5.8 (95% CI 5.3-6.9) months and 1.8 (95% CI 1.7-2.0) months, respectively. The response rate (RR) was 14.5% in 282 patients with measurable lesions. In 234 patients treated with third- or later-line, the DpR was found to be associated with PFS and OS in the Spearman analysis (r = 0.55 and 0.44, respectively) as well as using a discrete variable. When the DpR was divided into 5 groups (-20%≥DpR; -20%

CONCLUSION

The final analysis confirmed the efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy for patients with advanced GC in routine clinical practice. The exploratory analysis indicated that increasing DpR was associated with longer median PFS and OS in nivolumab treatment at a later-line setting.

Collapse

Whether PD-L1 testing is needed to identify patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors is an area of debate.

PubMed and Embase were searched for phase III randomized clinical trials. We assessed the heterogeneity of overall survival (OS) between patients with high and low PD-L1 expression using an interaction test.

Seventy studies representing 44791 patients were included. Both the CPS and TPS can predict better survival from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with high PD-L1 expression. However, only CPS 1 has the ability to select patients who are unlikely to respond to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy, while an OS advantage can be obtained from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors both in patients with high and low PD-L1 expression defined by CPS 5, CPS 10 and TPS.

CPS 1 is recommended to select patients with the likelihood of benefiting from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors while excluding patients who may not respond.

Assessing programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on tumor cells (TCs) using Food and Drug Administration-approved, validated immunoassays can guide the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in cancer treatment. However, substantial interobserver variability has been reported using these immunoassays. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to accurately measure biomarker expression in tissue samples, but its reliability and comparability to standard manual scoring remain to be evaluated. This multinational study sought to compare the %TC scoring of PD-L1 expression in advanced urothelial carcinoma, assessed by either an AI Measurement Model (AIM-PD-L1) or expert pathologists. The concordance among pathologists and between pathologists and AIM-PD-L1 was determined. The positivity rate of ≥ 1%TC PD-L1 was between 20-30% for 8/10 pathologists, and the degree of agreement and scoring distribution for among pathologists and between pathologists and AIM-PD-L1 was similar both scored as a continuous variable or using the pre-defined cutoff. Numerically higher score variation was observed with the 22C3 assay than with the 28-8 assay. A 2-h training module on the 28-8 assay did not significantly impact manual assessment. Cases exhibiting significantly higher variability in the assessment of PD-L1 expression (mean absolute deviation > 10) were found to have patterns of PD-L1 staining that were more challenging to interpret. An improved understanding of sources of manual scoring variability can be applied to PD-L1 expression analysis in the clinical setting. In the future, the application of AI algorithms could serve as a valuable reference guide for pathologists while scoring PD-L1.

Most oesophagogastric adenocarcinomas (OGAs) and colorectal cancers (CRCs) are mismatch repair proficient (MMRp), responding poorly to immune checkpoint inhibition. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of domatinostat (histone deacetylase inhibitor) plus avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) in patients with previously treated inoperable, advanced/metastatic MMRp OGA and CRC.

Eligible patients were evaluated in a multicentre, open-label dose escalation/dose expansion phase II trial. In the escalation phase, patients received escalating doses of domatinostat [100 mg once daily (OD), 200 mg OD, 200 mg twice daily (BD)] orally for 14 days followed by continuous dosing plus avelumab 10 mg/kg administered intravenously 2-weekly (2qw) to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The trial expansion phase evaluated the best objective response rate (ORR) during 6 months by RECIST version 1.1 using a Simon two-stage optimal design with 2/9 and 1/10 responses required to proceed to stage 2 in the OGA and CRC cohorts, respectively.

Patients (n = 40) were registered between February 2019 and October 2021. Patients in the dose escalation phase (n = 12) were evaluated to confirm the RP2D of domatinostat 200 mg BD plus avelumab 10 mg/kg. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Twenty-one patients were treated at the RP2D, 19 (9 OGA and 10 CRC) were assessable for the best ORR; 2 patients with CRC did not receive combination treatment and were not assessable for the primary endpoint analysis. Six patients were evaluated in the dose escalation and expansion phases. In the OGA cohort, the best ORR was 22.2% (95% one-sided confidence interval lower bound 4.1) and the median duration of disease control was 11.3 months (range 9.9-12.7 months). No responses were observed in the CRC cohort. No treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were reported at the RP2D.

Responses in the OGA cohort met the criteria to expand to stage 2 of recruitment with an acceptable safety profile. There was insufficient signal in the CRC cohort to progress to stage 2.

NCT03812796 (registered 23rd January 2019).

