Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2016; 8(3): 258-270
Published online Mar 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.258
Published online Mar 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.258
Table 1 Some venous thromboembolic event risk factors in cancer patients
Cancer-related | Patient-related | Treatment-related |
Reduced mobility | ||
Primary cancer (e.g., pancreatic cancer > colo-rectal cancer) | Age | Operation |
Stage (IV > III) | History of VTE | Chemotherapy |
Histology (e.g., adeno- > squamous cell-carcinoma) | Infection/fever | Central line/ port-catheter |
Grade (3 > 2) | Parenteral nutrition | |
Thrombocytosis | Radiation therapy | |
Leukocytosis | ||
Acute phase (elevated CRP) | ||
Elevated D-dimer |
Table 2 Comprehensive outline of some guidelines focusing on the prevention and treatment of cancer associated venous thromboembolism
Primary prophylaxis/prevention of VTE in cancer patients | Treatment of cancer-associated VTE | ||||
Surgical patients | In-patients (non surgical) | Out-patients | Acute/initial | Long-term/secondary prevention | |
ASCO Guidelines 2013[15] | UFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), Fondaparinux | UFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), Fondaparinux | Not recommended routinely1 LMWH may be considered | UFH, LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Tinzaparin), Fondaparinux | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin,Tinzaparin) |
A combined regimen of pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis may improve efficacy, especially in the highest risk patients. | VKA not recommended | VKA (INR 2-3) acceptable if LMWH is not available Use of NOACs is not recommended | |||
Patients undergoing major cancer surgery should receive prophylaxis starting before surgery and continuing for at least 7 to 10 d and it should be considered an extension up to 4 wk in patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery | Treatment of splanchnic or visceral vein thrombi diagnosed incidentally should be considered on a case-by-case basis, considering potential benefits and risks of anticoagulation | ||||
ESMO Guidelines 2011[16] | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), UFH Fondaparinux not recommended | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), Fondaparinux, UFH | Not recommended routinely May be considered in high risk patients | LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), UFH | Treatment for a total of 6 mo. Initial dose of LMWH 100% for 1 mo, thereafter 5 mo with 75%-80% of the initial dose of LMWH |
Cancer patients undergoing elective major abdominal or pelvic surgery should receive in hospital and post-discharge prophylaxis with s.c. LMWH for up to 1 mo after surgery | |||||
International Consensus Groupe 2013[17] | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Nadroparin, Tinzaparin), Fondaparinux, UFH For 10 ± 2 d or 25-31 d (28 d) extended use (Bemiparin sodium 3500 IU per day for 28 d) | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Nadroparin, Tinzaparin), Fondaparinux, UFH | Not recommended routinely To be considered/recommended: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic lung or pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy and having a low bleeding risk | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin), UFH | LMWH (Dalteparin, Enoxaparin) for 3 to 6 mo |
British Committee for Standards in Haematology 2015[18] | Patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery for cancer should be considered for extended thromboprophylaxis | Patients with active or recent cancer should receive thromboprophylaxis throughout their admission unless contraindicated Patients without a history of venous thromboembolism receiving adjuvant hormonal therapies for cancer should not routinely receive thrombo-prophylaxis | Patients should be assessed for thrombosis risk and although most do not routinely require thromboprophylaxis, it should be considered for high risk patients | Initial treatment should be with LMWH for six months | Warfarin and other oral anticoagulants are acceptable alternatives if LMWH is impractical and anticoagulation is indicated Anticoagulation should be continued, taking pt status and wishes and bleeding risk into consideration. There is a rationale but little direct evidence for preferring to continue to use LMWH |
Cancer patients with incidental pulmonary embolus or deep vein thrombosis should be therapeutically anticoagulated as for symptomatic disease | |||||
Australian Governments National Health and Medical Research Council 2009[19] | LMWH, continue for at least 7 to 10 d following major general surgery Consider using extended thromboprophylaxis with LMWH for up to 28 d after major abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer, especially in patients who are obese, slow to mobilise or have a past history of VTE | LMWH, UFH | - | - | |
