High-biliary injuries are associated with worse outcomes. Most series do not mention failure rates specific to the injury grade. In our experience, Strasberg E4 injuries are associated with a higher failure rate. This study shares our experience with the surgical management of postcholecystectomy Strasberg E4 injuries.

Patient demographics, radiological findings, operative details, and postoperative complications were collected for patients with Strasberg E4 injury from October 2003 to December 2020. Between 2003 and 2010, the preferred operation was Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). In cases of right lobe atrophy or an isolated right hepatic duct injury, a primary hepatic resection was considered. From 2010 onward, Strasberg E4 injuries were considered for a right hepatectomy with the left duct HJ. Patients were followed up at six monthly intervals with liver function tests and abdominal ultrasound.

Sixteen patients had Strasberg E4 injuries, thirteen presented with an external biliary fistula and three presented with obstructive jaundice. Nine of the ten patients who underwent HJ before 2010 developed cholangitis at a median follow-up of 14 months (2-28 months). Five of these subsequently underwent a hepatectomy, one underwent a liver transplant, and the other three underwent radiological dilatation of their anastomoses. From 2010 onward, six patients underwent an upfront right hepatectomy with left duct anastomosis. At a median follow-up of 40 months (10-74 months), 3 patients had minor derangement of liver enzymes, and none required an endoscopic or radiological intervention.

HJ in E4 injuries often produces poor long-term results. An upfront right hepatectomy with left duct anastomosis might be considered.

Bile duct injury (BDI) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a dreaded complication. Artificial intelligence (AI) has recently been introduced in surgery. This systematic review aims to investigate whether AI can guide surgeons in identifying anatomical structures to facilitate safer dissection during LC.

Following PROSPERO registration CRD-42023478754, a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant systematic search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and Web of Science databases was conducted.

Out of 2304 articles identified, twenty-five were included in the analysis. The mean average precision for biliary structures detection reported in the included studies reaches 98%. The mean intersection over union ranges from 0.5 to 0.7, and the mean Dice/F1 spatial correlation index was greater than 0.7/1. AI system provided a change in the annotations in 27% of the cases, and 70% of these shifts were considered safer changes. The contribution to preventing BDI was reported at 3.65/4.

Although studies on the use of AI during LC are few and very heterogeneous, AI has the potential to identify anatomical structures, thereby guiding surgeons towards safer LC procedures.

This study aimed to bibliometrically examine nursing publications regarding cholecystectomy surgery.

The study is a bibliometric analysis.

The study was conducted in the Web of Science database. The keywords "cholecystectomy AND nursing" were used during the scanning. The data were evaluated in quantitative aspects.

In the study, 481 publications were identified, publications were made between 1987 and 2023, the average number of years since the release of the publication was 10.2, and the annual increase rate was 8.19%. The most active country was the United States, and the journal most often published in was the "Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing." In the last 3 years, the themes of "meta-analysis, complication, pain, anxiety, quality of life" have been trending, the most working and continuing to develop our "laparoscopic cholecystectomy" and "pain" themes, and the leading theme in the field was "anxiety".

This study is the first bibliometric study examining nursing studies on cholecystectomy and provides a comprehensive overview of cholecystectomy and nursing issues over 36 years. In quantitative data, it was concluded that although studies in this field have a long history, the number of publications is low, and the annual growth rate is low. According to the quantitative evaluation results, it was found that the most studied topic in this field was laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pain, minimally invasive intervention and perioperative period topics remained isolated, and computerized tomography and gallbladder themes were among the newly emerging themes.

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is a rapidly evolving field, requiring comprehensive training for widespread adoption. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of RAS cholecystectomy training in improving the technical skills and confidence of novice surgeons. Furthermore, the study examined the transferability of RAS skills to laparoscopic skills, the role of RAS cholecystectomies in reducing errors and improving patient outcomes, and identified factors that predict a successful transition from traditional laparoscopic surgery to RAS surgery. The RAST curriculum includes multimodal learning content delivered through a cloud-based platform, with three steps: basic training, simulation exercises, and structured on-patient training in the operating room. One general surgeon was trained on the Intuitive Surgical da Vinci system and assisted in performing 10 da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomies. In the first 300 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy, there were no major complications, conversions to laparoscopy, or open surgeries. The RAST curriculum demonstrates feasibility in providing a comprehensive and effective RAS training experience for surgical residents, reducing the need for extensive travel and high costs. The RAST curriculum is a promising solution for training surgical residents in RAS, with potential for widespread adoption and scalability.

