Traumatic blunt splenic injury in the hemodynamically stable patient is initially managed with a nonoperative strategy that may include angioembolization. If patients continue to have ongoing signs of bleeding after angioembolization, definitive management is surgical splenectomy. We report the case of a patient with a grade IV blunt splenic injury who had ongoing bleeding after angioembolization and was taken for diagnostic robotic surgery. An isolated splenic injury was identified and the patient was treated with robotic splenectomy. On one month follow up the patient was noted to be doing well with minimal pain. To our knowledge, this is the first report of robotic splenectomy after failed non-operative manage in the setting of trauma. This case shows the potential value of robotic surgery to apply the benefits of minimally invasive surgery in hemodynamically stable patients who fail non-operative management after traumatic splenic injury.

Concerns about the expense of robotic surgery for inguinal hernia repairs have emerged alongside the growing interest and skill in robotic techniques over the past decade. This study aimed to assess whether the costs of robotic inguinal hernia repairs are comparable to those of laparoscopic or open methods.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive open, laparoscopic, and robotic inguinal hernia repairs using mesh at a single tertiary academic medical center from 2020 to 2023. We compared costs and operation times for initial unilateral and bilateral cases.

In unilateral repairs-open (n = 384), laparoscopic (n = 35), and robotic (n = 312)-the median operative times were 62, 67, and 67 min, respectively. Open repairs were quicker than laparoscopic (p = 0.010), but no significant difference was noted compared to robotic repairs (p = 0.066), and there was no substantial difference between laparoscopic and robotic repairs (p = 0.5). The total costs for unilateral open repairs ($11,218) were lower than the costs for laparoscopic ($13,819, p =  < 0.001) or robotic ($15,610, p =  < 0.001) repairs, with laparoscopic also being less expensive than robotic (p = 0.019). For bilateral repairs, the median operative times were 104 min for open (n = 56), 101 min for laparoscopic (n = 23), and 88 min for robotic (n = 70). There were no significant differences in times between open and laparoscopic repairs (p = 0.6); however, robotic repairs were quicker than both open (p = 0.012) and laparoscopic (p = 0.017) repairs. The cost for laparoscopic bilateral repair was higher compared to open ($19,727 vs $18,516, p = 0.014), but robotic surgery ($19,172) did not show a significant difference when compared to open (p = 0.11) or laparoscopic (p = 0.4) repairs.

Bilateral inguinal hernia repair is performed most quickly using robotic techniques and exhibits costs similar to those of open and laparoscopic surgery. Further studies exploring how surgeon experience with robotics affects costs and operative time are necessary.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB) constitute the most commonly performed bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) procedures in the USA. The number of robotic-assisted BMS cases remains low, primarily due to the increased cost and extended operative time associated with this technology. Our primary objective is to assess whether robotic platform reduces the need for a surgical first assistant (FA). Our secondary objective is to compare the utilization of skilled surgical assistants.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP Participant Use File cohort spanning from 2015 to 2019 to determine the prevalence of Attending Surgeon involvement in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic RYGB, and SG procedures, in comparison to non-physician surgical First Assistants. Cases involving medical trainees (residents and fellows) were excluded from the analysis. For each bariatric procedure, we established two distinct groups and employed propensity score matching to ensure patient comparability. A "good match" was defined as a standardized mean difference (SMD) of less than 0.10. All statistical analyses were two-sided, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

A total of 113,682 patients underwent LRYGB, with 12,480 undergoing robotic RYGB (RRYGB). After a 1:1 match, attending-level FAs were involved in 25.9% of LRYGB cases, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 18.5%. In contrast, RRYGB cases utilized attending-level FAs in 13.7% of cases, mid-level FAs in 68.4%, and had no assistants in 17.9% of cases (P < 0.0001). In LSG, attending-level FAs were present in 28.1% of cases, mid-level FAs in 51.6%, and no assistants in 20.3%. In comparison, robotic SG (RSG) cases had attending-level FAs in 16.1%, mid-level FAs in 55.6%, and no assistants in 28.3% of cases (P < 0.0001).

The robotic platform failed to show a reduction in the need for an assistant in Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) procedures but did lead to a decrease in the number of assistants required in sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Mid-level assistance was necessary for the majority of robotic and laparoscopic bariatric metabolic cases. The robotic platform was associated with an approximate 12% reduction in the requirement for attending-level assistance in robotic procedures.

The integration of medical technology in the operating room has revolutionized surgical workflows and team dynamics. However, this progress coincides with a critical global shortage of nurses and a high turnover rate within the existing nursing workforce, impacting patient care quality, nurses' well-being, and hospital finances.

This study investigates the impact of technological complexity on the workload and job satisfaction of intra-operative nurses, focusing on open surgery, minimally invasive surgery, and robotic-assisted surgery within the gynecology department of a Dutch academic hospital.

The study design follows a mixed-methods approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods to assess nursing experiences across three surgical modalities. Specifically, we conducted 5 interviews, distributed 28 validated questionnaires, performed automated video analysis on 35 recorded surgeries, and analyzed hospital datasets encompassing 411 cases. Data collection took place in 2022 and 2023.

Findings show that intra-operative nurses experience varying levels of workload and job satisfaction depending on the level of technology. Open procedures showed the highest job satisfaction, characterized by continuous engagement and manageable workloads. Minimally invasive surgery procedures, while less physically demanding, were associated with reduced involvement and lower satisfaction. Robotic-assisted procedures presented the most significant challenges, with increased workload, reduced involvement, and heightened stress stemming from surgery preparation, technological complexity, and altered team dynamics.

Advancements in medical technology improve outcomes and efficiency but often neglect their impact on intra-operative nurses. Communication issues, equipment challenges, and limited technical training contribute to burnout and turnover. This study underscores the need for supportive operating room environments that prioritize nurses' well-being. By examining the link between technology, workload, and satisfaction, it offers strategies to retain and empower nursing staff. It also shows how automated video analysis can objectively assess nursing roles, highlighting the importance of balancing technology with human-centered care in the operating room.

Not registered.

This study aims to assess the quality of educational surgical videos for robotic total mesorectal excision (TME), across widely used open-source platforms, using a newly designed quality assessment checklist.

The checklist was developed by using existing society guidelines, such as the European Academy of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, comprising four key sections: (i) usability of the platform, (ii) video component, (iii) intraoperative techniques and (iv) other information (including case presentation and outcomes). Videos were identified using the search terms 'Robotic TME' from surgical education platforms (WebSurg, C-SATS and Touch Surgery) and YouTube, between January 2016 and July 2024. All videos displaying robotic TME were reviewed and scored using the quality assessment tool (/12), and the videos across the platforms were subsequently compared.

