This study aimed to develop a diagnostic model utilizing clinical and laboratory data to identify complicated appendicitis in pediatric patients, improving acute appendicitis management.

Retrospective analysis of pediatric acute appendicitis cases (2018-2023) at two hospitals collected medical history, clinical criteria, and blood samples. Patients were divided into complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis groups for comparison. Significant variables were identified using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and incorporated into a logistic regression model to construct a nomogram. The effectiveness of the model was assessed based on sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and comparison with existing scoring systems.

Among 323 patients, four variables (neutrophil (NEU), C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen (Fg), and chlorine (Cl)) were identified as significant. The recommended cutoff value of nomogram was 0.730, exceeding that of Alvarado and PAS, with higher sensitivity (81.7%), specificity (82.6%), and accuracy (82.0%), as well as better performance in both internal and external validations. Furthermore, it demonstrated excellent calibration and clinical utility.

NEU, CRP, Fg, and Cl are effective markers for diagnosing complicated appendicitis in children. The nomogram model can be considered to be incorporated into the diagnosis process of appendicitis as an auxiliary means of surgical intervention decision-making in complex appendicitis cases.

Clinical guidelines (CGs) developed by expert communities benefit both the patient and the clinician. Meanwhile a considerable proportion of specialists are not familiar with or follow them in their daily practice. Colonic diverticulitis (CD) is the third most common cause of hospitalization among patients with gastrointestinal diseases and common indication for colon resection. Actual tactics for diagnosis and treatment of CD, as well as data on what influences its choice and how the decisions made agree with the existing CGs can be identified by anonymous surveys.

An anonymous internet survey of surgeons and coloproctologists was conducted. Groups of questions included demographics of the respondents; self-esteem score; sources of guidance in decision-making; classification systems for CD; preferable diagnostic tests; management of CD; indications for elective surgery; and outcomes of surgical treatment and others (n = 17). The study was conducted in accordance with the CHERRIES criteria. The required minimum sample size was calculated as 377 participants.

The study involved 401 respondents from 9 countries: 76.1% were general surgeons and 14.5% were colorectal surgeons. Excellent or good knowledge of the problem was claimed by 82.8% of the colorectal vs 66.2% of the general surgeons (p = 0.013). In decision-making respondents were largely guided by their professional experience, methods adopted in their clinic and domestic CGs. General Surgeons more often chose tactics inconsistent with CGs than coloproctologists. The largest differences between subgroups were noted for awareness of the reversal of Hartmann's procedure, most common postoperative complications and indications for elective surgery.

Adherence to the existing CGs was poor, which entails significant variation in the approaches practiced by the respondents from different cohorts. There is no consensus on the aspects that are not yet covered in the CGs. Further research is needed to elucidate these gaps and update the guidelines accordingly.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder with a significant global burden, impacting patients both physically and psychologically. While its exact etiology remains unclear, genetic predisposition and environmental triggers play key roles.

Biologic therapies have revolutionized psoriasis management, offering targeted and effective disease control. However, despite their proven benefits, these treatments remain underutilized, limiting optimal outcomes and contributing to disparities in care. This expert consensus examines current challenges in biologics use and provides evidence-based recommendations for managing moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Saudi Arabia.

Optimizing biologic therapy use is crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing disease burden. By addressing gaps in clinical practice, this consensus aims to streamline management approaches and reduce treatment disparities in Saudi Arabia.

Appendicitis, an inflammation of the appendix, and intussusception, the invagination of one intestinal segment into a distal segment, both have overlapping presentations, which can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This report describes a 4-year-old girl with coexisting McSwain type V appendiceal intussusception and appendicitis. This rare case highlights appendicitis as a potential lead point for intussusception.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) examination for acute appendicitis (AA). A total of 41 patients with suspected AA were enrolled in this study. CT scan was performed in 24 patients, and US was performed in 17 patients. Both CT scan and US were performed in 7 patients. The primary outcomes were the performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity) of US and CT in the patients with suspected AA. The secondary outcomes included the diagnostic accuracy of CT and US. By using US, 6 patients (35%) were incorrectly diagnosed and 2 other patients (12%) had equivocal results. By using CT as the primary diagnostic tool, 4 patients (17%) were misdiagnosed and 8 patients (33%) had equivocal results. Even if the equivocal results of CT and US were excluded from the calculation, the sensitivity and specificity of CT was 88% and 71% respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity of US was 73% and 50%, respectively. Although CT and US are believed to be reliable diagnostic tool to precisely diagnose AA. The rate of negative appendectomy still remains high. There is a need to develop a more accurate methods to diagnose AA, and therefore rate of negative appendectomy can be reduced.

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain. Differences in the management of this large group of patients has important consequences for the patients and the healthcare system. Controversies regarding the understanding of the natural course of the disease, the utility of new diagnostic methods, and alternative treatments have lead to large variations in practice patterns between centres. These national guidelines present evidence-based recommendations aiming at a uniform, safe and cost-efficient management of this large group of patients.

A working group of six experts with broad clinical and research experience was formed. Additional expertise from outside was consulted during the process. A national survey revealed significant variations in the management of patients with suspicion of appendicitis. The evidence provided in published guidelines and reviews were extracted and systematically graded, according to the GRADE methodology. This was supplemented by additional more recent and more directed search of the literature. Patients treated for appendicitis were involved through interviews. The guidelines were reviewed by external experts before the final version was determined.

The guidelines cover an extensive number of issues: pathology, epidemiology, aetiology, natural history, clinical and laboratory diagnosis, diagnostic scoring systems, diagnostic imaging, treatment, nursing care, follow-up, quality registers and quality indicators, among others. Special considerations related to children and pregnant women are covered.

These national guidelines present an extensive and thorough review of the current knowledge base related to appendicitis, and provide up-to-date evidence-based recommendations for the management of this large group of patients.

Ultrasound and multi-slice spiral computed tomography (CT) are frequently used to assist the diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA), and the examination results may vary among different demographics. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for AA.

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with AA who underwent emergency surgery at our hospital from March 2021 to August 2023, with postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Differences in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound and CT for different types of AA, age groups, and body mass index (BMI) values were then analyzed.

