Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Diabetes. Jul 15, 2026; 17(7): 121202
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.121202
Published online Jul 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.121202
Figure 1 Experimental procedure.
STZ: Streptozotocin; T2DM: Type 2 diabetes mellitus; CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group; SW: Sterile water; DGF: Dangua Fang; NAMPT: Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase; NAD+: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; SIRT1: Sirtuin 1.
Figure 2 Comparison of body weight changes.
aP < 0.05 vs the control group; bP < 0.01 vs the control group; cP < 0.05 vs the model group; dP < 0.01 vs the model group. n = 8 per group. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group.
Figure 3 Comparison of hepatic histopathological changes.
A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver tissue (× 100/200); B: Masson staining of liver tissue (× 100/200); C: Oil red O staining of liver tissue (× 100). HE: Hematoxylin and eosin; CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group.
Figure 4 Western blot protein bands and hepatic immunohistochemical staining.
A: Protein bands of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase and sirtuin 1; B and C: Hepatic immunohistochemical staining of Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase and sirtuin 1 (× 200). CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group; NAMPT: Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase; SIRT1: Sirtuin 1.
Figure 5 Comparison of amino acid metabolic changes.
A: Principal component analysis score scatter plot of all samples; B-D: Principal component analysis score scatter plots and permutation test results of orthogonal projections to latent structures-discriminant analysis models for each comparison group; E: K-means clustering of differential metabolites; F: Hierarchical clustering heatmaps of differential metabolites; G: Classification of differential metabolites. PC1: Principal component 1; PC2: Principal component 2; CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group.
Figure 6 Differential metabolic pathways and receiver operating characteristic analysis.
A-C: Pathway analysis plots for each comparison group; D-F: Receiver operating characteristic curves of differential metabolites for each comparison group. CON: Control group; MOD: Model group; DFG: Dangua Fang group; MET: Metformin group; AUC: Area under the curve.
Figure 7 Correlation analysis of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase/nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide/sirtuin 1 axis and metabolites.
NAMPT: Nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase; NAD+: Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; SIRT1: Sirtuin 1.
- Citation: Han Z, Wang ZT, Yang LQ, Heng XP. Regulatory effects of Dangua Fang on the NAMPT/NAD+/SIRT1 axis and amino acid metabolism in type 2 diabetic rats. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(7): 121202
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v17/i7/121202.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4239/wjd.121202