Aim: To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials & methods: We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. Results: 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. Conclusion: Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.

Few meta-analyses on incidence of endocrine immune-related adverse effects (eirAEs) have been published and many trials have been published since.

We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis with updated literature to assess risk and incidence of eirAEs of any grade and grade 3 to 5 by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy or combination therapy in solid tumors.

An electronic search using PubMed/Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Randomized controlled studies (RCTs) assessing eirAEs under ICI monotherapy or ICI combination therapy were selected. Stata software (v17) was used for statistical analyses and risk of bias was evaluated using Review Manager version 5.3.

A total of 69 RCTs with 80 independent reports, involving 42 886 patients, were included in the study. Meta-analysis revealed the following pooled estimates for risk ratio and incidence, respectively: for any grade hypothyroidism 7.81 (95% CI, 5.68-10.74, P < .0001) and 7.64% (95% CI, 6.23-9.17, P < .0001); significantly increased also for hyperthyroidism, hypophysitis/hypopituitarism, and adrenal insufficiency; and for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus 1.52 (95% CI, 1.07-2.18, P = .02), and 0.087% (95% CI, 0.019-0.189, P = .0006), respectively. Meta-regression showed that combination of ICIs (nivolumab plus ipilimumab; durvalumab plus tremelimumab) is an independent risk factor for any grade hypophysitis/hypopituitarism, and that ICI agent is an independent factor of risk for adrenal insufficiency, but that cancer type is not an independent risk factor for eirAEs.

We showed that risk, independent from cancer type, and incidence of eirAEs are substantially increased with ICI therapy. Combination of ICIs increases risk for eirAEs, especially for hypophysitis/hypopituitarism.

As the major malignant tumors in the chest, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and esophageal cancer (EC) bring huge health burden to human beings worldwide. Currently, surgery is still the mainstay for comprehensive treatment for NSCLC and EC, but the prognosis is still poor as the results of cancer recurrence and distant metastasis. Neoadjuvant therapy refers to a single or combined treatment before surgery, aiming to improve the therapeutic effects of the traditional therapies. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes and effects of neoadjuvant therapy are still controversial due to its apparent advantages and disadvantages, and different patients may respond differentially to the same scheme of neoadjuvant therapy, which makes it urgent and necessary to develop personalized scheme of neoadjuvant therapy for different individuals. Therefore, this review summarizes the novel schemes and strategies of neoadjuvant therapy, which may help to significantly improve of life quality of patients suffering from chest-related malignancies.

Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer. However, it shows limited efficacy against certain tumor types. The activation of innate immunity can suppress tumors by mitigating inflammatory and malignant behaviors through immune surveillance. The tumor microenvironment, which is composed of immune cells and cancer cells, plays a crucial role in determining the outcomes of immunotherapy. Relying solely on immune checkpoint inhibitors is not an optimal approach. Instead, there is a need to consider the use of a combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other modulators of the innate immune system to improve the tumor microenvironment. This can be achieved through methods such as immune cell antigen presentation and recognition. In this review, we delve into the significance of innate immune cells in tumor regression, as well as the role of the interaction of tumor cells with innate immune cells in evading host immune surveillance. These findings pave the way for the next chapter in the field of immunotherapy.

There is debate on which are the best surrogate endpoint and metric to capture treatment effect on overall survival (OS) in RCTs testing immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

We systematically searched for RCTs testing ICIs in patients with advanced solid tumors. Inclusion criteria were: RCTs i) assessing PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors either as monotherapy or in combination with another ICI, and/or targeted therapy, and/or chemotherapy, in patients with advanced solid tumors; ii) randomizing at least 100 patients. We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs to compare the surrogacy value of PFS and modified-PFS (mPFS) for OS in RCTs testing ICIs, when the treatment effect is measured by the hazard ratio (HR) for OS, and by the HR and the ratio of restricted mean survival time (rRMST) for PFS and mPFS.

61 RCTs (67 treatment comparisons and 36,034 patients) were included in the analysis. In comparisons testing ICI plus chemotherapy, HRPFS and HRmPFS both had a strong surrogacy value (R2 = 0.74 and R2 = 0.81, respectively). In comparisons testing ICI as monotherapy, HRPFS was the best surrogate, although having a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.58). In comparisons testing ICI plus other treatment(s), the associations were very weak for all the surrogate endpoints and treatment effect measures, with R2 ranging from 0.01 to 0.22.

In RCTs testing ICIs, the value of potential surrogates for HROS was strongly affected by the type of treatment(s) tested. The evidence available supports HRPFS as the best surrogate, and disproves the use of alternative endpoints, such as the mPFS, or treatment effect measures, such as the RMST.