Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Diabetes. May 15, 2019; 10(5): 291-303
Published online May 15, 2019. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v10.i5.291
Table 1 Summary of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 cardiovascular outcome trials
TrialNumberFollow upCVD (baseline)Characteristics (baseline)Drug vs Placebo (%) PEPSuperiority
SAVOR-TIMI53 (Saxagliptin) 2013n = 16492, 2.1 yr (median)Pre-existing CV or high CV risk/multiple CV risk factors65 y/o, DM duration: 10 yr; A1c: 8%; BMI: 317.3 vs 7.2No
EXAMINE (Alogliptin) 2013n = 5380, 1.5 yr (median)Acute MI or HUA in previous 15 to 90 d61 y/o, DM duration: 7 yr; A1c: 8%; BMI: 2911.3 vs 11.8No
TECOS (Sitagliptin) 2015n = 14671, 3.1 yr (median)Pre-existing CV disease (CAD, ischemic stroke, PAD)65.5 y.o, DM duration: 11.6 yr; A1c: 7.2%; BMI: 30.211.4 vs 11.6 (4-point MACE)No
Table 2 Summary of the results of the most important Randomized Controlled Trials prior to the new classes of antidiabetic medications
StudyEffects on microvascular complicationsEffects on macrovascular complicationsEffect on total mortality
DCCT[10] (1993), T1DMReduced retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathyNo difference on major cardiovascular and peripheral vascular eventsNo difference
UKPDS[9] (1998)Reduced microvascular endpointsNo difference on myocardial infarctionsNo difference
ACCORD[14] (2008)Reduced retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathyNo difference on MACEIncreased mortality
ADVANCE[11] (2008)Reduced nephropathyNo effect on MACENo difference
VADT[12] (2009)Reduced progression of albuminuriaNo effects on major cardiovascular eventsNo difference
Table 3 Summary of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors Randomized Controlled Trials
TrialNumber Follow upCV disease (baseline)Characteristics (baseline)Drug vs Placebo (%) PEPSuperiority
ELIXA[22] (Lixisenatide) (2015)n = 6068, 2.1 yrAcute Coronary Events (previous 180 d)Median age: 60; DM duration: 9.3 yr (median); A1c: 7.7%; BMI: 30.113.4 vs 13.2 (4-point MACENo
LEADER[23] (Liraglutide) (2016)n = 9340, 3.8 yr (median)> 50 y/o + > 1 CV condition/CKD or Chronic HF or > 60 y/o > 1 risk factor for CVDmean age: 64; DM duration: 12.8 yr (median); A1c: 8.7%; BMI: 32.513.0 vs 14.9Yes
SUSTAIN-6[24] (Semaglutide) (2016)n = 3297, 2.1 yr (median)> 50 y/o + > 1 CV condition/CKD or Chronic HF or > 60 y/o > 1 CV conditionmean age: 65; DM duration: 13.9 yr (median); A1c: 8.7%; BMI: 30.16.6 vs 8.9Yes
EXSCEL[26] (Exenatide) (2017)n = 14752, 3.2 yr (median)70% with previous CV events (CAD, ischemic cerebrovascular disease, or PAD)mean age: 63; DM duration: 12 yr (median); A1c: 8.0%; BMI: 3211.4 vs 12.2No
REWIND (Dulaglutide) (2019)?????
EMPA-REG[31] (Empagliflozin) (2015)n = 7020, 3.1 yr (median)Established CV disease; high CV riskmean age: 63; DM duration: > 10 yr 57%; 5-10 yr 25%; A1c: 8.07%; BMI: 30.610.5 vs 12.1Yes
CANVAS[32] (Canagliflozin); ANVAS – R (Canagliflozin) (2017)Total = 10142; CANVAS: n = 4330; CANVAS-R n = 5812; 3.6 yr (mean)> 30 y/o at high CV risk (ASCVD) Or > 50 y/o > 2 CV risk factorsmean age: 63.3; DM duration: 13.5 yr (median); A1c: 8.2; %BMI: 329.8 vs 10.1Yes
DECLARE[33] (Dapagliflozin) (2019)n = 17160; 4.2 yr (median)> 40 y/o established CVD or multiple risk factorsMEAN age: 64; DM duration: 11 yr (median); A1c: 8.3%; BMI: 328.8 vs 9.4No