Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2013; 5(7): 147-158
Published online Jul 15, 2013. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.147
Published online Jul 15, 2013. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.147
Table 1 Staging of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (Green FL 2002)
Tumor, nodes and metastases definitions |
Primary tumor |
Tis Carcinoma in situ |
T1 Tumor confined to the bile duct histologically |
T2 Tumor invades beyond the wall of the bile duct |
T3 Tumor invades the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, and/or ipsilateral branches of the portal vein or hepatic artery |
T4 Tumor invades any of the following: main portal vein or its branches bilaterally, common hepatic artery, or other adjacent structures, such as the colon, stomach, duodenum, or abdominal wall. |
Regional lymph nodes |
N0 No regional lymph node metastasis |
N1 Regional lymph node metastases |
Metastasis |
M0 No distant metastasis |
M1 Distant metastasis |
Stage grouping |
Stage 0 Tis, N0, M0 |
Stage IA T1, N0, M0 |
Stage IB T2, N0, M0 |
Stage IIA T3, N0, M0 |
Stage IIB T1, N1, M0 T2, N1, M0 T3, N1, M0 |
Stage III T4, any N, M0 |
Stage IV Any T, any N, M1 |
Table 2 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre stage
Stage | Hilar involvement | Portal vein | Lobar atrophy |
T1 | Biliary confluence ± 1/2 unilateral extension to second-order biliary radicles | No | No |
T2 | Biliary confluence ± unilateral extension to second-order biliary radicles | + Ipsilateral | + Ipsilateral |
Biliary confluence + bilateral extension to second-order biliary radicles | Yes/No | Yes/No | |
Biliary confluence + unilateral extension to second-order biliary radicles | + Contralateral | Yes/No | |
T3 | Biliary confluence + unilateral extension to second-order biliary radicles with contralateral hepatic lobar atrophy; | Yes/No | + Contralateral |
Biliary confluence + unilateral/bilateral | Bilateral | Yes/No |
Table 3 Prognostic factors and 5-year survival rate
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | No. of patients | Prognostic factors | Operative mortality(%) | 5-yr SV (%) |
Jarnagin et al[14] | 80 | Margin, hepatectomy, differentiation | 10 | 27 |
Seyama et al[20] | 58 | Lymph nodes | 0 | 40 |
Dinant et al[27] | 99 | Margin, resection period, lymph nodes | 15 | 27 |
DeOliveira et al[43] | 281 | Margin, lymph nodes | 5 | 10 |
Rea et al[45] | 46 | Lymph nodes, tumor grade, bilirubin | 9 | 26 |
Silva et al[46] | 45 | Tumor stage, margin | 9 | 11 |
Witzigmann et al[47] | 60 | Residual tumor status, grading | 8 | 22 |
Baton et al[48] | 59 | Chemotherapy, margin, lymph nodes | 5 | 20 |
Wahab et al[55] | 243 | Margin, S1 resection, lymph nodes, grading | 7 | 16 |
de Jong et al[90] | 305 | Lymph nodes, margin | 5 | 20 |
Table 4 Morbidity and mortality rate and R0 resections
Ref. | Resections | R0(%) | Morbidity | Mortality | 5-yr Survival rate |
Burke et al[3] | 30 | 83 | NA | 6 | 45 |
Nakeeb et al[4] | 109 | 26 | 47 | 4 | 11 |
Jarnagin et al[14] | 80 | 78 | 64 | 10 | 26 |
Nimura et al[15] | 55 | 84 | 41 | 6 | 41 |
Jarnagin et al[17] | 106 | 77 | 62 | 8 | NA |
Seyama et al[20] | 87 | 64 | 43 | 0 | 40 |
Kosuge et al[23] | 65 | 52 | 37 | 9 | 33 |
Neuhaus et al[24] | 80 | 61 | 55 | 8 | 22 |
Launois et al[25] | 131 | NA | NA | 19 | NA |
Kondo et al[26] | 40 | 95 | 48 | 0 | NA |
Dinant et al[27] | 99 | 31 | 66 | 15 | 27 |
Gerhards et al[29] | 112 | 14 | 65 | 18 | NA |
Hemming et al[32] | 53 | 80 | 40 | 9 | 35 |
IJitsma et al[33] | 42 | 65 | 76 | 12 | 19 |
Kawarada et al[34] | 65 | 64 | 28 | 2.3 | 26 |
Klempnauer et al[35] | 151 | 77 | NA | 10 | 28 |
Miyazaki et al[37] | 76 | 71 | 33 | 13 | 26 |
Nimura et al[38] | 142 | 61 | 49 | 9 | 26 |
Su et al[39] | 49 | 49 | 47 | 10 | 15 |
Todoroki et al[41] | 101 | 14 | 14 | 4 | 28 |
DeOliveira et al[43] | 281 | 62 | 60 | 5 | 30 |
Nagino et al[44] | 574 | 76.5 | 43.1 | 4.7 | 32.5 |
Rea et al[45] | 46 | 80 | 52 | 9 | 26 |
Nuzzo et al[74] | 440 | 77.3 | 47.5 | 8.6 | 25.5 |
Ito et al[85] | 38 | 63 | 32 | 0 | 33 |
Kawasaki et al | 79 | 68 | 14 | 1.3 | 22 |
- Citation: Serrablo A, Tejedor L. Outcome of surgical resection in Klatskin tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2013; 5(7): 147-158
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v5/i7/147.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.147