A total of 113 videos were scored using the checklist: 63 surgical education platform (10 WebSurg and 53 C-SATS) and 50 YouTube videos. The total median checklist score achieved by WebSurg (9 [IQR 8-9] and YouTube videos (8 [IQR 7-10]) was significantly higher than CSAT-S videos (4 [IQR 4-5]; p < 0.001). The usability of platform scores for YouTube was significantly higher than WebSurg and C-SATS videos (p < 0.001). Scores for video components, intraoperative techniques and other information were higher across WebSurg and YouTube videos when compared to C-SATS (p < 0.001); however, there was no significant difference between WebSurg and YouTube for each domain.

The overall educational quality of online robotic TME videos was found to be generally heterogeneous, with WebSurg and YouTube videos demonstrating higher scores based on the checklist. A new quality assessment tool has been proposed for robotic TME videos, which has the potential to improve the reliability and value of published video research.

Female patients are more likely than male patients to experience postoperative complications following hernia repair, but the drivers of this phenomenon remain unexplored. Whether surgical approach differentially impacts the likelihood of postoperative complications by sex following ventral and incisional hernia repair (VIHR) remains unknown.

Adult patients from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative Core Optimization Hernia Registry (MSQC-COHR) were included in this study. MSQC-COHR is a representative, random sample of adult patients from 70 hospitals across Michigan. All elective VIHR performed between January 1, 2020, to September 30, 2023, were included. The primary outcome was any 30-day complication. A multivariable logistics mixed effects model was used to measure the adjusted associations between the observed covariates and the likelihood of 30-day complications. Sex and surgical approach were interacted to test for potential differential effects of surgical approach on 30-day complications by sex.

Among 10,675 patients who underwent elective VIHR, 254 (2.4%) experienced postoperative complications. Of these, 152 (59.8%) patients were female. In bivariate analyses, female patients more often experienced a 30-day complication, regardless of operative approach (3.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). By surgical approach, female patients were found to have 4.2% (95% CI: 3.2-5.1) probability of 30-day complications after open repair, versus 1.5% (95% CI: 1.0-2.1) following MIS VIHR. Male patients had 2.1% (95% CI: 1.5-2.7) probability of 30-day complications after open repair, versus 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9-1.9) following MIS VIHR. Comparatively, female patients were 2.7 times more likely to experience complications after open repair compared to MIS repair, while male patients were 1.4 times more likely to have complications after open vs. MIS repair.

Following both open and MIS VIHR, female patients have a higher risk of postoperative complications compared to male patients, with this risk increasing after open repairs. The outcome disparity persists even after accounting for differences in comorbidities and hernia characteristics. Although this sex-based outcome disparity is not fully eliminated, MIS approaches mitigate the gap, suggesting that MIS repairs should be prioritized in female patients when feasible.

The use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy in acute care surgery is increasing, but its safety and efficacy compared with laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain unclear.

To compare clinical outcomes and bile duct injury rates between robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute care surgery.

This was a retrospective cohort study using patient data from a commercial claims and encounter database from 2016 to 2021. Included in the study were adult patients undergoing robotic-assisted cholecystectomy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute care surgery. Data were analyzed from January to October 2024.

Robotic-assisted or laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute care surgery.

The primary outcome was bile duct injury.

A total of 844 428 patients (mean [SD] age, 45.6 [12.5] years; 547 665 female [64.9%]) were included in this analysis. After propensity score matching, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (n = 35 037) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (n = 35 037) had similar bile duct injury rates (0.37% [128 of 35 037] vs 0.39% [138 of 35 037]; odds ratio [OR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.73-1.18; P = .54). Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy had higher major postoperative complications (8.37% [2934 of 35 037] vs 5.50% [1926 of 35 037]; OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.48-1.67; P < .001), more postoperative drain use (0.63% [219 of 35 037] vs 0.48% [132 of 35 037]; OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.07; P < .001), and longer median (IQR) hospital length of stay (3 [2-4] days vs 2 [1-4] days; P < .001).

In this large, propensity-matched cohort analysis of acute care surgery cholecystectomy, robotic-assisted and laparoscopic cholecystectomy had similar bile duct injury rates, but robotic-assisted cholecystectomy was associated with higher postoperative complications, longer hospital stays, and increased drain use. Further research is needed to optimize the use of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy for acute gallbladder disease. These findings suggest that, under current practice conditions, robotic-assisted cholecystectomy may not offer clear benefits compared with the standard, established laparoscopic cholecystectomy approach.

In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in the number of research papers published in the field of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS). Nevertheless, systematic analyses focusing on the key hotspots associated with the learning curves (LCs) of RAS, global collaboration models, and future trends remain relatively limited. This study employed bibliometric methods to conduct a comprehensive search and analysis of papers on the LC of RAS published in the Web of Science Core Collection between 2005 and 2025. A visual analysis was performed across multiple dimensions, including countries, institutions, sources, and authors. The results revealed an upward trend in the number of publications, with a peak observed in 2024. The United States ranked first in terms of publication volume, while Yonsei University emerged as the most productive institution. Mottrie Alexandre contributed to the highest number of publications, and Dindo d received the highest number of citations. Frequently occurring keywords included "outcome", "experience", "minimally invasive surgery", "revision", and "laparoscopic surgery". Clustering keywords were associated with "rectal cancer", "en-y gastric bypass", "transoral robotic surgery", "spine surgery", and "endometrial cancer". Furthermore, the top five keywords with the strongest citation bursts were "laparoscopic radical prostatectomy", "total mesorectal excision", "da vinci", "prostatectomy", and "mrc clasicc trial". This study offers valuable insights into the future development of this field and supports further exploration and innovation.

Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic techniques are widely used for inguinal hernia repair. While robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) repair is believed to offer ergonomic advantages for surgeons, there is limited evidence comparing its ergonomic impact to conventional laparoscopic TAPP (cTAPP) repair. This study aims to assess the ergonomic strain on surgeons during these procedures using subjective and objective measures.

This crossover observational study involved four experienced hernia surgeons who performed two procedures using each technique. Ergonomic strain was evaluated through self-reported perceived exertion (using the Borg scale), surface electromyography (sEMG) of select muscle groups, and posture analysis using rapid upper limb assessment (RULA) scores derived from kinematic data collected via Xsens Awinda. Statistical comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with adjustments for multiple comparisons.

Subjectively, surgeons perceived rTAPP as less physically demanding, with lower postoperative perceived exertion scores (median 1.5 vs. 3.0, p < 0.01). Objective measurements showed higher static muscle activity in the left erector spinae and median activity in the right trapezius during rTAPP (p = 0.016), but overall ergonomic strain, as indicated by RULA scores, was similar across modalities. Median RULA scores for both techniques were 3, and no significant differences were observed in work posture scores. Despite these findings, discomfort during cTAPP was more frequently reported, with surgeons citing the neck, shoulders, and lower back as affected areas.

