Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Diabetes. Jan 15, 2018; 9(1): 40-52
Published online Jan 15, 2018. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v9.i1.40
Published online Jan 15, 2018. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v9.i1.40
Table 1 Criteria for obesity, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus
Criteria for obesity, hypertension and T2DM | ||
Obesity | Hypertension (JNC VII criteria) | T2DM |
BMI (≥ 30) | SBP greater than or equal to 140 mmHg or | WHO and ADA classification: Fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) or 2 h plasma glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) |
Waist-hip ratio (> 0.80 for females and > 0.90 for males) | DBP greater than or equal to 90 mmHg respectively | |
Waist circumference (≥ 90 cm, > 88 cm for female and > 102 cm for male) |
Table 2 Search terms used for literature review
Search terms for obesity and hypertension | Search Terms for Obesity and type 2 diabetes |
(((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND prevalence[MeSH Terms]) AND India [MeSH Terms] | (((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes[MeSH Terms]) AND incidence[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] |
(((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND incidence[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] | (((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes[MeSH Terms]) AND prevalence[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] |
(((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND relative risk[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] | (((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes [MeSH Terms]) AND risk ratio[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] |
(((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND risk ratio[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] | (((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes[MeSH Terms]) AND relative risk[MeSH Terms]) AND India [MeSH Terms] |
(((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND attributable risk[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] | (((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes [MeSH Terms]) AND attributable risk[MeSH Terms]) AND India[MeSH Terms] |
((((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND hypertension[MeSH Terms]) AND prevalence[MeSH Terms]) OR incidence[MeSH Terms]) AND India [MeSH Terms] | ((((obesity[MeSH Terms]) AND type 2 diabetes [MeSH Terms]) AND prevalence[MeSH Terms]) OR incidence[MeSH Terms]) AND India [MeSH Terms] |
Table 3 Characteristics of included obesity and hypertension studies
Ref. | Year | Participants characteristics | Study characteristics | Measurements | Methodological quality of study | |||||||
Age M (sd) in yr | Setting | Study design | Sample size | Inclusion criteria | Exposure | Outcome | Adjusting confounders | Selection bias | Measurement error | Response rate | ||
Reddy et al[14] | 2003 | 20-30 | Urban slums | Cross-sectional | 1000 (500 male and 500 female) | Adults of 20-60 yr age | BMI > 25 | Mean blood pressure levels | Important Confounders1 | Not mentioned | Mentioned | 100% |
Mandal et al[15] | 2008 | 40-49 | Kolkata Municipal Corporation | Cross-sectional | 887 | Aged 20 yr or more | BMI ≥ 25 | JNC VII guideline | Important confounders1 + religion, marital status, nature of work, family type, animal protein intake | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 98.30% |
Bhadoria et al[16] | 2014 | 38-50 | Urban wards | Cross-sectional | 939 | Individuals aged 20 yr and above | BMI ≥ 27.5 | JNC VII guideline | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Mentioned | 97.02% |
Bhadoria et al[16] | 2014 | Males: 25-52 Female: 24-53 | 48 villages and 15 urban wards of Jabalpur District | Cross-sectional | 939 | Aged 20 yr and above | W/H ratio > 0.85 for females and > 0.90 for males | JNC VII guideline | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Mentioned | 97.02% |
Bhadoria et al[16] | 2014 | Males: 25-52 Female: 24-53 | Villages of Jabalpur district | Cross-sectional | 939 | Aged 20 yr and above | BMI ≥ 27.5 | JNC VII guideline | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Mentioned | 97.02% |
