Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among renal transplant (RTx) recipients, with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) representing a disproportionately high burden. However, the optimal revascularization strategy for NSTE-ACS in RTx recipients remains unclear. This retrospective study analyzed the 2016 to 2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. RTx recipients (≥18 years) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NSTE-ACS were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while perioperative complications, unplanned 30- and 90-day readmissions, repeat revascularization, and renal allograft failure were also considered. Multivariable logistic regression and Royston-Parmar models were used to identify the risk-adjusted association of revascularization modality, timing, and outcomes. Of an estimated 3,323 patients, 20.5% underwent CABG and 79.5% PCI. Following adjustment, CABG was associated with higher perioperative complications (AOR 3.46, 95% CI 2.31 to 5.19) and demonstrated a trend toward increased mortality risk (AOR 1.79, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.18). Royston-Parmar analysis demonstrated no difference in freedom from readmission or renal allograft failure within 90 days of discharge, but CABG was associated with a lower hazard of repeat revascularization (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.76). Timing analysis revealed stable mortality rates across intervals for both modalities. While PCI complications increased with longer delays to revascularization, CABG demonstrated a more stable pattern. In conclusion, our findings suggest that PCI appears to be associated with lower risks of mortality and complications compared to CABG in RTx recipients with NSTE-ACS. However, CABG may offer benefits of reduced risk of repeat revascularization and greater flexibility in timing without compromising renal allograft function.

Organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for individuals with kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy, as well as for those with end-stage liver disease. Despite the significant reduction in long-term morbidity and mortality with transplantation, kidney and liver allograft recipients remain at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature death from cardiovascular causes. This heightened risk is represented across all phenotypes of CVD, including coronary heart disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, valvulopathies and pulmonary hypertension. Pre-existing vascular risk factors for CVD, coupled with superimposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic derangements after transplantation, driven at least in part by post-transplant weight gain, immunosuppressive therapies and de novo risk factors such as dyslipidaemia and diabetes, coalesce to increase total CVD risk. In this review, we summarise pathophysiological considerations for both the short- and long-term increase in CVD risk following kidney/liver transplantation. We review the different phenotypes of CVD, with unique considerations for post-transplant care in this patient population. Finally, we highlight the need for awareness about long-term CVD risk and a multidisciplinary approach to managing organ-specific CVD risk in kidney and liver transplant patients.

Background: The suitability of the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) has not been fully validated in the European population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the KDRI in predicting kidney graft function and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in a Polish cohort of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Methods: In this retrospective study kidney graft function and CVEs were analyzed among 1420 patients transplanted between 1999 and 2017 and followed until 2021. The KDRI was calculated according to the formula proposed by Rao. Patients were assigned into quartiles (Qs) of KDRI values. Results: Patients in Q4 were older, with higher BMI, longer cold ischemia time (CIT), and a greater rate of ischemic heart disease at the transplantation. The KDRI value determined both early and long-term graft function. During a median follow-up period of 91 months, at least one cardiovascular event was noted in 227 (16.0%) kidney transplant recipients. There was a significant increasing trend for the occurrence of post-transplant CV complications along the consecutive KDRI quartiles (χ2 = 7.3; p < 0.01) among kidney transplant patients younger than 50 years at the time of transplantation. Conclusions: The KDRI is an adequate prognostic tool also for the European population. Despite the KDRI not being used for allocation in Poland we found that kidneys with a higher KDRI are allocated to recipients with worse survival prognosis. The quality of kidneys from a deceased donor may be related to the occurrence of post-transplant cardiovascular complications in recipients younger than 50 years at the transplantation, including those without history of comorbidities such as diabetes or cardiovascular disease.

Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of death after kidney transplantation. This statement addresses preoperative cardiac decision-making and management with the aim of assessing and reducing the risk of the kidney transplant surgery. Important issues from a clinician's perspective include the basic cardiovascular workup of these patients, coronary evaluation and management of coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Recovery left ventricular function after kidney transplant is discussed. In addition, the use of cardiovascular drugs in patients with special emphasis on antiplatelets and anticoagulants in patients planned for kidney transplant is also discussed.

Kidney transplantation remains the best treatment for chronic kidney failure, offering better outcomes and quality of life compared with dialysis. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients and is associated with decreased patient survival and worse graft outcomes. Post-transplant CVD results from a complex interaction between traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension and diabetes, and risk factors specific to kidney transplant recipients including chronic kidney disease, immunosuppressive drugs, or vascular access. An accurate assessment of cardiovascular risk is now needed to optimize the management of cardiovascular comorbidities through the detection of risk factors and the screening of hidden pretransplant coronary artery disease. Promising new strategies are emerging, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors, with a high potential to mitigate cardiovascular complications, although further research is needed to determine their role in kidney transplant recipients. Despite this progress, a significant gap remains in understanding the optimal management of post-transplant CVD, especially coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral artery disease. Addressing these challenges is essential to improve the short- and long-term outcomes in kidney transplant recipients. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of cardiovascular risk assessment and post-transplant CVD management.

The endothelium modulates vascular homeostasis owing to a variety of vasoconstrictors and vasodilators. Endothelial dysfunction (ED), characterized by impaired vasodilation, inflammation, and thrombosis, triggers future cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Chronic kidney disease, a state of chronic inflammation caused by oxidative stress, metabolic abnormalities, infection, and uremic toxins damages the endothelium. ED is also associated with a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate. After kidney transplantation, endothelial functions undergo immediate but partial restoration, promising graft longevity and enhanced CV health. However, the anticipated CV outcomes do not happen due to various transplant-related and unrelated risk factors for ED, culminating in poor CV health and graft survival. ED in kidney transplant recipients is an under-recognized and poorly studied entity. CV diseases are the leading cause of death among kidney transplant candidates with functioning grafts. ED contributes to the pathogenesis of many of the CV diseases. Various biomarkers and vasoreactivity tests are available to study endothelial functions. With an increasing number of transplants happening every year, and improved graft rejection rates due to the availability of effective immunosuppressants, the focus has now shifted to endothelial protection for the prevention, early recognition, and treatment of CV diseases.