While rTAPP was subjectively perceived as less physically demanding, objective metrics did not corroborate these perceptions, showing comparable ergonomic strain between techniques. These findings highlight a complex relationship between subjective and objective ergonomic measures and suggest a need for further research, incorporating broader assessments of cognitive and physical loads, to optimize surgeon ergonomics in minimally invasive procedures.

This study aims to identify the dynamics of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) teams and their metrics. A scoping review across seven science, engineering, and clinical databases was conducted. It was found that literature focuses on skills and interactions centralized around the surgeon and technical components of the robotic system; however, limited literature exists on skill proceduralization specific for other surgical team members performing robotic-assisted surgery procedures. A framework that identifies the individuals (i.e., surgeon, surgical team members, and robotic platform), with their respective skill requirements (technical and nontechnical), and the required interactions among the team and RAS systems was developed. Future research in RAS human-robot interaction can address the need to understand changing dynamics and skills required by the surgical team with the continuing evolution and adoption of surgical robot technology.

In 2012, Medicare introduced Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACO) model to improve the value of health care services as a part of the national comprehensive Accountable Care Act. While the effect of the MSSP on primary care has been extensively analyzed, little is known about the effect of the MSSP on cost and quality of surgical care, in particular the use of high-cost robotic surgical modalities. Hospitals routinely market robotic procedures as an indicator of high quality, despite limited evidence of their clinical value. This study examines the relationship between hospital participation in the MSSP and use of robotic surgery.

We conducted a retrospective analysis using 2016-2019 publicly available data on hospital MSSP participation and use of robotic-assisted procedures in New York State. Using bivariate and multivariate approaches, we identified hospital characteristics associated with the use of robotic technique and hospital quality.

Of the 157 general hospitals in NYS, 83 (53%) offered robotic surgery and 73 (47%) participated in the MSSP. MSSP-affiliated hospitals were more selective in the type of robotic procedures than non-MSSP hospitals, favoring procedures with stronger evidence-base such as prostatectomies. Hospitals that performed robotic surgery selectively had significantly lower spending per patient (p = 0.04). Higher volume of robotic procedures correlated with higher hospital ranking.

MSSP participation is associated with more selective use of robotic procedures and lower hospital spending. More research is needed to understand the relationship between hospital investments in quality improvement, use of robotic surgery and hospital performance rankings.

Robotic approaches have been increasingly utilized for cardiothoracic operations, though concerns regarding costs remain. We evaluated short-term outcomes and costs of robotic-assisted and conventional mitral valve repair (MV-repair), hypothesizing that cost differences would be mitigated at high-volume programs.

Adults undergoing elective MV-repair from 2016 to 2020 were identified in the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients with rheumatic heart disease, mitral stenosis, and those undergoing concomitant operations were excluded. Generalized linear models were utilized to evaluate the association between approach and in-hospital mortality, complications, length of stay, costs, and 90-day readmissions. Annual institutional MV-repair volume was modeled using restricted cubic splines, and cost differences subsequently evaluated by volume tertile.

Of 40,738 patients, 9.8% underwent robotic-assisted MV-repair. Risk-adjusted outcomes including mortality, stroke, reoperation, respiratory complications, postoperative infection, and readmission were comparable between the 2 groups, while those undergoing robotic-assisted MV-repair had lower rates of nonhome discharge. The median cost of robotic-assisted MV-repair was greater than conventional surgery ($46,800 vs $38,500, P < .001). Despite a 1.3-day decrement (95% CI, 1.1-1.6) in length of stay, robotic-assisted MV-repair was associated with greater risk-adjusted costs by $10,500 (95% CI, $5800-$15,200). Programs in the highest volume tertile exhibited comparable costs for robotic-assisted and conventional MV-repair (cost difference, $5900; 95% CI, -$1200 to $12,200; P > .05).

Robotic-assisted MV-repair had comparable short-term outcomes relative to conventional surgery. Despite increased costs of robotic-assisted MV-repair overall, high-volume programs had similar risk-adjusted costs by approach. These findings support the designation and performance of robotic MV-repair at centers of excellence in the United States.

In the last two decades, robotic technology has fundamentally transformed the field of colorectal surgery by providing surgeons with unprecedented levels of precision and control. Nevertheless, robotic surgery presents certain challenges such as prolonged operating times, high costs, limited accessibility, and the necessity for specialized training.

This comparative review analyzes the impact of robotic platforms on colorectal surgery and its outcomes, with the expanding market of this technology. The major databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholars were searched using the key term 'robotic assisted surgery,' 'robotic platforms,' and 'colorectal surgery' to identify relevant articles as of August 2024. The most utilized robotic platforms currently available on the market - Da Vinci, Versius, Senhance, and Revo-I - are compared through their peri- and post-operative outcomes, including operative duration, blood loss, hospitalization period, oncological outcomes, and cost, providing a comprehensive insight into the future of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery.

Robotic surgery significantly improves patient outcomes, including shorter postoperative recovery times and effective cancer resection margins. However, challenges faced with these platforms include longer intraoperative times, arm clashing, the need for bedside assistance, and cost. Nevertheless, with the evolution toward managing more complex rectal cancer cases and more challenging dissection planes, the need for robotic platforms will only grow.

Considerable evidence links pharmaceutical industry payments to health providers' over-prescribing behavior. In response, public policies were enacted to mitigate this effect. However, there is limited evidence examining surgical device industry payments and surgeons' utilization of robot-assisted surgeries (RAS). This study assessed the relationship between industry payments to healthcare providers and the usage of RAS.

Using 2015-2020 data from the CMS "Sunshine" Open Payments Database and New York State's (NYS) Statewide hospital discharge databases, we assessed temporal and spatial relationships between industry payments to hospitals and surgeons and volumes of RAS.

During 2015-2020, general surgery robotic device manufacturers paid providers more than $236 M nationwide. The highest proportion of payments was made toward "Education and training" (66.6%) and "Food and travel" (20.6%). In NYS, gastrointestinal (GI) RAS volume steadily increased by 182% (2015-2019, p < 0.01), while there was a 150% increase in general surgeon payments. Genitourinary (GU) and gynecological (GYN) surgeon payments remained unchanged but GU and GYN RAS volume increased by 17% and 75%, respectively, during this period (p < 0.05). Approximately, 93% of payments and 98% of abdomen and pelvic RAS in NYS were concentrated in metropolitan or non-rural counties.

With increasing payments from robotic device companies toward surgeon education and training, the use of RAS is likely to continue to rise in the long term. Unbiased and non-industry-funded studies examining RAS effect on surgeon behavior and patient outcomes are imperative to ensure system efficiency and patient safety.

