Pheno-molecular testing evaluates bacterial responses to antibiotics via quantitative nucleic acid detection, thus enabling rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing by eliminating the time-consuming isolation culture step. Carbapenems exert their antibacterial effects by disrupting cell wall synthesis, which requires prolonged antibiotic exposure to identify carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) by pheno-molecular testing. To overcome this limitation, we developed a bacterial integrity evaluation-based pheno-molecular testing (Baci-PmT) assay using multiplex droplet digital PCR (mddPCR). This assay features a low-osmolarity culture system supplemented with Meropenem and DNase. Its underlying principle lies in the carbapenem-induced cell wall weakening combined with osmotic pressure-induced outer membrane rupture, resulting in bacterial DNA leakage and subsequent enzymatic degradation. Experimental results show that after 30 min antibiotic exposure, the DNA levels of carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacterales (CSE) were significantly lower than those of CRE. Moreover, the types of carbapenemases were identified by evaluating the synergistic effects of carbapenemase inhibitors and Meropenem on bacterial integrity disruption. Using a color and spatial resolution-based mddPCR system, the Baci-PmT assay enabled the simultaneous identification of CRE-associated bacterial species, CRE phenotypes, and types of carbapenemases. The entire testing process can be completed within 3 to 4.5 h. When analyzing a cohort of 51 clinical samples, the Baci-PmT assay achieved 100% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity in identifying CRE. The concordance rates with conventional assays for determining CRE MIC and the types of carbapenemases were 100% and 87.5%, respectively. The developed Baci-PmT assay can achieve rapid and high-content detection of CRE, offering timely and accurate guidance for clinical interventions in CRE infections.

Healthcare settings are recognised as potential hotspots for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

Metagenomic sequencing was conducted on a national scale using wastewater from hospitals across Wales to screen for antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and opportunistic pathogens.

The total abundance and diversity of ARGs varied significantly across the hospitals. Genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, and Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin-class antibiotics were predominant, with distinct resistome patterns emerging spatially. OXA-type beta-lactamases were the dominant ARG types. Spatial variability was observed in the distribution of the "big five" carbapenemases (KPC, IMP, VIM, NDM, OXA-48-like) and mcr genes, as well as WHO-listed fungal priority pathogens and Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter spp., and Escherichia coli (ESKAPEE) pathogens. Furthermore, antibiotic concentrations in the effluents often exceeded risk quotients, posing a substantial risk for AMR emergence.

Overall, the study highlights the effectiveness of combining wastewater-based epidemiology with metagenomics to gain critical insights into the distinct resistome and microbiome profiles in hospital settings. Tailored strategies are essential to mitigate the spread of antibiotics, clinically relevant ARGs and pathogens in these settings. This study underscores the necessity of implementing pre-treatment processes for hospital effluents before release into community sewers and environmental waters to curb the spread of these micro-pollutants.

To address its high antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and antibiotic consumption rates, Italy introduced a national action plan to contrast AMR (PNCAR) in 2017.

To investigate trends in antibiotic use, prescribing practices, and AMR rates in Italy through indicators of appropriate antibiotic use.

Two point prevalence surveys (PPSs), according to The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) methods and definitions, were conducted in 2016 and 2022. Indicators of appropriate antibiotic use were defined and measured. Antibiotic use prevalence and AMR rates for specific pathogen-drug combinations were calculated. To account for potential confounding factors, a propensity score matching approach was applied to compare the results of the two PPS editions using prevalence rate ratio (PRR).

Overall, 28,991 patients from 140 hospitals and 60,403 patients from 325 hospitals were included in 2016 and 2022, respectively. Patient characteristics remained stable, but patients were increasingly exposed to invasive procedures. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use decreased from 43.51 to 41.52 (PRR 0.95, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.94-0.97, P<0.001). Improvements in some prescribing practices were identified: the proportion of surgical prophylaxis lasting >1 day decreased from 55.99% to 52.15%, (PRR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98, P<0.001) and the proportion of culture-guided hospital infection treatments increased from 33.68% to 48.57% (PRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.22-1.38, P<0.05). Conversely, a significant rise in the proportion of last line/broad-spectrum agents was recorded for most indications.

This study provided a mapping of prescribing activity at national level, and defined measurable quality indicators, through which strengths and areas for improvement in prescribing practices were identified.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) intended to optimize antibiotic use will be more effective if informed by the current status and patterns of antibiotic utilisation. In Zambia's primary healthcare (PHC) settings, data on ASPs and antibiotic utilisation were inadequate to guide improvements. As a first step, this study assessed antibiotic prescribing and ASP core elements among PHC first-level hospitals (FLHs) in Zambia.

A point prevalence survey was conducted at the five FLHs in Lusaka using the Global-PPS® protocol. Hospital ASP core elements evaluated included hospital leadership commitment, accountability, pharmacy expertise, action, tracking, reporting, and education.

Antibiotic use prevalence was 79.8% (146/183). A total of 220 antibiotic prescription encounters were recorded among inpatients, with ceftriaxone (J01DD04, Watch) being the most (50.0%) prescribed. Over 90.0% (202) of the antibiotic prescriptions targeted suspected community-acquired infections, but only 36.8% (81) were compliant with national treatment guidelines. ASP core element implementation was 36.0% (16.2/45), with only two hospitals achieving over 50.0%. The most deficient core elements were accountability, action, tracking, and reporting.

