|
1
|
Jayasuriya N, Munasinghe BM, Subramaniam N, Lokuliyana SP, Withanage D, Ravihari K. Enhancing Surgical Safety: Evaluating Compliance With the WHO Checklist in a Peripheral Hospital in Sri Lanka. Cureus 2025; 17:e79615. [PMID: 40151695 PMCID: PMC11948407 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2025] [Indexed: 03/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is utilised globally to enhance communication and teamwork, ensuring patient safety in surgeries and reducing complications and mortality. Despite its efficacy, compliance with the checklist may be variable, particularly in resource-limited settings. This audit evaluated the adherence to the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in the surgical theatre of Base Hospital Thambuththegama, Sri Lanka, to identify the gaps and areas for improvement. Methods A prospective audit assessed 102 surgical cases over three weeks, including elective and non-elective procedures. Data collection involved real-time observation of checklist use and assessment of staff participation. Compliance was evaluated based on checklist attachment, completion, and timing, while staff participation rates were analysed across roles. Results In 87.25% of cases, the checklist was attached to the bed head ticket (BHT). Fully completed checklists were observed in only 34.31% of cases, with just 13.73% completed at the correct time. Staff participation was highest among anaesthetists (90.5%) and house officers (88.1%) but significantly lower among consultants (7.1%). Key barriers included incomplete sections, incorrect timing, and inconsistent participation from senior staff. Conclusions The audit highlights critical gaps in compliance with the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, emphasising the need for targeted interventions. These include staff training, real-time monitoring, and enhanced accountability. Addressing these gaps can significantly improve surgical safety and patient outcomes. A re-audit is planned to evaluate the impact of the proposed changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Njass Jayasuriya
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Base Hospital, Thambuththegama, LKA
| | - B M Munasinghe
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Base Hospital, Thambuththegama, LKA
| | | | | | - Dmp Withanage
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Base Hospital, Thambuththegama, LKA
| | - Kal Ravihari
- Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Base Hospital, Thambuththegama, LKA
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Yaseen SJ, Taha S, Alkaiyat A, Zyoud SH. Multicenter audit of operating room staff compliance with the surgical safety checklist: a cross-sectional study from a low- and middle-income country. BMC Health Serv Res 2025; 25:103. [PMID: 39828673 PMCID: PMC11744863 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12288-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unsafe surgical practices are a preventable cause of morbidity and mortality. The WHO published its surgical safety checklist (SSC) to help reduce surgical errors and complications and improve patient outcomes. This study aims to audit compliance with the WHO's SSC and explore attitudes toward its implementation in hospitals within a low- and middle-income country. METHODS This was a two-part, cross-sectional study in which a retrospective desk review was used to audit compliance with SSC use, and a questionnaire was used to explore attitudes toward the SSC. The data were collected between September and November 2021 from two major governmental and nongovernmental hospitals. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, and surgical nurses were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire that measured attitudes across five domains via a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS The final sample consisted of 340 patients whose records were retrieved from one governmental hospital (n=170) and one nongovernmental hospital (n=170). Among those patients, 93 (27.4%) underwent general surgery, 49 (14.4%) underwent orthopedic surgery, and 45 (13.2%) underwent pediatric surgery. The SSCs were fully completed for 27.9% of the patients, partially completed for 43.2% of the patients, and left blank for 28.8% of the patients. Compliance with the use of the SSC was significantly associated with age (p=0.002), sex (p=0.022), type of surgery (p<0.001), classification of surgery (p=0.006) and hospital sector (p<0.001). None of the patients at the governmental hospital had a completely filled the SSC, whereas none of those at the nongovernmental hospital had a blank SSC. Among the final sample of 80 operating room staff members included in the study that explored their attitudes, 41.3%, 40.0%, and 18.8% were surgeons, surgical nurses, and anesthesiologists, respectively. The participants demonstrated positive attitudes toward the SSC across all the attitude domains. The majority said that lack of time (56.3%), staff assertiveness (55.0%), and training (53.8%) were the most important barriers to implementing the SSC. The hospital sector was significantly associated with higher scores across all domains. CONCLUSIONS While the majority of operating room staff used the SSC, only a minority filled the list completely. The attitudes toward using the WHO's SSC trended positively, which encourages the official implementation of the SSC at the national level. Addressing the identified barriers may enhance the quality of implementation by providing educational sessions. Future reaudits are recommended to enhance the adaptability of the SSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sana J Yaseen
- Faculty of Graduate Studies, Public Health Management Program, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine
- Quality and Patient Safety Department, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine
| | - Sari Taha
- An-Najah Global Health Institute (GHI), An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Abdulsalam Alkaiyat
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, P.O. Box 7, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Sa'ed H Zyoud
- Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, 44839, Palestine.
- Clinical Research Centre, An-Najah National University Hospital, Nablus, 44839, Palestine.
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Samost-Williams A, Sridhar S, Thomas EJ. Guide to perioperative checklist design, implementation, and integration. J Clin Anesth 2024; 96:111422. [PMID: 38413327 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Aubrey Samost-Williams
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 5.020, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - Srikanth Sridhar
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St., MSB 5.020, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Eric J Thomas
- Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, University of Texas Professionals Building, 6400 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Tuyishime H, Claure R, Balakrishnan K, Chan H, Lam L, Randolph M, Stroud J, Traber K, Tileston K, Shea K. Impact of a Daily Huddle on Safety in Perioperative Services. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2024; 50:678-683. [PMID: 38845238 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2024.04.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication failures contribute to quality gaps and may lead to serious safety events (SSEs) in the operating room (OR). Our perioperative services team experienced an increased rate of SSEs in 2020. Event analysis revealed clustered causes: communication failures and lack of timely information to prepare for cases. Consequently, the team implemented a daily morning OR safety huddle conducted before bringing patients into the OR to reduce quality gaps and improve communication. METHODS The attending surgeon and anesthesiologist, circulating nurse, and scrub staff are required to be present. Cases are discussed using a standard format designed by the OR team with built-in time for questions and clarifications. The surgeon initiates the huddle; the circulating nurse leads and records the discussion. OR leadership initially performed daily audits but gradually reduced them when huddles became standard operating procedure (SOP). SSEs were recorded from December 2015 to September 2020 preintervention and October 2020 to July 2023 postintervention. RESULTS Following the implementation of huddles, there were no SSEs for more than 900 days (2.0 SSEs/year preintervention vs. 0.0 SSEs/year postintervention). The first SSE during the postintervention period occurred in March 2023. Huddle compliance was consistently > 95%. No delays were observed in first-case on-time starts postintervention. The huddle is now SOP for all general OR teams and interventional radiology. CONCLUSION Implementing the morning safety huddle contributed to a reduction in the rate of SSEs without introducing delays to first-case start-times.
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Ghanmi N, Bondok M, Etherington C, Saddiki Y, Lefebvre I, Berthelot P, Dion PM, Raymond B, Seguin J, Sekhavati P, Islam S, Boet S. Optimizing Teamwork in the Operating Room: A Scoping Review of Actionable Teamwork Strategies. Cureus 2024; 16:e60522. [PMID: 38883070 PMCID: PMC11180536 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Suboptimal teamwork in the operating room (OR) is a contributing factor in a significant proportion of preventable complications for surgical patients. Specifying behaviour is fundamental to closing evidence-practice gaps in healthcare. Current teamwork interventions, however, have yet to be synthesized in this way. This scoping review aimed to identify actionable strategies for use during surgery by mapping the existing literature according to the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework. The databases MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online), Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Cochrane, Scopus, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to April 5, 2022. Screening and data extraction were conducted in duplicate by pairs of independent reviewers. The search identified 9,289 references after the removal of duplicates. Across 249 studies deemed eligible for inclusion, eight types of teamwork interventions could be mapped according to the AACTT framework: bundle/checklists, protocols, audit and feedback, clinical practice guidelines, environmental change, cognitive aid, education, and other), yet many were ambiguous regarding the actors and actions involved. The 101 included protocol interventions appeared to be among the most actionable for the OR based on the clear specification of ACCTT elements, and their effectiveness should be evaluated and compared in future work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nibras Ghanmi
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | - Mostafa Bondok
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of British Columbia, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Cole Etherington
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, CAN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jeanne Seguin
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | | | - Sindeed Islam
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| | - Sylvain Boet
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Jamshidi Z, Norouzi Tabrizi K, Khankeh H, Zeraati Nasrabadi M, Sadeghi H, Eghbali M. Design and psychometric properties of the acute care quality in trauma emergency units scale. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:447-453. [PMID: 37728635 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02360-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systematic trauma care scale could be designed and used by nurses to completely and adequately fulfill a complex care to improve trauma care quality. The purpose of this study was to design and evaluate the psychometric property of the Nursing Care Quality in Trauma Emergency Units and trauma care promotion. METHODS This methodological study was conducted in 2022. The process of designing and psychometric assessment of the scale was performed in two steps such as Generating an Item Pool and Validity and Reliability evaluation (Item reduction). The construct validity was determined using the experimental intervention; for determining the reliability of the scale and internal consistency, we measured the inter-rater reliability (IRR). Data were analyzed using the SPSS software, version 22. RESULTS Based on our findings, the CVI and CVR of the scale were 1 and 0.83-1, respectively. A significant difference between the pre- and post-intervention scores in group 1 supports the inference that the construct has been appropriately represented, and the instrument has construct validity (p < 0.001). We found that there was a significant difference in the scores of Patient assessment, Planning and Implementations, and Evaluation of the care plan. The inter-rater reliability method allows the optimal reliability assessment of observational instruments, which was used in this study, and the results confirmed excellent reliability of the instrument. CONCLUSIONS The validity and reliability of the Nursing Care Quality in Trauma Emergency Units Scale were confirmed. The instrument could successfully assess the process of nursing care in the trauma emergency ward. The use of this checklist is recommended as a valid observational tool for other researchers. STUDY TYPE Therapeutic/care management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Jamshidi
- Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| | - Kian Norouzi Tabrizi
- School of Behavioral Sciences and Mental Health, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Khankeh
- Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Hajar Sadeghi
- Department of Nursing Education, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Eghbali
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
- Health Sciences Research Center, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
De Simone B, Agnoletti V, Abu-Zidan FM, Biffl WL, Moore EE, Chouillard E, Coccolini F, Sartelli M, Podda M, Di Saverio S, Kaafarani H, Balogh ZJ, Bala M, Leppäniemi AK, Kirkpatrick AW, Pikoulis E, Rasa K, Rosato C, Sawyer R, Ansaloni L, de'Angelis N, Damaskos D, Stahel PF, Kluger Y, Coimbra R, Catena F. The Operating Room management for emergency Surgical Activity (ORSA) study: a WSES international survey. Updates Surg 2024; 76:687-698. [PMID: 38190080 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01668-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite advances and improvements in the management of surgical patients, emergency and trauma surgery is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This may be due in part to delays in definitive surgical management in the operating room (OR). There is a lack of studies focused on OR prioritization and resource allocation in emergency surgery. The Operating Room management for emergency Surgical Activity (ORSA) study was conceived to assess the management of operating theatres and resources from a global perspective among expert international acute care surgeons. METHOD The ORSA study was conceived as an international web survey. The questionnaire was composed of 23 multiple-choice and open questions. Data were collected over 3 months. Participation in the survey was voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven emergency and acute care surgeons answered the questionnaire; the response rate was 58.8%. The majority of the participants come from Europe. One hundred nineteen surgeons (81%; 119/147) declared to have at least one emergency OR in their hospital; for the other 20/147 surgeons (13.6%), there is not a dedicated emergency operating room. Forty-six (68/147)% of the surgeons use the elective OR to perform emergency procedures during the day. The planning of an emergency surgical procedure is done by phone by 70% (104/147) of the surgeons. CONCLUSIONS There is no dedicated emergency OR in the majority of hospitals internationally. Elective surgical procedures are usually postponed or even cancelled to perform emergency surgery. It is a priority to validate an effective universal triaging and scheduling system to allocate emergency surgical procedures. The new Timing in Acute Care Surgery (TACS) was recently proposed and validated by a Delphi consensus as a clear and reproducible triage tool to timely perform an emergency surgical procedure according to the clinical severity of the surgical disease. The new TACS needs to be prospectively validated in clinical practice. Logistics have to be assessed using a multi-disciplinary approach to improve patients' safety, optimise the use of resources, and decrease costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Villeneuve St Georges Academic Hospital, Villeneuve St Georges, France.
