Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) have rapidly changed the landscape of diabetes and obesity treatment. Enthusiasm for their use is tempered with concerns regarding their risk for inducing C-cell tumors based on preclinical studies in rodents. A black-box warning from the US Food and Drug Administration recommends against using GLP1RA in patients with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2A or 2B (MEN2), providing clear guidance regarding this cohort of patients. However, emerging data also suggest an increased incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in patients treated with these agents. Other studies, though, have not confirmed an association between GLP1RAs and DTC. With conflicting results concerning thyroid cancer risk, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach to screening patients prior to initiating the medications and/or evaluating for thyroid cancer during GLP1RA treatment. Within the context of patient cases, this review will summarize the existing data, describe ongoing controversies, and outline future areas for research regarding thyroid cancer risk with GLP1RA use.

The enteric nervous system (ENS) is a highly conserved, yet complicated network of neurons and glial cells located throughout the gut wall that controls digestive processes and gastrointestinal (GI) homeostasis. The intestinal epithelium, the immune system, and the gut microbiota are just a few examples of the cellular networks that the ENS interacts with on a variety of levels to maintain GI function. The presence or absence of nutrients in the intestinal lumen may cause short- and/or long-term changes in neurotransmitter expression, excitability, and neuronal survival, which ultimately affect gut motility, secretion, and permeability. Hence, the ENS should be identified as a key factor in initiating coordinated responses to nutrients. In this review we summarize current knowledge on nutrient-dependent ENS activity and how ENS secondary to nutrition may affect likelihood of developing inflammatory bowel disease. Our findings highlight that nutrients interact with enteroendocrine cells in the gut, triggering hormone secretion that plays a crucial role in signaling food-related information to the brain and regulating metabolic processes such as feeding behavior, insulin secretion, and energy balance; however, the complex interactions between nutrients, the ENS, and the immune system require further research to understand their contributions to GI disorders and potential therapeutic applications in treating obesity and metabolic diseases. Lay Summary: The enteric nervous system (ENS) controls digestion and interacts with nutrients in the gut to regulate processes like gut movement and hormone release, affecting metabolism and overall gut health. This review highlights the need for further research on how nutrient-ENS interactions contribute to conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, and metabolic disorders.

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) was the first incretin identified and plays an essential role in the maintenance of glucose tolerance in healthy humans. Until recently GIP had not been developed as a therapeutic and thus has been overshadowed by the other incretin, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), which is the basis for several successful drugs to treat diabetes and obesity. However, there has been a rekindling of interest in GIP biology in recent years, in great part due to pharmacology demonstrating that both GIPR agonism and antagonism may be beneficial in treating obesity and diabetes. This apparent paradox has reinvigorated the field, led to new lines of investigation, and deeper understanding of GIP.

In this review, we provide a detailed overview on the multifaceted nature of GIP biology and discuss the therapeutic implications of GIPR signal modification on various diseases.

Following its classification as an incretin hormone, GIP has emerged as a pleiotropic hormone with a variety of metabolic effects outside the endocrine pancreas. The numerous beneficial effects of GIPR signal modification render the peptide an interesting candidate for the development of pharmacotherapies to treat obesity, diabetes, drug-induced nausea and both bone and neurodegenerative disorders.

Despite sharing incretin activity with glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), the development of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)-based drugs has been hindered by the minor effects of native GIP on appetite and body weight and genetic studies associating loss-of-function with reduced obesity. Yet, pharmacologically optimized GIP-based molecules have demonstrated profound weight lowering benefits of GIPR agonism when combined with GLP-1-based therapies, which has re-energized deeper exploration of the molecular mechanisms and downstream signaling of GIPR. Interestingly, both GIPR agonism and antagonism offer metabolic benefits, leading to differing viewpoints on how to target GIPR therapeutically. Here we summarize the emerging evidence about the tissue-specific mechanisms that positions GIP-based therapies as important targets for the next generation of anti-obesity and metabolic therapies.

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) are important regulators of metabolism and mediate the incretin effect. This glucose-dependent potentiation of insulin secretion is severely impaired in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. While pharmacological doses of GLP-1 can overcome this impairment, the same is not true for GIP. The reasons for this are unclear. However, differences in the signalling profiles of the GLP-1 and GIP receptors (GLP-1R and GIPR) may contribute. GLP-1R and GIPR are closely related G protein-coupled receptors but differ in their ability to recruit arrestin, GIPR being relatively poorer. Furthermore, these receptors have been reported to utilize different mechanisms to undergo agonist-induced internalization. Methods: This study aimed to identify the role of the C-terminal region of the two receptors in their differing signalling behaviour using chimeric receptors where the C-terminal tail of one receptor was replaced with that of the other. Results: Replacement of the C-terminal tail had only limited effects on G protein and arrestin recruitment to either receptor. GIP-stimulated internalisation of GIPR occurred at a significantly (P < 0.001) slower rate than GLP-1-stimulated internalisation of GLP-1R. Replacement of the C-terminal tail of GIPR with that of GLP-1R significantly (P < 0.05) increased the internalization rate but not to the rate of wild-type GLP-1R. The reciprocal substitution significantly (P < 0.005) decreased internalization rate. Conclusion: These data show that the C-terminal region of GLP-1R and GIPR is not the critical determinant of their differing ability to recruit arrestin but modulates receptor endocytosis.

Type 2 diabetes and obesity have some overlapping pathophysiology. This has allowed for the creation of therapies which are highly effective in treating both conditions. Weekly subcutaneous incretin agonists are preferred agents as they provide significant improvement in glycemic parameters, weight, and other comorbidities, like heart failure and reduce major adverse cardiovascular event. Bariatric surgery continues to show the most durable benefits for patients with both type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity and should be considered in patients who are unable to meet goals with pharmacotherapy and lifestyle.