ASP implementation in Zambia's FLHs providing PHC was sub-optimal, with high antibiotic prescribing rates, frequent use of broad-spectrum Watch group antibiotics, and low compliance with national treatment guidelines. As key ways forward, ASPs in Zambia's PHC require strengthening by adapting the WHO AWaRe recommendations and improving accountability, actions, tracking, and reporting antibiotic use to improve stewardship practice and reduce AMR.

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are a major health challenge, especially for developing countries. Therefore, this study investigated the prevalence of HAIs in 42 Chinese hospitals in Weifang, China.

The definition of HAIs was identified using the Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. One-day cross-sectional surveys were annually performed from 2015 to 2020. The trained staff collected information on the prevalence of HAIs, isolated pathogens, and antibiotic use.

Among the surveyed inpatients, 1.66% developed HAIs, with a significant decline in HAI prevalence from 2015 (1.84%) to 2020 (1.55%) (Z = -4.206, P < 0.001). The ICU exhibited the highest prevalence of HAIs at 19.04%. Lower respiratory tract infections accounted for 46.32% of total cases. Moreover, a total of 1,297 bacterial isolates were identified, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (218 isolates, 16.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (199 isolates, 15.3%), and Escherichia coli (133 isolates, 10.3%) being the most prevalent. The most frequently detected resistant pathogen was Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae(218 isolates,37.20%).Antimicrobial usage reached 35.19%, accompanied by a notable increase in pathogen testing submissions over the study period (Z = 4.287, P < 0.001).

The overall prevalence of HAIs across 42 hospitals shows a declining trend. The prevention and control of healthcare-associated pathogens and multidrug-resistant organisms remain key priorities. Ensuring the rational use of antimicrobial agents is also a critical focus for future efforts.

Detailed surveillance of antimicrobials' use in the community is an essential strategy to control their overuse and misuse. This study aimed to evaluate prescribing patterns of antimicrobials in Russian outpatients in 2024 and quantify the prescribing in relation to quality indicators.

A point prevalence study was conducted during January-April 2024 in 14 healthcare facilities in 11 Russian cities (Chelyabinsk, Ekaterinburg, Krasnoyarsk, Moscow, Novokuznetsk, Saratov, Smolensk, Ulan-Ude, Vladivostok, Yakutsk, and Yaroslavl) in accordance with the outpatient protocol of Global-PPS project. Detailed data on antimicrobials, age, gender, and drug indications were collected for each outpatient receiving at least one agent for prophylaxis or treatment.

A total of 5,084 outpatients from 149 units were surveyed, of which 487 (9.6%) received at least one antimicrobial agent. The highest rates of antimicrobial prescribing were observed at upper respiratory tract (33.2%), gastroenterology (22.6%), hematology (13.6%), ear nose and throat (13.5%), and gynecology units (11.6%). Antibacterials accounted for 63.4% of antimicrobials on average, followed by antivirals (35.4%). Penicillins (41.4%), for the most part penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (30.1%), cephalosporins (18.3%), including third generation (17.7%), fluoroquinolones (16.1%), and macrolides (11.5%) were the top classes of antibiotics prescribed. Umifenovir (23.8%) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (19.0%) were the top antimicrobials prescribed. The administered antibacterials were almost equally distributed between "access" (46.5%) and "watch" (53.5%) AWaRe groups. On average, choice of antimicrobials followed the national guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health in 73.2% of cases.

The pooled rates of antimicrobial prescribing in outpatient settings was 9.6% with the substantial differences in patterns of consumption overall and among the units of different types. Broad-spectrum antibacterials such as penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, III-IV generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides together amounted to 48% of prescriptions. Common concerns in antimicrobial drug usage included low guidelines compliance and low rate of "access" group antibacterials.

Comprehensive antimicrobial use (AMU) data are essential to promote effective antimicrobial stewardship. However, qualitative information on AMUs in Japanese hospitals is limited.

This study aimed to provide an overview of AMU for inpatients in Japanese hospitals.

A multicentre point-prevalence survey was conducted across Aichi Prefecture in 2020, collecting patient demographics, underlying conditions, indications of AMU (for treatment of community-acquired infections [CAIs]/healthcare-associated infections [HAIs], surgical prophylaxis [SP], medical prophylaxis [MP] and others), treated infections, and antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) intervention.

Among the 10,199 patients from 27 hospitals included in this study, A total of 3,738 antimicrobials were prescribed to 3,024 patients (29.6%; 95% confidence interval: 28.8-30.5). Of these, 1,510 (40.4%) antimicrobials were prescribed for CAI treatment, 815 (21.8%) for HAI treatment, 745 (19.9%) for SP, and 639 (17.1%) for MP. SP administration over 2 days was observed in 31.2% of the cases. The top three prescribed antimicrobials were cefazolin (12.0%, 450), ceftriaxone (9.2%, 343), and oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (8.7%, 327). Antimicrobial use per 1,000 patients was highest in extra-large hospitals (472) and lowest in small hospitals (264). Ceftriaxone was most commonly prescribed for CAIs, while meropenem was typical for HAIs. AST intervention rates were 15.0% and 22.5% in CAIs and HAIs, respectively.

This study provides comprehensive AMU information from a region in Japan, highlighting variations linked to hospital size, frequent prescriptions of broad-spectrum antimicrobials for HAIs, high prescription rate of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as MP, and prolonged SAP.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a significant threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), exacerbated by inappropriate antibiotic use, access to quality antibiotics and weak antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). There is a need to review current evidence on antibiotic use, access, and AMR, in primary care across key countries.

This narrative review analyzes publications from 2018 to 2024 regarding access, availability, and use of appropriate antibiotics.