Surgical residency programs lack structured assessments of robotic surgery. The validated O-Score is an assessment tool for tracking robotic operative proficiency consisting of 9 items on a 5 point Likert scale. Surgical autonomy is one comprehensive binary item. This study aimed to establish a benchmark for the number of procedures and the O-Score sum score to achieve surgical autonomy in robotic visceral procedures.

This single-center prospective pilot cohort study assessed robotic procedures between 2020 and 2023. Bedside and console assistance performances were analyzed separately based on the O-Score and the calculated total numerical sum of the individual item values of the O-Score. Bedside assistance was conducted for upper gastrointestinal, hepatopancreatobiliary, and colorectal procedures, whereas console assistance referred to either one of the three areas. The study participants included inexperienced robotic surgeons who were evaluated by 2 robotic experts.

In total, 273 procedures were included in this study. For 13 bedside assistants, 273 O-Score assessments were identified, and 62 O-Score assessments for six console assistants. Surgical autonomy was achieved in 50.9% for bedside assistance and in 11.3 % for assistance at the robotic console. Surgical autonomy was positively correlated with the O-Score sum for bedside (p = < 0.001) and console assistance (p = 0.004). The positive prediction of surgical autonomy for bedside (console) assistance ranged from 74% (60%) to 93% (100%), correlated with a range of the O-Score sum between 37 (37) and 40 (40) and a robotic caseload between 19 (17) and 33 (24) procedures.

A significant improvement in the basic robotic performance was observed. Benchmarks regarding number of cases and O-Score sum were established for bedside assistance regardless of the type of visceral robotic operation. Currently, data on console assistance are limited. Monitoring robotic operative skills and skill progression is feasible in daily routine using the O-Score and O-Score sum.

Virtual reality has been shown to be a strong introduction to the robot. However, we hypothesized that a biotissue curriculum including common surgical anastomoses can further enhance robotic technical skills in surgical residents.

Post-graduate-year three (PGY-3) general surgery residents completed a two-week robotic simulation rotation. The inanimate exercises used biotissue to simulate common robotic anastomoses, including the running hepaticojejunostomy (RHJ), gastrojejunostomy (GJ), interrupted hepaticojejunostomy (IHJ), and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). Drills were timed and graded according to modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS; range 6-30).

32 residents completed the curriculum. 81.3% of residents reported prior experience at the surgeon console (median=5 operations). Across all drills the average time to completion decreased from first to fourth attempt (RHJ: 33.7±8.9 vs. 26.3±8.1 min, p<0.001; GJ: 57.2±15.1 vs. 44.6±9.5 min, p<0.001; IHJ: 32.6±7.2 vs. 27.1±7.7 min, p<0.001; PJ: 44.2±9.3 vs. 35.6±10.5 min, p<0.001). Average OSATS score increased across all drills as well (RHJ: 16.0±3.8 vs. 23.3±3.4, p<0.001; GJ: 19.4±2.1 vs. 26.0±2.5, p<0.001; IHJ: 16.9±2.7 vs. 23.2±3.6, p<0.001, PJ: 17.9±2.6 vs. 23.6±3.6, p<0.001).

The robotic biotissue curriculum improves resident performance on robotic anastomoses. With the rise of the robotic platform, training in robotic procedures should be incorporated during surgical residency.

Robotic partial nephrectomy is a standard procedure in urology, but its widespread use is limited by the high cost and technical constraints of current systems. New robotic systems are being developed to enhance affordability and accessibility, expanding the availability of advanced robotic surgery to a broader range of healthcare facilities and patients. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of the Toumai system in partial nephrectomy, examining its advanced features and their potential impact on surgical precision and operational efficiency. In this single center study, eleven patients underwent partial nephrectomy using Toumai. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety, while secondary outcomes included perioperative outcomes. All surgeries were completed successfully without conversion, minimal complications, and no major equipment failures. The median operative time was 107 min, docking time was 8 min, and estimated blood loss was 50 ml. One off-clamp partial nephrectomy was successfully performed and median warm ischemia time was 9 min in the remaining cases. Postoperatively, renal function remained stable, and surgical margins were negative in all cases. These preliminary results suggest that partial nephrectomy can be safely performed using the Toumai robotic system. The system's advanced features, including sensory feedback, high-frequency response, and enhanced imaging technologies, likely contributed to favorable surgical outcomes with minimal complications. However, these initial findings warrant further validation through larger studies and longer follow-up.

Robot-assisted surgery has transformed urology, but widespread adoption remains limited by the high cost, complex setup, and rigid system design. This prospective single-center study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the novel modular Carina in 19 upper and lower urinary tract surgeries. All cases were completed robotically without conversion, with one major complication. For partial nephrectomy (PN), median operative time (OT) was 120 min with 50 mL estimated blood loss (EBL), including one off-clamp PN completed in 77 min (EBL: 50 mL). Pyeloplasty had a median OT of 105 min (EBL: 50 mL), while radical prostatectomy (RP) achieved a median OT of 150 min (EBL: 50 mL). Radical cystectomy was completed in 301 min without major complications, and an uncomplicated postoperative course. Median docking times were 5 and 8 min for upper and lower tract surgeries, with negative margins and preserved renal function in all PN, and social continence post-RP. The Carina system demonstrates procedural safety and feasibility in complex urological procedures. The modular design may enhance workflow and space utilization, suggesting the potential for promising tool and broader clinical applications. Further validation with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up is needed.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a formidable global health challenge, ranking among the most prevalent malignancies and a principal contributor to cancer-associated mortality. While traditional open surgery has historically been the cornerstone of CRC treatment, the advent of minimally invasive techniques, particularly robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS), has garnered significant momentum owing to technological advancements in the field. Robotic platforms, exemplified by the da Vinci Surgical System, offer superior three-dimensional visualization, enhanced dexterity, and heightened precision, yielding improved perioperative outcomes, particularly in anatomically intricate regions such as the pelvis. This review provides a critical appraisal of the current landscape of RACS, emphasizing its superiority over conventional open and laparoscopic approaches. The increased control and precision afforded by robotic surgery have been shown to optimize outcomes in complex procedures such as total mesorectal excision, with evidence indicating reduced intraoperative blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and improved functional recovery. Nonetheless, challenges persist, including absence of haptic feedback, prohibitive costs, and steep learning curve associated with robotic systems. Despite these limitations, RACS has demonstrated considerable promise in sphincter-preserving and function-preserving procedures, ultimately enhancing postoperative quality of life. Beyond the surgical field, this review also investigates the integration of robotic surgery within multidisciplinary treatment strategies for CRC, particularly in the context of locally advanced rectal cancer. The combination of robotic techniques with total neoadjuvant therapy and immunotherapy-especially in tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency or high microsatellite instability has shown notable clinical efficacy. Furthermore, emerging personalized therapeutic approaches, including immunotherapies and targeted chemotherapeutic agents, emphasize the transformative potential of RACS in delivering superior oncologic outcomes. Looking towards the future, innovations in robotic platforms, including intraoperative imaging, artificial intelligence, and augmented reality, herald new possibilities for further enhancing the precision and efficacy of colorectal surgeries. The standardization of RACS protocols, alongside ongoing training and robust clinical research, will be critical to fully realizing the benefits of these advancements across diverse clinical settings. By incorporating cutting-edge technologies and personalized treatment methods, robotic-assisted surgery is prepared to become a cornerstone in future of CRC management, with the potential to significantly improve both survival outcomes and patient quality of life.