Incretin hormones, primarily composed of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), are secreted by enteroendocrine cells (EECs) and play crucial roles in maintaining blood glucose homeostasis. Notably, GIP accounts for two-thirds of the entire incretin effect. However, the secretion and function of GIP are impaired in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and the regulatory mechanisms governing GIP secretion remain unclear.

Our study aims to explore the role of an EEC-enriched protein, Secretagogin (SCGN), in the regulation of GIP secretion.

We collected duodenal tissues from both humans and mice to observe the colocalization of SCGN and GIP in EECs. Additionally, we utilized human cohorts and gene-edited mouse models to investigate the effect of SCGN on GIP secretion. Our study included 128 subjects, comprising 64 individuals diagnosed with newly onset diabetes and 64 age- and sex-matched nondiabetic healthy controls. At the animal level, we employed leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) mice and Scgn knockout mice for our investigations.

Our findings indicate that SCGN is abundantly expressed in GIP-producing K cells within the intestinal epithelium of both humans and mice. We observed a positive correlation between SCGN and GIP levels in postprandial states among patients with T2DM, db/db mice, and their healthy controls. Notably, Scgn knockout mice exhibited decreased GIP and insulin secretion. However, SCGN deficiency did not affect K-cell number, GIP mRNA expression, or intestinal morphology.

Collectively, these findings demonstrate that SCGN is a key regulator of nutrient-induced GIP secretion.

The gut microbiome is a complex system that directly interacts with and influences many systems in the body. This delicate balance of microbiota plays an important role in health and disease and is highly influenced by lifestyle factors and the surrounding environment. As further research emerges, understanding the full potential of the gut microbiome and the impact of using nutraceuticals to positively influence its function may open the door to greater therapeutic outcomes in the treatment and prevention of disease. Curcumin, a bioactive compound derived from the turmeric rhizome, has been studied in depth for its influence on human health as a potent anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. However, the therapeutic activity of curcumin is limited by its low oral bioavailability. While most available research has primarily focused on the curcuminoid compounds of turmeric, the non-curcuminoid compounds hold promise to offer therapeutic benefits while synergistically enhancing the bioavailability of curcumin and supporting the gut microbiome. This review summarizes current knowledge of the relationship between the gut and the various systems within the body, and how dysbiosis, or disruption in the gut microbial balance, leads to inflammation and increased risk of chronic disease. The review also summarizes recent research that focuses on the bioactivity of both the curcuminoid and non-curcuminoid compounds that comprise the whole turmeric root and their synergistic role in enhancing bioavailability to support a healthy gut microbiome and promising use in the treatment and prevention of disease.

The history of antiobesity pharmacotherapies is marked by disappointments, often entangled with societal pressure promoting weight loss and the prevailing conviction that excess body weight signifies a lack of willpower. However, categories of emerging pharmacotherapies generate hope to reduce obesity rates. This systematic review of phase 2 and phase 3 trials in adults with overweight/obesity investigates the effect of novel weight loss pharmacotherapies, compared to placebo/control or US Food and Drug Administration-approved weight loss medication, through searching Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2012-2024). We identified 53 phase 3 and phase 2 trials, with 36 emerging antiobesity drugs or combinations thereof and 4 withdrawn or terminated trials. Oral semaglutide 50 mg is the only medication that has completed a phase 3 trial. There are 14 ongoing phase 3 trials on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) (ecnoglutide, orforglipron, and TG103), GLP-1 RA/amylin agonist (CagriSema), GLP-1/glucagon RAs (mazdutide and survodutide), GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon RA (retatrutide), dapagliflozin, and the combination sibutramine/topiramate. Completed phase 2 trials on incretin-based therapies showed a mean percent weight loss of 7.4% to 24.2%. Almost half of the drugs undergoing phase 2 trials are incretin analogs. The obesity drug pipeline is expanding rapidly, with the most promising results reported with incretin analogs. Data on mortality and obesity-related complications, such as cardio-renal-metabolic events, are needed. Moreover, long-term follow-up data on the safety and efficacy of weight maintenance with novel obesity pharmacotherapies, along with studies focused on underrepresented populations, cost-effectiveness assessments, and drug availability, are needed to bridge the care gap for patients with obesity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Obesity is the epidemic of the 21st century. Except for the newer injectable medications, drugs with suboptimal efficacy have been available in the clinician's armamentarium for weight management. However, emerging alternatives of novel agents and combinations populate the current obesity therapeutic pipeline. This systematic review identifies the state and mechanism of action of emerging pharmacotherapies undergoing or having completed phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. The information provided herein furthers the understanding of obesity management, implying direct clinical implications and stimulating research initiatives.