There were very few studies focussing on a lack of access to antibiotics in primary care. However, there was considerable evidence of high rates of inappropriate antibiotic use, including Watch antibiotics, typically for minor infections, across studied countries exacerbated by patient demand. The high costs of antibiotics in a number of LMICs impact on their use, resulting in short courses and sharing of antibiotics. This can contribute to AMR alongside the use of substandard and falsified antibiotics. Overall, limited implementation of national action plans, insufficient resources, and knowledge gaps affects sustainable development goals to provide routine access to safe, effective, and appropriate antibiotics.

There is a clear need to focus health policy on the optimal use of essential AWaRe antibiotics in primary care settings to reduce AMR in LMICs.

Hospitals in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) face context-specific challenges in implementing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes. The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) project has established a network of hospitals across 90 countries, using point prevalence surveys to monitor antimicrobial use and guide AMS activities. However, little is known about AMS implementation in these hospitals. Using qualitative research, we aim to explore the implementation process in LMIC hospitals within the Global-PPS network and the factors influencing it, identify potential implementation strategies, and evaluate the role of Global-PPS in this process.

A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured online interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in AMS in LMIC hospitals within the Global-PPS network. Participants were selected using a combination of convenience and purposive sampling and included clinicians, microbiologists, pharmacists, and nurses. Interviews followed a topic guide based on the integrated checklist of determinants of practice (TICD Checklist). Transcripts were analysed using a combination of inductive and deductive thematic analyses.

Twenty-two HCWs from 16 countries were interviewed. Hospitals were in different stages of the AMS implementation process at the time of the study, from pre-implementation to institutionalisation of AMS as part of the continuous quality improvement process. While the Global-PPS provided a valuable tool for education and implementation, contextual barriers often hindered the translation of findings into targeted interventions. Four themes influenced AMS implementation, "institutional support and resource allocation", "AMS team functioning, roles, and expertise", "adoption and integration of AMS recommendations", and "data-driven decision-making" as a cross-cutting theme. Key determinants included AMS team competencies, multidisciplinary teams, sustainable funding and leadership support, diagnostic capacity, and reliable data to inform interventions. We also identified various strategies employed by local AMS teams to enhance implementation.

This study examines AMS implementation in LMIC hospitals in the Global-PPS network and identifies key determinants. AMS teams address challenges through task shifting, local engagement and ownership. While empirical evidence on the effectiveness of these strategies is limited, these insights can guide future AMS interventions and studies within LMIC hospitals. Strengthening AMS requires bridging the gap between measurement and action and expanding research on behaviour change.

Evidence behind antibiotic duration while treating ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains unclear. There is a need to balance minimizing the development of antimicrobial resistance without compromising clinical outcomes given the high mortality.

Recent studies have suggested that shorter antibiotic courses, when individualized to clinical response, may be adequate for treating VAP without increasing the incidence of mortality or recurrence, regardless of pathogens. Moreover, shortening duration may reduce the risk of adverse events, including acute kidney injury.

Shortening the duration of antibiotic treatment for VAP, in the setting of appropriate clinical response, is a reasonable strategy to reduce costs and selective pressure driving antimicrobial resistance. This was demonstrated in the latest REGARD-VAP study, even among VAP patients with nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli or carbapenem-resistant pathogens. Given the challenges in diagnosing VAP, such pragmatic approaches would be essential as part of overall antibiotic stewardship programmes. Further refinement to the criteria for antibiotic cessation may be possible.

Antibiotic resistance is a global environmental and health threat. Approximately 4.95 million deaths were associated with antibiotic resistance in 2019, including 1.27 million deaths that were directly attributable to bacterial antimicrobial resistance. Hospital wastewater is one of the key sources for the spread of clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) into the environment. Understanding the current situation of ARGs in hospital wastewater is of great significance. Here, we review the prevalence of ARGs and antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) in hospital wastewater and wastewater from other places and the treatment methods used. We further discuss the intersection between ARGs and COVID-19 during the pandemic. This review highlights the issues associated with the dissemination of critical ARGs from hospital wastewater into the environment. It is imperative to implement more effective processes for hospital wastewater treatment to eliminate ARGs, particularly during the current long COVID-19 period.

Introduction: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) can improve the rational use of antibiotics in hospitals. This study assessed the impact of a multifaceted AMS intervention on antibiotic use and prescribing patterns at three tertiary hospitals in Zambia. Methods: Point Prevalence Surveys (PPS) were conducted in three tertiary hospitals in August 2022 and in October 2023. It was part of a 3-year AMS demonstration project that aimed to optimize the use of antibiotics in treating urinary tract infections (UTIs) and bloodstream infections (BSIs) in various health sector settings in Zambia. Up to 170 medical records in 2022 and 265 in 2023 were included in the assessment. Results: Overall, the prevalence of antibiotic use in this PPS was 75%. Eighty-one percent (81%) and 71% of patients assessed were on at least one antibiotic in 2022 and 2023, respectively, indicating a decrease of 10%. Similarly, prescribing ceftriaxone, the most prescribed antibiotic, declined from an average of 48% in 2022 to 38% in 2023. Adherence to Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) slightly increased from 42% in 2022 to 45% in 2023. Additionally, antibiotic prescribing was reduced from 1.38 to 1.21. Conclusions: Antimicrobial stewardship had an early positive impact on antibiotic use and adherence to Standard Treatment Guidelines.

Healthcare systems face several challenges, with microbial infections being one of the main concerns. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a strategy that has been encouraged to optimize antimicrobial regimens, particularly those with significant toxicity and narrow therapeutic indices, such as amikacin (AMK). We aimed to evaluate AMK concentrations of patients in a non-routine TDM setting and compare the performance of immunoassay and chromatography methods for routine clinical use.