The overall sample comprised 279 confirmed cases of AA, with 64 cases of simple appendicitis, 127 cases of suppurative appendicitis, and 88 cases of gangrenous appendicitis. For these three pathological classifications, the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound was 68.75% (44/64), 73.22% (93/127), and 81.81% (72/88), respectively, while the diagnostic accuracy of CT was 71.87% (46/64), 82.67% (105/127), and 90.90% (80/88), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall diagnostic accuracy between the two methods (P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed no difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two methods for patients with normal BMI (P > 0.05). However, for overweight, obese, and elderly patients, CT provided significantly better diagnostic accuracy than ultrasound (P < 0.05).

While ultrasound and CT have similar diagnostic accuracy for different pathological types of AA, CT is more accurate for overweight, obese, and elderly patients.

Uncertainty is inherent in medical practice. False-negative decisions can delay treatments and result in adverse outcomes in children with acute appendicitis (AA). On the other hand, false-positive surgery decisions lead to unnecessary appendectomies. Impressive technological advancements, such as magnetic resonance imaging and laparoscopy, have reduced but failed to eliminate the occurrence of erroneous decisions. Furthermore, there seems to be a fundamental limit to further reduction, especially in eliminating the rates of negative appendectomy or, oppositely, complicated appendicitis. What does this mean for the pediatric surgeon? Will we ever be able to eliminate our mistakes? This systematic review emphasizes the importance of understanding the potential abilities and limitations of different diagnostic options, as well as the impact of decisions in the face of uncertainty.

Appendicolith can be incidentally detected on abdominal computer tomography (CT) without any signs of appendicitis. However, it has also been found to be a risk factor for failure of nonoperative management in acute appendicitis. The present retrospective study aimed to evaluate whether appendicolith predicts complicated appendicitis in patients with any appendicitis.

A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing appendectomy from January 2016 to December 2018. Appendicolith was considered to be present when it was described in a CT scan.

Of the 267 patients, appendicolith was found in 120 cases, while there were no in 147 cases in preoperative CT scans. In the case of complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or gangrenous perforated appendicitis), appendicolith was visible in CT scans in 57.7% of the patients. Of the patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 38.3% had appendicolith in CT scan (p = 0.002). In univariate logistic regression analysis, based on the finding of the histological specimen, appendicolith was associated with complicated appendicitis (OR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.28-3.51; p = 0.004). When adjusting for sex, age group (age ≤50 vs. >50 years), and duration of symptoms (≤24 vs. >24 h), the odds ratio was 3.52 (95% CI: 1.88-6.58; p < 0.001).

Our study found that appendicolith can be considered an independent risk factor for complicated appendicitis. Therefore, in the presence of appendicolith, surgical treatment should probably be preferred over nonsurgical treatment in acute appendicitis.

Guidelines for management and treatment of appendicitis recommends the removal of a normal-looking appendix, but the recommendations are deemed as weak because they are based on low quality evidence. We aimed to provide an overview of the recommendations from the European societies or associations of surgeons regarding the treatment of acute appendicitis and especially recommendations for the macroscopically normal-looking appendix.

European surgical societies were contacted and sent an electronic questionnaire. Questions concerned if the association had a national guideline or recommended an existing one, and if they recommended a specific approach for the management of the normal-looking appendix, including who decided to remove the appendix.

We contacted surgical societies from 28 European countries, and 17 surgical societies (61%) responded. Two societies had a national guideline for the treatment of appendicitis and one of these addressed how to treat the normal-looking appendix. Most societies (59%) answered that the operating surgeon decided whether to remove the normal-looking appendix. Eleven societies recommended using an existing guideline (65%), four societies (24%) did not recommend a guideline, and two societies did not know.

Only two surgical societies had a published national recommendation or guideline on the treatment of suspected appendicitis, only one had a guideline for the management of the normal-looking appendix, and most societies answered that the operating surgeon decided.

A 17-year-old patient presented to the emergency department of the General Hospital of Trikala, Greece, reporting hypogastric pain accompanied by a fever of up to 38°C. The pain, progressively increasing in intensity, had been present for about a week, with the fever onset occurring 24 hours prior. Based on clinical examination, transvaginal ultrasound, and computed tomography findings, an incorrect diagnosis of pyosalpinx was made, and intravenous treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics was initiated. However, the lack of improvement in the patient's clinical and laboratory findings after two days led to the decision to perform a laparotomy. Intraoperatively, a periappendiceal abscess was found, with a bilateral secondary extension of inflammation to the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and pelvic peritoneum. The inflamed appendix was resected from its retrocecal position, and the pelvic abscess was drained. The postoperative course was uneventful. This case report highlights an atypical presentation of acute appendicitis with abscess, which was preoperatively misdiagnosed as pyosalpinx. The main factors contributing to the misdiagnosis of acute appendicitis and the subsequent delay in medical care are discussed, emphasizing that early and accurate diagnosis is crucial in preventing adverse outcomes and ensuring effective treatment.

We aimed to explore the abnormal pathology findings in appendix specimens removed based on intraoperative abnormal appearance during elective surgery for benign gynaecological conditions by a minimally invasive gynaecologist, as well as the associated complication rate.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral surgical centre for benign gynaecological conditions between the years 2004-2023. It included patients who underwent appendicectomy by a trained minimally invasive gynaecologist based on observations during surgery for benign gynaecological conditions. Data included demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological information followed by postoperative complication data obtained from electronic medical records and direct communication with surgical colleagues. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the abnormal pathological findings in the appendix. The secondary outcome was the complication rate associated with appendicectomy in these cases.

The study cohort included 34 women who met inclusion criteria and underwent a laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain or a benign ovarian mass. Indications for appendicectomy included twelve cases (38.2%) with apparent appendiceal immobility (stiffness), fourteen cases (41.2%) with an appendix adherent to ovaries or the pelvic side walls, and seven cases (20.6%) with an abnormal appearance (large, wide, long, coiled, or curved). Pathological findings revealed six cases (17.6%) of acute or chronic appendicitis, four cases (11.8%) of endometriosis, five cases (14.7%) of abnormal pathological conditions, and three cases (8.8%) of cancer (two cases of well-differentiated adenocarcinoma and one case of low-grade appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma). Postoperative complication rate was 5.8% (two cases).

