Copyright
        ©The Author(s) 2016.
    
    
        World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2016; 8(12): 826-834
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.826
Published online Dec 15, 2016. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.826
            Table 1 Articles summarizing the risk of neoplasia based on the histology of polyps seen at baseline colonoscopy
        
    | Ref. | Sample size | Median follow-up, yr | Predictor | Primary outcome | Absolute risk of outcome (%) | RR1 [95%CI] | 
| RCT | ||||||
| Laiyemo et al[11] | 1905 | 4 | Villous | ACN | 9 (7-11) vs 5 (4-6) | 2.3 [1.5-3.4] | 
| Bonithon-Kopp et al[9] | 552 | 3 | HGD | ACN | 9.8 vs 5.5 | 1.9 [1.0-3.6] | 
| Villous | 10.3 vs. 6.8 | 1.7 [0.8-3.7] | ||||
| Pooled analysis | ||||||
| Martínez et al[14] | 8 studies | 3.9 | HGD | ACN | 16.0 (13.2-18.7) vs 10.6 (9.8-11.3) | 1.1 [0.8-1.4] | 
| 9167 | Villous | 16.8 (15.1-18.5) vs 9.7 (9.0-10.4) | 1.3 [1.1-1.5] | |||
| Meta-analysis | ||||||
| Saini et al[10] | 5 studies | 3 | HGD | ACN | 4% risk difference (0-8) | 1.8 [1.1-3.2] | 
| Villous | 2% risk difference (-1 to 4) | 1.3 [1.0-1.7] | ||||
| Prospective | ||||||
| Bertario et al[15] | 1086 | 10.5 | HGD | CRC | 2.8 SIR (0.3-10.2) vs 0.52 | Not available | 
| Tubulovillous Villous | Any adenoma | Not available | 1.3 [1.0-1.6] | |||
| 1.8 [1.2-2.6] | ||||||
| 2Lieberman et al[12] | 1193 | 5.5 | No adenomas | ACN | 2.4 | Ref | 
| HGD | 17 | 6.8 [2.6-18.1] | ||||
| Villous | 16 | 6.1 [2.5-14.7] | ||||
| Chung et al[8] | 3808 | 4.5 | Villous | ACN | Not available | 1.5 [0.7- 3.0] | 
| Registry | ||||||
| Van Heijningen et al[13] | 2990 | 2 | HGD | AA | 13 | 1.2 [0.8-1.8] | 
| Villous | 8 | 2.0 [1.2-3.2] | ||||
| HGD | ACN | 11 | Not available | |||
| Villous | 17 | |||||
            Table 2 Articles summarizing the risk of future colonic neoplasia based on the size of polyps seen at baseline colonoscopy
        
    | Ref. | Sample size | Median follow-up, yr | Predictor | Primary outcome | Absolute risk of outcome (%) | RR [95%CI] | 
| RCT | ||||||
| Laiyemo et al[11] | 1905 | 4 | ≥ 10 mm | ACN | 9 (7-11) vs 5 (4-6) | 0.9 [0.6-1.4] | 
| Bonithon-Kopp et al[9] | 552 | 3 | ≥ 10 mm | ACN | 7.1 vs 7.8 | 1.1 [0.5-2.1] | 
| Pooled analysis | ||||||
| Martínez et al[14] | 8 studies | 3.9 | < 5 mm | ACN | 8.7 (7.7-9.7) | Ref | 
| 9167 | 10-19 mm | 15.9 (14.5-17.4) | 2.3 [1.8-2.8] | |||
| ≥ 20 mm | 19.3 (16.4-22.3) | 3.0 [2.2-4.0] | ||||
| Meta-analysis | ||||||
| Saini I et al[10] | 5 studies | 3 | ≥ 10 mm | ACN | 2% risk difference (-2 to 6) | 1.4 [0.9-2.3] | 
| Prospective | ||||||
| Bertario et al[15] | 1086 | 10.5 | ≥ 20 mm | Any adenoma | Not available | 1.5 [1.1-2.1] | 
| CRC | SIR | Not available | ||||
| Baseline | 0.52 [0.3-0.9] | |||||
| < 10 mm | 0.33 [0.1-0.9] | |||||
| ≥ 10 mm | 0.82 [0.3-1.8] | |||||
| Lieberman et al[12] | 1193 | 5.5 | ≥ 10 mm | ACN | 15.5 vs 2.4 | 6.4 [2.7-14.9] | 
| Chung et al[8] | 3808 | 4.5 | ≥ 10 mm | ACN | Not available | 3.0 [1.8-5.1] | 
| Registry | ||||||
| Van Heijningen et al[13] | 2990 | 2 | ≥ 10 mm | AA | 8 vs 4 | 1.7 [1.2-2.3] | 
            Table 3 Articles summarizing the risk of colonic neoplasia based on the number of polyps seen at baseline colonoscopy
        