In this prospective study, peak (Cmax) and trough (Cmin) plasma samples were collected from 39 adult patients and quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Relevant clinical information was collected from medical records. AMK concentrations and clinical data were analyzed to evaluate therapy performance and influencing factors. In addition, fluorescence polarized immunoassay (FPIA) and UPLC-MS/MS were compared with Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis.

AMK concentrations varied widely, with a median Cmax of 41.40 µg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 27.60 - 56.75 µg/mL) and a median Cmin of 1.87 µg/mL (IQR 0.7 - 6.19 µg/mL). A high proportion of patients (83.1 %) failed to achieve the Cmax therapeutic target, while 31.7 % failed to achieve the Cmin therapeutic target. Overall, elderly patients and those with reduced renal function had higher Cmax target attainment, while the same groups had lower Cmin target attainment. The method comparison showed a mean difference of 1.54 % (limits of agreement -42.46 % to 45.54 %) in measured concentrations, with good correlation and no constant or proportional differences.

Many patients failed to reach the Cmax target and were at risk of treatment failure, although adequate Cmin was achieved more often. TDM with dose adjustments could improve AMK therapy, but further research is needed.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a significant global health concern, with improper antibiotic use contributing to its rise. Tanzania initiated an AMR action plan in 2017, but comprehensive surveillance and stewardship efforts remain limited. This study focused on evaluating antibiotic use, particularly surgical prophylaxis, in a rural Tanzanian hospital.

The study was conducted at Haydom Lutheran Hospital in Tanzania in May 2023, using a cross-sectional point prevalence survey. Antibiotic use in all patients admitted for >24 h and those undergoing surgery was recorded, including type, dose, indication and duration. Quality indicators for surgical prophylaxis were assessed.

Among 199 inpatients, 55% received antibiotics, with surgical prophylaxis accounting for 23% of prescriptions. Notably, none of the patients who received surgical prophylaxis received a single-dose regimen, and 67% exceeded the recommended 24-h duration. A combination of ampicillin-cloxacillin plus metronidazole was the most commonly prescribed combination for surgical prophylaxis (41% of prescriptions). Thirty-three percent of the antibiotics prescribed for surgical prophylaxis were classified as 'Not recommended' by the World Health Organization. Furthermore, 90% of surgical prophylaxis prescriptions lacked documented rationale, and 83% of prescriptions lacked stop/review dates in medical records.

This study reveals a high prevalence of prolonged antibiotic use for surgical prophylaxis, frequent use of antibiotics classified as 'Not recommended', and a lack of adequate documentation, which deviates from international standards. These practices highlight the urgent need for contextualized national guidelines, large-scale implementation projects of evidence-based interventions, and local initiatives in antibiotic stewardship, particularly in low-resource settings.

The inappropriate prescribing and use of antibiotics have contributed to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In Zambia, there is a paucity of information on the prescribing patterns and use of antibiotics among hospitalized patients in level 1 hospitals. This study investigated antibiotic use in five level 1 hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia.

This cross-sectional study utilized the World Health Organization (WHO) Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) methodology among in-patients admitted in level 1 hospitals before 08:00 a.m. on the survey day in August 2024. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 23.0.

The prevalence of antibiotic use among inpatients was 59.0%, with ceftriaxone being the most prescribed. Antibiotics were prescribed mainly for paediatrics and male inpatients. This study found that 53.0% of prescribed antibiotics were from the Access group while 38.2% were from the Watch group of the World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. Adherence to national treatment guidelines was 36.0%, with most antibiotics prescribed empirically without evidence of culture and sensitivity tests.

This study found a high use of antibiotics and low adherence to treatment guidelines in level 1 hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. The findings of this study demonstrate the need to establish and strengthen antimicrobial stewardship programs and strengthen laboratory capacity to aid clinicians in diagnosing, treating, and managing patients across level 1 hospitals in Zambia.

Background/Objectives: In this research, we aimed to analyze the trend of the antimicrobial resistance pattern of Gram-negative isolated in blood samples collected from patients with severe invasive infections hospitalized in the intensive care unit in selected periods during and after COVID-19. Methods: A retrospective study of bacterial pathogens was performed on 481 patients admitted to the ICU between 2020 and 2023. The resistance patterns were analyzed using the Vitek 2 Compact system. Results. A total of 686 Gram-negative bacterial isolates were obtained. The most frequently detected Gram-negative pathogens were Klebsiella spp. (30.91%), Acinetobacter spp. (24.64%), and Escherichia coli (18.95%). Almost 50% of all the pathogens were multidrug-resistant, with a statistically significant increase post-pandemic (p < 0.05). Post-pandemic, the study highlighted a significantly higher percentage of the Klebsiella strains (p < 0.05), and a significant increase in the antibiotic resistance rate against colistin (p < 0.001) and tigecycline (p = 0.005). A very high percentage of MDR Acinetobacter spp. isolates was found, with a significant increase in the antibiotic resistance rate against colistin (p < 0.001). A significantly lower resistance was recorded for the Escherichia coli strains in the case of ceftazidime (p = 0.03) and aminoglycosides (gentamicin-p = 0.01, amikacin-p < 0.001). An increase in the percentage of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella spp., Acinetobacter spp., and Enterobacter spp. strains was observed, and a significant decrease in the in the case of Proteus spp. (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our findings revealed a statistically significant increase in the resistance rate to last-line antibiotics and in the percentage of MDR Gram-negative strains isolated in the blood samples in the post-COVID-19 era.