The rapid adoption of robotic surgical systems has overtook the development of standardized training and competency assessment for surgeons, resulting in an unmet educational need in this field. This systematic review aims to identify the essential components and evaluate the validity of current robotic training curricula across all surgical specialties.

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, and CINAHL databases was conducted to identify the studies reporting on multi-specialty or specialty-specific surgical robotic training curricula, between January 2000 and January 2024. We extracted the data according to Kirkpatrick's curriculum evaluation model and Messick's concept of validity. The quality of studies was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI).

From the 3687 studies retrieved, 66 articles were included. The majority of studies were single-center ( n = 52, 78.8%) and observational ( n = 58, 87.9%) in nature. The most commonly reported curriculum components include didactic teaching ( n = 48, 72.7%), dry laboratory skills ( n = 46, 69.7%), and virtual reality (VR) simulation ( n = 44, 66.7%). Curriculum assessment methods varied, including direct observation ( n = 44, 66.7%), video assessment ( n = 26, 39.4%), and self-assessment (6.1%). Objective outcome measures were used in 44 studies (66.7%). None of the studies were fully evaluated according to Kirkpatrick's model, and five studies (7.6%) were fully evaluated according to Messick's framework. The studies were generally found to have moderate methodological quality with a median MERSQI of 11.

Essential components in robotic training curricula identified were didactic teaching, dry laboratory skills, and VR simulation. However, variability in assessment methods used and notable gaps in curricula validation remain evident. This highlights the need for standardized evidence-based development, evaluation, and reporting of robotic curricula to ensure the effective and safe adoption of robotic surgical systems.

Although open esophagectomies (OE) have traditionally been favored, minimally invasive approaches are increasingly utilized and associated with improved outcomes. We investigated the adoption rates of robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) compared with OE. Utilization rates by surgical approach, post-operative outcomes, and overall survival were analyzed.

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who underwent OE, MIE, and RAMIE for esophageal cancer from 2010 to 2019. Adoption rates of RAMIE, MIE and OE were determined for all patients. Patients with primary cervical esophageal cancer, stage 4 disease, unknown staging, or missing follow-up data were excluded. Multivariable Cox regression models compared overall survival based on surgical approach.

A total of 17,765 patients underwent an esophagectomy for stage I, II, and III disease (OE: n = 10,039; MIE: n = 5388; RAMIE: n = 2338). Between 2010 and 2019, OE decreased by 52%, while MIE and RAMIE increased by 49% and 704%, respectively. The overall conversion rate of MIE and RAMIE to OE decreased significantly over the study time period. On multivariable analysis, the odds of 30-day and 90-day mortality was lower for MIE (p < 0.001; p < 0.001) and trended towards lower for RAMIE when compared to OE, though was not a statistically significant difference. Further, the overall 5-year survival was higher in the MIE and RAMIE cohort compared to the OE cohort. Like short-term survival, patients who underwent MIE had a significantly lower mortality (p < 0.001) while those who underwent RAMIE trended towards lower mortality.

This contemporary review of a national cohort demonstrates the rapid adoption of minimally invasive esophagectomy techniques, without compromise in short-term or long-term outcomes.

Robotic-assisted bariatric surgery is growing rapidly. The optimal approach to minimize complications remains unclear.

Assess robot utilization and compare 30-day outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database.

United States.

A retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database identified primary SG and RYGB cases from 2015 to 2022. Revisions/conversions, cases converted to another approach, and combined cases other than esophagogastroduodenoscopy were excluded. Outcomes were compared with logistic regression following 1:1 propensity-score matching to adjust for differences in patient demographics/comorbidities and operative variables.

A total of 823,902 cases (591,118 SG; 232,784 RYGB) were included. From 2015 to 2022, the percentage of SG and RYGB performed robotically increased from 6.7% and 6.9% to 29.5% and 31.8%, respectively. Compared to laparoscopic, robotic SG had significantly higher overall morbidity (odds ratio 1.14 [1.07-1.21], P < .001), leak (1.24 [1.05-1.46], P = .03), and bleeding rates (1.34 [1.13-1.58], P < .001). Robotic RYGB had significantly lower overall morbidity (.75 [.70-.81], P < .001) and bleeding (.80 [.68-.94], P < .01) with similar leak rates (.87 [.71-1.07], P = .18). Combined robotic SG and RYGB outcomes were similar to laparoscopic for 2020-2022 cases, except for higher rates of organ/space infection, readmission, and septic shock in the robotic group.

Robotic SG has higher complication rates compared to laparoscopic, while robotic RYGB is protective against bleeding complications. Short-term outcomes for robotic surgery have become more similar to laparoscopic, but remain inferior. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the factors driving these findings.

This study aimed to analyze nationwide trends and regional disparities in inguinal hernia surgeries in South Korea between 2016 and 2022. Additionally, we aimed to evaluate changes in surgery frequency, including urban concentration and the introduction of robotic surgery.

This retrospective review used nationwide data on inguinal hernia surgeries from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

From 2016 to 2022, 254,367 inguinal hernia surgeries were performed in South Korea, with males accounting for 88.9% of cases. The annual number of surgeries fluctuated, particularly in 2020, owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Medical costs increased from $1,218.4 to $1,970 on average, whereas patient copayments rose from $180.2 to $293.3. Robotic inguinal hernia surgeries, introduced in 2019, increased to 226 cases in 2022. Pediatric surgeries steadily declined, whereas adult surgeries remained stable, with a slight increase in 2022. The average hospital stay did not change significantly but varied between pediatric and adult patients. Regional disparities were notable, especially in pediatric surgery rates between metropolitan areas, such as Seoul and the surrounding provinces.

This study highlights stable overall surgery rates, a decline in pediatric cases, and an increase in robotic inguinal hernia surgeries. The persistent concentration of healthcare services in metropolitan areas suggests a need for policy interventions to address regional disparities and ensure equitable healthcare access. The findings underscore the importance of ongoing efforts to improve healthcare distribution and the need for long-term strategies to address changing surgical trends.