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency surgery, Level I Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E. Moore Shock Trauma Center, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Elie Chouillard
- Unit of Metabolic and General Surgery, Clinique St Louis, Poissy, France
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- Department of General Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Department of General Surgery, Santa Maria del Soccorso Hospital, San Benedetto del Tronto, Ascoli Piceno, Italy
| | - Haytham Kaafarani
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Harvard Medical School & Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Zsolt J Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Acute Care Surgery and Trauma Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem Kiriat Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ari K Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Emmanouil Pikoulis
- Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaali, Turkey
| | - Chiara Rosato
- Department of Emergency and General Surgery, Level I Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Robert Sawyer
- General Surgery Department, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Colorectal and Digestive Surgery Unit, DIGEST Department Beaujon University Hospital (AP-HP), University Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Dimitris Damaskos
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip F Stahel
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center and Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency surgery, Level I Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
- eCampus University, CREAS, Ser.In.Ar. Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Riley MS, Etheridge J, Palter V, Zeh H, Grantcharov T, Kaelberer Z, Sonnay Y, Smink DS, Brindle ME, Molina G. Remote Assessment of Real-World Surgical Safety Checklist Performance Using the OR Black Box: A Multi-Institutional Evaluation. J Am Coll Surg 2024; 238:206-215. [PMID: 37846086 DOI: 10.1097/xcs.0000000000000893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large-scale evaluation of surgical safety checklist performance has been limited by the need for direct observation. The operating room (OR) Black Box is a multichannel surgical data capture platform that may allow for the holistic evaluation of checklist performance at scale. STUDY DESIGN In this retrospective cohort study, data from 7 North American academic medical centers using the OR Black Box were collected between August 2020 and January 2022. All cases captured during this period were analyzed. Measures of checklist compliance, team engagement, and quality of checklist content review were investigated. RESULTS Data from 7,243 surgical procedures were evaluated. A time-out was performed during most surgical procedures (98.4%, n = 7,127), whereas a debrief was performed during 62.3% (n = 4,510) of procedures. The mean percentage of OR staff who paused and participated during the time-out and debrief was 75.5% (SD 25.1%) and 54.6% (SD 36.4%), respectively. A team introduction (performed 42.6% of the time) was associated with more prompts completed (31.3% vs 18.7%, p < 0.001), a higher engagement score (0.90 vs 0.86, p < 0.001), and a higher percentage of team members who ceased other activities (80.3% vs 72%, p < 0.001) during the time-out. CONCLUSIONS Remote assessment using OR Black Box data provides useful insight into surgical safety checklist performance. Many items included in the time-out and debrief were not routinely discussed. Completion of a team introduction was associated with improved time-out performance. There is potential to use OR Black Box metrics to improve intraoperative process measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max S Riley
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - James Etheridge
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - Vanessa Palter
- International Centre for Surgical Safety, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (Palter)
| | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX (Zeh)
| | - Teodor Grantcharov
- Department of Surgery, Clinical Excellence Research Centre, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Grantcharov)
| | - Zoey Kaelberer
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - Yves Sonnay
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - Douglas S Smink
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - Mary E Brindle
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| | - George Molina
- From the Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Sonnay, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Riley, Etheridge, Kaelberer, Smink, Brindle, Molina)
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Paterson C, Mckie A, Turner M, Kaak V. Barriers and facilitators associated with the implementation of surgical safety checklists: A qualitative systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2024; 80:465-483. [PMID: 37675871 DOI: 10.1111/jan.15841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Despite the documented benefits of the World Health Organisation Patient Safety Checklist compliance rates with implementation continue to cause risk to patient safety. This qualitative systematic review aimed to explore the reported factors that impact compliance and implementation processes related to surgical safety checklists in perioperative settings. DESIGN A qualitative systematic review. METHODS A systematic review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) approach to synthesize qualitative studies was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases were expansively searched using keywords and subject headings. Articles were assessed using a pre-selected eligibility criterion. Data extraction and quality appraisal was undertaken for all included studies and a meta-aggregation performed. DATA SOURCES The CINAHL, Medline and Scopus databases were searched in August 2022 and the search was repeated in June 2023. RESULTS 34 studies were included. Following the synthesis of the findings there were multiple interrelating barriers to checklist compliance that impacted implementation. There were more barriers than enablers reported in existing studies. Enablers included effective leadership, education and training, timely use of audit and feedback, local champions, and the option for local modifications to the surgical checklist. Further research should focus on targeted interventions that improve observed compliance rates to optimize patient safety. CONCLUSION This qualitative systematic review identified multiple key factors that influenced the uptake of the Surgical Safety Checklist in operating theatres. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE Surgeon participation, hierarchical culture, complacency, and duplication of existing safety processes were identified which impacted the use and completion of the checklist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Paterson
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Australia
- Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide
- Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - A Mckie
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia
| | - M Turner
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia
| | - V Kaak
- Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Bruce ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Aghighi N, Aryankhesal A, Raeissi P, Najafpour Z. Frequency and influential factors on occurrence of medical errors: A three-year cross-sectional study. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2024; 12:422. [PMID: 38464657 PMCID: PMC10920663 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1726_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite efforts to improve patient safety, medical errors (MEs) continue to recur. Proper utilization of reported MEs can be effective in preventing their recurrence. This study investigated the errors reported in 3 years and examined the factors affecting them. MATERIALS AND METHODS This descriptive analytical study was conducted using the errors reported in 20 hospitals under the auspices of one of Iran's medical universities from 2018 to 2020. All reported errors were investigated by an expert panel. RESULTS In total, 6584 reported errors were grouped into four main categories based on the type of error. The highest reported errors were related to the management and treatment procedures. Analyses of the factors influencing medical errors revealed that 15 factors affected the occurrence of errors. An increasing trend of error was found in 9 of the 15 identified factors. Incorrect documenting of the physician's order in the nursing Kardex and noncompliance with the patient identification guide were the highest with 16.03 and 15.47%, respectively. CONCLUSION The most identified factor was the incorrect registration of the physician's prescription on the nursing card; therefore, it seems that the use of computerized physician order entry should be considered. Furthermore, the mere existence and training of patient safety guides cannot help prevent errors. Not only should the underlying causes of errors be carefully identified and investigated but it also requires serious determination to follow the patient's safety instructions from the highest to the lowest levels of the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Negar Aghighi
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aidin Aryankhesal
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Pouran Raeissi
- Department of Health Services Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zhila Najafpour
- Department of Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Mastrianni A, Hamlin L, Alberto EC, Sullivan TM, Ranganna A, Marsic I, Burd RS, Sarcevic A. Analysis of Task Attributes Associated with Crisis Checklist Compliance in Pediatric Trauma Resuscitation. AMIA ... ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS. AMIA SYMPOSIUM 2024; 2023:504-513. [PMID: 38222377 PMCID: PMC10785895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
Although checklists can improve overall team performance during medical crises, non-compliant checklist use poses risks to patient safety. We examined how task attributes affected checklist compliance by studying the use of a digital checklist during trauma resuscitation. We first determined task attributes and checklist compliance behaviors for 3,131 resuscitation tasks. Using statistical analyses and qualitative video review, we then identified barriers to accurately tracking task status, finding that certain task attributes were associated with non-compliant checklist behaviors. For example, tasks with multiple steps were more likely to be incorrectly recorded as completed when the task was not performed to completion. We discuss challenges in capturing and tracking the status of tasks with attributes that contribute to non-compliant checklist use. We also contribute a framework for understanding how tasks with certain attributes can be designed on checklists to improve compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Mastrianni
- College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leah Hamlin
- College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily C Alberto
- Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Travis M Sullivan
- Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Adesh Ranganna
- Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ivan Marsic
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Randall S Burd
- Division of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Aleksandra Sarcevic
- College of Computing and Informatics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Blum SFU, Hoffmann RT. Avoiding adverse events in interventional radiology - a systematic review on the instruments. CVIR Endovasc 2024; 7:2. [PMID: 38170413 PMCID: PMC10764660 DOI: 10.1186/s42155-023-00413-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoiding AEs is a pivotal fundament for high patient safety in an efficient interventional radiology (IR) department. Although IR procedures are considered to have a lower risk than their surgical alternatives, they account for one third of all radiological adverse events (AEs) and in general, the number of AEs is increasing. Thus, measures to prevent AEs in IR are of interest. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted via handsearch and Ovid. A structured data extraction was performed with all included studies and their quality of evidence was evaluated. Finally, data were aggregated for further statistical analysis. RESULTS After screening 1,899 records, 25 full-text publications were screened for eligibility. Nine studies were included in the review. Of those, four studies investigated in simulator training, one in team training, three in checklists, and one in team time-out. Eight were monocenter studies, and five were conducted in a non-clinical context. Study quality was low. Aggregation and analysis of data was only possible for the studies about checklists with an overall reduction of the median error per procedure from 0.35 to 0.06, observed in a total of 20,399 and 58,963 procedures, respectively. CONCLUSION The evidence on the instruments to avoid AEs in IR is low. Further research should be conducted to elaborate the most powerful safety tools to improve patient outcomes in IR by avoiding AEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
- Quality and Medical Risk Management, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany.
| | - Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
- Institute and Polyclinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, Dresden, 01307, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Etheridge JC, Moyal-Smith R, Yong TT, Lim SR, Sonnay Y, Lim C, Tan HK, Brindle ME, Havens JM. Transforming Team Performance Through Reimplementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:78-86. [PMID: 37966829 PMCID: PMC10652215 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
Importance Patient safety interventions, like the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist, require effective implementation strategies to achieve meaningful results. Institutions with underperforming checklists require evidence-based guidance for reimplementing these practices to maximize their impact on patient safety. Objective To assess the ability of a comprehensive system of safety checklist reimplementation to change behavior, enhance safety culture, and improve outcomes for surgical patients. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective type 2 hybrid implementation-effectiveness study took place at 2 large academic referral centers in Singapore. All operations performed at either hospital were eligible for observation. Surveys were distributed to all operating room staff. Intervention The study team developed a comprehensive surgical safety checklist reimplementation package based on the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment framework. Best practices from implementation science and human factors engineering were combined to redesign the checklist. The revised instrument was reimplemented in November 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Implementation outcomes included penetration and fidelity. The primary effectiveness outcome was team performance, assessed by trained observers using the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECH) system before and after reimplementation. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture was used to assess safety culture and observers tracked device-related interruptions (DRIs). Patient safety events, near-miss events, 30-day mortality, and serious complications were tracked for exploratory analyses. Results Observers captured 252 cases (161 baseline and 91 end point). Penetration of the checklist was excellent at both time points, but there were significant improvements in all measures of fidelity after reimplementation. Mean NOTECHS scores increased from 37.1 to 42.4 points (4.3 point adjusted increase; 95% CI, 2.9-5.7; P < .001). DRIs decreased by 86.5% (95% CI, -22.1% to -97.8%; P = .03). Significant improvements were noted in 9 of 12 composite areas on culture of safety surveys. Exploratory analyses suggested reductions in patient safety events, mortality, and serious complications. Conclusions and Relevance Comprehensive reimplementation of an established checklist intervention can meaningfully improve team behavior, safety culture, patient safety, and patient outcomes. Future efforts will expand the reach of this system by testing a structured guidebook coupled with light-touch implementation guidance in a variety of settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C. Etheridge
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Moyal-Smith
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tze Tein Yong
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Shu Rong Lim
- Health Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Yves Sonnay
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christine Lim
- International Safety and Policy, Johnson and Johnson Medical Devices, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Hiang Khoon Tan
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- SingHealth Duke-NUS Global Health Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary E. Brindle
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joaquim M. Havens
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
He R, Bhat S, Varghese C, Rossaak J, Keane C, Baraza W, Wells CI. Interventions to Improve Patient Care on Surgical Ward Rounds: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2023; 47:3159-3174. [PMID: 37857927 PMCID: PMC10694108 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ward rounds are an essential component of surgical and perioperative care. However, the relative effectiveness of different interventions to improve the quality of surgical ward rounds remains uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of various ward round interventions among surgical patients. METHODS A systematic literature search of the MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Scopus, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and PsycInfo databases was performed on 7 October 2022 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. All studies investigating surgical ward round quality improvement strategies with measurable outcomes were included. Data were analysed via narrative synthesis based on commonly reported themes. RESULTS A total of 28 studies were included. Most were cohort studies (n = 25), followed by randomised controlled trials (n = 3). Checklists/proformas were utilised most commonly (n = 22), followed by technological (n = 3), personnel (n = 2), and well-being (n = 1) quality improvement strategies. The majority of checklist interventions (n = 21, 95%) showed significant improvements in documentation compliance, staff understanding, or patient satisfaction. Other less frequently reported ward round interventions demonstrated improvements in communication, patient safety, and reductions in patient stress levels. CONCLUSIONS Use of checklists, technology, personnel, and well-being improvement strategies have been associated with improvements in ward round documentation, communication, as well as staff and patient satisfaction. Future studies should investigate the ease of implementation and long-term durability of these interventions, in addition to their impact on clinically relevant outcomes such as patient morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reuben He
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sameer Bhat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Surgery, Te Whatu Ora MidCentral, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - Chris Varghese
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Jeremy Rossaak
- Department of General Surgery, Tauranga Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Bay of Plenty, Tauranga, New Zealand
| | - Celia Keane
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Wal Baraza
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Cameron I Wells
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Surgical and Translational Research Centre, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.
- Department of General Surgery, Te Whatu Ora Te Toka Tumai Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Lim PJH, Chen L, Siow S, Lim SH. Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of surgical safety checklist: an integrative review. Int J Qual Health Care 2023; 35:mzad086. [PMID: 37847116 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical procedures pose an immense risk to patients, which can lead to various complications and adverse events. In order to safeguard patients' safety, the World Health Organization initiated the implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) in operating theatres worldwide. The aim of this integrative review was to summarize and evaluate the use and implementation of SSC, focusing on facilitators and barriers at the individual, professional, and organizational levels. This review followed closely the integrative review method by Whittemore and Knafl. An English literature search was conducted across three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE) and other hand search references. Keywords search included: 'acute care', 'surgical', 'adult patients', 'pre-operative', 'intra-operative', and 'post-operative'. A total of 816 articles were screened by two reviewers independently and all articles that met the pre-specified inclusion criteria were retained. Data extracted from the articles were categorized, compared, and further analysed. A total of 34 articles were included with the majority being observational studies in developed and European countries. Checklists had been adopted in various surgical specialities. Findings indicated that safety checklists improved team cohesion and communication, resulting in enhanced patient safety. This resulted in high compliance rates as healthcare workers expressed the benefits of SSC to facilitate safety within operating theatres. Barriers included manpower limitations, hierarchical culture, lack of staff involvement and training, staff resistance, and appropriateness of checklist. Common facilitators and barriers at individual, professional, and organizational levels have been identified. Staff training and education, conducive workplace culture, timely audits, and appropriate checklist adaptations are crucial components for a successful implementation of the SSC. Methods have also been introduced to counter barriers of SSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petrina Jia Hui Lim
- Senior Staff Nurse, Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608, Singapore
| | - Lin Chen
- Senior Staff Nurse, Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608, Singapore
| | - Serene Siow
- Senior Staff Nurse, Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608, Singapore
| | - Siew Hoon Lim
- Nurse Clinician, Division of Nursing, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road 169608, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Wyss M, Kolbe M, Grande B. Make a difference: implementation, quality and effectiveness of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist-a narrative review. J Thorac Dis 2023; 15:5723-5735. [PMID: 37969258 PMCID: PMC10636476 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-1807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective The positive effects of the WHO Surgery Safety Checklist (WHO SSC) have been demonstrated by a large amount of quantitative studies. With this review, the focus changes to the content of qualitative studies on WHO SSC to identify possible research gaps. In this way, gaps in the content of the execution of individual checklists can be closed. Methods The two research platforms "Ovid Medline" and "PubMed" formed a solid basis for the literature research. The search was conducted until the 19th of September 2022. The following group terms were used: "checklist", "surgery", "implementation", and "WHO Surgical Safety Checklist". Subsequently, the literature research was limited to studies between 2011 and 2021 in either English or German. Key Content and Findings Overall, a positive effect was found in all qualitative studies on WHO SSC with respect to leadership, teamwork, timing and acceptance. Acceptance through effective implementation of the SSC deserves special mention. Several studies highlighted the lack of understanding and training, which led to variation in execution. A large number of studies agree that the WHO SSC is fostering teamwork and improving communication. However, there are also hurdles and barriers in the application that seem to have an influence on the effectiveness. Conclusions The exact mechanisms of the advantage and application of the checklist are still poorly understood. Further research in this area is needed for a better understanding of the underlying work culture and consequently improving patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muriel Wyss
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michaela Kolbe
- Simulation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bastian Grande
- Institute of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Simulation Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Patel VR, Haynes AB. Technology Cannot Fix Dysfunctional Teams: Safety Culture Is Essential to Surgical Safety Checklist Effectiveness. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2023; 49:505-506. [PMID: 37507333 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
|
|
18
|
Pati AB, Mishra TS, Chappity P, Venkateshan M, Pillai JSK. Use of Technology to Improve the Adherence to Surgical Safety Checklists in the Operating Room. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2023; 49:572-576. [PMID: 37198060 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although checklists can improve safety in the operating room (OR), compliance with their use is variable. Use of a forcing function, a principle of human factors engineering, has not been reported earlier as a method of increasing checklist use. The authors conducted this study to determine the feasibility and effects of introducing a forcing function on OR surgical safety checklist implementation and adherence. METHODS The authors developed and introduced the use of an electronic version of the surgical safety checklist on an Android application, provided on a personal device available in the OR. This application was linked by Bluetooth to electrocautery equipment, which could not be started before the electronic checklist was completed on the screen of the personal device. In the same OR, retrospective data from use of the traditional (paper-based) checklist were compared with data from the new electronic checklist for frequency of use, and completeness (percentage of all checklist items completed) at three stages of the surgical process-sign-in, time-out, and sign-out. RESULTS The frequency of use was 100.0% for the electronic checklist, compared with 97.9% for the traditional checklist. The frequency of completeness was 27.1% for the traditional vs. 100.0% for the electronic (p < 0.001).The manual checklist's sign-out component was completed only 37.0% of the time. CONCLUSION Although checklist use in some form was already high with the traditional checklist, completion rate was low and significantly increased with the use of the electronic checklist with a forcing function.