Bacterial infection has been estimated to become the leading cause of death by 2050, causing 10 million deaths across the globe due to the surge in antibiotic resistance. Despite western sub-Saharan Africa being identified as one of the major hotspots of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) with the highest mortality, a comprehensive regional analysis of the magnitude and key drivers of AMR due to human antibiotic use has not been conducted.

We carried out a systematic review by conducting a comprehensive search in various databases including PubMed and Scopus for eligible articles published in the English Language between 1 January 2000 and 14 February 2024. Five key domains of antibiotic use were focused on: (1) antibiotic consumption; (2) appropriate antibiotic prescription; (3) indicators or key drivers of antibiotic use; (4) antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions; (5) knowledge, attitudes and perceptions of antibiotic consumers and providers. Data were extracted from eligible papers for all the five domains under consideration and random-effects model meta-analysis was carried out for antibiotic consumption.

Out of the 2613 records obtained, 64 articles which were unevenly distributed in the region were eligible for inclusion in our study. These articles reported on antibiotic consumption (5), appropriate antibiotic prescription (10), indicators or key drivers of antibiotic use (10), AMS interventions (10), and 31 studies reported on knowledge, attitudes and perceptions. Antibiotic consumption for inpatients has a pooled estimate of 620.03 defined daily dose (DDD) per 100 bed-days (confidence interval [CI] 0.00-1286.67; I2 = 100%) after accounting for outliers while prescribing appropriateness ranged from 2.5% to 93.0% with a pooled estimate of 50.09 ([CI: 22.21-77.92%], I2 = 99.4%). Amoxicillin, gentamicin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, metronidazole, and ceftriaxone were the commonly consumed antibiotics. Community-acquired infection, hospital-acquired infection, and prophylaxis were the major indicators of antibiotic use. AMS was effective to varying degrees with bundled interventions and gamified antimicrobial stewardship decision support application being the most effective. Healthcare workers demonstrated acceptable antibiotic knowledge but individuals from formal and informal settings self-medicate with antibiotics and had moderate to low knowledge of antibiotic use and resistance.

This review identified gaps in knowledge and highlighted areas where prompt actions are required, it further guides future research endeavors and policy development. The findings underscore the need for further implementation of AMS programs across the West African region to enhance understanding of antibiotic use patterns, prescribing practices, and the factors influencing them in the region.

Antimicrobial stewardship promotes the appropriate use of antibiotics to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. This study evaluated the use of antibiotics using a point prevalence survey at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Zone d'Abomey Calavi/Sô-Ava (CHUZ/AS) in Benin.

This cross-sectional study utilized the WHO point prevalence survey methodology for monitoring antibiotic use among inpatients in hospitals. The survey was conducted from 11 January 2022 to 19 January 2022 among hospitalized patients before 8:00 a.m. on the day of the survey.

Of the 111 inpatient medical files reviewed, the prevalence of antibiotic use was 82.9%. The number of antibiotics received per patient ranged from 1 to 5, with a mean of 2.45 ± 1.11 and a median of 2. The most commonly prescribed class of antibiotics was beta-lactams (46.7%), aminoglycosides (20.6%) and nitroimidazoles (19.7%). According to the WHO AWaRe classification, 30.4% of inpatients received the Access group of antibiotics and 44% received a combination of Access and Watch group antibiotics; treatment was empiric in 94.5% of encounters. Only 22.7% of patients were treated based on microbiological examination/culture and sensitivity testing.

This study found a high prevalence of antibiotic use among inpatients at the CHUZ/AS Tertiary Care Hospital in Benin. The most prescribed antibiotics were ampicillin, metronidazole and ceftriaxone. Consequently, the study found a low use of culture and sensitivity testing to guide treatment, particularly in the paediatric and surgical population, and the preference for broad-spectrum antibiotics suggests that antibiotic use at the CHUZ/AS Tertiary Care is not optimal. Therefore, antimicrobial stewardship programmes, policies and guidelines must be instigated and strengthened to address these gaps and promote rational use of antibiotics.

This study analyzed the practice of switching intravenous antibiotics to oral dosage form in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.

A prospective observational study was performed among patients admitted to medical/surgical wards in a private tertiary care hospital of Nepal.

Hospitalized adult patients who received IV antibiotics for at least 48 hours and met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study. The detailed information on use of antibiotics such as indication, duration, type time of switch etc. were collected and analyzed.

Among 335 patients, 282(83.9%) met the eligibility criteria for intravenous (IV) to oral conversion however, only 18.7% of patients were switched to oral regimen. Step-down conversion was the common type of IV to oral switch. Almost all patients were empirically treated with β-lactams antibiotics (n = 327). There was significant association between the antibiotic class and duration of IV therapy (P < 0.001). The length of hospital stays and duration of IV antibiotics therapy was lower in the timely converted group than in the non-converted groups (P < 0.001). The duration of IV antibiotics therapy was strongly correlated with duration of hospital stay (r = 0.743, P < 0.001).

The findings revealed a low prevalence of conversion from IV antibiotics to oral, despite a higher percentage of patients meeting the eligibility criteria for conversion. There is a need for the implementation of structured program to review patients on IV antibiotics and promote timely conversion to oral once they meet the conversion criteria.

Surveillance of antibiotic use is crucial for identifying targets for antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs), particularly in pediatric populations within countries like Pakistan, where antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is escalating. This point prevalence survey (PPS) seeks to assess the patterns of antibiotic use in pediatric patients across Punjab, Pakistan, employing the WHO AWaRe classification to pinpoint targets for intervention and encourage rational antibiotic usage.