Advancements in digital equipment have been applied to treating complex medical cases. However, the literature has not comprehensively reported these applications, and the outcomes of conventional surgeries have not been compared with robot-assisted surgeries to determine efficacy. Therefore, this literature review aimed to find and compare outcomes. According to existing literature, robot-assisted surgery has brought significant changes to various aspects of general surgical practice. The research outcomes have shown that robotic surgery minimizes surgical invasiveness by enabling smaller incisions, reducing blood loss, and accelerating patient recovery. The da Vinci Surgical System has shown enhanced surgical accuracy due to better control when operating in complex cases such as colorectal resections, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and hernia repairs. The use of robotic systems enables surgeons to remain comfortable while performing complex procedures because the system allows them to maintain ergonomic body positions. Robotic systems lead to better clinical outcomes for patients, such as rapid hospital discharge, fewer complications, and faster recovery times. The advantages of robotic surgery will become more apparent once technical challenges regarding costs, learning curves, and haptic feedback are fully addressed.

The aim of this study was to compare robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (L-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair with respect to surgical stress response and short-term outcomes.

This single-centre, open-label, RCT enrolled patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 to R-TAPP or L-TAPP using a computer-generated sequence with block sizes of six. All procedures were performed by the same experienced surgeons. The primary outcome was plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Secondary outcomes included interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels, operating time, complications, length of stay, and readmission rate.

A total of 150 patients (R-TAPP, 76; and L-TAPP, 74) were randomized, with 11 withdrawing before surgery, leaving 139 (R-TAPP, 74; and L-TAPP, 65) for intention-to-treat analysis. CRP levels were significantly lower after R-TAPP on postoperative days 1 and 3 (reductions of 23% and 32% respectively, P = 0.001). IL-6 levels were also lower after R-TAPP at 30 and 120 min after extubation (reductions of 26% and 22% respectively, P < 0.001). R-TAPP was associated with a shorter operating time (-13.4 min, P < 0.001), fewer complications (23.0% versus 41.5%, P = 0.029), including fewer haematomas (6.8% versus 18.5%, P = 0.043), and a higher same-day discharge rate (95.9% versus 81.5%, P = 0.012). No significant differences were observed regarding chronic pain and recurrence rates.

R-TAPP was associated with reduced surgical stress, complications, operating time, and hospitalization compared with L-TAPP. These findings support further multicentre trials to assess long-term outcomes and generalizability.

NCT05839587 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Traditionally, both visual and haptic feedback have been regarded as elementary aspects of endovascular neurosurgical intervention. The literature acknowledges that the lack of haptic feedback and the reliance on visual feedback alone in robotic endovascular neurosurgical intervention (RENI) is a limitation. However, several operators who are at the forefront of applying this technology appear to have become quickly accustomed to visual feedback alone. Some have explained their initial scepticism, but upon using the technology they eventually saw the lack of haptic feedback as less of an obstacle and started to regard visual feedback alone as a feasible and safe means to perform procedures. Therefore, this begs the question as to whether haptic feedback is in effect a necessity or a commodity. In this commentary, several considerations are made, presenting arguments supporting the idea that haptic feedback may not be an absolute necessity, and their potential counterarguments. Such reflection and discussion on the topic of haptic feedback in RENI is timely and presently warranted to guide its research and development.

To compare laparoscopic and ventral hernia repair (VHR) in the last 5 years in the United States utilizing the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database.

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the ACHQC database was performed to include all adult patients that underwent laparoscopic and robotic VHR in the last 5 years. Univariate analysis was performed to compare outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic-assisted approaches across perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

ACHQC database identified 11,096 patients with midline hernias who underwent VHR with mesh. The Laparoscopic group with patients from 2018 to 2023 (LAP) had 2,063 patients, and the robotic group (ROBO) had 9,033 patients. There was no difference in sex, age, BMI, DM, smoking status and COPD between groups. Median hernia width was 4 cm (IQR 2-6) in the ROBO group and 3 cm (IQR 2-5) in the LAP group (p < 0.001). Incisional hernia was higher in the ROBO group 5,259 (58%) versus 1,099 (53%) in the LAP group (p < 0.001). Recurrent hernia was more common in the ROBO group when compared with the LAP group (p < 0.001). Both groups had more permanent synthetic mesh. Retromuscular repair was higher in the ROBO group, 3,201 (37.6%) versus 68 (4.2%) in the LAP group (p < 0.001). The intraperitoneal repair was higher in the LAP group 1,363 (83%) versus 2,925 (34%) in the ROBO group (p < 0.001) Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR) was higher in the ROBO group 1,314 (14.5%) versus 5 (0.2%) in the LAP group (p < 0.001). Fascial closure was higher in the ROBO group (8,649; 96.5% versus 1,359; 67.3% in the LAP group p < 0.001). Regarding mesh fixation, regular suture was higher in the ROBO group 92% versus 61% in the LAP group (p < 0.001). Tacks (p < 0.001) was higher in the LAP group. The ROBO group had more patients with an operative time of 240+ minutes when compared with the LAP group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in 30-days readmission rates, recurrence, reoperation, overall postoperative complications, 30-day SSI, SSO, seroma and SSOPI between the groups.

The Robotic approach was associated with more technically challenging ventral hernia repairs with low complication rates over time. However, no differences in postoperative complications were found between the groups.

Robot-assisted surgery has been widely adopted in recent years. However, compared to other health technologies operating in close proximity to patients in a vulnerable state, ethical issues of robot-assisted surgery have received less attention. Against the background of increasing automation that is expected to raise new ethical issues, this systematic review aims to map the state of the ethical debate in this field. A protocol was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42023397951). Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, CINHAL, Philosophers' Index, IEEE Xplorer, Web of Science (Core Collection), Scopus and Google Scholar were searched in January 2023. Screening, extraction, and analysis were conducted independently by two authors. A qualitative narrative synthesis was performed. Out of 1723 records, 66 records were included in the final dataset. Seven major strands of the ethical debate emerged during the analysis. These include questions of harms and benefits, responsibility and control, professional-patient relationship, ethical issues in surgical training and learning, justice, translational questions, and economic considerations. The identified themes testify to a broad range of different ethical issues requiring careful deliberation and integration into the surgical ethos. Looking forward, we argue that a different perspective in addressing robotic surgical devices might be helpful to consider upcoming challenges of automation.

Robotic techniques can theoretically overcome the limitations of laparoscopic liver resection and are currently recognized as safe options; however, it is not known which approach is better. The purpose of this study was to compare the advantages of robotic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy.

