Copyright
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Feb 15, 2026; 17(2): 115495
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v17.i2.115495
Published online Feb 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v17.i2.115495
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of individual studies and study participants included in the meta-analysis, mean (SD)/median (interquartile range)
| Ref. | Study design | Major inclusion criteria | Groups | Glucose-lowering drug used | Number | Sex | Age (years) | Duration of diabetes mellitus (years) | Baseline body weight (kg) | Baseline HbA1c (%) | Study duration |
| Abdelgadir et al[16], 2019, United Arab Emirates | Prospective interventional | Age 18-75 years, all using insulin | SGLT2i | SGLT2i + insulin ± other OADs | 49 | Male: 19, female: 30 | 57.5 (9.1) | NA | 82 (13.9) | 7.95 (1.1) | 14 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Insulin+ OADs other than SGLT2i | 46 | Male: 16, female: 36 | 55.4 (9.4) | NA | 85 (11.1) | 7.7 (1.0) | ||||
| Ahmed et al[17], 2022, Pakistan | Prospective, observational | HbA1c 6.5%-8.5%, eGFR > 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | Metformin + empagliflozin | 44 | Male: 24, female: 20 | 44.7 (10.7) | NA | 85.3 (7.8) | 7.2 (0.8) | 9 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Metformin + sitagliptin | 88 | Male: 43, female: 45 | 50.6 (10.5) | NA | 77.6 (13.7) | 7.8 (1.5) | ||||
| Gameil et al[18], 2022, Egypt | Case-control observational | Age 45-60 years, HBA1c 7.5%-8.8%, body mass index > 25 kg/m2, eGFR > 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | Empagliflozin ± OAD/glargine | 87 | Male: 58, female: 29 | 52.4 (6) | 5 (2-9) | 89.6 (14.6) | 7.9 (0.5) | NA |
| SGLT2i | Dapagliflozin ± OAD/glargine | 85 | Male: 54, female: 31 | 52.5 (6.3) | 6 (2-8) | 92.5 (13.2) | 8.1 (0.4) | ||||
| Non-SGLT2i | OAD other than SGLT2i ± basal insulin | 73 | Male: 48, female: 25 | 52.3 (6) | 5 (2-9) | 93.4 (12.1) | 8.3 (0.5) | ||||
| Goh et al[19], 2023, Malaysia | Prospective cohort | Age 18-75 years, eGFR > 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | Empagliflozin ± OAD/insulin | 48 | Male: 12, female: 36 | 48.0 (43.5-56.5) | 10.5 (6-15) | 77.7 (66.7-99.2) | 8.4 (7.25-9.85) | 6 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | OAD except SGLT2i ± insulin | 50 | Male: 16, female: 34 | 51.5 (42-58) | 4.5 (2-10) | 75.3 (69.4-84.1) | 8.1 (6.60-10.30) | ||||
| Hassanein et al[20], 2017, Lebanon, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates | Non-randomised, parallel-cohort, prospective, comparative | Age 18-65 years, HbA1c ≤ 8.5% | SGLT2i | Canagliflozin + metformin ± DPP4i | 162 | Male: 100, female: 62 | 52.3 (7.7) | 6.5 (5.9) | 87.1 (14.8) | 7.3 (0.8) | 8 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Sulfonylurea + metformin ± DPP4i | 159 | Male: 87, female: 72 | 54.3 (7.4) | 7.6 (5.5) | 82.1 (14.1) | 7.2 (0.8) | ||||
| Hassanein et al[21], 2024, nine countries | Prospective, real-world, observational | Age ≥ 18 years | SGLT2i | iGlarLixi + SGLT2i use, with or without other OADs | 174 | Male: 98, female: 76 | 55.2 (9.6) | 11.4 (6.3) | 87.9 (16.2) | 8.2 (1.3) | 3-5 months |