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Khalid SY, Sibghatullah QM, Abdullah MH, Farooq O, Ashraf S, Ahmed A, Arshad A, Nadeem A, Mumtaz H, Saqib M. Implementation of World Health Organization behaviorally anchored rating scale and checklist utilization: promising results for LMICs. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1204213. [PMID: 37554500 PMCID: PMC10405729 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1204213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Operating teams can decrease the likelihood of patient risk by using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. To ascertain the impact of demographic factors on behaviorally anchored ratings and investigate operating room (OR) staff attitudes toward checklist administration, we set out to better understand how OR personnel use the checklist in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS A monocentric sequential mixed-methods study employing a quantitative approach of using World Health Organization Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (WHOBARS) assessments of surgical cases by OR personnel and two independent observers, who were certified surgeons having extensive experience in the rating of the WHOBARS scale for more than 1 year, followed by a qualitative approach of staff interviews were carried out in a tertiary care setting. In June and July 2022, over the period of 8 weeks, an intervention (training delivery) was implemented and evaluated. The information, skills, and behavior adjustments required to apply the checklist were taught in the course using lectures, videos, small group breakouts, participant feedback, and simulations. RESULTS After the introduction of WHOBARS, 50.81% of respondents reported always using the checklist, with another 30.81% using it in part. Participants' years in practice, hospital size, or surgical volume did not predict checklist use. Checklist use was associated with always counting instruments (51.08%), patient identity (67.83%), difficult intubation risk (39.72%), the risk of blood loss (51.08%), prophylactic administration of an antibiotic (52.43%), and the use of pulse oximeter (46.75%). Interviewees felt that the checklist could promote teamwork and a safe culture, particularly enabling speaking up. Senior staff were of key importance in setting the appropriate tone. CONCLUSION The use of a multi-disciplinary course for checklist implementation resulted in 50.81% of participants always using the checklist and an increase in counting surgical instruments. Successful checklist implementation was not predicted by the participant's length of medical service, hospital size, or surgical volume. If reproducible in other countries, widespread implementation in LMICs becomes a realistic possibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Yousaf Khalid
- Department of Surgery, Letterkenny University Hospital, Letterkenny, Ireland
| | | | - Muhammad Haroon Abdullah
- Department of Surgery, Fatima Memorial Hospital College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Omer Farooq
- Department of Surgery, District Headquarter Hospital, Attock, Pakistan
| | - Sandal Ashraf
- Department of Surgery, Midland Regional Hospital Mullingar, Mullingar, Ireland
| | - Adeel Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan
| | - Ashhar Arshad
- Department of Surgery, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Abdullah Nadeem
- Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Hassan Mumtaz
- Maroof International Hospital, Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Saqib
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Timm-Holzer E, Tschan F, Keller S, Semmer NK, Zimmermann J, Huber SA, Hübner M, Candinas D, Demartines N, Weber M, Beldi G. No signs of check-list fatigue - introducing the StOP? intra-operative briefing enhances the quality of an established pre-operative briefing in a pre-post intervention study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1195024. [PMID: 37457099 PMCID: PMC10338924 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1195024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The team timeout (TTO) is a safety checklist to be performed by the surgical team prior to incision. Exchange of critical information is, however, important not only before but also during an operation and members of surgical teams frequently feel insufficiently informed by the operating surgeon about the ongoing procedure. To improve the exchange of critical information during surgery, the StOP?-protocol was developed: At appropriate moments during the procedure, the leading surgeon briefly interrupts the operation and informs the team about the current Status (St) and next steps/objectives (O) of the operation, as well as possible Problems (P), and encourages questions of other team members (?). The StOP?-protocol draws attention to the team. Anticipating the occurrence of StOP?-protocols may support awareness of team processes and quality issues from the beginning and thus support other interventions such as the TTO; however, it also may signal an additional demand and contribute to a phenomenon akin to "checklist fatigue." We investigated if, and how, the introduction of the StOP?-protocol influenced TTO quality. Methods This was a prospective intervention study employing a pre-post design. In the visceral surgical departments of two university hospitals and one urban hospital the quality of 356 timeouts (out of 371 included operation) was assessed by external observers before (154) and after (202) the introduction of the StOP?-briefing. Timeout quality was rated in terms of timeout completeness (number of checklist items mentioned) and timeout quality (engagement, pace, social atmosphere, noise). Results As compared to the baseline, after the implementation of the StOP?-protocol, observed timeouts had higher completeness ratings (F = 8.69, p = 0.003) and were rated by observers as higher in engagement (F = 13.48, p < 0.001), less rushed (F = 14.85, p < 0.001), in a better social atmosphere (F = 5.83, p < 0.016) and less noisy (F = 5.35, p < 0.022). Conclusion Aspects of TTO are affected by the anticipation of StOP?-protocols. However, rather than harming the timeout goals by inducing "checklist fatigue," it increases completeness and quality of the team timeout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliane Timm-Holzer
- Institute for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Tschan
- Institute for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Keller
- Institute for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | | | - Jasmin Zimmermann
- Institute for Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Simon A. Huber
- Department of Psychology, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Candinas
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Markus Weber
- Department of Surgery, Triemli Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido Beldi
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Berne University Hospital, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Hill J, Irwin-Porter G, Buckley LA. Surgical safety checklists in UK veterinary practice: Current implementation and attitudes towards their use. Vet Rec 2023; 192:e2484. [PMID: 36607140 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.2484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical safety checklist (SSC) use benefits veterinary patients, but endorsement and implementation are essential for these benefits to be observed. METHODS A cross-sectional survey assessed UK veterinary professionals' attitudes towards and usage of SSCs and identified factors associated with poorer attitude or failure to use SSCs. RESULTS Of 513 respondents, 70% used SSCs. Of these, 87.1% used SSCs for every surgical procedure, 19.1% adapted SSCs for different procedures and 61.1% had a standard operating procedure detailing how to use SSCs. Attitudes towards SSC use were favourable, with increased positive attitude associated with employing at least one registered veterinary nurse with a post-qualifying qualification (p < 0.001), current SSC use (p < 0.001), undertaking self-directed reading (p = 0.033) or completing SSC-relevant post-qualification continuing professional development (p = 0.005). Factors associated with veterinary practices not using SSCs included Practice Standards Scheme (PSS) non-membership (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 1.1-3.4), no RCVS hospital status (OR 1.9, 1.1-3.5) or being a mixed first-opinion veterinary practice (OR 2.4, 1.2-5.0). LIMITATIONS Study limitations include sampling methodology and non-validated attitudinal scale usage. CONCLUSION Most respondents used SSCs. Familiarity, education and the RCVS PSS were associated with improved uptake and attitudes, but mixed practice was associated with reduced usage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Hill
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Langford, UK
- Paragon Veterinary Referrals, Wakefield, UK
| | | | - Louise A Buckley
- Deanery of Clinical Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Renouard F, Renouard E, Rendón A, Pinsky HM. Increasing the margin of patient safety for periodontal and implant treatments: The role of human factors. Periodontol 2000 2023; 92:382-398. [PMID: 37183608 DOI: 10.1111/prd.12488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Early complications following periodontal and dental implant surgeries are typically attributed to technique or poor biological response, ignoring the possibility of the human element. Interestingly, significant experience is not correlated with increased success, whereas evidence supports the impact of clinical behavior on patient outcome. This is the result of errors, much like those scrutinized in other high-risk technical fields, such as aviation. What can be surprising is that those who make these errors are very well acquainted with best practices. Given this, how is it possible for the conscientious practitioner to fail to apply protocols that are nonetheless very well known? Recently, the concepts of human and organizational factors have been translated to medicine, though dentistry has been slow to recognize their potential benefit. This review lists specific human factor behaviors, such as use of checklists and crew resource management, which might improve postsurgical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Erell Renouard
- Intercampus Affairs, Assistant Dean, Sciences Po, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Rendón
- Periodontology Unit, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Harold M Pinsky