Glucagon-like-peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists are commonly used to improve glycemic control and promote weight loss in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or obesity. However, there is a paucity of evidence regarding GLP-1 agonist use in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). We present 11 people with CF (males: 3, females: 7; age range 24-47; BMI range 25.7-43.7) treated with GLP-1 agonists (semaglutide: 9,tirzepatide: 2) for variable duration (1-50 months). All experienced weight loss on GLP- 1 agonist therapy (median change in weight = -7.2 kg; change in BMI [kg/m2] = -0.9 to -8.1). Eight pwCF showed improvement in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) [change = -5 to + 18] and nine pwCF showed improvement in percent predicted forced vital capacity (ppFVC) [change= +1 to + 26]. Of the 7 pwCF with CFRD, all reduced their insulin quantity (mean, 31.5 % decrease in total daily insulin dose), and glucose time in range improved for most (mean, +11 % increase from baseline). Four pwCF stopped using GLP-1 agonists: 2 due to severe nausea/vomiting, 1 due to lack of perceived benefit, and 1 due to change in insurance coverage. This report is the largest published series to date of pwCF treated with GLP-1 agonist therapy. With the addition of GLP-1 agonists, all individuals experienced weight loss and a reduction in daily insulin dose, and most had improvement in pulmonary function. Future multi-center studies are needed to corroborate the efficacy and safety of these agents in the CF population.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are a family of drugs, most well known by the third-generation once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, that act on the incretin pathway of metabolic, hormonal signaling to modulate pancreatic insulin release, gastric emptying, energy intake, and subjective feelings of satiety. This class of drugs' efficacy and safety in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity have been demonstrated across multiple large randomized controlled trials. These data have propelled GLP-1 receptor agonists to ubiquity in diabetic management and weight loss therapy, leading them to be frequently encountered in ophthalmic practice. The effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists like semaglutide on diabetic retinopathy (DR) is at this point unclear; some studies indicate a worsening of DR with the initiation of GLP-1 agonists, especially semaglutide. Overall, the macrovascular reduction of cardiovascular and stroke risks from GLP-1 receptor agonists should be prioritized over the potential microvascular progression of DR, as long as the patient is regularly followed by ophthalmology.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) co-agonists are major treatment options for subjects with obesity and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). They counter without addressing the mechanistic cause of the impaired incretin effect associated with obesity and T2DM. Incretin effect impairment is characterized by decreased secretion of incretins from enteroendocrine cells and incretin resistance of pancreatic β-cells. It is linked to hyperglycemia. We present evidence that subversion of the gating of glucose entry into glycolysis, mainly by glucokinase (hexokinase-4), during persistent hyperglycemia in enteroendocrine cells, pancreatic β- and α-cells and appetite-regulating neurons contributes to the biochemical mechanism of the impaired incretin effect. Unscheduled glycolysis and glycolytic overload thereby produced decreases cell signalling of incretin secretion to glucose and other secretion stimuli and incretin receptor responses. This mechanism provides a guide for development of alternative therapies targeting recovery of the impaired incretin effect.

Incretin-based therapies have emerged as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity. However, not all patients achieve optimal outcomes with existing treatments, highlighting the need for more effective solutions.

We present a comprehensive evaluation of Tirzepatide (TZP), a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GIP/GLP-1) receptor agonist, for managing obesity and T2D. We conducted a systematic search of Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 2024. The focus of the review is on the development and therapeutic potential of TZP, with detailed exploration on pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety. Furthermore, it reviews TZP's impacts on glycemic control, weight management, and its potential cardiovascular (CV) benefits.

TZP represents a significant advancement in the dual-targeted approach to treating T2D and obesity. Its unique mechanism of action offers superior efficacy in reducing glycemic levels and body weight compared to existing therapies. New data suggesting improvements in CV outcomes indicate that TZP could set a new standard in the treatment paradigm. While long-term data on efficacy and safety are still forthcoming, current evidence positions TZP as a promising option for patients who have not reached their therapeutic goals with existing treatments.

Obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are widespread, non-communicable diseases that are responsible for considerable levels of morbidity and mortality globally, primarily in the form of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Changes to lifestyle and behaviour have insufficient long-term efficacy in most patients with these diseases; metabolic surgery, although effective, is not practically deliverable on the scale that is required. Over the past two decades, therapies based on incretin hormones, spearheaded by glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP1) receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), have become the treatment of choice for obesity and T2DM, and clinical evidence now suggests that these agents have benefits for CVD. We review the latest advances in incretin-based pharmacotherapy. These include 'GLP1 plus' agents, which combine the known advantages of GLP1RAs with the activity of additional hormones, such as glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, glucagon and amylin, to achieve desired therapeutic goals. Second-generation non-peptidic oral GLP1RAs promise to extend the benefits of GLP1 therapy to those who do not want, or cannot have, subcutaneous injection therapy. We conclude with a discussion of the knowledge gaps that must be addressed before incretin-based therapies can be properly deployed for maximum benefit in the treatment of obesity and T2DM.

In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in the prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), with bariatric surgery remaining the most effective treatment strategy for these conditions. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has emerged as the most popular surgical procedure for bariatric/metabolic surgeries, effectively promoting weight loss and improving or curing T2DM. The alterations in the gastrointestinal tract following VSG may improve insulin secretion and resistance by increasing incretin secretion (especially GLP-1), modifying the gut microbiota composition, and through mechanisms dependent on weight loss. This review focuses on the potential mechanisms through which the enhanced action of incretin and metabolic changes in the digestive system after VSG may contribute to the remission of T2DM.

For more than a century, physicians have searched for ways to pharmacologically reduce excess body fat. The tide has finally turned with recent advances in biochemically engineered agonists for the receptor of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and their use in GLP-1-based polyagonists. These polyagonists reduce body weight through complementary pharmacology by incorporating the receptors for glucagon and/or the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). In their most advanced forms, gut-hormone polyagonists achieve an unprecedented weight reduction of up to ∼20%-30%, offering a pharmacological alternative to bariatric surgery. Along with favorable effects on glycemia, fatty liver, and kidney disease, they also offer beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system and adipose tissue. These new interventions, therefore, hold great promise for the future of anti-obesity medications.

Type 2 diabetes is increasing in Sub-Saharan Africa, but the pathophysiology in this population is poorly investigated. In Western populations, the incretin effect is reduced in type 2 diabetes, leading to lowered insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to investigate the incretin effect in a group of Sub-Saharan Africans with type 2 diabetes.

Twenty adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, based on either an oral glucose tolerance test (n = 10) or on glycated hemoglobin A1c (n = 10), and 10 non-diabetic controls were included in an interventional study in Tanzania. We investigated the incretin effect as the difference between the plasma insulin area under the curve during an oral glucose tolerance test and that obtained during an intravenous glucose infusion. Differences between diabetes groups were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance.

The incretin effect did not differ between groups (p = 0.45), and there was no difference in plasma concentrations of the incretin hormones during the OGTT.