| Non-SGLT2i | iGlarLixi with or without other OADs | 246 | Male: 134, female: 112 | 58.4 (9.8) | 12.6 (6.4) | 85.5 (14.0) | 8.2 (1.0) | ||||
| Pathan et al[22], 2022, Bangladesh | Multi-centre, open-label, two-arm parallel-group study | Age >18 years, HbA1c 7%-10%, eGFR > 45 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | Empagliflozin + metformin± DPP4i | 274 | Male: 134, female: 140 | 49.0 (11.8) | 7.8 (5.9) | 70.7 (11.3) | 8.4 (1.45) | 24 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Metformin ± DPP4i | 219 | Male: 95, female: 124 | 49.7 (10.5) | 6.3 (4.8) | 66.4 (9.5) | 8.1 (1.46) | ||||
| Pathan et al[23], 2025, Bangladesh | Real-life experience study | Age ≥ 18 years, type 2 diabetes mellitus for at least 1 year, HbA1c < 10% | SGLT2i | Ertugliflozin ± OAD | 703 | Male: 276, female: 419 | 50.21 (11.11) | 6.74 (5.39) | 69.93 (11.54) | 8.16 (0.91) | 8 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | OAD except ertugliflozin | 670 | Male: 281, female: 387 | 50.53 (11.17) | 5.75 (4.46) | 68.74 (10.53) | 7.79 (0.87) | ||||
| Samkari et al[24], 2023, Saudi Arabia | Prospective cohort study | Age 18-70 years, eGFR > 60 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | Empagliflozin + OAD | 77 | Male: 33, female: 44 | 56 (51-62) | 9.00 (5.00-15.00) | NA | 7.80 (7.10-8.77) | 12 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Sulfonylurea and metformin ± DPP4i | 77 | Male: 35, female: 42 | 52 (47-64) | 7.00 (5.00-15.00) | NA | 7.50 (6.70-8.33) | ||||
| Shao et al[25], 2018, Singapore | Prospective observational controlled cohort | Age 21-75 years, eGFR > 45 mL/minute/1.73 m2 | SGLT2i | SGLT2i ± OAD/insulin | 35 | Male: 19, female: 16 | 49.9 (10.6) | 15.7 (8.3) | 88.2 (24.1) | 9.3 (1.9) | NA |
| Non-SGLT2i | OAD/insulin except SGLT2i | 33 | Male: 18, female: 15 | 54.7 (11.2) | 12.3 (6.0) | 73.9 (19.1) | 8.7 (1.6) | ||||
| Wan Seman et al[26], 2016, Malaysia | Randomized, open-label | Age 18-65 years, HbA1c 7%-10.5% | SGLT2i | Dapagliflozin + metformin | 58 | Male: 35, female: 23 | 53 (9.1) | 5.0 (3.0- 9.0) | 77.5 (13.9) | 7.7 (7.08- 8.43) | 12 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Sulfonylurea + metformin | 52 | Male: 31, female: 21 | 56 (9.1) | 6.0 (3.0- 10.3) | 75.6 (15.35) | 7.6 (6.9-8.1) | ||||
| Yousuf et al[27], 2022, Pakistan | Prospective case-control observational | Age 18-65 years, HbA1c < 8.5% | SGLT2i | Empagliflozin + metformin ± DPP4i | 58 | Male: 30, female: 28 | 52.1 (10.63) | 6.98 (5.08) | NA | 7.74 (0.89) | 14 weeks |
| Non-SGLT2i | Sulfonylurea + metformin ± DPP4i | 58 | Male: 31, female: 27 | 50.43 (9.23) | 5.84 (5.82) | NA | 7.9 (0.83) |
Table 2 Comparison of the safety outcomes in the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor vs non- sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor arms
| Outcome variables (categorical) | Number of included studies | Number of participants with outcome/participants analyzed (%) | Pooled effect size | I2 (%) | P value | |