This study supports incorporating appendicectomy by trained gynaecological specialists during gynaecological elective surgery when abnormal findings are encountered. Further research and guidelines in this area can provide even greater clarity and direction for the future of gynaecological surgical practice.

Advanced imaging may augment the diagnostic milieux for presumed acute appendicitis (AA) during pregnancy, however it is not clear when such imaging modalities are indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of clinical scoring systems with the findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of AA in pregnant patients.

A retrospective cohort study between 2019 and 2021 was performed in two tertiary level centers. Pregnant patients presenting with suspected AA and non-diagnostic trans-abdominal ultrasound who underwent MRI as part of their evaluation were identified. Patient demographics, parity, gestation, presenting signs, and symptoms were documented. The Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) score for each patient were calculated and correlated with clinical and MRI findings. Univariate analysis was used to identify factors associated with AA on MRI.

Of the 255 pregnant patients who underwent MRI, 33 (13%) had findings of AA. On univariate analysis, presentation during the second/third trimester, migration of pain, vomiting and RLQ tenderness correlated with MRI findings of AA. Whilst 5/77 (6.5%) of patients with an Alvarado score ≤4 had signs of AA on MRI, a score of ≥5 had a sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of 84.8%, 36.6%, 94.0% and 17.2%. For an AIR score ≥ 5, this was 78.8%, 41.5%, 93.0%, and 16.7%, respectively.

Whilst clinical scoring systems may be useful in identifying which pregnant patients require MRI to be performed when AA is suspected, the low sensitivity implies further research is needed to refine the use of this valuable resource.

Peritoneal drainage (PD) following laparoscopic appendectomy(LA) has long been considered beneficial for appendicitis patients, especially those with complicated appendicitis. However, recent research has raised doubts about the advantages of PD, as it not only fails to reduce postoperative complications but also prolongs the operative duration and hospital stay and incurs higher medical expenses. Given this controversy, we conducted a meta-analysis to determine whether drainage is necessary after LA for complicated appendicitis. This meta-analysis had registered in PROSPERO(ID: CRD42023472382).

This study assessed current evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and potential benefits of drainage versus no drainage following LA for complicated appendicitis.

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Springer, and the Cochrane Library using the search terms "appendicitis", "laparoscopic appendectomy", and "drain" or "drainage" for studies published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2022. We employed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) criteria for study inclusion and exclusion. Primary outcomes included postoperative intra-abdominal abscess, postoperative intestinal obstruction, postoperative stump leakage, wound infection and postoperative visual analog scale(VAS) score, while secondary outcomes consisted of operative time, postoperative recovery time and total hospitalization duration. Studies with at least two outcomes were considered for meta-synthesis. Depending on I2 values, fixed- or random effects models were used for data synthesis. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for outcome comparisons between PD and no peritoneal drainage (NPD). Sensitivity analysis and meta-regression were performed to assess and investigate inter-study heterogeneity.

After conducting our literature search and screening, twelve studies were analyzed, comprising 3374 cases. During the comparison of primary outcomes between PD and NPD, the incidence of wound infection and postoperative VAS score were significantly higher in the PD group(P < 0.05). While during the comparison of secondary outcomes, the operative duration, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization duration were significantly longer in the PD group than in the NPD group(P < 0.05).

PD following LA for complicated appendicitis not only increases the incidence wound infection and aggravate patients' postoperative pain, but also prolongs the operative duration, postoperative recovery time and hospitalization duration. Therefore, routine PD after LA for acute complicated appendicitis is not recommended.

Background Appendicectomies are the most frequently performed acute general surgery. The risk of complications depends on several factors, including patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), duration of symptoms, serum inflammatory markers, and the grade of inflammation. Prior research failed to demonstrate a relationship between the rate of complications and the surgeon's level of experience. It is unclear if the assistant's level of experience influences complication rates. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to investigate the relationship between the surgeon's and assistant's position and the rate of complications following appendicectomy. We also explored whether more experienced staff were involved in higher-risk cases and their relationship with resource utilization. Results There was no significant difference in total complication rates based on the surgeon's and assistant's position (p = 0.48 and p = 0.99, respectively). Post-operative bleeding was the only complication that correlated with the assistant's level of experience (p = 0.002). More experienced surgeons performed faster appendicectomies (p =0.002), while the assistant's position had no influence (p = 0.47). There was no statistically significant relationship between the surgeon's and assistant's position, and post-operative length of admission, or risk factors for complications as measured by age, days of abdominal pain, white blood cell count (WCC), C-reactive protein (CRP), ASA, radiographic and intra-operative American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST). Conclusion Experienced surgeons performed faster appendicectomies. There was a trend toward higher rates of post-operative bleeding with less experienced assistants. Otherwise, there was no relationship between the surgeon's experience level and post-appendicectomy complication rates, length of post-operative stay, or patient risk factors for complications.

Acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain is a common presenting symptom in surgical patients, with a wide range of differentials, particularly in premenopausal females. This study explores ultrasound usage in the management of women aged 16-55 years presenting with RIF pain.

A total of 1,082 patients who presented to a tertiary hospital over 12 months were included. Data were collected from patients' electronic records, including initial clinical impression, imaging, management, operative findings, histology and subsequent hospital attendances within 6 weeks and within 6 months.

Following clinical assessment, 607 (56%) of patients underwent an ultrasound. Of these, 280 (25.9%) patients received no radiological imaging on initial presentation, and 252 (42%) had pathology identified on ultrasound. The most common finding was an ovarian cyst, closely followed by unexplained free pelvic fluid. Of the 607 patients scanned, 29 (4.8%) had an ultrasound diagnosis of appendicitis; 254 of 1,082 (23.5%) patients underwent operative management. Of the 254 patients who had surgery, 179 (70.5%) had preoperative imaging. Of the 29 (11.4%) cases where the intraoperative finding was gynaecological, 15 (51.7%) cases had not had any preoperative imaging. The negative appendicectomy rate was 21.3% (45/211). Of the 45 patients who had a histologically normal appendix, 22 (48.9%) had not had any previous imaging. Ultrasound had a specificity of 78% for diagnosing appendicitis.