Renal transplantation improves the survival and quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The bidirectional relationship between renal and heart disease creates a unique clinical scenario that demands a comprehensive and personalized approach. This expert consensus, drafted by the Spanish Society of Transplantation, the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and the Spanish Society of Nephrology, aims to assess current practices and propose strategies for the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients. A panel of Spanish nephrologists and cardiologists with expertise in renal and heart transplantation reviewed the scientific evidence concerning the current management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients. Subsequently, consensus statements were created through a 2-round Delphi methodology, resulting in 30 statements covering key topics such as the identification of renal transplant candidates, the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients, and eligibility for combined heart-kidney transplantation in patients with both end-stage renal disease and cardiac disease. These consensus statements provide expert guidance for the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients, an area where published clinical evidence remains limited.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease, significantly preserving kidney function and patient quality of life. However, post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a common complication, occurring in approximately one-third of renal transplant recipients. This study aims to evaluate the role of pulse wave parameters in predicting PTDM and to identify other pre-transplant risk factors.

This prospective cohort study included 105 patients on the kidney transplant waiting list from 2017 to 2022. Exclusion criteria included any pre-existing diabetes mellitus. Patients underwent physical examinations, laboratory analyses, and pulse wave analysis before transplantation and one year post-transplant. PTDM diagnosis followed International Consensus Guidelines. Data were analyzed using Wilcox test, Bonferroni correction, May-Whitney U-test, and Fisher's exact test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Post-transplant, 21% of patients were diagnosed with PTDM, increasing to 35% 3months post-transplant and 43% at one year post-transplant. Significant findings included: Pre-transplat risk factors for developing PTDM: Proteinuria (p = 0.037, OR = 3.942) and perioperative hyperglycemia (p = 0.003, OR = 4.219 at 3 months; p = 0.001, OR = 4.571 at 1 year). Pulse wave parameters for developing PTDM: Pre-transplant Aortic PP > 45 mmHg (AUC = 0.757) and PWV > 8.5 m/s (AUC = 0.730) were strong predictors of the development of PTDM after 3 months (p < 0.0001). Moreover, we found significant improvements in aortic pulse pressure (Aortic PP) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) post-transplant (p < 0.0001).

Our study confirms that pulse wave parameters, such as Aortic PP and PWV, are significant predictors of PTDM in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). These findings support incorporating pulse wave analysis into routine pre-transplant evaluations to identify high-risk patients. Additionally, monitoring these parameters post-transplant may aid in early intervention and prevention of PTDM, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Medical faculty and University Hospital Olomouc (approval no. 94/15).

The correlation between hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains uncertain. We sought to characterize the association between abnormal cholesterol profiles and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in this unique population.

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center and included all adult KTR, transplanted between January 2005 and April 2014. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) while the secondary outcome was the composite outcome of MACE and all-cause mortality. Exposure to abnormal cholesterol levels was calculated using a time-weighted average calculation. MACE and mortality risk were analyzed using a multivariate time-varying Cox model.

The final cohort comprised 737 KTR, with a median follow-up of 2,920 days. A total of 126 patients (17.1%) experienced MACE. High LDL-C levels and MACE risk were correlated by multivariate analysis (HR 1.008 per mg/dL, 95% CI: 1.001-1.016), while low HDL-C levels were not significantly associated with MACE (HR 0.992 per mg/dL, 95% CI: 0.976-1.009). A higher LDL-C/HDL-C ratio was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE in multivariate analyses (HR 1.502 per unit, 95% CI: 1.147-1.968), and also correlated with the composite outcome (HR 1.35 per unit, 95% CI: 1.06-1.71).

A high LDL-C/HDL-C ratio is predictive of an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in KTRs. These findings emphasize the significance of the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio as a valuable marker of cardiovascular risk and support current recommendations to improve hypercholesterolemia in this high-risk group.

 Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at very high risk for thromboembolism and bleeding. This study aimed to identify small noncoding RNAs (sncRNAs), specifically microRNAs and transfer-RNA (tRNA)-derived fragments (tRFs), as potential novel biomarkers for predicting thromboembolism and bleeding in this high-risk population.

 In this sncRNA discovery research, we leveraged the VIVALDI cohort, consisting of 625 ESKD patients on hemodialysis, to conduct two nested case-control studies, each comprising 18 participants. The primary outcomes were ischemic stroke in the first study and major bleeding in the second. Plasma samples were processed using the miND pipeline for RNA-seq analysis to investigate differential expression of microRNAs and tRNA/tRFs between cases and their respective matched controls, with results stringently adjusted for the false discovery rate (FDR).

 No significant differential expression of microRNAs for either ischemic stroke or major bleeding outcomes was observed in the two nested case-control studies. However, we identified four tRNAs significantly differentially expressed in ischemic stroke cases and seven in major bleeding cases, compared with controls (FDR < 0.1). Coverage plots indicated that specific tRNA fragments (tRFs), rather than full-length tRNAs, were detected, however. Alternative mapping approaches revealed challenges and technical limitations that precluded in-depth differential expression analyses on these specific tRFs. Yet, they also underscored the potential of tRNAs and tRFs as markers for thromboembolism and bleeding.

 While microRNAs did not show significant differential expression, our study identifies specific tRNAs/tRFs as potential novel biomarkers for ischemic stroke and major bleeding in ESKD patients.