A PPS was conducted across 23 pediatric wards of 14 hospitals in the Punjab Province of Pakistan using the standardized Global-PPS methodology developed by the University of Antwerp. The study included all pediatric inpatients receiving antibiotics at the time of the survey, categorizing antibiotic prescriptions according to the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification and the AWaRe classification system.

Out of 498 pediatric patients, 409 were receiving antibiotics, representing an antibiotic use prevalence of 82.1%. A substantial majority (72.1%) of the prescribed antibiotics fell under the WHO's Watch category, with 25.7% in the Access category and 2.2% in the Reserve group. The predominant diagnoses were respiratory infections, notably pneumonia (32.4%). The most commonly used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (37.2%) and Vancomycin (13.5%). Only 2% of antibiotic uses were supported by culture sensitivity reports, highlighting a reliance on empirical therapy.

The high prevalence of antibiotic use, particularly from the Watch category, and low adherence to culture-based prescriptions underscore the critical need for robust antibiotic stewardship programs in Pakistan. Strengthening these programs could help mitigate AMR and optimize antibiotic use, aligning with global health objectives.

Tackling the inertia of growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) requires changes in how antibiotics are prescribed and utilized. The monitoring of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals is a critical component in optimizing antibiotic use. Point prevalence surveys (PPSs) enable the surveillance of antibiotic prescribing at the patient level in small hospitals that lack the resources to establish antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP). In this study, we analyzed antibiotic use at two public secondary care hospitals in Mexico using PPSs.

Following WHO methodology, we conducted four cross-sectional PPSs on antibiotic use in two public secondary care facilities in Mexico: two surveys in a women's specialty hospital (H1) and two in a general referral hospital (H2). We collected data from clinical records of all patients with active antibiotic prescriptions (APs) across the medical, surgical, and mixed (MIX) wards, and intensive care units (ICUs). Descriptive statistics were computed to analyze the PPSs data using Stata.

The PPSs collected data on 127 patients, and 283 active APs. The prevalence of antibiotic use was 60.4% (H1, n = 29/48) and 70.5% (H2, n = 98/139). Antibiotics were more frequently used among patients in the MIX wards (H1: 87.5%, n = 14/16) and ICUs (H2: 90%, n = 9/10). The most frequent patient indications for antibiotic use were medical prophylaxis (H1: 51.7%, n = 15/29), community-acquired infections (H2: 42.9%, n = 42/98), and preoperative prophylaxis (H1: 27.6%, n = 8/29; H2: 23.5%, n = 23/98). The APs were mostly empirical (H1: 97%, n = 64/66; H2: 98.2%, n = 213/217), and parenterally administered (H1: 90.9%, n = 60/66; H2: 96.8%, n = 210/217). Most clinical records lacked documented post-prescription reviews (H1: 82.8%, n = 24/29; H2: 98%, n = 96/98). Preoperative prophylaxis was predominantly administered as multiple doses for more than one day. Penicillins with extended-spectrum (24.2%, n = 16/66), aminoglycosides (22.7%, n = 15/66), and first-generation cephalosporins (16.7%, n = 11/66) were the most prescribed antibiotic classes in H1, while third-generation cephalosporins (35%, n = 76/217), fluoroquinolones (14.3%, n = 31/217), and carbapenems (13.4%, n = 29/217) were the most prescribed in H2. No hospital had formally established ASP.

This study shows high prevalence rates of antibiotic use and variations in commonly prescribed antibiotic classes in public Mexican secondary care hospitals, along with shared practices in broad-spectrum antibiotic prescription. PPS-based surveillance enables the identification of specific targets to optimize antibiotic use according to the healthcare needs of patients in each hospital and facilitates comparative evaluations across hospitals.

We developed an antimicrobial and patient background surveillance system (APBSS), an automated surveillance system that can calculate surveillance data such as antimicrobial use and detection of antimicrobial resistance for each indication of antimicrobial administration. We evaluated the validity of the APBSS data.

Eligible patients were hospitalized at the Toyota Kosei Hospital on July 7, 2022. Evaluated surveillance data included antimicrobial administration, indications for antimicrobial administration, and diagnosis. In the APBSS, surveillance data were calculated using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination data and Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance laboratory data. Using surveillance data collected by the Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) as a reference standard, the agreement between the results calculated based on the APBSS was evaluated using Cohen's kappa coefficient. Indications for antimicrobial administration and diagnosis were analyzed in patients identified for antimicrobial administration in PPS or APBSS.

A total of 582 patients were included in this study, 223 of whom were evaluated for indications for antimicrobial administration and diagnosis. For the indications of antimicrobial administration, the Cohen's kappa coefficient was almost perfect (0.81-1.00) for all items. Cohen's kappa coefficient for the diagnosis of healthcare-associated infections was low. However, in major diseases (pneumonia and intra-abdominal, and symptomatic upper urinary tract infections) among community-acquired infections (CAIs) diagnosis, Cohen's kappa coefficient was substantial (0.61-0.80).

The APBSS can identify indications for antimicrobial administration and major CAIs with high accuracy. Therefore, the APBSS can calculate surveillance data, such as antimicrobial use and detection of antimicrobial resistance, for each of these items.

The optimal duration for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) for preventing surgical site infection (SSI) in orthopaedic surgeries remains poorly supported by high-level evidence. This study aimed to assess the association between SAP duration and the occurrence of SSI within one year postoperatively.