A reduced incretin effect appears not to contribute to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes in this Tanzanian population. More research is needed to explain the diabetes phenotype often seen in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03106480 , date of registration: 04/10/2017.

Glucose homeostasis is regulated by a dynamic interplay between hormones along the gastro-insular axis. For example, enteroendocrine L- and K- cells that line the intestine produce the incretins glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), respectively, which are secreted following a meal. Broadly, incretin signaling enhances insulin release from the endocrine pancreas and participates in the control of food intake, and therapeutics that mimic their activity have recently been developed for the treatment of type-2 diabetes and obesity. Notably, genes for cannabinoid subtype-1 receptor (CB1R) are expressed in these cell subpopulations; however, roles for CB1Rs in controlling fat-induced incretin release are unclear. To address this gap in our understanding, we tested the hypothesis that intestinal epithelial CB1Rs control fat-induced incretin secretion.

We treated mice with conditional deletion of CB1Rs in the intestinal epithelium (IntCB1-/-) or controls (IntCB1+/+) with oil gavage to stimulate incretin release in the presence of the cannabinoid receptor agonists, WIN55,212-2 or Δ9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and the peripherally-restricted CB1R antagonist AM6545. Circulating incretin levels were measured in plasma.

Oral gavage of corn oil increased levels of bioactive GLP1 and GIP in IntCB1+/+ mouse plasma. Pretreatment with the WIN55,212-2 or THC blocked this response, which was largely reversed by coadministration with AM6545. WIN55,212-2 failed to inhibit fat-induced GIP release, but not GLP1, in IntCB1-/- mice. In contrast, THC inhibited the secretion of incretins irrespective of CB1R expression in intestinal epithelial cells.

These results indicate that cannabinoid receptor agonists can differentially inhibit incretin release via mechanisms that include intestinal epithelial CB1R-dependent and CB1R-independent mechanisms.

In this systematic review, we assessed the safety and possible safety events of native glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)(1-42) in human studies with administration of synthetic human GIP. We searched the PubMed database for all trials investigating synthetic human GIP(1-42) administration. A total of 67 studies were included. Study duration ranged from 30 min to 6 days. In addition to healthy individuals, the studies included individuals with impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, type 1 diabetes, chronic pancreatitis and secondary diabetes, latent autoimmune diabetes in adults, diabetes caused by a mutation in the hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha gene, end-stage renal disease, chronic renal insufficiency, critical illness, hypoparathyroidism, or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. Of the included studies, 78% did not mention safety events, 10% of the studies reported that no safety events were observed in relation to GIP administration, and 15% of the studies reported safety events in relation to GIP administration with most frequently reported event being a moderate and transient increased heart rate. Gastrointestinal safety events, and changes in blood pressure were also reported. Plasma concentration of active GIP(1-42) increased linearly with dose independent of participant phenotype. There was no significant correlation between achieved maximal concentration of GIP(1-42) and reported safety events. Clearance rates of GIP(1-42) were similar between participant groups. In conclusion, the available data indicate that GIP(1-42) in short-term (up to 6 days) infusion studies is generally well-tolerated. The long-term safety of continuous GIP(1-42) administration is unknown.

Incretin-based therapies are highly successful in combatting obesity and type 2 diabetes1. Yet both activation and inhibition of the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) activation have resulted in similar clinical outcomes, as demonstrated by the GIPR-GLP-1R co-agonist tirzepatide2 and AMG-133 (ref. 3) combining GIPR antagonism with GLP-1R agonism. This underlines the importance of a better understanding of the GIP system. Here we show the necessity of β-arrestin recruitment for GIPR function, by combining in vitro pharmacological characterization of 47 GIPR variants with burden testing of clinical phenotypes and in vivo studies. Burden testing of variants with distinct ligand-binding capacity, Gs activation (cyclic adenosine monophosphate production) and β-arrestin 2 recruitment and internalization shows that unlike variants solely impaired in Gs signalling, variants impaired in both Gs and β-arrestin 2 recruitment contribute to lower adiposity-related traits. Endosomal Gs-mediated signalling of the variants shows a β-arrestin dependency and genetic ablation of β-arrestin 2 impairs cyclic adenosine monophosphate production and decreases GIP efficacy on glucose control in male mice. This study highlights a crucial impact of β-arrestins in regulating GIPR signalling and overall preservation of biological activity that may facilitate new developments in therapeutic targeting of the GIPR system.

Metformin lowers postprandial glycaemic excursions in individuals with type 2 diabetes by modulating gastrointestinal function, including the stimulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The impact of varying the timing of metformin administration on postprandial glucose metabolism is poorly defined. We evaluated the effects of metformin, administered at different intervals before an intraduodenal glucose infusion, on the subsequent glycaemic, insulinaemic and GLP-1 responses in metformin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Sixteen participants with type 2 diabetes that was relatively well-controlled by metformin monotherapy were studied on four separate days in a crossover design. On each day, participants were randomised to receive a bolus infusion of metformin (1000 mg in 50 ml 0.9% saline) via a nasoduodenal catheter at t = -60, -30 or 0 min (and saline at the other timepoints) or saline at all timepoints (control), followed by an intraduodenal glucose infusion of 12.56 kJ/min (3 kcal/min) at t = 0-60 min. The treatments were blinded to both participants and investigators involved in the study procedures. Plasma glucose, insulin and total GLP-1 levels were measured every 30 min between t = -60 min and t = 120 min.

There was a treatment-by-time interaction for metformin in reducing plasma glucose levels and increasing plasma GLP-1 and insulin levels (p<0.05 for each). The reduction in plasma glucose levels was greater when metformin was administered at t = -60 or -30 min vs t = 0 min (p<0.05 for each), and the increases in plasma GLP-1 levels were evident only when metformin was administered at t = -60 or -30 min (p<0.05 for each). Although metformin did not influence insulin sensitivity, it enhanced glucose-induced insulin secretion (p<0.05), and the increases in plasma insulin levels were comparable on the 3 days when metformin was given.