In patients who underwent operative management, a negative finding or finding not requiring surgical management was associated with no preoperative imaging. This supports the use of ultrasound scans as an adjunct in a multimodal approach to the assessment of women presenting with RIF pain.

Introduction Acute appendicitis can affect patients of any age, although it is uncommon in the extremes of age. Timely diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis can have a significant positive effect on both patient care and the local population's wider health. A variety of different imaging modalities exists to investigate possible appendicitis including ultrasound (US) scan, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, clinicians are at risk of overreliance on radiology alone, rather than clinical history and examination findings, to make a diagnosis. Method A team at a district general hospital (DGH) within the United Kingdom carried out a retrospective, single-centre audit over a three-month period using a general surgical handover list to collate data. The aim of the audit was to assess the value US added when reviewing paediatric patients for suspected appendicitis if biochemical results and clinical findings were within normal parameters. Results Following the exclusion of inappropriate patients, 76 patients were incorporated in the data collection process. Of those patients reviewed, eight (11%) of the population had a positive diagnosis of appendicitis, zero (0%) of which had positive US results. Fifty-three patients (70%) had negative US findings, and 23 patients (30%) did not receive a US at all. Fifty-three patients in whom a US was performed (100%) had a negative US as well as normal inflammatory markers (white cell count, C-reactive protein, and neutrophil). Conclusion US alone is not sufficient to rule out appendicitis and should be used when there is a moderate to high degree of clinical suspicion of appendicitis. US should be used, in conjunction with clinical and biochemical evidence, to help confirm a diagnosis of appendicitis only.

Background: In this retrospective study, we evaluate the diagnostic utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and leucocyte count within the EAES 2015 guidelines for acute appendicitis (AA) in differentiating uncomplicated (UAA) from complicated AA (CAA). Methods: Conducted at a tertiary care center in Germany, the study included 285 patients over 18 years who were diagnosed with AA from January 2019 to December 2021. Patient data included demographics, inflammatory markers, and postoperative outcomes. Results: CRP levels (Md: 60.2 mg/dL vs. 10.5 mg/dL; p < 0.001) and leucocyte count (Md: 14.4 Gpt/L vs. 13.1 Gpt/L; p = 0.016) were higher in CAA. CRP had a medium diagnostic value for detecting CAA (AUC = 0.79), with a cutoff at 44.3 mg/L, making it more likely to develop CAA. Leucocyte count showed low predictive value for CAA (AUC = 0.59). CRP ≥ 44.3 mg/L was associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications (OR: 2.9; p = 0.002) and prolonged hospitalization (OR: 3.5; p < 0.001). Conclusions: CRP, within the context of the EAES classification, presents as a valuable diagnostic marker to distinguish CAA from UAA, with a higher risk of postoperative complications and hospitalization. Leucocyte count showed low diagnostic value for the identification of CAA.

The increased use of remote monitoring and telemedicine support may help alleviate the need for some of the postoperative inpatient hospital care and reduce health care costs, but little is known about current postoperative hospital resource use patterns. We aim to describe hospital resources use patterns in pediatric patients postappendectomy for complicated appendicitis and to evaluate the potential of earlier discharge with remote monitoring.

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database for patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between 2016 and 2021. Health care use/costs (antibiotics, intravenous fluids [proxy for diet], analgesics, laboratory studies, and imaging tests) were determined using administrative billing data. Potentially avoidable days were defined as nondischarge days without codes for intravenous opioid pain medication or intravenous fluids. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used.

In total, 24,165 patients were included: 8,300 patients (34.3%) had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day, totaling 13,970 days or 14.2% of all hospitalization days. Median hospitalization cost was $19,434 [$15,658-$25,157], with accommodation and operating room being the greatest contributors. Public insurance and minority races and ethnicities were associated with greater odds of potentially avoidable days. More than 80% of hospitalized patients had intravenous antibiotics through 10 days postoperatively. More than 20% received opioids daily.

More than one third of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis could have had at least 1 potentially avoidable hospitalization day. Remote monitoring and telemedicine support should be explored and could help with earlier discharge and lower costs.

Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain necessitating surgical intervention. While the traditional treatment has been urgent appendectomy, recent studies suggest that an antibiotics-first approach can be safe for uncomplicated cases. Classifying appendicitis into uncomplicated and complicated categories is crucial for guiding treatment decisions and predicting patient outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the distinct imaging findings associated with uncomplicated appendicitis and its complicated subtypes-phlegmonous, gangrenous, and perforated appendicitis-to aid in differential diagnosis.

This retrospective observational study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2023 and included 1,250 patients (492 women, 758 men) who underwent an appendectomy with available pathology results. After excluding 56 patients with normal pathology, 52 with non-appendicitis pathologies, and 48 with inaccessible computed tomography (CT) images, 1,094 patients were analyzed. CT images were evaluated for appendiceal diameter, wall thickness, cecal wall thickness, periappendiceal fat stranding, effusion, lymphadenopathy, intraluminal and free periappendiceal air, mucosal hyperenhancement, and the presence of appendicolith.

The diameter of the appendix, along with the presence of periappendiceal air, effusion, and intraluminal appendicolith, were significantly higher in the perforated appendicitis group compared to other groups (p<0.05). Periappendiceal fat stranding, evaluated as a binary variable, did not show significant differences among the groups. Appendiceal wall thickness was higher in the perforated group and lower in the non-perforated gangrenous group compared to the uncomplicated group (p<0.05). No significant correlation was found for mucosal hyperenhancement between the appendicitis subgroups. Intraluminal air, though normal in a healthy appendix, was a specific predictor of complicated appendicitis when combined with other findings.

This study provides a detailed analysis of distinct imaging findings associated with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Key differentiators such as appendiceal diameter, periappendiceal air, effusion, and intraluminal appendicolith are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The findings highlight the importance of these parameters in distinguishing various types of appendicitis, offering valuable insights for clinical practice. Future prospective studies and advanced imaging techniques are needed to validate these findings and enhance the diagnosis and management of acute appendicitis and its complications.

Appendicitis is the most prevalent surgical emergency. The negative appendicectomy rate and diagnostic uncertainty are important concerns. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current appendicitis risk prediction models in patients with acute right iliac fossa pain.