This prospective cohort study was based on the database from Surgical Site Infection Surveillance and Improvement Project (SISIP) of a tertiary orthopaedic university hospital from October 2014 to December 2020. The main outcome was SSI, defined according to the CDC/NHSN criteria, determined by a review of index hospitalization medical records, microbiology laboratory reports, and readmission records for SSI treatment within one year after discharge. Adjusted generalized additive models (GAMs) were performed to assess the relationships between SAP duration and SSI, determine the cut-off point of SAP duration, and estimate the relative contribution of each included variable across the overall cohort and the three subgroups (open fracture, closed fracture, and non-traumatic group). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between prolonging SAP duration based on the cut-off point and SSI.

There were 37 046 patients (55.1% male) included, with an overall SSI incidence of 2.35% (871/37 046). In adjusted GAMs, no statistically significant relationships were observed in the overall cohort and open or closed group ( P >0.05), but a non-linear relationship was exhibited in the non-traumatic group ( P =0.03); the cut-off point was 2.4 days for the overall cohort and 3.6 days (open), 2.6 days (closed), 1.1 days (non-trauma) for three subgroups. In adjusted logistic regression, prolonging SAP duration did not demonstrate a statistically significant protective effect in overall cohort (aOR=0.868; 95% CI, 0.746-1.011) and three groups (open: aOR=0.867; 95% CI, 0.668-1.124; closed: aOR=0.925; 95% CI, 0.754-1.135; non-trauma: aOR=1.184; 95% CI, 0.832-1.683). The relative contribution ranks of SAP duration were 21st overall among 34 factors, 14th for open fractures, 28th for closed fractures, and 3rd for the non-traumatic group among 33 factors.

Prolonged postoperative SAP duration has no protective effect against SSI in orthopaedic surgery. Our findings support current guidelines against the practice of continuing SAP postoperatively.

The necessity of post procedural prophylactic antibiotics following clean surgeries is controversial. While most evidence suggests that there is no benefit from these additional antibiotics and guidelines do not support their use, there is a paucity of evidence as to how often they are still being used and their impact on infection outcomes. The current study assessed the use of prophylactic antibiotics following cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations in the province of Alberta, and their impact on infection and mortality.

We conducted a population-based cohort study in the province of Alberta. Administrative data was used to link all patients ≥ 18 who underwent outpatient CIED implantation from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2019 to antibiotics commonly used for surgical prophylaxis which were prescribed within 48 h of implantation. The primary outcome, explored with an adjusted Poisson model, was incidence of complex surgical site infection within one year of device implantation. All-cause mortality was a secondary outcome.

Post implantation prophylactic antibiotics were used 41% of the time overall, though the rate has been decreasing over time. The most commonly used prophylactic antibiotic was cefalexin (52%). When adjusted analyses were completed, there was no difference in the outcome of infection between those who did and did not receive post implantation prophylactic antibiotics (Relative Risk 0.74, 95% CI 0.46-1.17) and there was no difference in mortality (Relative Risk 0.8, 95% CI 0.63-1.02).

The use of prophylactic antibiotics following CIED implantation does not correlate to a reduced rate of complex surgical site infection or reduced mortality. The widespread use of these antibiotics, which is not guideline concordant, suggests the need for targeted antimicrobial stewardship interventions for surgical prophylaxis to ensure that antibiotic use is being optimized. Further work should explore other adverse outcomes associated with this antibiotic usage and stewardship programs should explore interventions to educate and reduce antibiotic use for this indication.

Antimicrobial resistance is a global health crisis exacerbated by excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics, especially among low- and middle-income countries including Pakistan. The paediatric population is a key area in view of their vulnerability and excessive prescribing of antibiotics in Pakistan. Consequently, there is an urgent need to robustly assess antimicrobial use among hospitalized neonates and children in tertiary hospitals in Pakistan as they are generally the training centres for new physicians subsequently treating children.

A point prevalence survey (PPS) was conducted in the children's wards of 14 tertiary care hospitals in Punjab Province, covering over 50% of the population of Pakistan. This builds on a previous PPS among tertiary care hospitals treating exclusively neonates and children.

A total of 1811 neonates and children were surveyed with 1744 patients prescribed antibiotics, a prevalence of 96.3%. A total of 2747 antibiotics were prescribed to these 1744 neonates and children, averaging 1.57 antibiotics per patient. Overall, 57.7% of the patients were prescribed one antibiotic and 27.2% two antibiotics, with 85.6% of antibiotics administered parenterally. Over a third (34.4%) of the antibiotics were prescribed prophylactically, with 44.7% of them for surgical procedures. Among those prescribed antibiotics for surgical procedures, 75.2% were prescribed for more than one day. Overall, 92.2% of antibiotics were prescribed empirically, with 86.2% prescribed without mentioning the rationale for their choice in the notes, with 77.6% having no stop date. Respiratory tract infections were the most common indication (43.4%). Staphylococcus species (36.0%) were the most common pathogen with limited Culture and Sensitivity Testing performed. Three quarters (75.2%) of antibiotics were from the Watch list, and 24.4% were Access antibiotics.

A very high prevalence of antibiotic use among neonates and children in tertiary hospitals in Pakistan, including Watch antibiotics, mirroring previous studies. Consequently, initiatives including antimicrobial stewardship programmes are urgently needed to address current inappropriate prescribing.

Quality indicators (QIs) are widely used tools for antibiotic stewardship programmes. The Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) system has been developed by the WHO to classify antibiotics based on their spectrum of activity and potential selection of antibiotic resistance. This review aimed to identify existing indicators for optimal antibiotic use to inform the development of future AWaRe QIs.

A literature search was performed in PubMed. We included articles describing QIs for hospital and primary healthcare antibiotic use. We extracted information about (i) the type of infection; (ii) setting; (iii) target for quality assessment; and (iv) methodology used for the development. We then identified the indicators that reflected the guidance provided in the AWaRe system.