The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences in cardiovascular outcomes of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Here, a retrospective cohort study was conducted, and data from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan were used. In total, 2904 patients who had end-stage renal disease (ERSD) and received kidney transplantation (KT) were identified by propensity score matching (PSM) and were enrolled from 1997 to 2012, with follow-up ending in 2013. Besides, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal strokes. Apart from that, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by Cox regression, while the Bayesian network model was constructed to assess the importance of risk factors for MACEs. Furthermore, the original cohort was a sensitivity analysis. Women had a lower risk of MACEs compared with men (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98; P = .024). Beyond that, stratified analysis of age and waiting time for KT showed that the risk of MACEs was significantly lower in women than in men among KTRs aged > 50 years (HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.62-1.0; P = .05) or waiting time for KT ≤ 6 years (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72-0.99; P = .04). Bayesian network indicated that age is an important determinant of cardiovascular outcomes in KTRs, regardless of gender. In Taiwan, women had a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes than men in KTRs aged > 50 years or with a waiting time for KT ≤ 6 years. Furthermore, age is an important independent determinant for the prognosis of KTRs.

Improving access to kidney transplants remains a priority for the transplant community. However, many medical, psychosocial, geographic, and socioeconomic barriers exist that prevent or delay transplantation for candidates with certain conditions. There is a lack of consensus regarding how to best approach many of these issues and barriers, leading to heterogeneity in transplant centers' management and acceptance practices for a variety of pretransplant candidate issues. In this review, we address several of the more common contemporary patient medical and psychosocial barriers frequently encountered by transplant programs. The barriers discussed here include kidney transplant candidates with obesity, older age, prior malignancy, cardiovascular disease, history of nonadherence, and cannabis use. Improving understanding of how to best address these specific issues can empower referring providers, transplant programs, and patients to address these issues as necessary to progress toward eventual successful transplantation.

Cardiovascular disease, infection, malignancy, and thromboembolism are major causes of morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Prospectively identifying monogenic conditions associated with post-transplant complications may enable personalized management. Therefore, we developed a transplant morbidity panel (355 genes) associated with major post-transplant complications including cardiometabolic disorders, immunodeficiency, malignancy, and thrombophilia. This gene panel was then evaluated using exome sequencing data from 1590 KTR. Additionally, genes associated with monogenic kidney and genitourinary disorders along with American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) secondary findings v3.2 were annotated. Altogether, diagnostic variants in 37 genes associated with Mendelian kidney and genitourinary disorders were detected in 9.9% (158/1590) of KTR; 25.9% (41/158) had not been clinically diagnosed. Moreover, the transplant morbidity gene panel detected diagnostic variants for 56 monogenic disorders in 9.1% KTRs (144/1590). Cardiovascular disease, malignancy, immunodeficiency, and thrombophilia variants were detected in 5.1% (81), 2.1% (34), 1.8% (29) and 0.2% (3) among 1590 KTRs, respectively. Concordant phenotypes were present in half of these cases. Reviewing implications for transplant care, these genetic findings would have allowed physicians to set specific risk factor targets in 6.3% (9/144), arrange intensive surveillance in 97.2% (140/144), utilize preventive measures in 13.2% (19/144), guide disease-specific therapy in 63.9% (92/144), initiate specialty referral in 90.3% (130/144) and alter immunosuppression in 56.9% (82/144). Thus, beyond diagnostic testing for kidney disorders, sequence annotation identified monogenic disorders associated with common post-transplant complications in 9.1% of KTR, with important clinical implications. Incorporating genetic diagnostics for transplant morbidities would enable personalized management in pre- and post-transplant care.

Clinical outcomes of patients with renal transplant (RT) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain poorly elucidated.

Between 2014 and 2021, data were analysed for the following three groups of patients undergoing PCI enrolled in a multicentre Australian registry: (1) RT recipients (n=226), (2) patients on dialysis (n=992), and (3) chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30‒60 mL/min per 1.73 m2) without previous RT (n=15,534). Primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)-composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularisation, and stroke.

RT recipients were younger than dialysis and patients with CKD (61±10 vs 68±12 vs 78±8.2 years, p<0.001). Patients with RT less frequently had severe left ventricular dysfunction compared with dialysis and CKD groups (6.7% vs 14% and 8.5%); however more, often presented with acute coronary syndrome (58% vs 52% and 48%), especially STEMI (all p<0.001). Patients with RT and CKD had lower rates of 30-day MACCE (4.4% and 6.8% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) than the dialysis group. Three-year survival was similar between RT and CKD groups, however was lower in the dialysis group (80% and 83% vs 60%, p<0.001). After adjustment, dialysis was an independent predictor of 30-day MACCE (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44‒2.50, p<0.001), however RT was not (OR 0.91, CI 0.42‒1.96, p=0.802). Both RT (hazard ratio [HR] 2.07, CI 1.46‒2.95, p<0.001) and dialysis (HR 1.35, CI 1.02‒1.80, p=0.036) heightened the hazard of long-term mortality.

RT recipients have more favourable clinical outcomes following PCI compared with patients on dialysis. However, despite having similar short-term outcomes to patients with CKD, the hazard of long-term mortality is significantly greater for RT recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients require lifelong immunosuppression to prevent graft rejection. However, immunosuppression is associated with adverse effects. A minority of kidney transplant recipients can be weaned off immunosuppression and maintain their graft function, a situation referred to as "functional or operational tolerance". We describe a case of a 70-year-old man who received a haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplant for lymphoma 22 years before receiving a kidney transplant from the same donor and was weaned off all immunosuppression by four months post-transplant. Tolerance was present, and there has been no graft rejection or graft vs. host disease. This case demonstrates successful long-term hematopoietic chimerism and functional tolerance after receiving a kidney transplant from the same donor.

Kidney transplantation improves quality of life and prolongs survival of patients with end-stage kidney disease. However, kidney transplant recipients present a higher risk for cardiovascular events compared to the general population. Risk assessment for graft failure as well as cardiovascular events is still based on invasive procedures. Biomarkers in blood and urine, but also new diagnostic approaches like genetic or molecular testing, can be useful tools to monitor graft function and to identify patients of high cardiovascular risk. Many biomarkers have been introduced, whereas most of these biomarkers have not been implemented in clinical routine. Here, we discuss recent developments in biomarkers and diagnostic models in kidney transplant recipients. Because many factors impact graft function and cardiovascular risk, it is most likely that no biomarker will meet the highest demands and standards. We advocate to shift focus to the identification of patients benefitting from molecular and genetic testing as well as from analysis of more specific biomarkers instead of finding one biomarker fitting to all patients.