| SGLT2i arm | Non-SGLT2i arm | |||||
| Any AE, RR (95%CI) | 3 | 71/397 | 53/462 | 1.40 (0.83-2.39) | 59 | 0.21 |
| Serious AE, RR (95%CI) | 2 | 1/220 | 0/211 | 2.74 (0.11-68.72) | Not available | 0.54 |
| Hospitalization, RR (95%CI) | 2 | 2/135 | 0/129 | 2.84 (0.30-26.98) | 0 | 0.36 |
| Abdominal pain, RR (95%CI) | 3 | 9/805 | 9/816 | 1.55 (0.62-3.88) | 0 | 0.35 |
| Dehydration, RR (95%CI) | 5 | 64/1042 | 30/1050 | 1.79 (0.83-3.83) | 58 | 0.14 |
| Dizziness, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 21/971 | 32/937 | 0.66 (0.10-4.21) | 81 | 0.66 |
| Postural dizziness, RR (95%CI) | 5 | 65/427 | 4/396 | 6.39 (1.58-25.80) | 44 | 0.009 |
| Hypotension/postural hypotension, RR (95%CI) | 7 | 61/1265 | 4/1195 | 4.43 (1.35-14.55) | 31 | 0.01 |
| Volume depletion, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 40/571 | 33/513 | 1.34 (0.62-2.90) | 54 | 0.46 |
| Headache, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 10/445 | 14/518 | 0.90 (0.38-2.14) | 5 | 0.81 |
| Hunger, RR (95%CI) | 3 | 10/268 | 20/267 | 0.33 (0.04-2.78) | 74 | 0.31 |
| Sweating, RR (95%CI) | 2 | 8/210 | 6/209 | 1.38 (0.51-3.78) | 0 | 0.53 |
| Generalized weakness, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 22/326 | 27/319 | 0.58 (0.14-2.45) | 54 | 0.46 |
| Symptomatic hyperglycemia, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 29/356 | 39/474 | 0.81 (0.54-1.20) | 0 | 0.29 |
| Increased urination, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 23/322 | 14/357 | 2.15 (0.81-5.70) | 16 | 0.12 |
| Symptomatic hypoglycemia, RR (95%CI) | 10 | 56/1640 | 135/1646 | 0.53 (0.29-0.97) | 69 | 0.04 |
| Severe hypoglycemia, RR (95%CI) | 3 | 0/375 | 8/435 | 0.14 (0.02-1.11) | 0 | 0.06 |
| Genital infection, RR (95%CI) | 4 | 7/326 | 3/319 | 2.03 (0.23-17.59) | 47 | 0.52 |
| Urinary tract infection, RR (95%CI) | 5 | 15/1241 | 15/1188 | 1.18 (0.53-2.60) | 0 | 0.69 |
| Broke fast, RR (95%CI) | 2 | 8/126 | 14/123 | 0.38 (0.03-5.26) | 70 | 0.47 |
| Number of days fasted, MD (95%CI) | 3 | 252 | 296 | -0.26 (-1.72 to 1.21) | 88 | 0.73 |
| Serum urea (mmol/L), MD (95%CI) | 2 | 83 | 83 | 0.67 (-0.52 to 1.87) | 86 | 0.27 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL), MD (95%CI) | 5 | 485 | 423 | 0.03 (-0.05 to 0.11) | 64 | 0.43 |
| Estimated glomerular filtration rate (mL/minute/1.73 m2), MD (95%CI) | 7 | 1311 | 1189 | -0.81 (-1.83 to 0.20) | 0 | 0.12 |
| Serum sodium (mmol/L), MD (95%CI) | 3 | 1012 | 922 | -1.00 (-1.34 to -0.67) | 0 | < 0.00001 |
| Serum potassium (mmol/L), MD (95%CI) | 3 | 1012 | 922 | 0.01 (-0.17 to 0.19) | 51 | 0.89 |
- Citation: Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Shaikh S, Ashraf H, Kuchay MS, Nagendra L, Dutta D, Pappachan JM. Safety and efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in adults with type 2 diabetes fasting during Ramadan: A meta-analysis. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(2): 115495
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v17/i2/115495.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.v17.i2.115495