A total of 773 indicators for antibiotic use were identified. The management of health services and/or workers, the consumption of antibiotics, and antibiotic prescribing/dispensing were the principal targets for quality assessment. There was a similar distribution of indicators across primary and secondary care. For infection-specific indicators, about 50% focused on respiratory tract infections. Only a few QIs included information on review treatment or microbiological investigations. Although only 8 (1%) indicators directly cited the AWaRe system in the wording of the indicators, 445 (57.6%) indicators reflected the guidance provided in the AWaRe book.

A high number of indicators for appropriate antibiotic use have been developed. However, few are currently based directly on the WHO AWaRe system. There is a clear need to develop globally applicable AWaRe based indicators that can be integrated into antibiotic stewardship programmes.

Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to optimize antibiotic use and prevent antimicrobial resistance.

This study assessed the impact of ASPs, initiated using a hub-and-spoke approach, on antibiotic use in Zambian public hospitals.

A pre-post study was conducted in 10 ASP-naive hospitals across Zambia using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)'s hospital-based ASP core elements (i.e. leadership, accountability, pharmacy expertise, stewardship actions, tracking progress, reporting and education) checklist and the global point prevalence survey methodology. The intervention involved technical staff from a national 'hub' hospital with an established ASP providing on-site orientation and mentorship to multidisciplinary teams of healthcare workers at 10 'spoke' hospitals to build capacity in antimicrobial stewardship. ASP core elements and inpatient antibiotic use prevalence (AUP) were assessed before and 12 months after ASP implementation. Data were statistically analysed.

The adoption of ASP core elements improved significantly (P = 0.001, 95% CI: -17.8 to -5.42). AUP decreased from 50.1% (±5.8, n = 1477) to 44.3% (±4.6, n = 1400) after 12 months, though the reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.442; 95% CI: -9.8 to 21.6), with 'Watch' list antibiotics remaining the most commonly prescribed across the hospitals.

The hub-and-spoke approach successfully catalysed ASPs in public hospitals in Zambia, demonstrating the potential for improving antibiotic use practices over time, provided structural challenges are addressed. This approach and insights can guide stakeholders in Zambia and similar settings in enhancing hospital ASPs.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of compliance to institutional guidelines on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) among the surgical wards of our facility and to evaluate the impact of our antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the adherence rate.

We conducted a cross-sectional study including all 14 surgical wards of our hospital. Eight of these wards participate in a non-restrictive ASP. All patients admitted to one of the wards who had been prescribed SAP were included; the appropriateness of prophylaxis was defined according to the institutional protocols.

During the study period, we evaluated 169 patients undergoing a surgical procedure, of whom 105 (62.1%) received SAP. Overall, 10 (10.5%) patients were prescribed unnecessary prophylaxis; among the remaining 95, 30 (31.6%) received appropriate prophylaxis, while 65 (68.4%) were prescribed SAP deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons (38.5% received a drug with a larger spectrum of activity, 9.2% a molecule with a narrower spectrum, 36.9% an incorrect dose and 76.9% a longer duration of prophylaxis). A higher number of patients in the inappropriate prophylaxis group received abdominal surgery (P = 0.001) and were admitted to a ward not participating in the ASP (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, being admitted to an ASP unit was the only factor independently related to having received appropriate prophylaxis.

A low rate of adherence to local guidelines on SAP was observed, but a non-restrictive ASP can significantly impact the appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis.

Audits for monitoring the quality of antimicrobial prescribing are a main tool in antimicrobial stewardship programs; however, interobserver reliability has not been conclusively assessed. Our objective was to measure the level of agreement between pharmacists and physicians on the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals.

A national multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted of patients who were receiving antimicrobials one day of April 2021. Hospital participation was voluntary, and the study population was randomly selected. Pharmacists and physicians performed a simultaneous, independent assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions. The observers used an assessment method by which all indicators of the quality of antimicrobial use were considered. Finally, an algorithm was used to rate overall antimicrobial prescribing as appropriate, suboptimal, inappropriate, or not assessable. Gwet's AC1 coefficient was used to assess interobserver agreement.

In total, 101 hospitals participated, and 411 hospital antimicrobial prescriptions were reviewed. The strength of agreement was moderate regarding the overall quality of prescribing (AC1=0.51; 95%CI=[0.44-0.58]). A very good level of agreement (AC1>0.80) was observed between pharmacists and physicians in all indicators of the quality, except for duration of treatment, rated as good (AC1=0.79; 95%CI=[0.75-0.83]), and registration on the medical record, rated as fair (AC1=0.34; 95%CI=[0.26-0.43]). The agreement was greater in critical care, onco-hematology, and pediatric units than in medical and surgery units.

In this point prevalence study, a moderate level of agreement was observed between pharmacists and physicians in the evaluation of the appropriateness of antimicrobials prescribing in hospitals.

The Global Point Prevalence Survey (PPS) of antimicrobial consumption and resistance has been widely undertaken to combat the global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study was conducted in alignment with the Global-PPS in three tertiary care hospitals in Kerman, Iran, to evaluate antimicrobial consumption patterns.

The study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2021 in Afzalipour, Shafa, and Shahid Bahonar Hospitals. Data were collected using the standardized Global-PPS method at three different points throughout the year to minimize bias. Information on antimicrobial prescriptions, primary diagnosis, prophylaxis, therapy indications, and treatment type were documented. Antimicrobial prevalence was calculated using the total number of admitted patients as the denominator and those on antimicrobial regimens as the numerator.