New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus after Transplantation (NODAT) emerges as a prevalent complication post-kidney transplantation, with its incidence influenced by variations in NODAT definitions and follow-up periods. The condition's pathophysiology is marked by impaired insulin sensitivity and β-cell dysfunction. Significant risk factors encompass age, gender, obesity, and genetics, among others, with the use of post-transplant immunosuppressants intensifying the condition. NODAT's significant impact on patient survival and graft durability underscores the need for its prevention, early detection, and treatment. This review addresses the complexities of managing NODAT, including the challenges posed by various immunosuppressive regimens crucial for transplant success yet harmful to glucose metabolism. It discusses management strategies involving adjustments in immunosuppressive protocols, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacological interventions to minimize diabetes risk while maintaining transplant longevity. The importance of early detection and proactive, personalized intervention strategies to modify NODAT's trajectory is also emphasized, advocating for a shift towards more anticipatory post-transplant care.

Kidney transplant recipients are at increased risks of cardiovascular events, but contemporary risk estimates are sparse. Using the Danish nationwide administrative databases, we quantified 1- and 5-year risks of cardiovascular disease and kidney failure among all first-time kidney transplant recipients (2005-2018) and age- and sex-matched controls (1:10 ratio).

Cumulative 1- and 5-year incidence of cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure), kidney failure (re-transplantation or need for dialysis >30 days post-transplant), and mortality following transplantation were calculated until maximally Dec 31, 2018.

A total of 2,565 kidney transplant recipients (median age 50.5 [25-75th percentile 40.2-60.7] years, 37 % females) and 25,650 controls were included. 1-year cumulative incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke, or heart failure was 2.6 % (95 % confidence interval 1.9 %-3.2 %) among kidney transplant recipients versus 0.5 % (0.4 %-0.5 %) in controls. Cumulative 5-year risk estimates for the same endpoints were 8.3 % (7.1 %-9.5 %) for the transplant patients, and 2.6 % (2.3 %-2.8 %) among controls, respectively. For the kidney transplant cohort, cumulative mortality was 2.2 % (1.7 %-2.8 %) and 10.3 % (9.0 %-11.6 %) at 1- and 5 years, respectively, versus 0.5 % (0.4 %-0.6 %) and 3.0 % (2.7 %-3.2 %) for controls. The cumulative incidence of dialysis and re-transplantation was 6.1 % (5.2 %-7.1 %) at 1 year and 16.3 % (14.7 %-17.9 %) at 5 years, respectively.

Despite the benefits of transplantation, kidney transplant recipients continue to have significant long-term cardiovascular disease, end-stage kidney disease, and mortality risks even with contemporary medical management. Better cardiovascular preventive strategies are warranted to improve prognosis in this segment of patients.

Background: There is increasing evidence that cardiac screening prior to kidney transplantation does not improve its outcomes. However, risk aversion to perioperative events means that, in practice, testing remains common, limiting the availability of 'real-world' data to support any change. Our objective was to assess perioperative and 1-year post-transplant cardiovascular events in a kidney transplant candidate cohort who received minimal cardiovascular screening. Methods: The retrospective cohort study included all adult kidney-only transplant recipients in a single UK region between January 2015 and December 2021. Kidney transplant recipients asymptomatic of cardiac disease, even those with established risk factors, did not receive cardiac stress testing. The perioperative and 1-year post-transplant cardiovascular event incidences were examined. Logistic regression was used to identify variables of statistical significance that predicted cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. Results: A total of 895 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prior to transplantation, 209 (23%) recipients had an established cardiac diagnosis, and 193 (22%) individuals had a diagnosis of diabetes. A total of 18 (2%) patients had a perioperative event, and there was a 5.7% incidence of cardiovascular events 1 year post-transplantation. The cardiovascular mortality rate was 0.0% perioperatively, 0.2% at 3 months post-transplant, and 0.2% at 1 year post-transplant. Conclusions: This study demonstrates comparable rates of cardiovascular events despite reduced screening in asymptomatic recipients. It included higher risk individuals who may, on the basis of screening results, have been excluded from transplantation in other programmes. It provides further evidence that extensive cardiac screening prior to kidney transplantation is unlikely to be offset by reduced rates of cardiovascular events.

Advanced chronic kidney disease is associated with high cardiovascular risk, even after kidney transplant. Pretransplant cardiac testing may identify patients who require additional assessment before transplant or would benefit from risk optimization. The objective of the current study was to determine the relative prognostic utility of pretransplant positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) for posttransplant major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs).

We retrospectively followed patients who underwent MPI before kidney transplant for the occurrence of MACE after transplant including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiac death. An abnormal MPI result was defined as a total perfusion deficit >5% of the myocardium. To determine associations of MPI results with MACE, we utilized Cox hazard regression with propensity weighting for PET versus SPECT with model factors, including demographics and cardiovascular risk factors.

A total of 393 patients underwent MPI (208 PET and 185 SPECT) and were followed for a median of 5.9 years post-transplant. Most were male (58%), median age was 58 years, and there was a high burden of hypertension (88%) and diabetes (33%). A minority had abnormal MPI (n=58, 15%). In propensity-weighted hazard regression, abnormal PET result was associated with posttransplant MACE (hazard ratio, 3.02 [95% CI, 1.78-5.11]; P<0.001), while there was insufficient evidence of an association of abnormal SPECT result with MACE (1.39 [95% CI, 0.72-2.66]; P=0.33). The explained relative risk of the PET result was higher than the SPECT result (R2 0.086 versus 0.007). Normal PET was associated with the lowest risk of MACE (2.2%/year versus 3.6%/year for normal SPECT; P<0.001).