MAYO CLINIC VTE Prevention and Management Guidelines 2014[20] | UFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), Fondaparinux Cancer patients undergoing pelvic or abdominal surgery should receive 4 wk of LMWH | UFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), Fondaparinux | UFH, LMWH (Enoxaparin, Dalteparin), Fondaparinux VKA (INR2-3) | Anticoagulants are continued until there is no evidence of active malignant disease defined as any evidence of cancer on cross-sectional imaging or any cancer-related treatment (surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy) within the past 6 mo | |
ASH Guidelines 2013[21] | UFH, LMWH, Fondaparinux in all patients undergoing major surgical intervention for malignant disease Prolonged prophylaxis for up to 4 wk may be considered in patients undergoing major abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer with high-risk features such as residual malignant disease, obesity, and prior history of VTE | UFH, LMWH, Fondaparinux | Routine VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory patients receiving chemotherapy is not recommended | LMWH | LMWH Continue treatment with LMWH is preferred for at least the initial 6 mo of treatment |
German Guidelines[22,23] | LMWH, Fondaparinux, (UFH) Patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery for cancer are recommended to get extended thromboprophylaxis (28 to 35 d) | LMWH, Fondaparinux, (UFH) | LMWH, Patients should be assessed for thrombosis risk and thromboprophylaxis should be considered for high risk patients | LMWH, Fondaparinux, UFH | LMWH for 3 to 6 mo If cancer persists extended secundary prophylaxis (with LMWH, VKA, or NOAC) is usefull (till death) |
Table 3 Primary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolic event in gastrointestinal cancers
Study | Cancer | n | VTE placebo | VTE LMWH | VTE U-LMWH | RR |
PROTECHT1 | Gastorintestinal2 | 148/272 | 2.7% | 1.5% | -44% | |
Agnelli et al[68], 2009 | Pancreas | 17/36 | 5.9% | 8.3% | 40% | |
SAVE-ONCO | Colo-rectal | 461/464 | 2.0% | 1.1% | -45% | |
Agnelli et al[69], 2012 | Pancreas | 128/126 | 10.9% | 2.4% | -78% | |
Stomach | 207/204 | 1.9% | 0.5% | -75% | ||
FRAGEM | Pancreas | 60/63 | 23% | 3.4% | -85% | |
Maraveyas et al[70], 2012 | ||||||
CONKO 004 | Pancreas | 152/160 | 9.9% | 1.3% | -87% | |
Pelzer et al[71], 2015 |
Khorana score criteria[73] | Score |
Primary cancer | |
With very high risk (pancreas, stomach) (high grade glioma1) | 2 |
With high risk (lung, lymphoma, gynecologic, bladder, testicular) | 1 |
Platelet count prior to chemotherapy > 350000/μL | 1 |
Hb < 10 g/dL or ESA-application | 1 |
Leukocyte count prior to chemotherapy > 11000/μL | 1 |
Body mass index > 35 kg/m² | 1 |
High risk | > 3 |
Vienna prediction score (additional parameters to Khorana score)[75] | |
D-dimer > 1.44 μg/mL | 1 |
Soluble P-selectin > 153.1 μg/mL | 1 |
High risk | > 4 |
Protecht prediction score (additional parameters to Khorana score)[76] | |
Cisplatin or carboplatin | 1 |
Gemcitabine | 1 |
High risk | > 3 |
CLOT | CATCH | VKA | Dalteparin | P | VKA | Tinzaparin | P | |
Study-population characteristics | ||||||||
n | 676 | 900 | ||||||
Women | 52% | 59% | ||||||
Median age (yr) | 63 | 59 | ||||||
ECOG 0-1 | 63% | 77% | ||||||
Metastasized cancer | 67% | 55% | ||||||
Brest cancer | 17.6% | 9% | ||||||
Colo-rectal cancer | 17.8% | 13% | ||||||
Lung cancer | 14.8% | 12% | ||||||
Gynecological cancer | 11.2% | 23% | ||||||
Pancreatic cancer | 4.8% | |||||||
Urogenital cancers | 14.2% | |||||||
Brain cancers | 5.5% | |||||||
Hematological cancers | 10% | 10% | ||||||
Study outcomes | ||||||||
VTE | 15.8% | 8.0% | 0.002 | 10.0% | 6.9% | 0.07 | ||
DVT | 11.0% | 4.2% | 5.3 | 2.7 | 0.04 | |||
Fatal PE | 2.1% | 1.7% | 3.8% | 3.8% | ||||
Non-fatel PE | 2.7% | 2.7% | 0.7% | 0.4% | ||||
Major bleeding | 4% | 6% | 0.25 | 2.7% | 2.9% | |||
CRNM-bleeding | 16% | 11% | 0.03 | |||||
Any bleeding | 19% | 14% | 0.09 | |||||
6-mo mortality | 41% | 39% | 41% | 40% | ||||
INR < 2 | 30% | 26% | ||||||
INR 2-3 | 46% | 47% |
Table 6 Take home messages
Patients with gastrointestinal cancers are among those with the highest cancer-associated VTE risk (e.g., pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer) |
Primary prevention of VTE should be considered according to an individual risk-benefit estimation |
Scoring systems help to identify patients at high VTE risk. These patients may benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation |
Usual prophylactic dosages of LMWH may not be effective enough in patients with the highest risk (e.g., pancreatic cancer) |
Gastrointestinal cancer patients with VTE should have medical anticoagulation therapy with LMWH for at least three to six months |
In patients with gastrointestinal cancers splanchnic vein thrombosis, portal hypertension, hepatopathy-associated coagulation defects (e.g., decreased prothrombin time) and thrombocytopenia may complicate anticoagulation strategies |
- Citation: Riess H, Habbel P, Jühling A, Sinn M, Pelzer U. Primary prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolic events in patients with gastrointestinal cancers - Review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(3): 258-270
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v8/i3/258.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.258