In well-controlled metformin-treated type 2 diabetes, glucose-lowering by metformin is greater when it is given before, rather than with, enteral glucose, and this is associated with a greater GLP-1 response. These observations suggest that administration of metformin before meals may optimise its effect in improving postprandial glycaemic control.

www.anzctr.org.au ACTRN12621000878875 FUNDING: The study was not funded by a specific research grant.

We previously reported that, among all the naturally occurring amino acids, L-valine is the most powerful luminal stimulator of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) release from the upper part of the rat small intestine. This makes L-valine an interesting target for nutritional-based modulation of GLP-1 secretion. However, the molecular mechanism of L-valine-induced secretion remains unknown.

We aimed to investigate the effect of orally given L-valine in mice and to identify the molecular details of L-valine stimulated GLP-1 release using the isolated perfused rat small intestine and GLUTag cells. In addition, the effect of L-valine on hormone secretion from the distal intestine was investigated using a perfused rat colon.

Orally given L-valine (1 g/kg) increased plasma levels of active GLP-1 comparably to orally given glucose (2 g/kg) in male mice, supporting that L-valine is a powerful stimulator of GLP-1 release in vivo (P > 0.05). Luminal L-valine (50 mM) strongly stimulated GLP-1 release from the perfused rat small intestine (P < 0.0001), and inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+-channels with nifedipine (10 μM) inhibited the GLP-1 response (P < 0.01). Depletion of luminal Na+ did not affect L-valine-induced GLP-1 secretion (P > 0.05), suggesting that co-transport of L-valine and Na+ is not important for the depolarization necessary to activate the voltage-gated Ca2+-channels. Administration of the KATP-channel opener diazoxide (250 μM) completely blocked the L-valine induced GLP-1 response (P < 0.05), suggesting that L-valine induced depolarization arises from metabolism and opening of KATP-channels. Similar to the perfused rat small intestine, L-valine tended to stimulate peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY) and GLP-1 release from the perfused rat colon.

L-valine is a powerful stimulator of GLP-1 release in rodents. We propose that intracellular metabolism of L-valine leading to closure of KATP-channels and opening of voltage-gated Ca2+-channels are involved in L-valine induced GLP-1 secretion.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide health problem that has raised major concerns to the public health community. This chronic condition typically results from the cell's inability to respond to normal insulin levels. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are the primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestinal tract. While clinical research has extensively explored the therapeutic potential of GLP-1R in addressing various T2DM-related abnormalities, the possibility of GIPR playing an important role in T2DM treatment is still under investigation. Evidence suggests that GIP is involved in the pathophysiology of T2DM. This chapter focuses on examining the role of GIP as a therapeutic molecule in combating T2DM, comparing the past, present, and future scenarios. Our goal is to delve into how GIP may impact pancreatic β-cell function, adipose tissue uptake, and lipid metabolism. Furthermore, we will elucidate the mechanistic functions of GIP and its receptors in relation to other clinical conditions like cardiovascular diseases, non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and renal disorders. Additionally, this chapter will shed light on the latest advancements in pharmacological management for T2DM, highlighting potential structural modifications of GIP and the repurposing of drugs, while also addressing the challenges involved in bringing GIP-based treatments into clinical practice.

The current paradigm for the insulin system focuses on the phenomenon of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and insulin action on blood glucose control. This historical glucose-centric perspective may have introduced a conceptual bias in our understanding of insulin regulation. A body of evidence demonstrating that in vivo variations in blood glucose and insulin secretion can be largely dissociated motivated us to reconsider the fundamental design of the insulin system as a control system for metabolic homeostasis. Here, we propose that a minimal glucose-centric model does not accurately describe the physiological behavior of the insulin system and propose a new paradigm focusing on the effects of incretins, arguing that under fasting conditions, insulin is regulated by an adipoincretin effect.

Insulin-PI3K signaling controls insulin secretion. Understanding this feedback mechanism is crucial for comprehending how insulin functions. However, the role of adipocyte insulin-PI3K signaling in controlling insulin secretion in vivo remains unclear. Using adipocyte-specific PI3Kα knockout mice (PI3KαAdQ) and a panel of isoform-selective PI3K inhibitors, we show that PI3Kα and PI3Kβ activities are functionally redundant in adipocyte insulin signaling. PI3Kβ-selective inhibitors have no effect on adipocyte AKT phosphorylation in control mice but blunt it in adipocytes of PI3KαAdQ mice, demonstrating adipocyte-selective pharmacological PI3K inhibition in the latter. Acute adipocyte-selective PI3K inhibition increases serum free fatty acid (FFA) and potently induces insulin secretion. We name this phenomenon the adipoincretin effect. The adipoincretin effect operates in fasted mice with increasing FFA and decreasing glycemia, indicating that it is not primarily a control system for blood glucose. This feedback control system defines the rates of adipose tissue lipolysis and chiefly controls basal insulin secretion during fasting.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor (GIPR) are transmembrane receptors involved in insulin, glucagon and somatostatin secretion from the pancreatic islet. Therapeutic targeting of GLP1R and GIPR restores blood glucose levels in part by influencing beta cell, alpha cell and delta cell function. Despite the importance of the incretin-mimetics for diabetes therapy, our understanding of GLP1R and GIPR expression patterns and signaling within the islet remain incomplete. Here, we present the evidence for GLP1R and GIPR expression in the major islet cell types, before addressing signaling pathway(s) engaged, as well as their influence on cell survival and function. While GLP1R is largely a beta cell-specific marker within the islet, GIPR is expressed in alpha cells, beta cells, and (possibly) delta cells. GLP1R and GIPR engage Gs-coupled pathways in most settings, although the exact outcome on hormone release depends on paracrine communication and promiscuous signaling. Biased agonism away from beta-arrestin is an emerging concept for improving therapeutic efficacy, and is also relevant for GLP1R/GIPR dual agonism. Lastly, dual agonists exert multiple effects on islet function through GIPR > GLP1R imbalance, increased GLP1R surface expression and cAMP signaling, as well as beneficial alpha cell-beta cell-delta cell crosstalk.