Postcholecystectomy bile duct injury (BDI) remains a devastating iatrogenic complication that adversely impacts the quality of life with high healthcare costs. Despite a decrease in the incidence of laparoscopic cholecystectomy-related BDI, the absolute number remains high as cholecystectomy is a commonly performed surgical procedure. Open Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with meticulous surgical technique remains the gold standard surgical procedure with excellent long-term results in most patients. As with many hepatobiliary disorders, a minimally invasive approach has been recently explored to minimize access-related complications and improve postoperative recovery. Since patients with gallstone disease are often admitted for a minimally invasive cholecystectomy, laparoscopic and robotic approaches for repairing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture are attractive. While recent series have shown the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive post-cholecystectomy biliary stricture management, most are retrospective analyses with small sample sizes. Also, long-term follow-up is available only in a limited number of studies. The principles and technique of minimally invasive repair resemble open repair except for the extent of adhesiolysis and the suturing technique with continuous sutures commonly used in minimally invasive approaches. The robotic approach overcomes key limitations of laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to become the preferred minimally invasive approach for the repair of postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. Despite increasing use, lack of prospective studies and selection bias with available evidence precludes definitive conclusions regarding minimally invasive surgery for managing postcholecystectomy biliary stricture. High-volume prospective studies are required to confirm the initial promising outcomes with minimally invasive surgery.

Iatrogenic bile duct injury remains the most severe complication of gallbladder surgeries. To reduce post-operation complication, we introduce an improved approach for bile duct injury repairment, named transhepatic percutaneous cholangial drainage (TPCD) which combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis. Clinical data obtained from 12 patients between February 2012 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographic, clinical, operative, and follow-up data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. All injuries were repaired successfully and no fatal cases occurred. The mean operative time and hospital stay duration were 367.5 ± 103.2 min and 11.3 ± 3.5 days, respectively. In two cases (16.7%), bile leakage occurred at the bile duct anastomosis site. Three patients (25.0%) developed low-grade fever and one patient (8.3%) developed a postoperative infection of the incision site. No postoperative bleeding or bile duct strictures occurred in any of the cases. The patients were followed up from 12 to 122 months (median, 70.5 months). No cholangitis or bile duct restenosis was observed after biliary drainage tube removal. There were no long-term bile duct-related complications seen in the follow-up time. It is safe and feasible for TPCD combined with end-to-end biliary anastomosis using in bile duct injury.

There are few studies on simulation training in laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis. There is also a lack of mature and reliable training models for bilioenteric anastomosis. In this study, we aimed to assess a feasible training model for bilioenteric anastomosis. Surgeons can improve their surgical ability by performing laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis on this model through repeated training.

The original articles related to simulation training in surgical anastomosis were identified from January 2000 to November 2021 in the Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection database. We conducted a bibliometric analysis based on the country of these publications and the type of anastomosis. A 3D-printed bilioenteric anastomosis model was applied in this study. Baseline data of 15 surgeons (5 surgeons of Attendings, 5 surgeons of Fellows, and 5 surgeons of Residents) were collected. The bilioenteric anastomosis data, including the operation time and operation score, were recorded and analyzed. A study of the learning curve was also performed for further assessment.

Surgeons at different levels of experience exhibited different levels of performance in conducting laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis on this model. Experienced surgeons completed their first training session in a shorter time and obtained a higher surgical score. In turn, repeated training significantly shortened the time of laparoscopic bilioenteric anastomosis for each trainer and improved the surgical score. Surgeons with different levels of experience needed different numbers of cases to reach the stable period of the learning curve. Experienced surgeons were able to reach a proficient level through fewer training cases.

A suitable biliary-enteric anastomosis model can help surgeons conduct simulation training and provide experience and skill accumulation for future real operations. Our training model performed well in this study and can effectively accomplish this goal.

Major bile duct injuries (BDIs) may require complex surgical repairs that are usually performed with a conventional open approach. This study aims to analyze current evidence concerning the safety and the outcomes of the minimally invasive (MI) approach for biliary anastomosis in post-cholecystectomy BDIs. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web-Of-Science indexed studies involving MI (laparoscopic or robotic) biliary anastomosis in patients with iatrogenic BDIs was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. A total of 13 studies involving 198 patients were included. One hundred and twenty-five patients (63.1%) underwent a laparoscopic biliary anastomosis, while 73 (36.1%) received an analogue robotic procedure. All the included BDIs were types D and E (E1-E5). The mean OT varied between 190 and 330 (mean = 227) minutes. Ten studies reported the mean intraoperative blood loss that ranged between 50 and 252 (mean = 135.9) mL. No conversions occurred in the robotic series, while four patients required conversion to open surgery among the laparoscopic ones. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.3 days. The reported overall morbidity was similar among the robotic and laparoscopic series. During the follow-up period, no surgery-related mortality occurred. A growing number of referral centers are showing the safety and feasibility of the MI approach for biliary anastomosis in patients with major BDIs. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions.