- DDS Private Practice, Airline Transport Pilot, Lead Line Check Pilot Airbus A-330, Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Ališić E, Krupić M, Alić J, Grbić K, Mašić N, Parvaneh S, Krupić F. The Role of an Assistant Nurse in Implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist: Perception and Perspectives. Cureus 2023; 15:e38854. [PMID: 37303377 PMCID: PMC10256323 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist is a tool developed by the WHO to promote safer surgical practices and reduce the incidence of surgical errors and complications. This study aims to describe the role of assistant nurses in the implementation of this checklist by surgical teams. Materials and methods This descriptive study utilized a questionnaire-based survey conducted between September 2018 and March 2019 among 196 healthcare professionals at two surgical units in a university hospital in Sweden. The questionnaire covered demographic information such as age, gender, and occupation, as well as details about their workplace, experience, education/training on using the WHO checklist, the adaptation of the checklist to their department, their responsibilities in implementing and using the checklist, the frequency of use in emergency situations, and the impact on patient safety. Results The results of the study showed that assistant nurses, despite having the lowest level of education among healthcare professionals, were highly trusted and valued by other members of the surgical team. Most healthcare professionals were unsure who was responsible for using the WHO checklist but believed it was the assistant nurse's responsibility to ensure its implementation. Assistant nurses reported little to no training on using the checklist but noted that it had been adapted to the department's needs. Almost half (48.8%) of assistant nurses believed that the checklist was often used in emergency surgery, and most believed that it improved patient safety. Conclusions Improved understanding of the significance of assistant nurses in implementing the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist may enhance adherence to the checklist and potentially improve patient safety, as they were the most valued and trusted healthcare professionals in the surgical team according to the study's findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edin Ališić
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, SWE
| | - Melissa Krupić
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, SWE
| | - Jasmin Alić
- Urology Clinic, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH
| | - Kemal Grbić
- Clinic of Thoracic Surgery, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH
| | - Nejra Mašić
- Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, BIH
| | - Shariet Parvaneh
- Department of Gynecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, SWE
| | - Ferid Krupić
- Department of Anesthesiology/Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SWE
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
McMillan MW. Surgical time-out procedures: a single centre audit of standardised surgical communications. J Small Anim Pract 2023; 64:69-77. [PMID: 36418012 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess deviation from a standardised structure of surgical time-out procedures in a multidisciplinary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS An observational process audit was performed on a convenience sample of surgical cases. A fly-on-the-wall observer assessed surgical time-out procedures in real-time. Pre-induction and recovery checklists were not assessed. Observations were recorded on standardised reporting forms including a checklist and free text. Analysis was performed using a validated framework of four conceptual domains: the purpose, occasion, audience and content of the communication. Field notes were taken to allow retrospective verification of assessments. Observations were compared to a predefined standardised surgical time-out procedure structure. RESULTS Twenty surgical time-out procedures were observed from a mixture of procedure types. Although all were performed at the specified time and place, only eight (40%) were considered to have fully achieved their purpose with potentially important sections of the communication being omitted in the others. Individuals were not ready for communication to begin in 14 (70%) and distractions occurred in 11 surgical time-out procedures (55%). In seven surgical time-out procedures (35%) superfluous information was communicated. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In a busy operating theatre environment, surgical time-out procedures may not be performed as they are intended. Communication during surgical time-out procedures should be audited to highlight opportunities for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M W McMillan
- The Ralph Veterinary Referral Centre, Fourth Avenue, Marlow, Buckinghamshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Elam ME, Louis CJ, Brindle ME, Woodson J, Greece JA. Using i-PARIHS to assess implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist: an international qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1284. [PMID: 36284293 PMCID: PMC9597976 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08680-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strategies selected to implement the WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) are key factors in its ability to improve patient safety. Underutilization of implementation frameworks for informing implementation processes hinders our understanding of the checklists' varying effectiveness in different contexts. This study explored the extent to which SSC implementation practices could be assessed through the i-PARIHS framework and examined how it could support development of targeted recommendations to improve SSC implementation in high-income settings. METHODS This qualitative study utilized interviews with surgical team members and health administrators from five high-income countries to understand the key elements necessary for successful implementation of the SSC. Using thematic analysis, we identified within and across-case themes that were mapped to the i-PARIHS framework constructs. Gaps in current implementation strategies were identified, and the utility of i-PARIHS to guide future efforts was assessed. RESULTS Fifty-one multi-disciplinary clinicians and health administrators completed interviews. We identified themes that impacted SSC implementation in each of the four i-PARIHS constructs and several that spanned multiple constructs. Within innovation, a disconnect between the clinical outcomes-focused evidence in the literature and interviewees' patient-safety focus on observable results reduced the SSC's perceived relevance. Within recipients, existing surgical team hierarchies impacted checklist engagement, but this could be addressed through a shared leadership model. Within context, organizational priorities resulting in time pressures on surgical teams were at odds with SSC patient safety goals and reduced fidelity. At a health system level, employing surgical team members through the state or health region resulted in significant challenges in enforcing checklist use in private vs public hospitals. Within its facilitation construct, i-PARIHS includes limited definitions of facilitation processes. We identified using multiple interdisciplinary champions; establishing checklist performance feedback mechanisms; and modifying checklist processes, such as implementing a full-team huddle, as facilitators of successful SSC implementation. CONCLUSION The i-PARIHS framework enabled a comprehensive assessment of current implementation strategies, identifying key gaps and allowed for recommending targeted improvements. i-PARIHS could serve as a guide for planning future SSC implementation efforts, however, further clarification of facilitation processes would improve the framework's utility. TRIAL REGISTRATION No health care intervention was performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meagan E Elam
- Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
- Ariadne Labs, 401 Park Dr 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Christopher J Louis
- Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Mary E Brindle
- Ariadne Labs, 401 Park Dr 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Jonathan Woodson
- Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
- Boston University School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| | - Jacey A Greece
- Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA, 02118, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Gul F, Nazir M, Abbas K, Khan AA, Malick DS, Khan H, Kazmi SNH, Naseem AO. Surgical safety checklist compliance: The clinical audit. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 81:104397. [PMID: 36147088 PMCID: PMC9486577 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Gul
- Department of Surgery, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Maheen Nazir
- Department of Surgery, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Khawar Abbas
- Department of Surgery, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
- Corresponding author.
| | | | | | - Hashim Khan
- Department of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | | | - Arbab Osama Naseem
- Department of Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Sens F, Viprey M, Piriou V, Peix JL, Herquelot E, Occelli P, Bourdy S, Gawande AA, Carty Mj MJ, Michel P, Lifante JC, Colin C, Duclos A. Safety Attitude of Operating Room Personnel Associated With Accurate Completion of a Surgical Checklist: A Cross-sectional Observational Study. J Patient Saf 2022; 18:449-456. [PMID: 35948294 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE How the checklist is executed in routine practice may reflect the teamwork and safety climate in the operating room (OR). This cross-sectional study aimed to identify whether the presence of a fully completed checklist in medical records was associated with teams' safety attitudes. METHODS Data from 29 French hospitals, including 5677 operated patients and 834 OR professionals, were prospectively collected. The degree of checklist compliance was categorized for each patient in 1 of 4 ways: full, incomplete, inaccurate, and no checklist completed. The members of OR teams were invited to complete a questionnaire including teamwork climate measurement (Safety Attitudes Questionnaire) and their opinion regarding checklist use, checklist audibly reading, and communication change with checklist. Multilevel modeling was performed to investigate the effect of variables related to hospitals and professionals on checklist compliance, after adjustment for patient characteristics. RESULTS A checklist was present for 83% of patients, but only 35% demonstrated full completion. Compared with no checklist, full completion was associated with higher safety attitude (high teamwork climate [adjusted odds ratio for full completion, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-9.76]; communication change [1.31, 1.04-1.66]; checklist aloud reading [1.16, 1.02-1.32]) and was reinforced by the designation of a checklist coordinator (2.43, 1.06-5.55). Incomplete completion was also associated with enhanced safety attitude contrary to inaccurate completion. CONCLUSIONS Compliance with checklists is associated with safer OR team practice and can be considered as an indicator of the extent of safety in OR practice.
Collapse
|
|
28
|
The Redesign of a Checklist for Evaluating Driver Impairment: A Human Factors and Ergonomics Approach. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10071292. [PMID: 35885818 PMCID: PMC9320005 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The Cantonal Police of Zurich, Switzerland, use a checklist to identify impaired drivers when conducting traffic stops. This checklist was developed by subject-matter experts and has been in use for eight years. The goal of this study was to redesign the checklist while considering human factors and ergonomics principles in combination with findings from a retrospective analysis of a set of 593 completed checklists. The checklist was amended in accordance with the results of the retrospective analysis by adding missing items and discarding superfluous ones. In addition, a hierarchical cluster analysis of the retrospective data suggested an improved spatial organization of checklist elements and the grouping of similar items of the checklist. Furthermore, aspects related to Fitts’s law, visual complexity, and an optimized direction of processing the checklist underpinned the design process. The results of an evaluation of the redesigned checklist by 11 laypeople and 13 police officers indicated an improved usability of the redesigned checklist over the original.
