BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Diabetes. Nov 15, 2025; 16(11): 111008
Published online Nov 15, 2025. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111008
Table 1 Comparison of demographic characteristics between two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Index
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t/χ²
P value
Age (years)58.44 ± 7.6557.96 ± 8.170.4780.633
BMI (kg/m²)24.37 ± 4.1124.42 ± 4.120.090.928
Female/male31 (27.93)/80 (72.07)39 (29.1)/95 (70.9)0.0410.839
Smoking status22 (19.82)21 (15.67)0.7220.396
Drinking status12 (10.81)11 (8.21)0.4830.487
Physical activity (hours/week)4.69 ± 2.224.69 ± 1.930.0240.981
Education level (high school and below/bachelor degree and above)94 (84.68)/17 (15.32)117 (87.31)/17 (12.69)0.3510.554
Occupation status (working/not working)46 (41.44)/65 (58.56)51 (38.06)/83 (61.94)0.290.59
Difficulty paying for basics (hard/ not hard)75 (67.57)/36 (32.43)88 (65.67)/46 (34.33)0.0980.754
Marital status (single/married/divorced)28 (25.23)/59 (53.15)/24 (21.62)37 (27.61)/75 (55.97)/22 (16.42)1.0940.579
Monthly average income (< 3000/3000-6000/> 6000)23 (20.72)/56 (50.45)/32 (28.83)23 (17.16)/57 (42.54)/54 (40.3)3.5080.173
Hypertension31 (27.93)32 (23.88)0.5210.471
Anemia18 (16.22)15 (11.19)1.3140.252
Table 2 Comparison of baseline diabetes features between two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Index
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t/χ²
P value
Duration of diabetes (years)9.01 ± 2.298.84 ± 2.390.5520.581
Family history of diabetes29 (26.13)31 (23.13)0.2940.588
Use of SBGM59 (53.15)59 (44.03)2.0240.155
Only insulin injection78 (70.27)88 (65.67)0.5880.443
Oral medicine plus insulin injection25 (22.52)40 (29.85)1.6730.196
The average daily dose of insulin injection (units)42.47 ± 13.8941.47 ± 12.970.5850.559
Staple food control (≤ 400 g/day/> 400 g/day)76 (68.47)/35 (31.53)93 (69.4)/41 (30.6)0.0250.875
Dorsalis pedis artery pulsation93 (83.78)120 (89.55)1.7790.182
Table 3 Comparison of baseline colorectal cancer characteristics between two groups, n (%)
Parameters
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t/χ²
P value
Tumor site0.20.654
Segmented colon69 (62.16)87 (64.93)
Rectum42 (37.84)47 (35.07)
Tumor size at diagnosis1.1080.575
< 4 cm41 (36.94)41 (30.6)
4-6 cm36 (32.43)47 (35.07)
> 6 cm34 (30.63)46 (34.33)
TNM staging0.3130.855
Stage I25 (22.52)31 (23.13)
Stage II45 (40.54)58 (43.28)
Stage III41 (36.94)45 (33.58)
Disease duration1.2220.543
< 3 months36 (32.43)47 (35.07)
3-6 months38 (34.23)51 (38.06)
> 6 months37 (33.33)36 (26.87)
Surgical method0.170.68
Palliative surgery76 (68.47)95 (70.9)
Radical surgery35 (31.53)39 (29.1)
ECOG0.1580.924
Grade 021 (18.92)26 (19.4)
Grade 122 (19.82)29 (21.64)
Grade 268 (61.26)79 (58.96)
Table 4 Comparison of blood glucose between two groups of patients, mean ± SD
Index
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t
P value
FPG before nursing (mmol/L)10.12 ± 1.2810.08 ± 1.480.2590.796
FPG after nursing (mmol/L)7.55 ± 1.886.98 ± 1.212.7320.007
2-hour PG before nursing (mmol/L)12.83 ± 1.5712.47 ± 1.581.7550.08
2-hour PG after nursing (mmol/L)9.92 ± 2.878.85 ± 2.553.0960.002
HbA1c before nursing (%)8.87 ± 1.418.57 ± 1.761.5060.133
HbA1c after nursing (%)7.49 ± 2.646.51 ± 2.413.0360.003
Table 5 Comparison of blood glucose variability between two groups, mean ± SD
Parameters
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t
P value
ASVFBG0.51 ± 0.210.44 ± 0.172.8810.004
SDFBG0.54 ± 0.330.43 ± 0.233.0850.002
CVFBG8.64 ± 2.477.93 ± 1.292.7280.007
Table 6 Comparison of adverse events between two groups, n (%)
Parameters
SC group (n = 111)
IET group (n = 134)
t
P value
Falls0 (0.00) 1 (0.75) None1
Hypoglycemia1 (0.90) 3 (2.24) 0.10.752
Excessive fatigue0 (0.00)1 (0.75)None1
Musculoskeletal pain1 (0.90) 2 (1.49) 01