A nationwide prospective observational study was conducted, including all consecutive adult patients who presented with right iliac fossa pain. Diagnostic, clinical and negative appendicectomy rate data were recorded. The Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Adult Appendicitis Score systems were calculated with collected data to classify patients into risk categories. Diagnostic value and categorization performance were evaluated, with use of risk category-based metrics including 'true positive rate' (percentage of appendicitis patients in the highest risk category), 'failure rate' (percentage of patients with appendicitis in the lowest risk category) and 'categorization resolution' (true positive rate/failure rate).

A total of 3358 patients from 84 centres were included. Female patients were less likely to undergo surgery than men (71.5% versus 82.5% respectively; relative risk 0.866, 95% c.i. 0.834 to 0.901, P < 0.001); with a three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate (11.3% versus 4.1% respectively; relative risk 2.744, 95% c.i. 2.047 to 3.677, P < 0.001). Ultrasonography was utilized in 56.8% and computed tomography in 75.2% of all patients. The Adult Appendicitis Score had the best diagnostic performance for the whole population; however, only RIPASA was significant in men. All scoring systems were successful in females patients, but Adult Appendicitis Score had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value. The RIPASA and the Adult Appendicitis Score had the best categorization resolution values, complemented by their exceedingly low failure rates in both male and female patients. Alvarado and AIR had extremely high failure rates in men.

The negative appendicectomy rate was low overall, but women had an almost three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate despite lower likelihood to undergo surgery. The overuse of imaging tests, best exemplified by the 75.2% frequency of patients undergoing computed tomography, may lead to increased costs. Risk-scoring systems such as RIPASA and Adult Appendicitis Score appear to be superior to Alvarado and AIR.

Laparoscopic surgery is widely used in abdominal emergency surgery (AES), and the possibility of extending this approach to the more recent robotic surgery (RS) arouses great interest. The slow diffusion of robotic technology mainly due to high costs and the longer RS operative time when compared to laparoscopy may represent disincentives, especially in AES. This study aims to report our experience in the use of RS in AES assessing its safety and feasibility, with particular focus on intra- and post-operative complications, conversion rate, and surgical learning curve. Our data were also compared to other experiences though an extensive literature review.

We retrospectively analysed a single surgeon series of the last 10 years. From January 2014 to December 2023, 36 patients underwent urgent or emergency RS. The robotic devices used were Da Vinci Si (15 cases) and Xi (21 cases).

36 (4.3%) out of 834 robotic procedures were included in our analysis: 20 (56.56%) females. The mean age was 63 years and 30% of patients were ≥ 70 years. 2 (5.55%) procedures were performed at night. No conversions to open were reported in this series. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, 2 (5.5%) major complications were collected. Intraoperative and 30-day mortality were 0%.

Our study demonstrates that RS may be a useful and reliable approach also to AES and intraoperative laparoscopic complications when performed in selected hemodynamically stable patients in very well-trained robotic centers. The technology may increase the minimally invasive use and conversion rate in emergent settings in a completely robotic or hybrid approach.

This study aimed to assess the impact of peritoneal drainage and its type on prognosis, encompassing postoperative recovery and complications, in pediatric patients (≤ 16 years old) following appendectomy based on the grade of appendicitis.

In this retrospective study, we analyzed pediatric patients (≤ 16 years old) with appendicitis who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our center from January 2017 to January 2024 and classified them into grade I-V based on the grade of appendicitis, with V representing the most serious cases. The patients were grouped according to drainage status and type. The main clinical outcomes included postoperative rehabilitation indexes such as time to resume a soft diet, time to remove the drain, duration of postoperative antibiotic use and length of hospitalization (LOH), as well as postoperative complications including intra-abdominal abscess (IAA), ileus and wound infection (WI), and readmission within 30 days after surgery.

A total of 385 pediatric patients with appendicitis were included in the study and divided into No-drainage (ND) group (n = 74), Passive drainage (PD) group (n = 246) and Active drainage (AD) group (n = 65) according to drainage status and type. Compared to the other two groups, the ND group had a significantly shorter time to resume a soft diet, duration of postoperative antibiotic use and LOH, and these differences were statistically significant. Similar findings were observed in grade I patients too (P < 0.05). In all cases examined here, the AD group had a significantly shorter time for drain removal compared to the PD group (3.04 [1-12] vs 2.74 [1-15], P = 0.049); this difference was also evident among grade I patients (2.80 [1-6] vs 2.47 [1-9], P = 0.019). Furthermore, within the same grade, only in grade IV did the AD group exhibit a shorter duration of postoperative antibiotic use compared to the PD group (4.75 [4-5] vs 8.33 [5-15], P = 0.009). Additionally, the LOH in the AD group was longer than that in the PD group (8.00 [4-13] vs 4.75 [4-5], P = 0.025). Among all cases, the ND group exhibited significantly lower incidences of overall complications and WI compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). Additionally, the incidence of IAA in the ND group was significantly lower than that in the PD group (0% vs 5.3%, P = 0.008 < 0.0167). Furthermore, although there were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of overall complications, IAA, ileus, and WI between the PD and AD groups during grade ≥ II analysis (P > 0.05), a higher readmission rate within 30 days was observed in the PD group compared to the AD group; however, these differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, multivariate analysis revealed that a higher grade of appendicitis was associated with an increased risk of overall complications and IAA as well as a longer duration of postoperative antibiotic use and LOH.

The appendicitis grade is a crucial indicator for predicting postoperative IAA and LOH. In patients with grade I appendicitis, peritoneal drainage, even if active drainage, is not recommended; For patients with grade ≥ II appendicitis, active drainage may be more effective than passive drainage in reducing the duration of postoperative antibiotic use and LOH.

Acute appendicitis is a global disease with high incidence. The main objective was to assess the association between time from admission to surgery (TAS) and surgery during emergency hours with operative outcome in light of conflicting evidence.

This is a retrospective population-wide analysis of hospital billing data (2010-2021) of all adult patient records of surgically treated cases of acute appendicitis in Germany by TAS. The primary outcome was a composite clinical endpoint (CCE; prolonged length of stay, surgical site infection, interventional draining after surgery, revision surgery, ICU admission and/or in-hospital mortality). Cases of complicated appendicitis were identified using diagnosis (ICD-10) and procedural codes (resection beyond appendectomy).