    | Ref. | Sample size | Median follow-up, yr | Predictor | Primary outcome | Absolute risk of outcome (%) | RR [95%CI] | 
| RCT | ||||||
| Laiyemo et al[11] | 1905 | 4 | ≥ 3 adenomas | ACN | 10 (7-14) vs 6 (5-7) | 1.5 [1.0-2.2] | 
| Bonithon-Kopp et al[9] | 552 | 3 | ≥ 3 adenomas | ACN | 18.1 vs 5.0 | 2.7 [1.2-6.4] | 
| Meta-analysis | ||||||
| Saini I et al[10] | 5 studies | 3 | ≥ 3 adenomas | ACN | 5% risk difference (1-10) | 2.5 [1.1-6.0] | 
| Prospective | ||||||
| 1Lieberman et al[12] | 1193 | 5.5 | 1-2 | ACN | 4.6 | 1.9 [0.8-4.4] | 
| ≥ 3 | 11.9 | 5.0 [2.1-12.0] | ||||
| Chung et al[8] | 3808 | 4.5 | ≥ 3 adenomas | ACN | Not available | 3.1 [1.5-6.6] | 
| Registry | ||||||
| Van Heijningen et al[13] | 2990 | 2 | 1 | AA | 4 | Ref | 
| 2 | 7 | 1.6 [1.1-2.4] | ||||
| 3 | 8 | 2.1 [1.3-3.4] | ||||
| 4 | 12 | 2.0 [0.9-4.6] | ||||
| ≥ 5 | 18 | 3.3 [1.7-6.6] | ||||
| Ng et al[18] | 4989 | 2 | AA | Not available | Adjusted OR | |
| 1 | 3.6 [2.6-5.0] | |||||
| 2 | 7.1 [4.9-10.4] | |||||
| 3 | 13.7 [0.9-4] | |||||
            Table 4 Risk of concurrent and future advanced adenomas and colon cancer based on serrated polyps
        
    | Ref. | Sample size | Median follow-up, yr | Predictor | Primary outcome | Absolute risk | Risk [95%CI] | 
| RCT | ||||||
| Holme et al[20] | 100210 | 10.9 | ≥ 10 mm serrated polyp | Future CRC | 3.4 vs 1.4 cases/1000 patient years | HR 3.3 [1.3-8.6] | 
| Registry | ||||||
| Álvarez et al[17] | 5059 | None | Proximal l ≥ 10 mm | ACN | Not available | 4.2 [1.7-10.2] | 
| Distal l ≥ 10 mm | 2.6 [1.5-4.6] | |||||
| Proximal HP | 1.6 [1.3-2.3] | |||||
| Hiraoka et al[16] | 10199 | None | ≥ 10 mm serrated polyps | ACN | 4.0 [2.8-5.7] | |
| CRC | Not available | 3.3 [2.2-5.0] | ||||
| Proximal CRC | 4.8 [2.5-8.4] | |||||
| Hazewinkel et al[19] | 1426 | None | Proximal SP | ACN | Not available | 2.4 [1.6-3.8] | 
| Proximal HP | 2.0 [1.1-3.4] | |||||
| Prox SSA/P | 3.0 [1.5-6.2] | |||||
| ≥ 10 SP | 4.0 [1.9-8.6] | |||||
| ≥ 10 mm HP | 3.2 [1.1-9.1] | |||||
| ≥ 10 mm SSA/P | 5.0 [1.7-14.9] | |||||
| Ng et al[18] | 4989 | None | SSA | ACN | Not available | 4.5 [2.4-8.5] | 
| Proximal SP | 2.2 [1.4-3.6] | |||||
| ≥ 10 mmSP | 59.3 [18.9-186.2] | |||||
| ≥ 3 SP | 4.9 [1.2-19.2] | |||||
| ≥ 3 non-advanced adenomas | 3.6 [2.6-5.0] | |||||
| Schreiner et al[21] | 3121 | None | Proximal SP | AA | 17.3 vs 10.0 | 1.9 [1.3-2.7] | 
| ≥ 1 cm SP | 27.3 vs 10.3 | 3.4 [1.7-6.7] | ||||
| 1371 | 5.5 | Proximal SP | Future | |||
| without adenomas | AA | 5.1 vs 2.7 | 3.1 [1.6-6.2] | |||
| Proximal SP | 7.9 vs 6.3 | 1.2 [0.5-3.8] | ||||
| with nonadvanced adenoma | 28.9 vs 14.7 | 2.3 [1.0-5.0] | ||||
| Proximal SP | ||||||
| with advanced adenoma | ||||||
| Organization and yearof guidelines | Recommendations for surveillance of adenomas | |
| Baseline finding | Timing of next exam, yr | |
| USMSTF on CRC[5], 2012 | 1-2 small adenomas | 5-10 | 
| Adenoma with villous histology | 3 | |
| Adenoma with high grade dysplasia | 3 | |
| Adenoma ≥ 10 mm | 3 | |
| 3-10 adenomas | 3 | |
| Serrated polyps: | ||
| < 10 mm no dysplasia | 5 | |
| ≥ 10 mm | 3 | |
| Dysplasia | 3 | |
| Traditional serrated adenoma | 3 | |
| British Society of Gastroenterology[28], 2010 | 1-2 small adenomas | 5-10 | 
| 3-4 small adenomas | 3 | |
| Adenoma ≥ 10 mm | 3 | |
| ≥ 5 small adenomas | 1 | |
| ≥ 3 at least one ≥ 10 mm | 1 | |
| European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy[27], 2010 | High risk adenomas: | 3 | 
| Adenoma ≥ 10 mm | ||
| Adenomas with high grade dysplasia | ||
| Villous component | ||
| ≥ 3 adenomas | ||
| Serrated polyp ≥ 10 mm | ||
| Serrated polyps with dysplasia | ||
| Not high risk adenomas | 10 | |
- Citation: Calderwood AH, Lasser KE, Roy HK. Colon adenoma features and their impact on risk of future advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8(12): 826-834
 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v8/i12/826.htm
 - DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i12.826
 