Kidney transplant recipients are at high cardiovascular risk, despite a minority having obstructive coronary artery disease on MPI. PET MPI findings predict posttransplant MACE. Normal PET may better discriminate lower risk patients compared with normal SPECT, which should be confirmed in a larger prospective study.

The 2013 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines recommends statin treatment for all adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), except those aged <30 years of age and without prior cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF), but does not specify on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) target levels. The 2018 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines addressed the management of hyperlipidemia in the general population based on an individualized approach of the CVRF with a specific on-treatment LDL target.

To analyze dyslipidemia management according to the recommendations of the KDIGO and AHA guidelines.

This retrospective study included all KTRs who underwent transplantation between January 2017 and May 2020 at King Abdulaziz Medical Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The rate of statins prescription in general, rate of statins prescription among KTRs per their CVRF, and rate of achieving the proposed LDL goals, as defined by the AHA, were analyzed.

A total of 287 KTRs were included. Of the 214 (74.6%) patients aged ≥30 years, 80% received a statin. Statins were prescribed in 93% and 96% of KTRs with diabetes or coronary artery disease, respectively. In patients aged ≥30 years, LDL targets, per AHA guidelines, were achieved in 62% with a target of 2.6 mmol/l, and in 19% with a target of 1.8 mmol/l. Statin therapy resulted in non-significant changes in the mean LDL values from baseline to 12 months after transplantation (P = 0.607), even when only patients prescribed statin after transplantation were included (P = 0.34).

By applying the KDIGO guidelines, a high rate of statin prescriptions was achieved among KTRs with multiple CVRF and KTRs in general. However, a significant proportion of these KTRs did not achieve the LDL targets proposed by the AHA guidelines, suggesting that higher-intensity statins would be required to achieve these targets.

Pre-emptive kidney transplantation (PEKT), i.e., transplantation performed before initiation of maintenance dialysis, is considered an ideal renal replacement therapy because there is no exposure to long-term dialysis therapy. Therefore, we summarized advantages/disadvantages of PEKT to assist in deciding whether kidney transplantation should be performed pre-emptively.

This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021269163. Observational studies comparing clinical outcomes between PEKT and non-PEKT were included; those involving only pediatric recipients or simultaneous multi-organ transplantations were excluded. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi-Web databases were searched on 1 August 2021. Studies were pooled using the generic inverse-variance method with random effects model, and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I.

Seventy-six studies were included in the systematic review (sample size, 23-121,853; enrollment year, 1968-2019). PEKT patients had lower all-cause mortality (adjusted HR: 0.78 [95% CI 0.66-0.92]), and lower death-censored graft failure (0.81 [0.67-0.98]). Unadjusted RRs for the following outcomes were comparable between the two patient groups: cardiovascular disease, 0.90 (0.58-1.40); biopsy-proven acute rejection, 0.75 (0.55-1.03); cytomegalovirus infection, 1.04 (0.85-1.29); and urinary tract infection, 0.89 (0.61-1.29). Mean differences in post-transplant QOL score were comparable in both groups. The certainty of evidence for mortality and graft failure was moderate and that for other outcomes was very low following the GRADE classification.

The present meta-analysis shows the potential benefits of PEKT, especially regarding patient and graft survival, and therefore PEKT is recommended for adults with end-stage kidney disease.

There are limited data about the prevalence of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and the findings of CV workup among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients (KTRs) in Saudi Arabia.

A single-center retrospective study of KTRs who underwent KTx from 2017 to 2020 was performed. We reviewed the prevalence of CV risk factors and the results of the pre-KTx CV workup which was derived from the American Heart Association guidelines.

We included 254 KTRs. The mean age was 43.1 ± 15.9 years, and 55.5% were men and 79.5% were living-donor KTRs. Pre-emptive KTx was 9.8%, peritoneal dialysis was 11.8%, and hemodialysis was 78.3% (arteriovenous fistula: 33.1% versus hemodialysis catheter: 66.9%). The mean dialysis vintage was 4.8 ± 3.3 years for deceased-donor KTRs versus 2.4 ± 2.6 years for living-donor KTRs. CV risk factors were hypertension: 76%, diabetes: 40.6% (type 1 : 25.2% versus type 2 : 74.7%), hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein >2.6 mmol/L): 40.2%, coronary artery disease (CAD): 12.6%, smoking: 9.1%, peripheral vascular disease: 2.8%, and cerebral vascular disease: 2.4%. The prevalence of obesity stage 1 was 19.7% and obesity stage 2 was 4%. Left ventricular hypertrophy was present in 38.5%. The ejection fraction was abnormal (<55%) in 22%. Abnormal wall motion was present in 34 patients (13.4%). A cardiac (PET-CT) stress test was conducted on 129 patients (50.8%) which showed abnormal perfusion in 37 patients (28.7%). Out of those who required PET-CT, 18.6% had a coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) of more than 400, 41.8% had a CACS of zero, 29.4% had a CACS of 1-100, and 14.7% had a CACS of 100-400. Coronary angiogram was required in only 41 patients (16.1%), 12 (29.3%) required coronary interventions, 25 (61%) were treated medically, and 4 (9.8%) did not have any CAD. CT scans of pelvic arteries were performed in 118 patients (46.5%). It showed moderate or severe calcifications in only 7 patients (5.9%), whereas it was normal in 97 patients (82.2%), or it showed only mild calcifications in 14 patients (11.9%).

This study outlines the prevalence of CV risk factors and the findings of the pretransplant CV workup among KTx candidates who underwent KTx. Multicenter national studies will be helpful to validate the generalizability of these findings.

Patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) and a previous acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have less access to KT. Data on ESKD patients with an AMI history who underwent first KT or dialysis between January 2007 and December 2018 were extracted from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Patients who underwent KT (n = 423) were chronologically matched in a 1:3 ratio with those maintained on dialysis (n = 1,269) at the corresponding dates, based on time-conditional propensity scores. The 1, 5, and 10 years cumulative incidences for all-cause mortality were 12.6%, 39.1%, and 60.1% in the dialysis group and 3.1%, 7.2%, and 14.5% in the KT group. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of KT versus dialysis were 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.24; p < 0.001) for mortality and 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23-0.51; p < 0.001) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Of the MACE components, KT was most protective against cardiovascular death (HR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12-0.42; p < 0.001). Protective effects of KT for all-cause mortality and MACE were consistent across various subgroups, including patients at higher risk (e.g., age >65 years, recent AMI [<6 months], congestive heart failure). KT is associated with lower all-cause mortality and MACE than maintenance dialysis patients with a prior AMI.

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at high risk of cardiovascular events and bleeding. Optimizing risk assessment of ESKD patients regarding the risk of thromboembolism and bleeding complications in comorbid conditions, including atrial fibrillation and coronary heart disease, is challenging. To improve risk prediction we investigated growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a promising cardiovascular biomarker, and its relation to adverse outcomes.

In this prospective, multicentre, population-based cohort study, GDF-15 was measured in 594 ESKD patients on haemodialysis (median age 66 years, 38% female), who were followed up for a median of 3.5 years. The association of GDF-15 with major bleeding, arterial thromboembolism, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and death was analysed within a competing risk framework. Further, we evaluated the additive predictive value of GDF-15 to cardiovascular and death risk assessment.

GDF-15 levels were in median 5475 ng/l (25th-75th percentile 3964-7533) and independently associated with major bleeding {subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 1.31 per double increase [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00-1.71]}, MACE [SHR 1.47 (95% CI 1.11-1.94)] and all-cause mortality [SHR 1.58 (95% CI 1.28-1.95)] but not arterial thromboembolism [SHR 0.91 (95% CI 0.61-1.36)]. The addition of GDF-15 to the HAS-BLED score significantly improved discrimination and calibration for predicting major bleeding [C-statistics increased from 0.61 (95% CI 0.52-0.70) to 0.68 (95% CI 0.61-0.78)]. Furthermore, we established an additive predictive value of GDF-15 beyond current risk models for predicting MACE and death.

GDF-15 predicts the risk of major bleeding, cardiovascular events and death in ESKD patients on haemodialysis and might be a valuable marker to guide treatment decisions in this challenging patient population.

Extended criteria donors (ECD) hearts have demonstrated acceptable outcomes in select populations. However, their use in patients undergoing simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation (SHKT) has not been explored. This study is assessed the effect of ECD hearts in patients undergoing SHKT vs isolated heart transplants (IHT).

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients undergoing IHT and SHKT. Patients were stratified by receipt of ECD heart, defined as donor hearts failing to meet established acceptable use criteria. Interaction effects between ECDs and simultaneous kidney transplants were generated. Postoperative outcomes, risk factors, and patient/graft survival were compared across cohorts using Fine-Gray, Kaplan Meier, and Cox Proportional Hazards analyses.

Among 26,207 patients included, 1,766 (7%) underwent SHKT. ECD hearts were used in 25% of both IHT and SHKT cohorts. Five-year survival among SHKT/ECD patients (67.3%) was reduced (p < 0.01) compared to SHKT/SDC (80.3%), IHT/ECD (78.1%) and IHT/SCD (80.0%) groups. Among SHKT patients, use of ECD hearts was associated with increased risk (SHR: 1.48; p < 0.01) of renal graft failure compared to SCD hearts. Among SHKT patients, receipt of an ECD heart, and individual ECD criteria (coronary disease and size mismatch >20%), predicted mortality. The interaction effect of receiving both ECD and SHKT predicted mortality and graft failure (HR 1.43; p < 0.01).

Patients undergoing SHKT with an ECD heart face greater risks of mortality and graft failure in comparison to those undergoing IHT with ECD hearts. Careful selection of donor organs should be applied to this high-risk cohort.

Kidney graft failure is not a homogenous disease and the Banff classification distinguishes several types of graft rejection. The maintenance of a transplant and the treatment of its failure require specific medications and differ due to the underlying molecular mechanism. As a consequence, patients suffering from different rejection types will experience distinct side-effects upon therapy. The review is focused on comparing treatment regimens as well as presenting the latest insights into innovative therapeutic approaches in patients with an ongoing active ABMR, chronic active ABMR, chronic ABMR, acute TCMR, chronic active TCMR, borderline and mixed rejection. Furthermore, the profile of cardiovascular adverse effects in relation to the applied therapy was subjected to scrutiny. Lastly, a detailed assessment and comparison of different approaches were conducted in order to identify those that are the most and least detrimental for patients suffering from kidney graft failure.

Although cardiovascular disease is known to be one of the leading causes of death after kidney transplantation (KT), evidence on the risk difference of de novo major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with that in dialysis patients or the general population (GP) remains rare.

We identified KTRs using the nationwide health insurance database in South Korea and then 1:1 matched them with the dialysis and GP controls without a pre-existing MACE. The primary endpoint was defined as de novo MACEs consisting of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and ischemic stroke. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and death-censored graft failure (DCGF) in KTRs.

We included 4156 individuals in each of the three groups and followed them up for 4.7 years. De novo MACEs occurred in 3.7, 21.7 and 2.5 individuals per 1000 person-years in the KTRs, dialysis controls and GP controls, respectively. KTRs showed a lower MACE risk {adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12-0.20], P < .001} than dialysis controls, whereas a similar MACE risk to GP controls [aHR 0.81 (95% CI 0.52-1.27), P = .365]. In addition, KTRs showed a similar MACE risk compared with the GP group, regardless of age, sex and the presence of comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia. Among KTRs, de novo MACEs were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, but not with DCGF.

De novo MACEs in KTRs were much lower than that in dialysis patients and had a similar risk to the GP, but once it occurred it caused elevated mortality risk in KTRs.

For the improvement of outcome after renal transplantation it is important to predict future risk of major adverse cardiac events as well as all-cause mortality. We aimed to determine the relationship of pre-transplant NT-proBNP with major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality after transplant in patients on the waiting-list with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.