Adhikari et al[17] | 2015 | 53.9 ± 12.7 | Semi-urban in Mangalore city | cross-sectional | 800 | ≥ 20 yr | BMI ≥ 25 | JNC VII criteria | Important confounders1 + serum cholesterol, serum triglycerides | Mentioned and discussed | Mentioned and discussed | 68.80% |
Table 4 Characteristics of included obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus studies
Ref. | Year | Participants characteristics | Study characteristics | Measurements | Methodological quality of study | |||||||
Age M (sd) in yr | Setting | Study design | Sample size | Inclusion criteria | Exposure | Outcome | Adjusting confounders | Selection bias | Measure-ment error | Response rate | ||
Mohan et al[19] | 1996 | 55.5 ± 11.9 | Tamilnadu | Cross-sectional | 1399 | Individuals aged ≥ 20 yr | BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 | Diabetes (WHO criteria) | Important confounders1 +, SBP, DBP | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 90.20% |
Mohan et al[19] | 1996 | 55.5 ± 11.9 | Tamilnadu | Cross-sectional | 1399 | individuals aged ≥ 20 yr | WC ≥ 90 cm | Diabetes (WHO criteria) | Important confounders1 +, SBP, DBP | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 90.20% |
Kumar et al[20] | Pub-lished year 2008 | 36.4 | Kolkata | Cross-sectional | 2200 | Policemen with (monthly income: Rs.6000-15000), age (20 and 60 yr) | BMI | T2DM | Important confounders1 +, SBP, DBP, | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 98.18% |
Kumar et al[20] | Pub-lished year 2008 | 36.4 | Kolkata | Cross-sectional | 2200 | policemen with (monthly income: Rs.6000-15000), age (20 and 60 yr) | WHR | T2DM | Important confounders1 + SBP, DBP | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 98.18% |
Kumar et al[20] | Pub-lished year 2008 | 36.4 | Kolkata | Cross-sectional | 2200 | Policemen with (monthly income: Rs.6000-15000), age: 20 and 60 yr | WC | T2DM | Important confounders1 SBP, DBP | Not mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 98.18% |
Bharati et al[21] | 2007 | 20-49 | Rural and urban field practice area. | Cross-sectional | 1370 | Adults: ≥ 20 yr | BMI > 30 | T2DM (ADA classif-ication) | Important confounders1 + blood cholesterol, hypertension | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 100% |
Bharati et al[21] | 2007 | 20-49 | Rural and urban field practice area | Cross-sectional | 1370 | Adults: ≥ 20 yr | WHR | T2DM (ADA classifi-cation) | Important confounders1 + blood cholesterol, hypertension | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 100% |
Ravindra Singh et al[24] | 2012-13 | 30-39 | Agra City | Cross-sectional | 633 | Adults: ≥ 30 yr residing in Agra City | BMI | T2DM (WHO criteria) | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 100% |
Ravindra Singh et al[24] | 2012-13 | 30-39 | Agra City | Cross-sectional | 633 | Adults: ≥ 30 yr residing in Agra City | WHR | T2DM (WHO criteria) | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 100% |
Ravindra Singh et al[24] | 2012-13 | 30-39 | Agra City | Cross-sectional | 633 | Adults: ≥ 30 yr residing in Agra City | WC (> 88 cm for female and > 102 cm for male) | T2DM (WHO criteria) | Important confounders1 | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 100% |
Ghor-pade et al[22] | 2007 | 35-50 | Rural Tamilnadu | Cohort | 1403 | Adults > 25 yr of age from selected population | BMI ≥ 23 | T2DM | Important confounders1 + n work status, Alcohol intake | Mentioned | Mentioned and discussed | 85% |
Vijaya-kumar et al[23] | 2007 | 30-44 | Urban Kerala | Cross-sectional | 1990 | ≥ 18 yr, residing since t 6 mo | WHR (< 0.80 in women, 0.90 in men) | T2DM (Those with diabetes, and ADA classi-fication) | Important confounders1 + hyperchol-esterolemia, elevated BP | Not mentioned | Not mentioned | 82.70% |
- Citation: Babu GR, Murthy GVS, Ana Y, Patel P, Deepa R, Benjamin-Neelon SE, Kinra S, Reddy KS. Association of obesity with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus in India: A meta-analysis of observational studies. World J Diabetes 2018; 9(1): 40-52
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v9/i1/40.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v9.i1.40