The prevalence of obesity continues to rise in both adolescents and adults, in parallel obesity is strongly associated with the increased incidence of type 2 diabetes, heart failure, certain types of cancer, and all-cause mortality. In relation to obesity, many pharmacological approaches of the past have tried and failed to combat the rising obesity epidemic, particularly due to insufficient efficacy or unacceptable side effects. However, while the history of antiobesity medication is plagued by failures and disappointments, we have witnessed over the last 10 years substantial progress, particularly in regard to biochemically optimized agonists at the receptor for glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1R) and unimolecular coagonists at the receptors for GLP-1 and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Although the GIP receptor:GLP-1R coagonists are being heralded as premier pharmacological tools for the treatment of obesity and diabetes, uncertainty remains as to why these drugs testify superiority over best-in-class GLP-1R monoagonists. Particularly with regard to GIP, there remains great uncertainty if and how GIP acts on systems metabolism and if the GIP system should be activated or inhibited to improve metabolic outcome in adjunct to GLP-1R agonism. In this review, we summarize recent advances in GLP-1- and GIP-based pharmacology and discuss recent findings and open questions related to how the GIP system affects systemic energy and glucose metabolism.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), a gastrointestinal peptide and central mediator of glucose metabolism, is secreted by L cells in the intestine in response to food intake. Postprandial secretion of GLP-1 is triggered by nutrient-sensing via transporters and G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GLP-1 secretion may be lower in adults with obesity/overweight (OW) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) than in those with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), but these findings are inconsistent. Because of the actions of GLP-1 on stimulating insulin secretion and promoting weight loss, GLP-1 and its analogs are used in pharmacologic preparations for the treatment of T2DM. However, physiologically stimulated GLP-1 secretion through the diet might be a preventive or synergistic method for improving glucose metabolism in individuals who are OW, or have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or T2DM. This narrative review focuses on fasting and postprandial GLP-1 secretion in individuals with different metabolic conditions and degrees of glucose intolerance. Further, the influence of relevant diet-related factors (e.g., specific diets, meal composition, and size, phytochemical content, and gut microbiome) that could affect fasting and postprandial GLP-1 secretion are discussed. Some studies showed diminished glucose- or meal-stimulated GLP-1 response in participants with T2DM, IGT, or OW compared with those with NGT, whereas other studies have reported an elevated or unchanged GLP-1 response in T2DM or IGT. Meal composition, especially the relationship between macronutrients and interventions targeting the microbiome can impact postprandial GLP-1 secretion, although it is not clear which macronutrients are strong stimulants of GLP-1. Moreover, glucose tolerance, antidiabetic treatment, grade of overweight/obesity, and sex were important factors influencing GLP-1 secretion. The results presented in this review highlight the potential of nutritional and physiologic stimulation of GLP-1 secretion. Further research on fasting and postprandial GLP-1 concentrations and the resulting metabolic consequences under different metabolic conditions is needed.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) accounts for more than 90% of total diabetes mellitus cases all over the world. Obesity and lack of balance between energy intake and energy expenditure are closely linked to T2DM. Initial pharmaceutical treatment and lifestyle interventions can at times lead to remission but usually help alleviate it to a certain extent and the condition remains, thus, recurrent with the patient being permanently pharmaco-dependent. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent, self-renewing cells with the ability to secrete a variety of biological factors that can help restore and repair injured tissues. MSC-derived exosomes possess these properties of the original stem cells and are potentially able to confer superior effects due to advanced cell-to-cell signaling and the presence of stem cell-specific miRNAs. On the other hand, the repository of antidiabetic agents is constantly updated with novel T2DM disease-modifying drugs, with higher efficacy and increasingly convenient delivery protocols. Delving deeply, this review details the latest progress and ongoing studies related to the amalgamation of stem cells and antidiabetic drugs, establishing how this harmonized approach can exert superior effects in the management and potential reversal of T2DM.

In youths with obesity, the gut hormone potentiation of insulin secretion - the incretin effect - is blunted. We explored the longitudinal impact of the incretin effect during pubertal transition on β cell function and insulin sensitivity. Youths with obesity and 2-hour glucose level ≥ 120 mg/dL underwent a 3-hour oral glucose-tolerance test (OGTT) and an isoglycemic i.v. glucose infusion to quantify the incretin effect. After 2 years, 30 of 39 participants had a repeated OGTT and were stratified into 3 tertiles according to the baseline incretin effect. The high-incretin effect group demonstrated a longitudinal increase in β cell function (disposition index, minimal model [DIMM]), with greater insulin sensitivity at follow-up and stable insulin secretion (φtotal). A lower incretin effect at baseline was associated with higher 1-hour and 2-hour glucose level at follow-up. The high-incretin effect group displayed a greater increase of GLP-17-36 than the moderate- and low-incretin group at baseline, while such a difference did not persist after 2 years. Glucagon suppression was reduced at follow-up in those with low-baseline incretin in respect to the high-incretin group. The incretin effect during pubertal transition affected the longitudinal trajectory of β cell function and weight in youths with obesity.