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Treloar EC, Ting YY, Kovoor JG, Ey JD, Reid JL, Maddern GJ. Can Checklists Solve Our Ward Round Woes? A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2022; 46:2355-2364. [PMID: 35781840 PMCID: PMC9436887 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06635-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate and thorough surgical ward round documentation is crucial for maintaining quality clinical care. Accordingly, checklists have been proposed to improve ward round documentation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the literature investigating the use of checklists to improve surgical ward round documentation. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched on August 16, 2021. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We included English studies that investigated the use of checklists during ward rounds in various surgical subspecialties compared to routine care, where the rates of documentation were reported as outcomes. We excluded studies that used checklists in outpatient, non-surgical, or pediatric settings. Due to heterogeneity of outcome measures, meta-analysis was precluded. This study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021273735) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 (PRISMA 2020) reporting guidelines. RESULTS A total of 206 studies were identified, only 9 were suitable for inclusion. All included studies were single-center observational studies, spanning across seven surgical specialties. Rates of documentation on 4-23 parameters were reported. Documentation for all measured outcomes improved in 8/9 studies; however, statistical analyses were not included. There was a high risk of bias due to the nature of observational studies. CONCLUSION Ward round checklists can serve as a useful tool to improve inpatient care and safety. Currently, there is no high-level evidence showing the effectiveness of checklists on ward round documentation. The synthesis of results indicates that further high-quality research is imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellie C Treloar
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.,Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Ying Yang Ting
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Joshua G Kovoor
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Jesse D Ey
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Jessica L Reid
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Road, Woodville, SA, 5011, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Albsoul R, Alshyyab MA, Al Odat BA, Al Dwekat NB, Al-masri BE, Alkubaisi FA, Flefil SA, Al-Khawaldeh MH, Sa'ed RA, Abu Ajamieh MW, Fitzgerald G. Surgical team perceptions of the surgical safety checklist in a tertiary hospital in Jordan: a descriptive qualitative study. TQM JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1108/tqm-02-2022-0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the perceptions of operating room staff towards the use of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in a tertiary hospital in Jordan.Design/methodology/approachThis was a qualitative descriptive study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of 21 healthcare staff employed in the operating room (nurses, residents, surgeons and anaesthesiologists). The interviews were conducted in the period from October to December 2021. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.FindingsThree main themes emerged from data analysis namely compliance with the surgical safety checklist, the impact of surgical safety checklist, and barriers and facilitators to the use of the surgical safety checklist. The use of the checklist was seen as enabling staff to communicate effectively and thus to accomplish patient safety and positive outcomes. The perceived barriers to compliance included excessive workload, congestion and lack of training and awareness. Enhanced training and education were thought to improve the utilization of the surgical safety checklist, and help enhance awareness about its importance.Originality/valueWhile steps to utilize the surgical safety checklist by the operation room personnel may seem simple, the quality of its administration is not necessarily robust. There are several challenges for consistent, complete and effective administration of the surgical safety checklist by the surgical team members. Healthcare managers must employ interventions to eliminate barriers to and offer facilitators of adherence to the application of the surgical safety checklist, therefore promoting quality healthcare and patient safety.
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Agarwal N, Shabani S, Huang J, Ben-Natan AR, Mummaneni PV. Intraoperative Monitoring for Spinal Surgery. Neurol Clin 2022; 40:269-281. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
|
32
|
Matsumae M, Nishiyama J, Kuroda K. Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection. Magn Reson Med Sci 2022; 21:148-167. [PMID: 34880193 PMCID: PMC9199972 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the major issues in the surgical treatment of gliomas is the concern about maximizing the extent of resection while minimizing neurological impairment. Thus, surgical planning by carefully observing the relationship between the glioma infiltration area and eloquent area of the connecting fibers is crucial. Neurosurgeons usually detect an eloquent area by functional MRI and identify a connecting fiber by diffusion tensor imaging. However, during surgery, the accuracy of neuronavigation can be decreased due to brain shift, but the positional information may be updated by intraoperative MRI and the next steps can be planned accordingly. In addition, various intraoperative modalities may be used to guide surgery, including neurophysiological monitoring that provides real-time information (e.g., awake surgery, motor-evoked potentials, and sensory evoked potential); photodynamic diagnosis, which can identify high-grade glioma cells; and other imaging techniques that provide anatomical information during the surgery. In this review, we present the historical and current context of the intraoperative MRI and some related approaches for an audience active in the technical, clinical, and research areas of radiology, as well as mention important aspects regarding safety and types of devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsunori Matsumae
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Jun Nishiyama
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kagayaki Kuroda
- Department of Human and Information Sciences, School of Information Science and Technology, Tokai University, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Uppot RN, Yu AYC, Samadi K, Pino RM, Lee J. Let the EHR Talk Loudly: An EHR-Connected Verbal Surgical Safety Checklist for Medical Procedures in the Intensive Care Unit. J Patient Saf 2022; 18:e136-e139. [PMID: 32569096 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to test the accuracy and user acceptance of an electronic health records (EHR)-connected verbal surgical safety checklist in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS An EHR-connected verbal checklist software was deployed in our ICU between January 2019 and June 2019. The software, loaded on a mobile tablet, loudly verbalized clinical information from the EHR in the form of a time-out checklist. The accuracy of the information delivered was compared with up-to-date clinical data in the EHR in 300 patients. User acceptance was assessed using survey instruments. RESULTS The software accurately verbalized patient demographics in 100% (300/300) of tested cases. Concordance rates with real-time values in the EHR for the following variables were calculated: allergies 98.6% (296/300), international normalized ratio 97.6% (293/300), and platelets 91.6% (275/300). Surveys showed that 41.2% (7/17) of users preferred current standard EHR time-outs, 17.6% (3/17) preferred verbalization software, 35.3% (6/17) preferred neither, and 5.9% (1/17) wanted both. When asked if EHR-connected verbalization software should officially replace the current standard EHR checklists, 76.5% (13/17) supported the idea. CONCLUSIONS An EHR-connected verbal surgical safety checklist software can leverage information in the EHR to help with workflow and patient safety. This study shows that the software can verbally deliver clinical information with great accuracy and that most ICU staff would support replacing current time-out processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul N Uppot
- From the Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology
| | - Alvin Yiu Chun Yu
- From the Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology
| | - Katayoun Samadi
- From the Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology
| | | | - Jarone Lee
- Departments of Surgery and Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
[Survey on training in orthopedics/trauma surgery : Is Germany ready for a competence-based training?]. Chirurg 2021; 93:586-595. [PMID: 34882255 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01536-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE A high-quality advanced training is a key factor for good and safe patient treatment. Germany is currently revising the advanced training curricula and logbooks aiming to change the training into a competence-based training. The aim of this study was to analyze the day to day reality of orthopedic and trauma surgery advanced training in Germany based on the elements of the advanced training. METHODS In March 2020 an online survey on advanced training was carried out with 44 questions on the topics of advanced training curriculum, logbook, educational resources, evaluation, authorized trainer and distribution of working time . RESULTS A total of 237 persons completed the survey, of which 208 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The respondents perceived a lack of clear standards in the advanced training curriculum and 25% did not receive structured learning resources in the form of simulations or courses. Mandatory annual process interviews were performed in only 58%. Most respondents valued the expertise of the trainers in orthopedic and trauma surgery, whereas they rated their competence in supervision and giving feedback as below average. Administrative work consumed 220 min of the daily working time and on average 60min remained per day for respondents to learn operative skills. CONCLUSION The survey revealed inconsistencies in the current advanced training curriculum and a lack of supervision and evaluation. The implementation of competence-based advanced training should therefore not only focus on a change of the curriculum but also on implementing competence-based training at all levels of training (learning resources, training, evaluation).
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Kelz RR, Tong J. Examining Quality Improvement in Medicine and Business. J Am Coll Surg 2021; 233:809-810. [PMID: 34823683 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
|
36
|
Lorkowski J, Maciejowska-Wilcock I, Pokorski M. Compliance with the Surgery Safety Checklist: An Update on the Status. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2021; 1374:1-9. [PMID: 34773633 DOI: 10.1007/5584_2021_661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
WHO has recommended the implementation of the Surgery Safety Checklist (SSC) to reign in often simple logistic errors that lead to numerous complications, some of them being fatal, in the perioperative period. This study aims to discuss doubts presented in the medical literature concerning the effectiveness of SSC in the currently existing form. The article is based on the literature search performed in PubMed using the command phrase "Surgery Safety Checklist". The search yielded 1,476 articles up to March 2021. Out of this group, we selected 811 articles for further detailed analysis. The selection was based on the meritorious SSC-related topicality and scrutinized content of the articles. Out of these articles, we identified 59 studies that specifically raised the issue of the effectiveness of SSC use in its current form, which we discussed herein in detail. The review distinctly indicates that the SSC reduces perioperative complications including fatalities. However, there are issues reported with the itemized content of the checklist that hardly corresponds to the diverseness of patients' conditions and operating room settings. Further, it is unclear if a reduction in the complications stems from the use of SSC or the algorithms for performing procedures it contains. The consensus arises that SSC should be periodically updated so that it would catch up with the advances in medical knowledge and the emerging technologies, which would safeguard the SSC from becoming just another paperwork nuisance for the operating room staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacek Lorkowski
- Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Sports Medicine, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration, Warsaw, Poland. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Mazovia, Warsaw, Poland.
| | | | - Mieczyslaw Pokorski
- Institute of Health Sciences, Opole University, Opole, Poland.,Faculty of Health Sciences, The Jan Długosz University in Częstochowa, Częstochowa, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Sirihorachai R, Saylor KM, Manojlovich M. Interventions for the Prevention of Retained Surgical Items: A Systematic Review. World J Surg 2021; 46:370-381. [PMID: 34773133 PMCID: PMC10186264 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-021-06370-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retained surgical items (RSI) are preventable error events. Interest in reducing RSI is increasing globally because of increasing demand for safe surgery. While research of interventions to prevent RSI have been reported, no rigorous analysis of the type and effectiveness of interventions exists. This systematic review examines (1) what types of intervention have been implemented to prevent RSI; and (2) what is the effectiveness of those interventions. METHODS We performed a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Mednar, and OpenGrey databases. Two reviewers independently screened a total of 1,792 titles and abstracts, and reviewed 87 full-text articles, resulting in 17 articles in the final analysis. Study characteristics included qualitative and quantitative studies that examined the effectiveness of RSI prevention interventions for adult patients who undergo open surgery. The primary outcome was RSI and related error events. RESULTS Four studies and 13 quality improvement projects described RSI interventions categorized into four groups: (1) technology-based, (2) communication-based, (3) practice- or guideline-based, (4) interventions that fell into more than one category. Following guidance in the Quality Improvement minimum quality criteria set, the quality of all studies ranged from poor to fair. Heterogeneity in the interventions used and variable study quality limit our confidence in the interventions' ability to reduce RSI. CONCLUSION Since technology-based interventions may not be financially feasible in low and middle-income countries (LMIC), in those settings interventions that target the social system may be more appropriate. Rigorous methods to investigate local contexts and build knowledge are needed so that interventions to prevent RSI have a greater likelihood of success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rattima Sirihorachai
- Faculty of Nursing, Mahidol University, 2 Wang Lang Road, Siriraj, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand.
