Review
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Diabetes. Dec 15, 2014; 5(6): 835-846
Published online Dec 15, 2014. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v5.i6.835
Table 1 Prevalence of albuminuria and impaired glomerular filtration rate in diabetic patients
Ref.Population (Nationality)Albuminuria prevalenceImpaired GFR prevalence
Parving et al[13]International DEMAND study of 33 countries 2006 32208 type 2 diabetic patientsMicroalbuminuria: 39% Macroalbuminuria: 10%22%
Bos et al[108] data from: Herman et al[109] Hamed et al[111]Northern Africa Systematic review of PubMed 1990-2012 > 18 years old diabetic patientsEgypt 1998: Albuminuria: 21%[109] Sudan 2008 (insulin treated diabetic patients): Albuminuria: 22%[110]Egypt 1998-Outpatient clinics: 6.7%[109] Egypt 1995-Hospital inpatients: 46.3%[111]
Icks A and Koch M Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in diseases. In: Wolf G. Diabetes and Kidney Disease[11], data from: Chadban et al[112]Australia AusDiab study: a national population-based cross-sectional survey > 25 years old diabetic patients8.70% proteinuria-spot urine protein to creatinine ratio (abnormal: > 0.20 mg/mg)27.60%
Unnikrishnan et al[113]Southern India CURES 45 study 17, 16 type 2 diabetic patientsMicroalbuminuria: 36.9% Macroalbuminuria: 2.2%-
Icks A and Koch M Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in diseases. In: Wolf G. Diabetes and Kidney Disease[11], data from: Lin et al[114]Taiwan Community-based screening 1999–2001 > 30 years old type 2 diabetic patients29.40% proteinuria-spot urine protein to creatinine ratio (abnormal: > 0.20 mg/mg)15.10%
Yang et al[115]China A nationally representative sample from 14 provinces and municipalities > 20 years old diabetic patients17.30%19.10%
Lou Arnal et al[116]Spain A survey of 16 Health Centers of the Alcañiz Health Sector 2008 > 18 years old, 3466 type 2 diabetic patients31.70%25.20%
Detournay et al[117]France ENTRED data 2007 A survey of the national public prescription claims database Type 2 diabetic patients-22%
Collins et al[14]United Status NHANES study 2005-2010 Adult diabetic patients29.90%19.30%
Al-Rubeaan et al[54]Saudi Arabia SNDR data > 25 yr, 54670 type 2 diabetic patientsMicroalbuminuria: 1.2% Macroalbuminuria: 8.1%GFR < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2: 1.50%
Table 2 Decline of estimated glomerular filtration rate in different populations
PopulationeGFR decline (mL/min per 1.73 m2 per year)Ref.
Healthy
PREVEND study 6894 subjects0.55Halbesma et al[5]
Estimated using MDRD formula
Annual health exam, Japan0.36Imai et al[19]
120727 subjectsEstimated using MDRD formula modified by a Japanese coefficient
ARIC study0.47Matsushita et al[20]
13029 subjectsEstimated using MDRD formula
Tromso Study, Norway1.21 (men)Kronborg et al[21]
2249 men and 2192 women1.19 (women) Estimated using MDRD formula
Aged without diabetes
2475 men > 65 years old1.4Hemmelgarn et al[22]
3163 women > 65 years old0.8Hemmelgarn et al[22]
Aged with diabetes
490 men > 65 years old2.7Hemmelgarn et al[22]
445 women > 65 years old2.1Hemmelgarn et al[22]
CKD
MDRD study group3.7MDRD study group
eGFR 25-80 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n = 28Levey et al[23]
eGFR 7.5-24 mL/min per 1.73 m2, n = 634.3
African Americans with hypertension eGFR 20-65 mL/min per 1.73 m2 low mean arterial pressure, n = 3802.21Wright et al[24]
normal mean arterial pressure, n = 3741.95
Tromso Study, Norway1.03Eriksen et al[25]
eGFR 30-59 mL/min per 1.73 m2 3047 subjects
eGFR < 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 4231 subjects2.65Levin et al[26]
Table 3 Definitions of rapid renal function decline
Population (Nationality)Rapid renal function declineRef.
Study
United States 4380 patients from the community-based CHS ≥ 65 years old Follow-up: 7 yr 14% with diabetes> 3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per yearReviewed by KDIGO CKD Work Group[18]: Shlipak et al[28] Rifkin et al[30]
Taiwan 577 type 2 diabetes patients from an outpatient department in a hospital-based study 63 years old (mean age) Follow-up: 1 yr> 3 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per yearSheen et al[72]
472 CKD 4-5 patients from an outpatient department in a hospital-based study 65 years old (mean age) 35.4% with diabetes Follow-up: 1.5 yr (17.3 mo)Tsai et al[118]
Canada 4231 patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min per 1.73 m2 from a cohort derived from all patients registered in a provincial database Follow-up: 2.5 yr (31 mo)> 4 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per yearLevin et al[26]
Italy 1682 type 2 diabetes patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2 from an outpatient department in a hospital based study Follow-up: 10 yr> 4% per yearZoppini et al[70]
Canada 3154 patients with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2, from the community based Walkerton Health Study (2002 to 2008) Follow-up: 7 yr> 5% per yearClark et al[74,119]
Taiwan 7968 civil servants and teachers ≥ 50 years old (mean age: 57 years old) Follow-up: 15 yr> 20% per yearReviewed by KDIGO CKD Work Group[18]: Cheng et al[29]
Taiwan 167 patients in a hospital based study> 25% per yearChen et al[85]
ReviewChronic kidney disease Lancet> 4 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per yearLevey et al[3]
GuidelineKDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease KDIGO CKD Work Group> 5 mL/min per 1.73 m2 per yearInker et al[10] KDIGO CKD Work Group[18]