Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2017; 9(8): 333-340
Published online Aug 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i8.333
Published online Aug 15, 2017. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i8.333
Table 1 Patient characteristics n (%)
Adeno | SCC | Total | |
No. of patients | 841 | 132 | 973 |
Median age (range) | 62 (22-84) | 60 (37-77) | 61 (22-84) |
Gender | |||
Male | 730 (87) | 95 (72) | 825 (85) |
Female | 111 (13) | 37 (28) | 148 (15) |
Performance status1 | |||
0 | 223 (27) | 33 (25) | 256 (26) |
1 | 489 (58) | 75 (57) | 564 (58) |
2 | 127 (15) | 23 (18) | 150 (15) |
Sub-site | |||
Oesophagus | 438 (52) | 117 (89) | 555 (57) |
OGJ | 403 (48) | 15 (11) | 418 (43) |
Extent of disease2 | |||
Locally advanced | 219 (26) | 36 (27) | 255 (26) |
Metastatic | 622 (74) | 95 (72) | 717 (74) |
Location of metastases | |||
Liver | 340 (46) | 46 (35) | 386 (40) |
Peritoneum | 41 (5) | 4 (3) | 45 (4.5) |
Lung | 136 (16) | 18 (14) | 154 (16) |
Table 2 Multivariate analyses of overall survival
Factors | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Overall survival | |||||||
Histological arm | Adenocarcinoma (r) | 1.000 | |||||
SCC | 1.196 | 0.972-1.471 | 0.089 | ||||
Sex | Female (r) | 1.000 | |||||
Male | 0.983 | 0.807-1.196 | 0.983 | ||||
Subsite | Oesophagus (r) | 1.000 | |||||
OGJ | 0.988 | 0.853-1.145 | 0.876 | ||||
Liver mets | No (r) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
Yes | 1.671 | 1.433-1.948 | < 0.001 | 1.581 | 1.341-1.863 | < 0.001 | |
Peritoneal mets | No (r) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
Yes | 2.290 | 1.583-3.314 | < 0.01 | 2.190 | 1.503-3.191 | < 0.001 | |
ALP | < 100 U/I (r) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
≥ 100 U/I | 1.608 | 1.357-1.908 | < 0.001 | 1.287 | 1.072-1.544 | 0.007 | |
Performance score | 0-1 (r) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
2-3 | 2.140 | 1.754-2.611 | < 0.001 | 1.703 | 1.374-2.110 | < 0.001 | |
Treatment arm | EOX (r) | 1.000 | |||||
EOF | 1.122 | 0.848-1.484 | 0.420 | ||||
ECX | 1.139 | 0.862-1.505 | 0.361 | ||||
ECF | 1.175 | 0.916-1.506 | 0.204 | ||||
MCF | 1.176 | 0.870-1.589 | 0.291 | ||||
PVI 5FU + MMC | 2.107 | 1.461-3.040 | < 0.001 | ||||
PVI 5FU | 2.132 | 1.481-3.067 | < 0.001 | ||||
Overall | < 0.001 | ||||||
Study | Trial 3[10] (r) | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
Trial 1[15] | 0.993 | 0.804-1.228 | 0.951 | 1.034 | 0.830-1.288 | 0.763 | |
Trial 2[16] | 1.850 | 1.432-2.390 | < 0.001 | 1.736 | 1.326-2.271 | < 0.001 | |
Overall | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Objective response rates and toxicity composite endpoint n (%)
Adeno | SCC | |
No. of patients | 841 | 132 |
Complete response | 48 (6) | 7 (5) |
Partial response | 323 (38) | 36 (27) |
Stable disease | 224 (30) | 35 (27) |
Progressive disease | 157 (19) | 38 (29) |
Objective response rate (95%CI) | 371 (44) 41%-48% | 43 (33) 25%-41% P = 0.01 |
Toxicity composite endpoint (95%CI) | 381 (45) 42%-49% | 58 (44) 35%-53% P = 0.77 |
- Citation: Davidson M, Chau I, Cunningham D, Khabra K, Iveson T, Hickish T, Seymour M, Starling N. Impact of tumour histological subtype on chemotherapy outcome in advanced oesophageal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2017; 9(8): 333-340
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v9/i8/333.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v9.i8.333