We included 176 patients with end-stage renal disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction who received a kidney transplant. MACE was defined as myocardial infarction (ST-segment elevation [STEMI] or non-ST-segment elevation [NSTEMI]), stroke or transient ischemic attack), coronary artery disease requiring intervention or bypass or death from cardiovascular causes.

MACE occurred in 28/176 patients. Patients with NT-proBNP levels above 4350 pg/ml had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 90.67% and 68.20%, whereas patients with NT-proBNP levels below 4350 pg/ml had 1- and 5-year survival rates of 100% and 90.48% (p < 0.01). 1- and 5-year MACE-free survival rates were calculated as 78.82% and 74.68% for patients with NT-proBNP > 4350 pg/ml and 93.33% and 91.21% for patients with NT-proBNP < 4350 pg/ml (p < 0.01).

Pre-transplant NT-proBNP might identify renal transplant candidates at risk for MACE after transplant.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a risk factor for poor outcomes after kidney transplantation (KT). However, the outcomes of KT have improved recently. Therefore, we investigated whether PTDM is still a risk factor for mortality, major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACEs), and graft failure in KT recipients.

We studied a retrospective cohort of KT recipients (between 1994 and 2017) at a single tertiary center, and compared the rates of death, MACEs, overall graft failure, and death-censored graft failure after KT between patients with and without PTDM using Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox proportional hazard model.

Of 571 KT recipients, 153 (26.8%) were diagnosed with PTDM. The mean follow-up duration was 9.6 years. In the Kaplan- Meier analysis, the PTDM group did not have a significantly increased risk of death or four-point MACE compared with the non-diabetes mellitus group (log-rank test, P=0.957 and P=0.079, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models showed that PTDM did not have a negative impact on death or four-point MACE (P=0.137 and P=0.181, respectively). In addition, PTDM was not significantly associated with overall or death-censored graft failure. However, patients with a long duration of PTDM had a higher incidence of four-point MACE.

Patient survival and MACEs were comparable between groups with and without PTDM. However, PTDM patients with long duration diabetes were at higher risk of cardiovascular disease.

During the last four decades, development of effective immunosuppressants has significantly improved short-term results of organ transplantation. However, long-term results have not been satisfactory due to chronic rejection or complications caused by immunosuppressive drugs. Therefore, induction of immunological tolerance of the transplanted organ is considered essential to improve the long-term results. Despite numerous tolerance strategies that have been successful in murine models, inducing hematopoietic chimerism through donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only method that reproducibly induces kidney allograft tolerance in nonhuman primates or humans. Combining kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation to achieve allograft tolerance has now been attempted with different chimerism strategies. This review summarizes the status of current clinical trials on the induction of allograft tolerance. We also summarize recent studies to extend the chimerism approach to deceased donor transplant recipients.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in a kidney transplant candidate is an important predictor of posttransplant mortality. It is not known how the exclusion of CAD in the kidney allocation system has impacted its goal of longevity matching.

This is an observational study on adult deceased donor kidney transplant alone recipients between December 4, 2014, and December 31, 2018, with Medicare fee for service (FFS) insurance. Patients were categorized on the basis of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI), Estimated Posttransplant Survival (EPTS), and CAD. Outcomes studied were mortality, death with a functioning graft, overall graft loss, and death-censored graft loss.

Among 21 151 patients with Medicare FFS coverage for >1 y before transplant, there were 2869 and 18 282 patients with and without CAD, respectively. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was higher risk of mortality, death with a functioning graft, overall graft loss, and death-censored graft loss with CAD ( P < 0.05 for all). Mortality was higher for CAD group within each category of KDPI and among patients with Estimated Posttransplant Survival 0% to 20% receiving kidneys with KDPI <20% ( P < 0.001 for all). On Cox multivariate analysis, the hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality and graft loss were higher with CAD diagnosis without intervention (HR 1.38 [1.25-1.52] and 1.29 [1.18-1.4]), CAD with stents (HR 2.76 [1.68-4.53] and 2.36 [1.46-3.81]), and CAD with bypass surgery (HR 1.56 [1.29-1.89] and 1.39 [1.17-1.65]). Posttransplant CAD events were higher in patients with preexisting CAD ( P < 0.001).

The exclusion of a candidate's history of CAD in the kidney allocation system adversely impacts its goal of optimal longevity matching.

The number of kidney transplant recipients has grown incrementally over the years. These patients have a high comorbidity index and require special attention to immunosuppression management. In addition, this population has an increased risk for cardiovascular events, electrolyte abnormalities, allograft dysfunction, and infectious complications. It is vital for hospitalists and internists to understand the risks and nuances in the care of this increasingly prevalent, but also high-risk, population.

The optimal coronary artery disease surveillance strategy for end-stage renal disease patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation is unknown. It is unclear what risk factors are associated with the development of new-onset perfusion abnormalities on serial myocardial perfusion imaging. Potential kidney transplant recipients who underwent 2 myocardial perfusion imaging studies at Emory University Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 were identified. We assessed the frequency of development of any new perfusion defect and development of moderate to severe ischemia (reversible perfusion defect >10%) on serial imaging. Finally, we identified the clinical and imaging factors associated with new perfusion defects and explored the association between new perfusion defects and all-cause mortality. History of myocardial infarction (MI) and peripheral artery disease was associated with an increased risk of developing a new perfusion defect. History of MI was also associated with the risk of developing moderate-severe ischemia. Female patients were less likely to develop new perfusion defects or moderate-severe ischemia. There was no association between either outcome and all-cause mortality. In conclusion, a history of MI, peripheral artery disease, and male gender are risk factors for developing new perfusion defects, although only the history of MI and male gender predict moderate to severe ischemia. Interval development of any abnormal perfusion is not associated with increased mortality.

Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) rates immediately after kidney transplantation remain uncertain due to heterogeneous reporting in the literature. To clarify this, we retrospectively studied every eligible kidney transplant procedure performed in England between April 1, 2002 and March 31. 2018 with follow-up through August 31, 2019. The primary outcome of interest was MACE broadly defined as any hospital admission with myocardial infarction, stroke, unstable angina, heart failure, any coronary revascularisation procedure and/or any cardiovascular death. Among 30,325 kidney transplant recipients, MACE occurred in 781 within the first year after transplantation (2.6% of all kidney transplant procedures). Of these 781 events, 201 occurred during the index admission for kidney transplantation surgery representing 25.7% of all first-year MACE and 0.7% of all kidney transplant procedures. Kidney transplant recipients who suffered a non-fatal MACE within the first year had significantly decreased 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year patient survival of 80.5%, 70.2%, 59.5% and 38.6% respectively, compared to 97.4%, 94.4%, 90.7% and 78.4% for kidney transplant recipients not developing MACE.. In an adjusted Cox proportional hazard model, non-fatal MACE within the first-year post-transplant was associated with significant long-term mortality risk (hazard ratio 2.59; 95% confidence interval 2.34-2.88). Kidney transplant recipients experiencing MACE during the index admission compared to subsequent admissions were differentiated by age, sex and previous cardiac history but had similar patient survival. These rates are significantly lower than those reported in North America. Thus, our data confirms MACE is not a benign post-transplant event and has a strong association with long-term mortality risk.

Cardiovascular events, including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and arrhythmia, are common complications after kidney transplantation and continue to be leading causes of graft loss. Kidney transplant recipients have both traditional and transplant-specific risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In the general population, modification of cardiovascular risk factors is the best strategy to reduce cardiovascular events; however, studies evaluating the impact of risk modification strategies on cardiovascular outcomes among kidney transplant recipients are limited. Furthermore, there is only minimal guidance on appropriate cardiovascular screening and monitoring in this unique patient population. This review focuses on the limited scientific evidence that addresses cardiovascular events in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, we focus on clinical management of specific cardiovascular entities that are more prevalent among kidney transplant recipients (ie, pulmonary hypertension, valvular diseases, diastolic dysfunction) and the use of newer evolving drug classes for treatment of heart failure within this cohort of patients. We note that there are no consensus documents describing optimal diagnostic, monitoring, or management strategies to reduce cardiovascular events after kidney transplantation; however, we outline quality initiatives and research recommendations for the assessment and management of cardiovascular-specific risk factors that could improve outcomes.

Living kidney donors (LKD) partially compensate the initial loss of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), a phenomenon known as renal functional reserve (RFR). RFR is reduced in the elderly, a population with increased prevalence of chronic kidney disease. We hypothesized that the selected, healthy population of LKD, would specifically inform about the physiological determinants of the RFR and studied it using measured GFR (mGFR).

We retrospectively analyzed pre-donation and post-donation mGFR in 76 LKD from Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) between 2002 and 2018. In addition to GFR measurements, we collected pre-donation morphologic parameters, demographic data, and kidney volumes.

Mean pre-donation mGFR was 90.11 ± 12.64 mL/min/1.73 m² and decreased to 61.26 ± 9.57 mL/min/1.73 m² 1 year after donation. Pre-donation mGFR correlated with age (p = 0.0003), total kidney volume (p = 0.0004) and pre-donation serum creatinine (p = 0.0453). Pre-donation mGFR strongly predicted 1-year post-donation mGFR. Mean RFR (increase in GFR of the remnant kidney between pre-donation and post-donation) was 36.67 ± 16.67% 1 year after donation. In the multivariate linear model, RFR was negatively correlated to total kidney volume (p = 0.02) but not with age or pre-donation serum creatinine.

We found that pre-donation mGFR decreases with age and identified low total kidney volume as a predictor of RFR in healthy individuals. This suggests an adaptative and reversible decrease in kidney function rather than age-related damage. Older subjects may have reduced metabolic requirements with subsequent reduction in glomerular filtration and kidney volume and preserved RFR. Therefore, low GFR in older subjects should not preclude kidney donation.

Cardiac risk assessment before kidney transplantation has become widely accepted. However, the optimal patient selection and screening tool for cardiac assessment remain controversial. Clinicians face several challenges in this process, including the ever-growing pre-transplant population, aging transplant candidates, increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease, and scarcity of donor organs. Optimizing the cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant candidates is necessary to better appropriate limited donor organs and improve patient outcomes. Increasing waiting times from the initial evaluation for transplant candidacy to the actual transplant raises questions regarding re-testing and re-stratification of risk. In this review, we summarize and discuss the current literature on cardiac evaluation prior to kidney transplantation. We also propose simple evidence-based evaluation algorithms for initial and follow-up CAD surveillance in patients being wait-listed for kidney transplantation.

Whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection increases the risk of cardiovascular complications after kidney transplantation (KT) through different indirect effects remains controversial.

We analyzed the incidence of post-transplant atherosclerotic (PAEs) and thrombotic events (PTEs) in 465 KT recipients according to the previous exposure to any level or high-level (≥1,000 IU/mL) CMV viremia (either asymptomatic or clinical disease) by means of landmark analysis beyond days 30, 180 and 360 after transplantation. Proportional hazards models were constructed with death and graft loss as competing risks.

After a median of 722 days, the cumulative incidences of PAE and PTE were 6.0% each. Most PAEs (53.6%) occurred beyond post-transplant day 360, whereas most PTEs (60.7%) were diagnosed between days 30-180.The incidence of PAE beyond day 180 was higher among patients with previous CMV viremia compared to those without (two-year rates: 4.7% versus 0.4%; P-value = 0.035). This difference was more pronounced in recipients developing high-level viremia (6.3% versus 0.7%, respectively; P-value = 0.013). After multivariate adjustment for age, pre-transplant cardiovascular risk, antiplatelet and statin therapy and graft function, however, associations were not maintained either for any-level (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.48-7.05) or high-level CMV viremia (HR: 2.84; 95% CI: 0.78-10.36). No significant differences were found in the remaining landmark analyses (days 30 or 360) or for the outcome of PTE either.