BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Diabetes. Oct 15, 2026; 17(10): 124799
Published online Oct 15, 2026. doi: 10.4239/wjd.124799
Human pregnancy outcomes after early glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure: A scoping review
Ritu Singh, Akriti Singh, Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Ritu Singh, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Horizon Multispecialty Hospital, Kolkata 700014, West Bengal, India
Ritu Singh, Department of Gynecology & Obstetrics, G. D Hospital & Diabetes Institute, Kolkata 700013, West Bengal, India
Akriti Singh, Department of Medicine, KPC Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata 700032, West Bengal, India
Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Department of Diabetes & Endocrinology, G. D Hospital & Diabetes Institute, Kolkata 700013, West Bengal, India
Co-first authors: Ritu Singh and Awadhesh Kumar Singh.
Author contributions: Singh R conceptualized the study and wrote the first draft; Singh A and Singh AK conducted the literature review and revised the draft; and all authors agreed to submit the final manuscript. Singh R and Singh AK contributed equally to this study as co-first authors.
AI contribution statement: AI tools, specifically ChatGPT 5.6, were used to assist with the formatting of some figures. No AI tool was used to generate research data, interpret results, or formulate conclusions. All AI-assisted content was critically reviewed and revised by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no competing interest.
PRISMA 2009 Checklist statement: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews documents are attached as Supplementary material.
Corresponding author: Ritu Singh, MD, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Horizon Multispecialty Hospital, P-34, C.I.T Road, Kolkata 700014, West Bengal, India. drritusingh73@gmail.com
Received: June 24, 2026
Revised: July 17, 2026
Accepted: August 28, 2026
Published online: October 15, 2026
Processing time: 110 Days and 11.8 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and related incretin-based dual agonists are increasingly used by women of reproductive age for type 2 diabetes, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, and infertility-related metabolic dysfunction. This expanding use has created a clinical dilemma about how to counsel women during periconception or inadvertent early-pregnancy exposure.

AIM

To map and critically synthesize the available human evidence on maternal, pregnancy, fetal, neonatal, and offspring outcomes following periconceptional or early-pregnancy GLP-1RA exposure.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews, using PubMed and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000 to June 10, 2026. Evidence was organized by study design and inferential strength, including case reports; case series; pharmacovigilance analyses; regulatory clinical-trial pregnancy datasets; comparative cohort, registry, and controlled studies; and systematic reviews with meta-analyses. Systematic reviews without meta-analysis were retained only for contextualization and reference cross-checking. A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 domains and Joanna Briggs Institute tools were used for contextual quality appraisal.

RESULTS

Forty-seven reports were included, comprising 41 core evidence reports and 6 contextual systematic reviews without meta-analysis. Core evidence included 17 case reports, 3 case series, 1 pharmacovigilance study, 1 regulatory clinical-trial pregnancy dataset, 16 cohort studies, and 3 systematic reviews with meta-analyses. Across comparative cohorts and meta-analyses, inadvertent preconceptional or early-pregnancy GLP-1RA exposure was not associated with a consistent increase in overall major congenital malformations. However, signals for spontaneous abortion, elective termination, preeclampsia, preterm birth, altered gestational weight gain, fetal growth abnormalities, and renal/genitourinary anomalies were inconsistently reported. Interpretation was limited by confounding from type 2 diabetes, obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility, hypertension, nephropathy, comparator choice, exposure-window heterogeneity, and prescription-based exposure misclassification. Evidence was strongest for cautious reassurance after inadvertent exposure and weakest for planned or continued pregnancy use.

CONCLUSION

Current human evidence does not indicate a reproducible teratogenic signal after inadvertent preconceptional or early-pregnancy GLP-1RA exposure. Nevertheless, available data remain observational, heterogeneous, and confounded. GLP-1RAs should be discontinued when pregnancy is recognized, and women should be transitioned to pregnancy-compatible metabolic care. Planned or continued GLP-1RA use during pregnancy is not supported.

Keywords: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; Semaglutide; Tirzepatide; Pregnancy; Preconception; Periconception; Congenital malformation; Obesity; Type 2 diabetes; Scoping review

Core Tip: This scoping review maps the full human evidence spectrum on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exposure before conception and during early pregnancy, from case reports to meta-analyses. The most important finding is cautiously reassuring: no consistent overall signal of major congenital malformations has emerged after inadvertent early exposure. However, pregnancy loss, termination, hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, fetal growth, and renal/genitourinary signals remain uncertain and highly confounded. Clinicians should reassure women after accidental exposure, stop glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists once pregnancy is recognized, and avoid planned or continued use during pregnancy until stronger prospective evidence is available.

Write to the Help Desk