| | - Kate M Saylor
- MSI, Taubman Health Sciences Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Brown B, Bermingham S, Vermeulen M, Jennings B, Adamek K, Markou M, Bassham JE, Hibbert P. Surgical safety checklist audits may be misleading! Improving the implementation and adherence of the surgical safety checklist: a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 10:bmjoq-2021-001593. [PMID: 34732540 PMCID: PMC8572456 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite good quality evidence for benefits with its use, challenges have been encountered in the correct and consistent implementation of the surgical safety checklist (SSC). Previous studies of the SSC have reported a discrepancy between what is documented and what is observed in real time. A baseline observational audit at our institution demonstrated compliance of only 3.5% despite a documented compliance of 100%. This project used quality improvement principles of identifying the problem and designing strategies to improve staff compliance with the SSC. These included changing the SSC from paper-based to a reusable laminated form, a broad multidisciplinary education and marketing campaign, targeted coaching and modifying the implementation in response to ongoing staff feedback. Five direct observational audits were undertaken over four Plan–Do–Study–Act cycles to capture real-time information on staff compliance. Two staff surveys were also undertaken. Compliance with the SSC improved from 3.5% to 63% during this study. Staff reported they felt the new process improved patient safety and that the new SSC was easily incorporated into their workflow. Improving compliance with the SSC requires deep engagement with and cooperation of surgical, anaesthesia and nursing teams and understanding of their work practices and culture. The prospective observational audit highlighted an initial 3.5% compliance rate compared with 100% based on an audit of the patient notes. Relying solely on a retrospective paper-based model can lead to hospitals being unaware of significant safety and quality issues. While in-person prospective observations are more time-consuming and resource-consuming than retrospective audits, this study highlights their potential utility to gain a clear picture of actual events. The significant variation between documented and observed data may have considerable implications for other retrospective studies which rely on human-entered data for their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigid Brown
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sophia Bermingham
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Marthinus Vermeulen
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Beth Jennings
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Kirsty Adamek
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark Markou
- Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jane E Bassham
- Continuous Improvement Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.,College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Peter Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
GÜRKAN A, KIRTIL İ, DİKMEN Y. Surgical Teams’ Attitudes and Views Concerning the Surgical Safety ChecklistTR. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES 2021. [DOI: 10.33808/clinexphealthsci.937745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
|
40
|
Geva A, Albert BD, Hamilton S, Manning MJ, Barrett MK, Mirchandani D, Harty M, Morgan EC, Kleinman ME, Mehta NM. eSIMPLER: A Dynamic, Electronic Health Record-Integrated Checklist for Clinical Decision Support During PICU Daily Rounds. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2021; 22:898-905. [PMID: 33935271 PMCID: PMC8490208 DOI: 10.1097/pcc.0000000000002733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Design, implement, and evaluate a rounding checklist with deeply embedded, dynamic electronic health record integration. DESIGN Before-after quality-improvement study. SETTING Quaternary PICU in an academic, free-standing children's hospital. PATIENTS All patients in the PICU during daily morning rounds. INTERVENTIONS Implementation of an updated dynamic checklist (eSIMPLER) providing clinical decision support prompts with display of relevant data automatically pulled from the electronic health record. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The prior daily rounding checklist, eSIMPLE, was implemented for 49,709 patient-days (7,779 patients) between October 30, 2011, and October 7, 2018. eSIMPLER was implemented for 5,306 patient-days (971 patients) over 6 months. Checklist completion rates were similar (eSIMPLE: 95% [95% CI, 88-98%] vs eSIMPLER: 98% [95% CI, 92-100%] of patient-days; p = 0.40). eSIMPLER required less time per patient (28 ± 1 vs 47 ± 24 s; p < 0.001). Users reported improved satisfaction with eSIMPLER (p = 0.009). Several checklist-driven process measures-discordance between electronic health record orders for stress ulcer prophylaxis and user-recorded indication for stress ulcer prophylaxis, rate of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis prescribing, and recognition of reduced renal function-improved during the eSIMPLER phase. CONCLUSIONS eSIMPLER, a dynamic, electronic health record-informed checklist, required less time to complete and improved certain care processes compared with a prior, static checklist with limited electronic health record data. By focusing on the "Five Rights" of clinical decision support, we created a well-accepted clinical decision support tool that was integrated efficiently into daily rounds. Generalizability of eSIMPLER's effectiveness and its impact on patient outcomes need to be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alon Geva
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ben D. Albert
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Susan Hamilton
- Department of Cardiovascular and Critical Care Nursing, Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mary-Jeanne Manning
- Department of Cardiovascular and Critical Care Nursing, Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Megan K. Barrett
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Dimple Mirchandani
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew Harty
- Anesthesia Information Services, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Erin C. Morgan
- Anesthesia Information Services, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Monica E. Kleinman
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nilesh M. Mehta
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Sepúlveda Plata MC, López Romero LA, González SB. [Compliance with the surgical safety checklist in a hospital in Santander. A cross-sectional studyCumprimento do checklist de segurança para cirurgia em hospital do Santander. Um estudo transversal]. REVISTA CUIDARTE 2021; 12:e2122. [PMID: 40115226 PMCID: PMC11290791 DOI: 10.15649/cuidarte.2122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patient safety constitutes a priority in health care, being the surgical safety checklist one of the strategies implemented by the WHO. The objective was to determine the level of compliance in the application of the surgical safety checklist in surgical room personnel of a public institution. Materials and Methods Cross-sectional study in 45 members of the surgical team in a hospital, in which compliance to the WHO checklist was evaluated during July and August 2018. Results Overall compliance was 13.3% (n=6), with the pre-anesthesia phase reaching the highest level (55.6%, n=25). The highest compliance was recorded by the surgical instrumentation staff (100%, n=8), while the lowest by the nursing staff (25%, n=3), with statistically significant differences (p=0.005). Additionally, a correlation was observed between years of work in the service and compliance in the transfer phase (rho= -0.30, p=0.048). Discussion Overall compliance was low, which corroborates the stated hypothesis and is similar to other studies described in the literature. Conclusions The overall compliance to the checklist was very low, with differential behaviors as the surgical instrument technicians showed the highest compliance and the nursing staff the lowest. The antibiotic prophylaxis item was the least compliant, while the pre-anesthesia phase was the most compliant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Cecilia Sepúlveda Plata
- Hospital Regional Manuela Beltrán. Fundación Universitaria de San Gil. Grupo de investigación en ciencias de la educación y de la salud, San Gil (Santander Colombia). E-mail: Autor de correspondencia Fundación Universitaria de San Gil Fundación Universitaria de San Gil Colombia
| | - Luis Alberto López Romero
- Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia. Grupo de Investigación y Desarrollo de Conocimiento en Enfermería FCV (GIDCEN- FCV). Centro de investigaciones, Floridablanca (Santander, Colombia). E-mail: Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia Colombia
| | - Sandra Beatriz González
- Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, División de Programas de Enfermería (Ciudad de México, México). Catedrática de posgrado en Educación a Distancia UNIVERSIDAD CUAUHTÉMOC. Plantel Aguascalientes, México. E-mail: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Urban D, Burian BK, Patel K, Turley NW, Elam M, MacRobie AG, Merry AF, Kumar M, Hannenberg A, Haynes AB, Brindle ME. Surgical Teams' Attitudes About Surgical Safety and the Surgical Safety Checklist at 10 Years: A Multinational Survey. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e075. [PMID: 36590849 PMCID: PMC9770110 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
To assess health care professionals' attitudes on the Surgical Safety Checklist ("the Checklist") in resource-rich health systems and provide insights on strategies for optimizing Checklist use. Background In use for over a decade, the Checklist is a safety instrument aimed at improving operating room communication, teamwork, and evidence-based safety practices. Methods An online survey was sent to surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists in 5 high-income countries (Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand). Survey results were analyzed using SPSS. Results A total of 2032 health care professionals completed the survey. Of these respondents, 47.6% were nurses, 70.5% were women, 65.1% were from the United States, and 50.0% had 20 years of experience or more in their role. Most respondents felt the Checklist positively impacted patient safety (70.9%), team communication (73.1%), and teamwork (58.9%). Only 50.3% of respondents were satisfied their team's use of the Checklist, and only 47.5% reported team members stopping to fully participate in the process. More nurses lacked confidence regarding their role in the Checklist process than surgeons and anesthesiologists combined (8.9% vs 4.3%). Fewer surgeons and anesthesiologists than nurses felt they received adequate training on the Checklist's use (57.8% vs 76.7%). Conclusions While most respondents perceive the Checklist as enhancing patient safety, not all surgical team members are actively engaging with its use. To enhance buy-in and meaningful use of the Checklist, health systems should provide more training on the Checklist with respect to its purpose and strengthening teamwork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denisa Urban
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Kripa Patel
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Nathan W. Turley
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Meagan Elam
- School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA
| | - Ali G. MacRobie
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alan F. Merry
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Manoj Kumar
- Department of Surgery, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland
| | - Alexander Hannenberg
- Ariadne Labs, TH Chan Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, Harvard
| | | | - Mary E. Brindle
- From the Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Ariadne Labs, TH Chan Harvard School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, Harvard
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Ngonzi J, Bebell LM, Boatin AA, Owaraganise A, Tiibajuka L, Fajardo Y, Lugobe HM, Wylie BJ, Jacquemyn Y, Obua C, Haberer JE, Geertruyden JPV. Impact of an educational intervention on WHO surgical safety checklist and pre-operative antibiotic use at a referral hospital in southwestern Uganda. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6352323. [PMID: 34390247 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzab089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends adherence to its surgical safety checklist (SSC) to optimize patient safety and reduce cesarean surgical site infection (SSI). Educational interventions combined with audit and feedback mechanisms on the checklist use by clinicians have the potential to improve adherence and clinical outcomes. Despite the increase in cesarean delivery rates, there is a paucity of data on how such interventions can improve adherence in resource-limited settings. OBJECTIVE We performed a quality improvement project to measure the impact of an educational intervention with daily audit and feedback procedures on rates of WHO SSC adherence, including pre-operative antibiotic administration and SSI at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital maternity ward in Uganda. METHODS The study involved chart abstraction of WHO SSC and pre-operative antibiotic use during cesarean deliveries and signs of subsequent SSI in three phases. First, we conducted a retrospective review of all charts from May to June 2018 (pre-intervention phase). Second, we instituted an educational intervention on the WHO SSC and pre-operative antibiotics use, followed by a daily audit of charts and feedback to clinicians from July to August 2018 (the intervention phase). Third, we reviewed charts from September to October 2018 (the post-intervention phase). The WHO SSC adherence, pre-operative antibiotic administration and SSI rates were measured as the proportion of the total cesarean deliveries per study phase and then compared across the three phases. RESULTS We reviewed 678 patients' charts (200 in the pre-intervention phase, 230 in the intervention phase and 248 in the post-intervention phase). The mean patient age was 25 years. The use of the WHO SSC was 7% in the pre-intervention phase compared to 92% in the intervention phase (P < 0.001), and 77% in the post-intervention phase (P < 0.001). Pre-intervention antibiotic receipt was 18% compared to 90% in the intervention phase (P < 0.001) and 84% in the post-intervention phase (P < 0.001). The documented SSI rate in the pre-intervention phase was 15% compared to 7% in the intervention phase (P = 0.02) and 11% in the post-intervention phase (P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS An educational intervention, daily audit and feedback to clinicians increased the use of the WHO SSC and prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean delivery-although the rates waned with time. Research to understand factors influencing the checklist use and antibiotic prophylaxis including prescriber knowledge, motivation and clinical process is required. Implementation interventions to sustain usage and impact on clinical outcomes need to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ngonzi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara, Uganda +256