Common bile duct injury is a severe complication. It is related to increased rates of morbidity and mortality. Early recognition and on-time diagnosis plus multidisciplinary management of this disease led by a hepatobiliary surgeon show fewer complications rate and best postoperative outcomes. However, no guidelines exist about the proper time of reconstruction. This study aims to describe the experience of a specialized Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary (HPB) group and to analyze the outcomes regarding the time of bile duct injury (BDI) repair. A multicenter retrospective review of a prospective database was conducted. All the patients older than 18 years old that underwent common bile duct reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2021 were included. Analysis and description of preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were performed. A reconstruction time-based group differentiation was made and analyzed. 44 patients underwent common bile duct reconstruction between January 2014 and December 2021. 56.82% of the patients were female. The mean age was 53.27 years ± 20.7 years. The most common injury was type E2 (29.55%). Hepaticojejunostomy was performed in 81.81% (of the patients. Delayed reconstruction (> 72 h) was performed in the majority of the cases (75.00%) due to delays in the referral centers or poor condition. No statistically significant difference regarding complications in early or delayed BDI reconstruction. The mortality rate was 2.7% (n = 1). 2-year follow-up bilioenteric stenosis was observed in 7 patients. Biloma showed a statistical relationship with complex bile duct injuries (p = 0.02). Bile duct injury is a severe and complex postoperative complication that increases morbidity and mortality rates in the short and long term in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. In our study, there were no statistical differences between the timing of bile duct reconstruction and the postoperative outcomes; we identified the presence of biloma as a statistically related factor associated with complex bile duct injury; however, further prospective or studies with an increased sample size are required to prove our results.

Biliodigestive leaks are typically caused by an insufficiency at the surgical anastomosis. Biliodigestive anastomosis (BDA) insufficiencies can lead to bilomas, abscesses and vascular erosion in chronic conditions.

We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical and radiological records of all patients with biliodigestive insufficiency who received interventional treatment between July 2015 and February 2021. Nine patients (three with unilateral drainage and six with bilateral drainage) were treated with a modified percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). Clinical success was considered after complete resolution of the peribiliary collections, absence of bile within the surgical drains, radiological patency of the BDA (contrast medium flowing properly through the BDA and no signs of leakage) and haemodynamic stability of the patient without signs of sepsis.

Clinical success was achieved in all nine patients. No patients required revision surgery to repair their BDA. The mean indwelling drainage time was 34.8±16.5 days. The mean number of interventional procedures performed per patient was 6.6±2.0.

Patients who present with BDA insufficiency may benefit from interventional radiological techniques. Our modified PTCD resolved the BDA leak in all nine cases and should be considered as a valuable option for the treatment of patients with this complication. Our technique demonstrated to be feasible and effective.

Major hepatectomy is still regarded as a technically demanding procedure for which minimally invasive surgery remains limited to selected cases in experienced centres and robotic platforms may provide some advantages over conventional laparoscopy in this setting. We aimed to combine and meta-analyse the available literature upon this topic.

The PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were appraised to find all available studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic major hepatectomies. According to a pre-established pattern preoperative settings, operative and postoperative outcomes were assessed. The meta-analysis was performed by using the Revman 5.3 software.

A total of 485 patients from eight studies were included in the analysis. Robotic major hepatectomies showed a significantly lower conversion rate and estimated blood loss as compared to laparoscopic ones. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies patients experienced significant shorter postoperative hospitalisation.

Robotic surgery appears as competent as conventional laparoscopy to perform major hepatectomies, with possible advantages on conversion rate and perioperative blood loss, despite slightly prolonged postoperative hospitalisation.

Introduction: Minimally invasive reconstruction of the biliary tract is complex and involves multiple steps. The procedure is challenging and has been an essential technique in modern hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery in recent years. Additionally, the quality of the reconstruction directly affects long-and short-term complications and affects the prognosis and quality of life. Various minimally invasive reconstruction methods have been developed to improve the reconstruction effect; however, the optimal method remains controversial. Areas covered: In this study, were viewed published studies of minimally invasive biliary reconstruction within the last 5 years and discussed the current status and main complications of minimally invasive biliary reconstruction. More importantly, we introduced the current reconstruction strategies and technical details of minimally invasive biliary reconstruction, which may be potentially helpful for surgeons to choose reconstruction methods and improve reconstruction quality. Expert opinion: Although several improved and modified methods for biliary reconstruction have been developed recently, no single approach is optimal or adaptable to all situations. Patient-specific selection of appropriate technical strategies according to different situations combined with sophisticated and skilled minimally invasive techniques effectively improves the quality of anastomosis and reduces complications.