Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2015; 7(10): 241-249
Published online Oct 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i10.241
Published online Oct 15, 2015. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v7.i10.241
NCCN | AHPBA/SSAT/SSO | MD Anderson | Intergroup (Alliance) | |
Celiac artery | No abutment for pancreatic head cancer. For body/tail, ≤ 180° contact | No abutment or encasement | Abutment | Tumor-vessel interface < 180° of vessel wall circumference |
CHA | Solid tumor contact ≤ 180° allowing for reconstruction | Abutment or short segment encasement | Abutment or short-segment encasement | Reconstructable short-segment interface of any degree |
SMA | Solid tumor contact ≤ 180° | Abutment | Abutment | Tumor-vessel wall interface < 180° of vessel wall circumference |
SMV/PV | Solid tumor contact > 180° or contact of ≤ 180° with contour irregularity or thrombosis allowing for safe reconstruction | Occlusion | Occlusion | Tumor-vessel interface ≥ 180° of vessel wall circumference and/or reconstructible occlusion |
Ref. | Study type | n | Regimen | Resection | R0 resection | Median OS(resected patients) | Median OS(all patients) | Definition |
Katz et al[40] | Retrospective | 84 | 5-FU, paclitaxel, gemcitabine or capecitabine + RT; Gemcitabine based chemotherapy | 38% | 97% | 40 mo | 21 | MDA |
Turrini et al[70] | Retrospective | 49 | 5-FU/cis + RT 45 Gy for 5 wk | 18% | 100% | 24 mo | 14 mo | MDA |
Chun et al[71] | Retrospective | 74 | 5-FU or gem + RT | 100% | 59% | 23 | 23 | Other |
Stokes et al[41] | Retrospective | 40 | Capecitabine + RT | 46% | 75% | 23 | 12 | MDA |
Katz et al[37] | Retrospective | 115 | Gem followed by gem or 5-FU or capecitabine + RT; Gem or 5-FU or capecitabine + RT | 70% | 95% | 33 | 22 | NCCN |
Mellon et al[45] | Retrospective | 110 | GTX X 3 cycles followed by SBRT | 51% | 96% | 19 | 34 | NCCN |
Landry et al[39] | Randomized phase II | 21 | Gem + RT; Gem/cis/5-FU followed by 5-FU/RT | 24% | 100% | 26 | 19.4 mo; 13.4 mo | Other |
Lee et al[44] | Prospective trial | 18 | Gem/capecitabine X 3-6 cycles | 61% | 82% | 23 | 16 | NCCN |
Kim et al[42] | Phase II study | 39 | Gem/Ox + RT | 63% | 84% | 25 | 18 | NCCN |
Motoi et al[43] | Phase II study | 16 | Gem/S1 X 2 cycles | NA | 87% | NA | 18 | MDA |
Takahashi et al[46] | Prospective | 80 | Gem + RT followed by Gem | 54% | 98% | NA | NA | Other |
- Citation: Mahipal A, Frakes J, Hoffe S, Kim R. Management of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 7(10): 241-249
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v7/i10/241.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v7.i10.241