855 694 patient records were included, of which 27·6% (236,481) were complicated cases of acute appendicitis. 49·0% (418,821) were females and median age was 37 (interquartile range 22·5-51·5). Age, male sex, and comorbidity were associated with an increased proportion of CCE and in-hospital mortality. TAS was associated with a clinically relevant increase of CCE after 12 h in complicated appendicitis [Odd's ratio (OR), 1·19, 95% CI: 1·14-1·21] and after 24 h in uncomplicated appendicitis (OR 1·10, 95% CI: 1·02-1·19). Beyond the primary endpoint, the proportion of complicated appendicitis increased after TAS of 72 h. Surgery during emergency hours (6 pm-6.59 am) was associated with an increase of CCE and mortality (OR between 1·14 and 1·49). Age, female sex, night-time admission, weekend admission, a known previous surgery, obesity, and therapeutic anticoagulation were associated with delayed performance of surgery.

This work found an increase of a CCE after TAS of 12 h for complicated appendicitis and an increase of the CCE after TAS of 24 h for uncomplicated appendicitis with a stable proportion of complicated appendicitis in these time windows. Both CCE and mortality were increased if appendectomy was performed during emergency hours.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have demonstrated superior outcomes across various elective procedures. Laparoscopic surgery (LS) is established in general surgery with laparoscopic operations for acute appendicitis and cholecystitis being the standard of care. Robotic surgery (RS) has been associated with equivalent or improved postoperative outcomes compared with LS. This increasing uptake of RS in emergency general surgery has encouraged the adoption of robotic acute care programs across the world. The key elements required to build a sustainable RS program are an enthusiastic surgical team, intensive training, resources and marketing. This review is a comprehensive layout elaborating the step-by-step process that has helped our high-volume level I trauma center in establishing a successful robotic acute care surgery program.

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the predominant condition responsible for acute abdominal pain across all age demographics. The purpose of this research is to determine if the hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) and modified HALP (m-HALP) scores differ between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in patients diagnosed with AA who have applied to the emergency department (ED). Additionally, this study aims to investigate whether HALP and m-HALP scores are superior to other biomarkers.

The retrospective analysis included adult patients, aged eighteen or older, who were diagnosed with AA, and sought treatment at the ED of a tertiary hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: complicated appendicitis (CA) and uncomplicated appendicitis (UCA). The cut-off in diagnostic value measurements was determined using the receiver operating characteristic analysis.

A total of 436 patients (CA: 126, UCA: 310) were included. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), neutrophil-to-albumin ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV) were found to have acceptable diagnostic power in CA detection (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.735-0.783). In detecting UCA, HALP and m-HALP were of fair diagnostic power (AUC: 0.64, 0.68, respectively).

In this study, we found that although PIV, SIRI, SII, and NLR had acceptable diagnostic values in distinguishing CA and UCA, HALP and m-HALP had fair diagnostic values.

Acute appendicitis is a complex diagnosis that often requires both clinical and radiological evaluation. Significant variations in diagnostic approaches are evident among clinicians and healthcare institutions. While certain guidelines advocate for risk stratification based on clinical characteristics, others emphasize the importance of pre-operative imaging. This study seeks to explore the accuracy of the Alvarado Score and abdominal ultrasound (AUS) in diagnosing acute appendicitis.

Suspected cases of appendicitis admitted to Al-Thora Hospital in Ibb, Yemen, from Jan 2021 to July 2022 were evaluated. The demographics, clinical, and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. This study assessed Alvarado scores (calculated based on clinical evaluation and laboratory data) and pre-operative AUS findings, correlating them with post-operative and histopathology findings. The Alvarado scores and AUS sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed using the ROC curve.

Out of 1021 cases of acute abdomen, 171 patients were suspected of appendicitis. Using AUS along with the Alvarado score, appendicitis was presumed in 137 patients who underwent appendectomy. 130 (94.9%) patients had positive intraoperative and histopathology findings while 7 (5.1%) had negative findings. The Alvarado Score had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.62% and 87.80% at cutoffs of 6, respectively [Area under the curve (AUC): 0.985; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.954 to 0.998; p < 0.0001]. Abdominal US showed a sensitivity of 98.46% and specificity of 82.93% (AUC:0.907; 95% CI, 0.853 to 0.946; p < 0.0001).

Alvarado's score and AUS exhibited high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing acute appendicitis. The substantial accuracy and efficacy of both the Alvarado score and AUS support their utilization as primary investigative tools in resource-limited settings. This approach can help avoid unnecessary appendectomies and minimize the financial burden on patients.

Introduction Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common surgical emergency in developed countries, whose incidence peaks in the second and third decades. The risk of mortality in uncomplicated AA is very low. There are many scoring systems to predict AA. Prediction scores are used less frequently to predict complicated AA. Rural hospitals are often constrained by a lack of round-the-clock imaging or special laboratory services, which may enable accurate diagnosis. Materials and methods This study aimed to determine whether prediction scores without imaging or C-reactive protein (CRP) levels could predict complicated AA in a rural setting. All cases of AA for the previous 13 months were recruited for the study. Demographic data, clinical signs and symptoms, complete blood counts, intraoperative findings, and the corresponding histopathological results were collated. The scoring systems (Alvarado, RIPASA, Tzanakis, and Ohmann) were calculated from the clinical and laboratory data. Demographic variables, clinical features, and histopathological findings are described as frequencies/proportions. Chi-squared and Student's t-tests were used to analyze differences between patients with complicated and uncomplicated AA. A receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) and determine whether appendicitis scores could predict complicated AA. Results There were 76 patients with a mean age of 29.1±13.0 years. Serositis was observed in 65% of the patients; mucosal ulceration was the most common microscopic finding, with a pathological diagnosis of AA in 58 (76.3%) patients. Rovsing's sign and the presence of phlegmon and granuloma were significantly different between those with and without complicated AA. The clinical prediction scores were not significantly different between the two groups. The Tzanakis and Ohmann scores were significant (cutoff: 6.5 and 7.25, p=0.001 and 0.01, respectively) in diagnosing AA (sensitivity/specificity of 98.3/66.7 and 98.3/94.4, respectively). With a cutoff of 5.75, the RIPASA score, with an AUC of 0.663 (p=0.09), showed the highest sensitivity (90.7) and specificity (76.6) for diagnosing complicated AA. Conclusion Diagnosing AA based solely on clinical presentation remains a challenge. This study showed that clinical scores such as those of Alvarado, RIPASA, Tzanakis, and Ohmann could not accurately predict complicated AA. Scoring systems without imaging and intraoperative diagnoses are not infallible; therefore, histopathological examination of the resected appendix is mandatory.

Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common emergency general surgical condition worldwide. Diagnosis is challenging and incorporates clinical, biochemical and radiological investigations. Our aim was to provide data from routine practice investigating widely utilised diagnostic methods from a single centre within the United Kingdom.

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendicectomy for AA between April 2022 and March 2023. AA was defined as the presence of transmural polymorphonuclear leukocytes in histology. Subgroup analysis was performed on paediatric patients. Factors associated with AA were investigated, and the diagnostic utility of biochemical and radiological investigations was examined.

A total of 330 appendicectomies were analysed. We found an overall negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) of 38% and 48% in paediatric patients. Independent factors associated with AA on the multivariate analysis included elevated neutrophil counts (>7 × 109/L) (OR 4.04), elevated CRP (>5 mg/L) (OR 3.04) and a radiological diagnosis (OR 8.0). Computerised tomography (CT) and ultrasound had sensitivity/specificity of 98%/47% and 35%/86%, respectively. The positive-predictive values were 85% for CT and 50% for ultrasound, and the negative-predictive values were 86% for CT and 77% for ultrasound.

Our study has highlighted the importance of utilising a combination of factors to improve the diagnostic certainty of AA. However, our routine practice data have shown different sensitivities and specificities of imaging in comparison to existing literature, resulting in a high NAR. Further real-world data are needed to understand whether these differences from the existing data are seen in other clinical settings.

Acute appendicitis is a common abdominal emergency observed in emergency departments (ED). Distinguishing between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is important in determining a treatment strategy. Serum soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) is an inflammatory biomarker. We aimed to determine the role of VCAM-1 in predicting complicated appendicitis in children.

Pediatric patients with suspected appendicitis admitted to the ED were enrolled in this prospective study. Pre-surgical serum VCAM-1 was tested in children with acute appendicitis within 72 h of symptoms (from day 1 to day 3). Serum VCAM-1 levels were further analyzed and compared between patients with and without complicated appendicitis.

Among the 226 pediatric appendicitis patients, 70 had uncomplicated appendicitis, 138 had complicated appendicitis, and 18 had normal appendices. The mean serum VCAM-1 levels in patients with perforated appendicitis were higher than in those with simple appendicitis (p < 0.001). On day 1 to day 3, the mean VCAM-1 levels in patients with complicated appendicitis were all significantly higher than in those with uncomplicated appendicitis (all p < 0.001).

Serum VCAM-1 levels may be helpful in differentiating uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in children and could predict appendiceal perforation.

Appendicectomy remains the standard treatment for appendicitis. There is a lack of clarity on the timeframe in which surgery should be performed to avoid unfavourable outcomes.

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the impact the (1)time-of-day surgery is performed (2), time elapsed from symptom onset to hospital presentation (patient time) (3), time elapsed from hospital presentation to surgery (hospital time), and (4)time elapsed from symptom onset to surgery (total time) have on appendicectomy outcomes.

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The time-of-day which surgery was done was divided into day, evening and night. The other groups were divided into < 24 h, 24-48 h and > 48 h. The rate of complicated appendicitis, operative time, perforation, post-operative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), length of stay (LOS), readmission and mortality rates were analysed.

Sixteen studies were included with a total of 232,678 patients. The time of day at which surgery was performed had no impact on outcomes. The incidence of complicated appendicitis, post-operative complications and LOS were significantly better when the hospital time and total time were < 24 h. Readmission and mortality rates were significantly better when the hospital time was < 48 h. SSI, operative time, and the rate of perforation were comparable in all groups.

Appendicectomy within 24 h of hospital admission is associated with improved outcomes compared to patients having surgery 24-48 and > 48 h after admission. The time-of-day which surgery is performed does not impact outcomes.

Objectives-The objective was to compare the effectiveness of observation in standard-of-care computed tomography (CT) in adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis (AA). Methods-Patients with clinically suspected AA and inconclusive diagnosis after primary clinical examination, laboratory examination, and transabdominal ultrasound (TUS) were eligible for the study, and they were randomized (1:1) to parallel groups: observation-group patients were observed for 8-12 h and then, repeated clinical and laboratory examinations and TUS were performed; CT group (control group) patients underwent abdominopelvic CT scan. The study utilized Statistical Analysis System 9.2 for data analysis, including tests, logistic regression, ROC analysis, and significance evaluation. Patients were enrolled in the study at Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos in Lithuania between December 2018 and June 2021. Results-A total of 160 patients (59 men, 101 women), with a mean age of 33.7 ± 14.71, were included, with 80 patients in each group. Observation resulted in a reduced likelihood of a CT scan compared with the CT group (36.3% vs. 100% p < 0.05). One diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in the observation group; there were no cases of negative appendectomy (NA) in the CT group. Both conditional CT and observation pathways resulted in high sensitivity and specificity (97.7% and 94.6% vs. 96.7% and 95.8%). Conclusions-Observation including the repeated evaluation of laboratory results and TUS significantly reduces the number of CT scans without increasing NA numbers or the number of complicated cases.

Appendicitis is an extremely common disease with a variety of medical and surgical treatment approaches. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinicians and patients in decisions regarding the diagnosis and treatment of appendicitis.

A systematic review was conducted from 2010 to 2022 to answer 8 key questions relating to the diagnosis of appendicitis, operative or nonoperative management, and specific technical and post-operative issues for appendectomy. The results of this systematic review were then presented to a panel of adult and pediatric surgeons. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts.

Conditional recommendations were made in favor of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis being managed operatively, either delayed (>12h) or immediate operation (<12h), either suction and lavage or suction alone, no routine drain placement, treatment with short-term antibiotics postoperatively for complicated appendicitis, and complicated appendicitis previously treated nonoperatively undergoing interval appendectomy. A conditional recommendation signals that the benefits of adhering to a recommendation probably outweigh the harms although it does also indicate uncertainty.