Electronic databases (the Cochrane Library, PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Web of Science) were systematically searched from January 2000 to August 2023 for eligible studies that compared robotic hepatectomy and laparoscopic hepatectomy. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were then reviewed systematically. The reported data were aggregated statistically using RevMan 5.4 software. The parameters of interest included intraoperative, postoperative, survival and financial outcomes. Subgroup analysis was performed according to the type and difficulty level of hepatectomy and the study setting.

A total of 26 propensity-score matching comparative trials met the inclusion criteria, which comprised 9355 participants (robotic hepatectomy versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: 3938 versus 5417) in the meta-analysis. For surgical outcomes, lower blood loss, lower open conversion rate and higher R0 resection rate were observed in the robotic hepatectomy group compared with the laparoscopic hepatectomy group (mean difference (MD) -86.22, 95% c.i. -116.49 to -55.95, I² = 87%, P < 0.001; OR 0.51, 95% c.i. 0.38 to 0.69, I² = 40%, P < 0.001; OR 1.31, 95% c.i. 1.03 to 1.67, I² = 0%, P = 0.030 respectively). The lower blood loss (major hepatectomy group: MD -56.88, 95% c.i. -109.09 to -4.28, I² = 76%, P = 0.030; IWATE score (advanced/expert more than 80%) group: MD -0.61, 95% c.i. -1.14 to -0.08, I² = 95%, P < 0.001) and lower open conversion rate (major hepatectomy group: OR 0.41, 95% c.i. 0.30 to 0.56, I² = 0%, P < 0.001; IWATE score (advanced/expert less than 80%) group: OR 0.52, 95% c.i. 0.36 to 0.75, I² = 0%, P = 0.659) advantage persisted across subgroup analyses.

The robotic approach had advantages to laparoscopic in terms of lower blood loss and reduced rates of open conversion, especially in difficult hepatectomies.

Robotic retromuscular hernia repair has proven to be feasible and safe but lacks randomized data to demonstrate significant clinical benefit. The majority of current comparative studies published have been case series, retrospective studies, systematic reviews, or large registry data, all of which have significant limitations and bias (Bittner et al. in Surg Endosc 32:727-734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5729-0 , 2018; Bracale et al in Hernia 25:1471-1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-021-02487-5 , 2021; Carbonell in Ann Surg 267:210-217. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244 , 2018; (Warren et al. in Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1 , 2024; Dewulf et al in BJS Open 6:zrac057. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac057 , 2022; Maskal and Beffa in Surg Clin N Am 103:977-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2023.04.007 , 2023). It was only recently that the first randomized trial was conducted by Warren et al. comparing open and robotic retromuscular hernia repairs with synthetic mesh (Warren et al. in Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1 , 2024). The data currently available has yielded inconsistent outcomes leaving significant knowledge gaps for clinical decision making. Reduced length of stay for robotic retromuscular repairs has been a consistently proven outcome, however, and therefore, we hypothesized that robotic retromuscular hernia repairs would be superior to open retromuscular hernia repair by reducing length of stay in the hospital by 24 h (Carbonell in Ann Surg 267:210-217. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002244 , 2018).

The Institutional Review Board at all participating sites has approved this protocol. This trial has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT: 05472987). The ROVHR trial is a registry-based, multicenter, double-blinded randomized trial. The primary hypothesis is robotic retromuscular hernia repairs is superior to open retromuscular hernia repairs by reducing length of stay by at least 24 h. Secondary outcomes include 30-day wound morbidity, readmissions, opioids prescribed and consumed, NRS-11 pain scores obtained daily for the 5 first days after surgery, PROMIS-3a Pain Intensity survey, and patient reported outcomes including Hernia-Related Quality of Life (HerQLes), and EuraHS. Additionally, direct operating room costs will be compared.

Based existing literature, we designed a randomized trial with a primary endpoint to determine if robotic retromuscular hernia repairs reduce length of in hospital stay by at least 24 h compared to open retromuscular hernia repairs. This study will add high-level of evidence providing evidence-based outcomes for clinical decision making.

NCT05472987. Registered on July 20, 2022.

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has revolutionized surgical practice worldwide, with urology leading its adoption. Despite its global expansion, significant disparities exist in regional implementation, particularly in the Arab world. This study evaluates the current landscape of robotic surgery in the Arab world, highlighting advancements, challenges, and future directions. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on robotic procedures across multiple specialties in Arab countries. Data on installed robotic systems were obtained from industry reports and local distributors. A total of 56 relevant publications were identified. The highest volume of RAS publications originated from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Emerging trends include a rise in multidisciplinary robotic procedures, innovative telesurgical applications, and increased research output. However, high-quality, large-scale studies remain limited. The Arab world has made notable strides in RAS adoption, with key centers advancing research and clinical practice. Although full integration remains a work in progress, the foundation for widespread robotic surgical adoption in the Arab world is firmly in place.

Robotic surgery has expanded significantly over the last decade. To help train learners, many institutions have implemented various training methods. Studies have shown that simulation training is an effective tool to develop skills for both residents and attending physicians. However, its influence on medical student training is unclear. Medical students were asked to compete in a 4-month da Vinci robotic console simulation tournament. Participants were given unlimited attempts to achieve the highest score possible on four different modules. Questionnaires were completed before and after the tournament to assess baseline demographics, surgical confidence, and perceptions toward robotic surgery. Performance data from the simulator was collected for each participant. A total of 12 medical students completed the tournament. Paired T-test analysis of pre-survey and post-survey questionnaires demonstrated significant increases in reported interest in robotic surgery (p < 0.001) and surgery overall (p = 0.0028). Self-reported surgical confidence using the simulator also increased significantly (p = 0.0043). There was an increase in overall performance across all modules when comparing first and last attempts (p < 0.001), (p < 0.001), (p = 0.0031), and (p = 0.011). Spearman's rank correlation analyses showed an association between overall performance and number of attempts for two of four modules (p = 0.0063) and (p = 0.046). Tournament-style simulation training increased medical students' surgical skill dexterity, confidence and interest in robotic surgery. Additional research with larger sample sizes are necessary to fully characterize the effectiveness of robotic surgical training for medical students.

Advances in robotic instrumentation have facilitated minimally invasive completion of complex cancer operations. The objective of this study is to determine the feasibility of robotic approach for cytoreduction (R-CRS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis in a series of 16 consecutive cases.

Single institution retrospective study of consecutive patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis deemed appropriate for R-CRS after multidisciplinary review between 2017 and 2022. Feasibility was defined as the proportion of patients in whom complete cytoreduction was achieved without conversion to open.