The incretin effect describes the insulin response to nutrient ingestion that exceeds the response to glycemia per se. It is mediated by gastrointestinal factors and is necessary to maintain postprandial glucose homeostasis. The incretin effect results in a more than twofold increase of the insulin response to a meal in healthy people and two different techniques have been used in the past to measure its magnitude. Most studies employ an OGTT on 1 day, followed by a matching glucose infusion on a separate day. Another study design employs a hyperglycemic glucose clamp that is maintained after oral ingestion of glucose. Both protocols allow quantification of the incretin effect by comparing the insulin response to an identical glycemic stimulus. Here we performed a within-subject comparison of both techniques to quantify the incretin effect and suggest different calculation methods to interpret the results derived from the clamp experiment in a cohort of healthy young adults (n = 10, age 33 ± 4 yr). All subjects participated on four different study days: 1) OGTT, 2) isoglycemic glucose infusion (Iso-IV), 3) hyperglycemic clamp with oral glucose ingestion (clamp-OGTT), and 4) hyperglycemic clamp (clamp). With the classic OGTT/Iso-IV method, the insulin response to glucose ingestion increased more than twofold and was 60 ± 6% and 49 ± 5% for insulin and c-peptide. Different estimates of the incretin effect based on the clamp method ranged from 58% to 79% for insulin and 38% to 61% for c-peptide, both significantly higher than values derived from the OGTT/isoglycemic infusion method. However, when the effect of continuous hyperglycemia on insulin secretion was accounted for, using extrapolation from early time points of the clamp, good agreement was noted between the two methods. Based on these results, both techniques seem to be equally suited to measure the incretin effect and should be employed according to the scientific questions, experimental contingencies, and investigator experience.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This proof-of-concept study shows that the incretin effect can be reliably assessed by two different methods with similar quantitative results. A single-day hyperglycemic clamp with oral glucose ingestion allows the determination of the incretin effect with fewer study days and less day-to-day variability.

Incretin hormones, principally glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1), potentiate meal-stimulated insulin secretion through direct (GIP + GLP-1) and indirect (GLP-1) actions on islet β-cells. GIP and GLP-1 also regulate glucagon secretion, through direct and indirect pathways. The incretin hormone receptors (GIPR and GLP-1R) are widely distributed beyond the pancreas, principally in the brain, cardiovascular and immune systems, gut and kidney, consistent with a broad array of extrapancreatic incretin actions. Notably, the glucoregulatory and anorectic activities of GIP and GLP-1 have supported development of incretin-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Here we review evolving concepts of incretin action, focusing predominantly on GLP-1, from discovery, to clinical proof of concept, to therapeutic outcomes. We identify established vs uncertain mechanisms of action, highlighting biology conserved across species, while illuminating areas of active investigation and uncertainty that require additional clarification.

Accumulating evidence suggests that metabolic demands of the regenerating liver are met via lipid metabolism and critical regulators of this process. As such, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) critically affect hepatic regeneration in rodent models. The present study aimed to evaluate potential alterations and dynamics of circulating GLP-1 and GLP-2 in patients undergoing liver resections, focusing on post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). GLP-1, GLP-2, Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and parameters of lipid metabolism were determined perioperatively in fasting plasma of 46 patients, who underwent liver resection. GLP-1 and GLP-2 demonstrated a rapid and consistently inverse time course during hepatic regeneration with a significant decrease of GLP-1 and increase of GLP-2 on POD1. Importantly, these postoperative dynamics were significantly more pronounced when PHLF occurred. Of note, the extent of resection or development of complications were not associated with these alterations. IL-6 mirrored the time course of GLP-2. Assessing the main degradation protein dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) no significant association with either GLP-1 or -2 could be found. Additionally, in PHLF distinct postoperative declines in plasma lipid parameters were present and correlated with GLP-2 dynamics. Our data suggest dynamic inverse regulation of GLP-1 and GLP-2 during liver regeneration, rather caused by an increase in expression/release than by changes in degradation capacity and might be associated with inflammatory responses. Their close association with circulating markers of lipid metabolism and insufficient hepatic regeneration after liver surgery suggest a critical involvement during these processes in humans.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder, with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) significantly impacting the cardiovascular (CV) system. Our comprehensive study on the cardiovascular effects of liraglutide, conducted concurrently with the formulation of diabetes treatment guidelines, aims to provide healthcare providers and patients with reassurance regarding the safety and effectiveness of liraglutide. From the beginning until August 20, 2023, we conducted searches in databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholar. These searches aimed to identify studies comparing liraglutide to control in terms of symptom resolution among patients with T2DM. For all relevant outcomes, we calculated risk ratios along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Thirteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this analysis. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, CV mortality, and all-cause mortality. No significant difference was found between the liraglutide and control groups for the outcome of stroke. However, sensitivity analysis revealed a significant reduction in the risk of stroke among patients taking liraglutide. Our comprehensive meta-analysis strongly supports the use of liraglutide for managing cardiovascular disease (CVD) due to its established safety and effectiveness. Further RCTs and meta-analyses are needed to more thoroughly evaluate liraglutide's therapeutic potential, with the aim of enhancing the quality of life for those with CVD.

Serving whey protein before a meal in order to lower postprandial blood glucose concentrations is known as a premeal. The underlying mechanisms are only partly understood but may involve stimulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), and insulin secretion together with a slower gastric emptying rate.

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to review all randomized clinical trials investigating premeals with whey protein in comparison with a nonactive comparator (control) that evaluated plasma glucose, GLP-1, GIP, insulin, and/or gastric emptying rate. Secondary aims included subgroup analyses on the timing and dose of the premeal together with the metabolic state of the participants [lean, obese, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)].

We searched EMBASE, CENTRAL, PUBMED, and clinicaltrials.gov and found 16 randomized crossover trials with a total of 244 individuals. The last search was performed on 9 August, 2022.