These recommendations should provide guidance with regard to current controversies in appendicitis. The panel also highlighted future research opportunities where the evidence base can be strengthened.

Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7-8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the best treatment approach depends on patient characteristics. Non-operative management (NOM), which involves the utilization of antibiotics and aggressive intravenous hydration, and surgical appendectomy are valid treatment options for healthy adults. NOM is also ideal for poor surgical candidates. Another important consideration is the timing of surgery, i.e., the role of interval appendectomy (IA) and the possibility of delaying surgery for a few hours on index admission. IA refers to surgical removal of the appendix 8-12 weeks after the initial diagnosis of appendicitis. It is ideal in patients with a contained appendiceal perforation on initial presentation, wherein an initial nonoperative approach is preferred. Furthermore, IA can help distinguish malignant and non-malignant causes of acute appendicitis, while reducing the risk of recurrence. On the contrary, a decision to delay appendectomy for a few hours on index admission should be made based on the patients' baseline health status and severity of appendicitis. Post-operatively, surgical drain placement may help reduce postoperative complications; however, it carries an increased risk of drain occlusion, fistula formation, and paralytic ileus. Furthermore, one of the most critical aspects of appendectomy is the closure of the appendiceal stump, which can be achieved with the help of endoclips, sutures, staples, and endoloops. In this review, we discuss different aspects of management of acute appendicitis, current controversies in management, and the potential role of endoscopic appendectomy as a future treatment option.

Background: Many scoring systems, algorithms, and guidelines have been developed to aid in the evaluation and diagnosis of acute appendicitis (AA). Many of these algorithms advocate against the routine use of radiological investigations when there is a high clinical suspicion of AA. However, there has been a significant rise in the use of imaging techniques for diagnosing AA in the past two decades. This is a national study aimed at assessing the adherence of residents assigned to the emergency department to the clinical guidelines for diagnosing AA. Methods: We introduced a case study of a male patient with highly suspicious clinical findings of AA to all surgical and emergency medicine residents assigned to the emergency department with the autonomy to make critical decisions to determine the preferred way of diagnosing AA. Results: A total of 62.4% of all relevant residents participated in this survey; 69.6% reported that the Alvarado score was eight or higher, and 82.1% estimated that the next step recommended by most clinical guidelines was appendectomy without further abdominal imaging tests. However, 83.4% chose to perform an imaging test to establish the diagnosis of AA. Conclusions: Our study revealed a notable non-adherence to clinical guidelines in diagnosing AA. Given the significance of these guidelines, we assert that adopting medical recommendations should not solely depend on individual education but should also be incorporated as a departmental policy.

Although robotic surgery has become an established approach for a wide range of elective operations, data on its utility and outcomes are limited in the setting of emergency general surgery.

To describe temporal trends in the use of laparoscopic and robotic approaches and compare outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for 4 common emergent surgical procedures.

A retrospective cohort study of an all-payer discharge database of 829 US facilities was conducted from calendar years 2013 to 2021. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to November 2023. A total of 1 067 263 emergent or urgent cholecystectomies (n = 793 800), colectomies (n = 89 098), inguinal hernia repairs (n = 65 039), and ventral hernia repairs (n = 119 326) in patients aged 18 years or older were included.

Surgical approach (robotic, laparoscopic, or open) to emergent or urgent cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, or ventral hernia repair.

The primary outcome was the temporal trend in use of each operative approach (laparoscopic, robotic, or open). Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery and length of stay (both total and postoperative). Temporal trends were measured using linear regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare secondary outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery groups.

During the study period, the use of robotic surgery increased significantly year-over-year for all procedures: 0.7% for cholecystectomy, 0.9% for colectomy, 1.9% for inguinal hernia repair, and 1.1% for ventral hernia repair. There was a corresponding decrease in the open surgical approach for all cases. Compared with laparoscopy, robotic surgery was associated with a significantly lower risk of conversion to open surgery: cholecystectomy, 1.7% vs 3.0% (odds ratio [OR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.49-0.62]); colectomy, 11.2% vs 25.5% (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.32-0.42]); inguinal hernia repair, 2.4% vs 10.7% (OR, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.16-0.26]); and ventral hernia repair, 3.5% vs 10.9% (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.25-0.36]). Robotic surgery was associated with shorter postoperative lengths of stay for colectomy (-0.48 [95% CI, -0.60 to -0.35] days), inguinal hernia repair (-0.20 [95% CI, -0.30 to -0.10] days), and ventral hernia repair (-0.16 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.06] days).

While robotic surgery is still not broadly used for emergency general surgery, the findings of this study suggest it is becoming more prevalent and may be associated with better outcomes as measured by reduced conversion to open surgery and decreased length of stay.

Appendicitis, characterized by inflammation of the vermiform appendix, is a common abdominal emergency necessitating appendectomy. Recent evidence suggests a potential link between appendicitis and subsequent diverticular disease, yet population-based studies investigating this association are limited.

Utilizing the Disease Analyzer database encompassing data from over 1000 primary care practices in Germany, we conducted a retrospective cohort study. We included 25,379 adults diagnosed with appendicitis and an equal number of matched controls without appendicitis. The incidence of diverticular disease over a 10-year follow-up period was compared between the two cohorts. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the association between appendicitis and diverticular disease, adjusting for potential confounders.

Our findings revealed a significant association between appendicitis and subsequent diverticular disease (HR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.57-1.97), with an increased risk observed across all age groups. Notably, this association was stronger in men (HR: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.68-2.37) than in women (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.36-1.84). The cumulative 10-year incidence of diverticular disease was higher in patients with appendicitis (6.5%) compared to those without (3.6%). Additionally, we observed a clear age-dependent increase in the incidence of diverticular disease.

This large-scale population-based study provides valuable insights into the interaction between appendicitis and diverticular disease. The study underscores the need for further research elucidating the underlying mechanisms linking appendicitis to diverticular disease. Probiotics emerge as a potential therapeutic avenue warranting exploration in the management of both conditions. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, highlighting the importance of considering appendicitis as a potential risk factor for diverticular disease, particularly in men. Further investigation is warranted to validate these findings and explore potential therapeutic interventions targeting the shared pathophysiological pathways underlying both conditions.