A total of 16 patients (median interquartile range [IQR]: age 60 ys [45.8-70.5], body mass index 29 [24.5-33.6], peritoneal carcinomatosis index 5 [2.8-6.3]) underwent R-CRS of which six also received hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemtotherapy. Seven patients had gastrointestinal primary cancers (3 colorectal, 3 appendiceal, 1 small bowel neuroendocrine); and nine had gynecologic cancers (7 ovarian, 2 endometrial). Median operative time was 6.0 h (IQR: 5.0-9.0), and median estimated blood loss was 87.5 mL (IQR: 30.0-262.5). Robotic procedures included: pelvic tumor debulking 12 (75%), omentectomy 8 (50%), peritonectomy 6 (38%), large bowel resection 6 (37%), retroperitoneal mass resection 4 (25%), and hepatectomy 3 (19%). Median length of stay was 3.5 ds (IQR: 1.8-5.3) for the whole cohort and only 2 ds (IQR: 1.0-5.5) for patients who did not undergo hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Feasibility rate was 87.5%, whereas conversion, 30-d complication, and 30-d mortality rates were 12.5%, 18.8%, and 0%, respectively.

Our experience with R-CRS demonstrates feasibility of the approach with a potential for benefit in short-term outcomes in a carefully selected cohort of patients when performed at a high-volume robotic surgery center.

Many patients who would benefit from minimally invasive surgery (MIS) have open surgery; robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) addresses some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery and could increase rates of MIS across different patient populations.

To determine whether the introduction of RAS increases MIS rates and whether increases are seen across different patient populations undergoing common general surgery procedures.

A retrospective cohort study was performed to compare rates of MIS in the year before and after the index date for hospitals that did and did not introduce RAS. Generalized estimating equation regression models were used to compare rates in MIS over time.

PINC AI Healthcare Database, an all-payor discharge database of hospitals in the United States.

Hospitals that performed cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, ventral hernia repair, and colorectal resection from 2016 to 2022.

RAS hospitals performing at least 1 common general surgery procedure using RAS.

The primary analysis examined rates of MIS, defined as the rate of common general surgeries that were minimally invasive (laparoscopic or RAS) in a hospital. The secondary analysis examined MIS rates for common general surgeries, across age, sex, race, ethnicity, and payor.

Of 408 hospitals included in the study, 153 (38%) introduced RAS for common general surgeries. The relative MIS rate for hospitals that introduced RAS compared with hospitals that did not went from 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14; P < 0.01) before the index date to 1.15 (95% CI, 1.09-1.22; P < 0.01) after the index date (P interaction < 0.01), indicating a larger increase in MIS rates among hospitals introducing RAS. MIS rates increased significantly more in hospitals that introduced RAS across patient age, sex, ethnicity, race, and payor compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS.

Hospitals that introduced RAS for common general surgery procedures were associated with an increase in MIS rates across different patient populations compared with hospitals that did not introduce RAS.

This study aims to provide the first comparative real-world evidence of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs performed in India, regardless of defect size or technique used.

The primary objective was to compare postoperative pain, analgesic use, and quality of life (QOL) between the two groups. Additionally, data on length of hospital stay, operating time, incidence of intra- and postoperative complications, re-admission rates, and use of tacks were collected and analyzed.

The study included 290 cases: 111 (38.28%) in the robotic group and 179 (61.72%) in the laparoscopic group. Incisional hernias were more common in the robotic group (65 patients, 58.56%), while primary ventral hernias were more prevalent in the laparoscopic group (113 patients, 63.13%). The most common robotic repair approach was extended totally extraperitoneal Rives-Stoppa (eTEP-RS) with or without transversus abdominis release (TAR), performed in 75 (67.56%) cases. In the laparoscopic group, intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus was the most frequently performed procedure, used in 115 (64.25%) cases. The robotic group reported significantly lower pain levels after 6 hours, 24 hours, and 14 days following surgery. The number and duration of analgesic use were significantly reduced in the robotic group. Additionally, the robotic group had significantly better health perception scores. Compared to the laparoscopic group, the robotic group experienced significantly fewer postoperative complications (2 vs. 16; p = 0.013). Notably, the robotic group did not use tacks for mesh fixation, while tacks were employed in roughly 116 (64.8%) of the laparoscopic cases.

In real-world Indian settings, this study demonstrates the feasibility of robotic-assisted ventral hernia repairs, regardless of defect size or technique used.

Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.

A scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected via virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.

The review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).

There is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.

This study aimed to elucidate the current status, disparities, and challenges in adopting gynecological robotic surgery in Japan. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted among 17,444 members of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology between September and November 2023. The questionnaire assessed the demographics, robotic surgery implementation, and attitudes toward robotic surgery. Of the 1443 respondents (8.3% response rate), 46.0% worked in facilities without robotic systems. A total of 69.8% supported further promotion of robotic surgery, with younger generations showing greater interest. Healthcare economics was identified as the primary barrier (94.1%). Perceptions of benefits varied between malignant (75.4%) and benign (53.1%) conditions. Only 33.2% of participants endorsed robotic surgery training during residency. Regional differences were observed in attitudes towards educational benefits. Additionally, responses differed based on the number of laparoscopic surgeries performed and prior robotic surgery experience. This study revealed the significant challenges in accessing robotic surgery and limitations in insurance coverage. Disparities in the awareness of the benefits and conflicts of laparoscopic surgery were identified. The upcoming merger of the robotic and endoscopic surgery societies may drive further adoption. Comprehensive educational programs and awareness campaigns are vital for improving access and understanding among obstetricians and gynecologists in Japan.

Robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI) is an efficacious and safe treatment option for coronary artery disease. However, predictors of manual support during R-PCI are unknown, which we aimed to investigate in a multi-center study.

We utilized patient-level data from R-PCIs carried out from 2020 to 2022 at four sites in Germany. Manual support was defined as the combination of partial manual assistance, where the procedure is ultimately completed using robotic techniques, and manual conversion. A two-step selection process based on akaike information criteria was used to identify the ideal multivariable model predicting manual support.

In 210 patients (median age 69.0 years; 25.7% female), a total of 231 coronary lesions were treated by R-PCI. Manual support was needed in 46 lesions (19.9%). Procedures requiring manual support were associated with significantly longer procedural times, greater total contrast fluid volumes, longer fluoroscopy times, and higher dose-area products. Amongst the predictors of manual support were lesions in the left anterior descending artery [OR: 1.09 (95%-CI: 0.99-1.20)], aorto-ostial lesions [OR: 1.35 (95%-CI: 1.11-1.64)], chronic total occlusions [OR: 1.78 (95%-CI: 1.38-2.31)], true bifurcations [OR: 1.37 (95%-CI: 1.17-1.59)], and severe calcification [OR: 1.13 (95%-CI: 1.00-1.27)].

Our findings reveal that nearly one out five of patients undergoing R-PCI required manual support, which was linked to longer procedure durations. Predictors of manual support reflected characteristics of more complex coronary lesions. These results highlight the limitations of current R-PCI platforms and underscore the need for technical advancements to address different clinical scenarios.