Whey protein premeals lowered peak glucose concentration by -1.4 mmol/L [-1.9 mmol/L; -0.9 mmol/L], and the area under the curve for glucose was -0.9 standard deviation (SD) [-1.2 SD; -0.6 SD] compared with controls (high certainty). In association with these findings, whey protein premeals elevated GLP-1 (low certainty) and peak insulin (high certainty) concentrations and slowed gastric emptying rate (high certainty) compared with controls. Subgroup analyses showed a more pronounced and prolonged glucose-lowering effect in individuals with T2DM compared with participants without T2DM. The available evidence did not elucidate the role of GIP. The protein dose used varied between 4 and 55 g, and meta-regression analysis showed that the protein dose correlated with the glucose-lowering effects.

In conclusion, whey protein premeals lower postprandial blood glucose, reduce gastric emptying rate, and increase peak insulin. In addition, whey protein premeals may elevate plasma concentrations of GLP-1. Whey protein premeals may possess clinical potential, but the long-term effects await future clinical trials.

Mice systemically lacking dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) have improved islet health, glucoregulation, and reduced obesity with high-fat diet (HFD) feeding compared to wild-type mice. Some, but not all, of this improvement can be linked to the loss of DPP4 in endothelial cells (ECs), pointing to the contribution of non-EC types. The importance of intra-islet signaling mediated by α to β cell communication is becoming increasingly clear; thus, our objective was to determine if β cell DPP4 regulates insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in HFD-fed mice by regulating the local concentrations of insulinotropic peptides. Using β cell double incretin receptor knockout mice, β cell- and pancreas-specific Dpp4-/- mice, we reveal that β cell incretin receptors are necessary for DPP4 inhibitor effects. However, although β cell DPP4 modestly contributes to high glucose (16.7 mM)-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated islets, it does not regulate whole-body glucose homeostasis.

Tirzepatide is a promising drug with dual-acting glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor activation that has revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as an adjunct to diet and exercise. In phase 3 clinical trials (SURPASS 1-5), the dose-dependent efficacy and safety of tirzepatide were assessed by once-weekly subcutaneous injection (5 mg, 10 mg, and 15 mg), as monotherapy or combination therapy, in individuals with T2DM. Tirzepatide has been shown to achieve better glycemic control in terms of glycosylated hemoglobin reduction and improved fasting and postprandial glucose levels as compared to other diabetic medications. Moreover, the studies demonstrate a reduction in body weight (-6.2 to -12.9 kg), and other cardiovascular benefits by altering the lipid profile, reducing blood pressure, and visceral adiposity. Tirzepatide has acceptable side effects and is well tolerated, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. The SURPASS 4 clinical trial has shown positive cardiovascular outcomes in people with T2DM and elevated cardiovascular risk. Additionally, encouraging results from SURMOUNT trials and ongoing SURPASS-CVOT studies will shed more light on cardiovascular safety in the future. In this review, we have summarized the clinical trials and their respective outcomes and highlighted the potential future indications for tirzepatide in the management of obesity, heart failure, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Introduction Oral semaglutide, with a long half-life of seven days, is the first oral-based peptide drug and is used as an antidiabetic for the reduction of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Oral semaglutide, like other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs), is costly and has gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, especially with a 14 mg dose. In the real world, some type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients on 14 mg oral dose adopt an alternate-day strategy to minimize unwanted GI symptoms. In this study, we analyzed the ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) data of patients with T2DM who were on 14 mg alternate-day oral semaglutide therapy. Methods This retrospective observational study evaluated the AGP data of 10 patients on alternate-day dosing of 14 mg oral semaglutide. The AGP data over a period of 14 days on a single group of patients were analyzed without any control group or randomization and are presented as a case series. AGP monitoring, using Freestyle Libre Pro (Abbott, Illinois, United States), is a standard operating procedure of the endocrinology department for all T2DM patients who were put on oral semaglutide therapy. The AGP data of the glycemic parameters time-in-range (TIR), time-above-range (TAR), and time-below-range (TBR), were compared between the days when oral semaglutide was consumed (days-on-drug) versus the days when oral semaglutide was not consumed (days-off-drug). The statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results We applied the Shapiro-Wilk test (sample size <50) for normality testing; the TIR values of days-on-drug and days-off-drug showed high p values (p =0.285 and 0.109), respectively. This indicated that TIR values days-on-drug and days-off-drug were normally distributed. Although, the distribution of TAR and TBR values days-on-drug and days-off-drug, were not normal as they had small p values (p< 0.05). Hence, further analysis of the paired set of data was done using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. It revealed no difference in TIR, TAR, and TBR between the two groups (days-on-drug and days-off-drug). Conclusion Throughout the period of observation, the glycemic metrics (TIR, TAR, and TBR) remained steady with a 14 mg alternate-day oral semaglutide regimen.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a gut-derived incretin hormone, plays a pivotal role in glucose-induced insulin secretion. Currently, the role of incretin hormones in the pathogenesis of cirrhosis is not clearly defined. This study aimed to investigate circulating levels of GLP-1 in liver cirrhosis and its association with the severity of liver disease.

A total of 80 participants including 39 patients with a definite diagnosis of liver cirrhosis and 41 healthy controls recruited in this cross-sectional study. Circulating levels of GLP-1 were determined using the ELISA method. The severity of liver cirrhosis was assessed according to the Child-Pugh, MELD (i), MELD-Na, MELD New, and UK end-stage liver disease score (UKELD) criteria.

The mean age of patients and healthy subjects was 42.51 ± 12.80 and 42.07 ± 10.92 years, respectively (p value = .869). The mean MELD (i), MELD-Na, MELD New, UKELD, and Child-Pugh scores were 14.36 ± 4.26, 15.26 ± 4.81, 14.74 ± 4.66, 52.33 ± 3.82, and 7.28 ± 1.50, respectively. In this study, circulating levels of GLP-1 were statistically lower in cirrhotic patients compared with healthy controls (95.26 ± 17.15 vs 111.84 ± 38.14 pg/mL; p value = .017).

Larger prospective studies are needed to explore the incretin effect in cirrhosis patients compared with healthy individuals.