| | - Lisa M Bebell
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St, Suite 722, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Adline A Boatin
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St, Suite 722, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Aspihas Owaraganise
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara, Uganda +256
| | - Leevan Tiibajuka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara, Uganda +256
| | - Yarine Fajardo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara, Uganda +256
| | - Henry Mark Lugobe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara, Uganda +256
| | - Blair J Wylie
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St, Suite 722, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Yves Jacquemyn
- Global Health Institute, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10; 2650 Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Celestino Obua
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, P.O BOX 1410, Mbarara +256, Uganda
| | - Jessica E Haberer
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 125 Nashua St, Suite 722, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Liu LQ, Mehigan S. A Systematic Review of Interventions Used to Enhance Implementation of and Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in Adult Surgery. AORN J 2021; 114:159-170. [PMID: 34314014 DOI: 10.1002/aorn.13469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The focus of this systematic review is to identify and synthesize the evidence for effectiveness of interventions to increase compliance with the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) for adult surgery. We searched a variety of databases and identified 24 peer-reviewed articles of either a quantitative (n = 17), qualitative (n = 4), or mixed-methods design (n = 3) published in English from January 1, 2008, to July 8, 2020. Interventions included modifying the ways of delivering the SSC, integrating or tailoring the SSC to local context or existing practice, promoting clinician awareness and engagement, and managing policies. Despite a lack of common outcome measures, all quantitative and mixed-methods study results showed a significant positive effect on SSC compliance. A few researchers reported nonsignificant or negative changes in certain aspects with the interventions. Additional research is needed to address SSC compliance measures globally and outcomes in developing countries.
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Checklists in Femur Fractures: High Adherence After Implementation of Computer-based Pediatric Femur Guidelines. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2021; 5:01979360-202108000-00004. [PMID: 35103636 PMCID: PMC9521745 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-21-00154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) created an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the care of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures in 2010. Our institution implemented checklists based off these guidelines embedded in a standardized EMR order. The purpose of this study was to describe compliance with checklist completion and to assess safety improvement in a large urban pediatric hospital.
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Snow T. Providing Comprehensive Perioperative Care for Patients Undergoing Regional Blocks. AORN J 2021; 113:190-196. [PMID: 33534159 DOI: 10.1002/aorn.13316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
|
47
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan B Cohen
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Goldman J, Kuper A, Whitehead C, Baker GR, Bulmer B, Coffey M, Shea C, Jeffs L, Shojania K, Wong B. Interprofessional and multiprofessional approaches in quality improvement education. ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION : THEORY AND PRACTICE 2021; 26:615-636. [PMID: 33113055 DOI: 10.1007/s10459-020-10004-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The imperative for all healthcare professionals to partake in quality improvement (QI) has resulted in the development of QI education programs with participants from different professional backgrounds. However, there is limited empirical and theoretical examination as to why, when and how interprofessional and multiprofessional education occurs in QI and the outcomes of these approaches. This paper reports on a qualitative collective case study of interprofessional and multiprofessional education in three longitudinal QI education programs. We conducted 58 interviews with learners, QI project coaches, program directors and institutional leads and 135 h of observations of in-class education sessions, and collected relevant documents such as course syllabi and handouts. We used an interpretive thematic analysis using a conventional and directed content analysis approach. In the directed content approach, we used sociology of professions theory with particular attention to professional socialization, hierarchies and boundaries in QI, to understand the ways in which individuals' professional backgrounds informed the planning and experiences of the QI education programs. Findings demonstrated that both interprofessional and multiprofessional education approaches were being used to achieve different education objectives. While each approach demonstrated positive learning and practice outcomes, tensions related to the different ways in which professional groups are engaging in QI, power dynamics between professional groups, and disconnects between curricula and practice existed. Further conceptual clarity is essential for a more informed discussion about interprofessional and multiprofessional education approaches in QI and explicit attention is needed to professional processes and tensions, to optimize the impact of education on practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Goldman
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, 525 University Ave., Suite 630, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L3, Canada.
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
- Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Ayelet Kuper
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cynthia Whitehead
- Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - G Ross Baker
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Beverly Bulmer
- St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Maitreya Coffey
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
- Children's Hospitals Solutions for Patient Safety, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Christine Shea
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lianne Jeffs
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kaveh Shojania
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, 525 University Ave., Suite 630, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L3, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Brian Wong
- Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto, 525 University Ave., Suite 630, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L3, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Checklists Improve Team Performance During Simulated Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Emergencies: A Randomized Trial. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0404. [PMID: 33912834 PMCID: PMC8078306 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–related complications are potentially catastrophic if not addressed quickly. Because complications are rare, high-fidelity simulation is recommended as part of the training regimen for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists. We hypothesized that the use of standardized checklists would improve team performance during simulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies. Design: Randomized simulation-based trial. Setting: A quaternary-care academic hospital with a regional extracorporeal membrane oxygenation referral program. Subjects: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation specialists and other healthcare providers. Interventions: We designed six read-do checklists for use during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies using a modified Delphi process. Teams of two to three providers were randomized to receive the checklists or not. All teams then completed four simulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies. Measurements and Main Results: Simulation sessions were video-recorded, and the number of critical tasks performed and time-to-completion were compared between groups. A survey instrument was administered before and after simulations to assess participants’ attitudes toward the simulations and checklists. We recruited 36 subjects from a single institution, randomly assigned to 15 groups. The groups with checklists completed more critical tasks than participants in the control groups (90% vs 75%; p < 0.001). The groups with checklists performed a higher proportion of both nontechnical tasks (71% vs 44%; p < 0.001) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–specific technical tasks (94% vs 86%; p < 0.001). Both groups reported an increase in reported self-efficacy after the simulations (p = 0.003). After adjusting for multiple comparisons, none of the time-to-completion measures achieved statistical significance. Conclusions: The use of checklists resulted in better team performance during simulated extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies. As extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use continues to expand, checklists may be an attractive low-cost intervention for centers looking to reduce errors and improve response to crisis situations.
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Lareyre F, Chaudhuri A, Adam C, Carrier M, Mialhe C, Raffort J. Applications of Head-Mounted Displays and Smart Glasses in Vascular Surgery. Ann Vasc Surg 2021; 75:497-512. [PMID: 33823254 DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Advances in virtual, augmented and mixed reality have led to the development of wearable technologies including head mounted displays (HMD) and smart glasses. While there is a growing interest on their potential applications in health, only a few studies have addressed so far their use in vascular surgery. The aim of this review was to summarize the fundamental notions associated with these technologies and to discuss potential applications and current limits for their use in vascular surgery. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed to introduce the fundamental concepts and provide an overview of applications of HMD and smart glasses in surgery. RESULTS HMD and smart glasses demonstrated a potential interest for the education of surgeons including anatomical teaching, surgical training, teaching and telementoring. Applications for pre-surgical planning have been developed in general and cardiac surgery and could be transposed for a use in vascular surgery. The use of wearable technologies in the operating room has also been investigated in both general and cardiovascular surgery and demonstrated its potential interest for image-guided surgery and data collection. CONCLUSION Studies performed so far represent a proof of concept of the interest of HMD and smart glasses in vascular surgery for education of surgeons and for surgical practice. Although these technologies exhibited encouraging results for applications in vascular surgery, technical improvements and further clinical research in large series are required before hoping using them in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Lareyre
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Hospital of Antibes-Juan-les-Pins, France; Université Côte d'Azur, CHU, Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France.
| | - Arindam Chaudhuri
- Bedfordshire-Milton Keynes Vascular Centre, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bedford, UK
| | - Cédric Adam
- Laboratory of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (MICS), CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Marion Carrier
- Laboratory of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (MICS), CentraleSupélec, Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Claude Mialhe
- Cardiovascular Surgery Unit, Cardio Thoracic Centre of Monaco, Monaco
| | - Juliette Raffort
- Université Côte d'Azur, CHU, Inserm U1065, C3M, Nice, France; Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, University Hospital of Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|