Lung cancer is currently the most prevalent malignancy and the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Although the early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents a relatively good prognosis, a considerable number of lung cancer cases are still detected and diagnosed at locally advanced or late stages. Surgical treatment combined with perioperative multimodality treatment is the mainstay of treatment for locally advanced NSCLC and has been shown to improve patient survival. Following the standard methods of neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative management, postoperative adjuvant therapy, and other therapeutic strategies are important for improving patients' prognosis and quality of life. However, controversies remain over the perioperative management of NSCLC and presently consensus and standardized guidelines are lacking for addressing critical clinical issues in multimodality treatment.

The working group consisted of 91 multidisciplinary experts from thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiotherapy, epidemiology, and psychology. This guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The clinical questions were collected and selected based on preliminary open-ended questionnaires and subsequent discussions during the Guideline Working Group meetings. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for available evidence. The GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the strengths of recommendations. Finally, the recommendations were developed through a structured consensus-building process.

The Guideline Development Group initially collected a total of 62 important clinical questions. After a series of consensus-building conferences, 24 clinical questions were identified and corresponding recommendation were ultimately developed, focusing on neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative management, adjuvant therapy, postoperative psychological rehabilitation, prognosis assement, and follow-up protocols for NSCLC.

This guideline puts forward reasonable recommendations focusing on neoadjuvant therapy, perioperative management, adjuvant therapy, postoperative psychological rehabilitation, prognosis assessment, and follow-up protocol of NSCLC. It standardizes perioperative multimodality treatment and provides guidance for clinical practice among thoracic surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiotherapists, aiming to reduce postoperative recurrence, improve patient survival, accelerate recovery, and minimize postoperative complications such as atelectasis.

To investigate the value of Fluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) combined with 3D quantitative technology and clinicopathological features in predicting the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

A retrospective review was performed for patients who underwent PET/CT and curative resection of NSCLC between January 2016 and June 2019 in our hospital. PET/CT data, clinical features, and pathology results were collected. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on CT images by ITK-SNAP software. The prognosis was followed up, and the study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to initially assess the relationship between each parameter and PFS, and parameters were grouped accordingly. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to develop models based on clinicopathological features to predict prognosis of NSCLC patients. Kaplan-Meier method was used to draw the survival curves.

A total of 128 patients were enrolled in the study with PFS of 8-96 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, SUVindex (the ratio of SUVmax of lesion to SUVmax of liver), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), Dmax (the largest diameter), GTV, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and TNM staging are significantly related to recurrence (all p<0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that only age, SUVindex, and LNM were independent prognostic factor for PFS (all p < 0.05).

Although 18F-FDG PET/CT combined with 3D quantitative technique were helpful in predicting PFS in NSCLC, only age, SUVindex, and LNM were independent predictors for PFS.

Establishing the effectiveness of high-protein supplementation in reducing cancer-related side effects is crucial.

The study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of high-protein supplementation on clinical outcomes of patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Systematic searches were conducted on Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus from inception until July 2023. Randomized controlled trials administering supplements with ≥10 g protein/serving, given to 20+ adult patients undergoing cancer therapy were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the effects of high-protein supplementation on the primary outcomes of body weight and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We employed a vote-counting approach based on effect direction for secondary outcomes (that is, body composition, muscle function, hospitalization, response to cancer therapy/toxicity, survival, and systemic inflammation). Risk-of-bias (ROB) was assessed.

Thirty-five studies involving 3701 patients with diverse cancer types were included. Patients who received high-protein supplementation lost less body weight than controls (mean difference = 1.45 kg; 95% CI: 0.42, 2.48 kg; P = 0.006; I2 = 80%). No differences in HRQoL were observed; all studies assessing HRQoL were rated as high ROB. A beneficial effect on muscle mass was found in 11 of 13 studies, although most had a high ROB due to assessment techniques. When considering higher quality studies, evidence of a beneficial effect was found in 5 of 5 studies for muscle strength, and 3 of 4 for hospitalization rate. Effects on other secondary outcomes were inconsistent or limited. No serious adverse effects were reported.

High-protein supplementation mitigates weight loss, improves muscle strength, and lowers hospitalization rates in patients undergoing cancer therapy. These positive clinical outcomes, along with a favorable safety profile, suggest that high-protein supplementation may be a valuable addition to medical practice. However, given the need for more robust trials and the high ROB observed in the existing studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. This review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42021237372.

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a marker of immune-nutrition balance, has predictive value for the survival and prognosis of patients with various cancers.

To explore the clinical significance of the preoperative PNI on the prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma (AC) patients who underwent curative pancreaticoduodenectomy.

The data concerning 233 patients diagnosed with ACs were extracted and analyzed at our institution from January 1998 to December 2020. All patients were categorized into low and high PNI groups based on the cutoff value determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. We compared disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) between these groups and assessed prognostic factors through univariate and multivariate analyses.

The optimal cutoff value for the PNI was established at 45.3. Patients with a PNI ≥ 45.3 were categorized into the PNI-high group, while those with a PNI < 45.3 were assigned to the PNI-low group. Patients within the PNI-low group tended to be of advanced age and exhibited higher levels of aspartate transaminase and total bilirubin and a lower creatinine level than were those in the PNI-high group. The 5-year OS rates for patients with a PNI ≥ 45.3 and a PNI < 45.3 were 61.8% and 43.4%, respectively, while the 5-year DFS rates were 53.5% and 38.3%, respectively. Patients in the PNI- low group had shorter OS (P = 0.006) and DFS (P = 0.012). In addition, multivariate analysis revealed that the PNI, pathological T stage and pathological N stage were found to be independent prognostic factors for both OS and DFS.

The PNI is a straightforward and valuable marker for predicting long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy. The PNI should be incorporated into the standard assessment of patients with AC.

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) developed a new method for evaluating malnutrition; however, no consensus has been reached regarding the use of these criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the association between nutritional status assessed using the GLIM criteria and outcomes of lung cancer after surgery.

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection and bioelectrical impedance analysis to estimate muscle mass before surgery were included. Their background, pathological stage, recurrence, and prognosis were investigated. Patients were divided into two groups according to the GLIM criteria: normal nutrition and malnutrition groups.

The normal and malnutrition groups comprised 110 and 88 patients, respectively. Malnutrition was significantly associated with poor overall survival after surgery (P = 0.025) but not with disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis showed that malnutrition (hazard ratio [HR]:2.374, P = 0.020), advanced pathological stage of lung cancer (HR: 1.919, P = 0.002), and the presence of postoperative complications (HR: 2.035, P = 0.047) were significantly associated with poor overall survival.

Malnutrition assessed using the GLIM criteria was associated with the prognosis of patients with postoperative non-small cell lung cancer. Preoperative assessment using the GLIM criteria would allow for effective nutritional and rehabilitative interventions to improve prognosis.