Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2013; 5(7): 159-170
Published online Jul 15, 2013. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.159
Table 1 Observed survival of a series of 29 patients with resected hilar cholangiocarcinoma
Period (yr)Observed survival (95%CI)
168.4 (51.3-85.5)
239.6 (21.5-57.7)
335.6 (17.7-53.5)
431.2 (13.5-48.9)
522.3 (6.2-38.4)
Table 2 Histological types of 29 cases of perihilar bile duct carcinomas n (%)
Histology
Adenocarcinoma, biliary type24 (82.8)
Without IPNB20 (69)
Well or moderately differentiated18
Poorly differentiated with signet ring cells2
With IPNB4
Well or moderately differentiated3
Poorly differentiated with signet ring cells1
IPNB high grade (papillary carcinoma)5 (17.2)
Without invasive carcinoma1 (3.4)
With invasive carcinoma, biliary type4 (13.8)
Well-moderately differentiated3
Poorly differentiated with signet ring cells1
Adenocarcinoma, gastric foveolar type2 (13.8)
Adenocarcinoma, clear cell type1 (3.4)
Adenosquamous carcinoma1 (3.4)
Total number of cases29
Table 3 Other histological features in 29 cases of perihilar bile duct carcinomas n (%)
Gross type
Sclerosing10 (34.5)
Nodular8 (27.6)
Nodular-sclerosing6 (20.7)
Papillary2 (6.9)
Papillary-nodular2 (6.9)
Papillary-sclerosing1 (3.4)
BilIN
BilIN-1 and/or 210 (34.5)
BilIN-19 (31)
BilIN-25 (17.2)
BilIN-3 (in situ carcinoma)6 (20.7)
Lymphatic invasion (L1)9 (31)
Venous invasion (V1)11 (37.9)
Perineural invasion23 (79.3)
T-staging (according to AJCC/UICC (7th ed)
pTis1 (3.4)
pT11 (3.4)
pT2a10 (34.5)
pT2b12 (41.4)
pT35 (17.2)
Lymph node status:
Positive7 (24.1)
Negative16 (55.2)
No lymph nodes histologically studied6 (20.7)
Margin status
Negative (R0)12 (41.4)
Positive (R1) (invasive carcinoma)17 (58.6)
Bile duct margin10 (34.5)
Radial margin11 (37.9)