Review
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2013; 5(4): 71-80
Published online Apr 15, 2013. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i4.71
Table 1 Radiofrequency ablation systems commercially available in the United States[4,8]
RFA systemElectrodesGenerator power/frequencyControl systemAlgorithm used to maximize volumes
Boston scientific14 gauge, 10-12 tines, umbrella shaped200 W/460 kHzImpedance controlledCoaxial system
Valleylab (radionics)17.5 gauge, single cooled needle or three cooled needles in triangular cluster200 W/480 kHzImpedance controlledCool-tip
RITA medical systems250 W/460 kHzTemperature controlled
Starburst XL14 gauge, 9 tines, Christmas tree shape max diameter 5 cmExpandable
Starburst XLi14 gauge, 9 tines, max diameter 7 cm
Starburst Flex13 gauge, flexibleExpandable, wet electrode
Berchtold18-14 gauge60 W/375 kHzImpedance or temperature controlledWet electrode
Table 2 Studies reporting survival after use of radiofrequency ablation for colorectal liver metastases
Ref.Patients (tumors) nMedian tumor size (cm)Extrahepatic diseaseChemotherapyMethod% complete ablationLocal recurrenceOverall survival
1 yr3 yr5 yr
Abdalla et al[26]57 (110) for RFA2.5NoNR0NR9% for RFANR37% for RFA43% for HR + RFANR
190 for HR5% for HR + RFA73% for HR
101 for RFA + HR2% for HR
Siperstein et al[27]234 (665)3.9 (mean)Yes80% before RFALNRNRNR20%218%2
Park et al[28]30 for RFA2.0 for RFANo73% after RFAPNR23% for RFANRNR19%2 for RF1
59 for HR3.1 for HR81% after HR2% for HR48%2 for HR
Abitabile et al[54]47 (147)2YesAfter RFAO, P97%9% for overall88%157%121%1
0%-5% for < 3 cm
Gillams et al[55]167 (167)3.9 (mean)Yes80% before RFAPNR14.00%99%158%130%1
91%228%225%2
Jakobs et al[56]68 (183)2.28 (mean)No78% parallel or afterPNR18.00%96%271%2
Machi et al[57]100 (507)3.0 (mean)NRO, L, P7%90%42%31%
Schindera et al[58]14 (20)1.8NoNRP89%15%72%260%2NR
White et al[59]30 (56)3.0 (0.8-7)No36% before, 50% afterP89%17%75%245%2NR
Solbiati et al[60]117 (179)2.6Yes72% parallelP98%39%93%246%2NR
Table 3 Studies involving survival using radiofrequency ablation for primary lung tumors and metastases
Ref.Patients (tumors) nMean tumor size (cm)Tumor typeMedian local progression free intervalOverall survival
Complications
1 yr2 yr3 yr
Ambrogi et al[1]54 (64)2.440 for NSCLC< 3 cm - 15.8 mo72% for NSCLC146% for NSCLC130% for NSCLC16 for PTX
24 for Mets> 3 cm - 6.6 mo88% for Met172% for Mets1NR for Mets11 for chest wall hematoma
Kim et al[30]8 for RFA3.66 for RFAAll stage I NSCLCNR88% for RFA50% for RFA25% for RFA1 for PTX
14 for SR3.99 for SR93% for SR77% for SR67% for SR4 for hemoptysis
Simon et al[35]153 (189)2.775 for stage I NSCLC< 3 cm - 45 mo78% for NSCLC57% for NSCLC136% for NSCLC118 for PTX
57 for Mets> 3 cm - 12 mo70% for Met54% for Mets144% for Mets15 for hemoptysis
4 for death
Chua et al[37]1484108 for CRCM11 moNRNR60%66 for PTX
Other16 for pleural effusion
40 for Mets1 for vleeding
Lencioni et al[61]106 (183)3.533 for NSCLCNR70% for NSCLC48% for NSCLC27 for PTX
73 for Mets89% for CRCM66% for CRCM4 for effusion
92% for Other64% for Other
Yan et al[62]552.1All CRCMNR85%64%46%16 for PTX/9 requiring drainage
5 for hemoptysis
Hiraki et al[63]202.4All stage I NSCLC9 mo90%84%74%13 for PTX/1 requiring drainage
Table 4 Studies involving survival using radiofrequency ablation for primary lung tumors and metastases
Ref.PatientsRange tumor size (cm)Mean tumor size (cm)Complete coagulation necrosis n (%)ResectionAssessment of cell viabilityComplications
Burak et al[38]100.8-1.61.29 (90)DelayedHE CK8/18None
Singletary et al[40]29 ≤ 2.0-25 (86)ImmediateHE NADH-diaphorase1 skin burn
Oura et al[41]520.5-2.01.352 (100)DelayedNR1 skin burn
Khatri et al[64]150.8-1.51.2813 (93)ImmediateHE NADH-diaphorase2 skin puckering
Noguchi et al[65]100.5-2.01.110 (100)ImmediateHE NADH-diaphoraseNone
Fornage et al[66]200.6-2.01.221 (100)ImmediateHE NADH-diaphoraseNone
Hayashi et al[67]220.5-2.60.9 (median)19 (86)DelayedHE NADH-diaphorase1 skin burn
Izzo et al[68]260.7-3.01.825 (96)ImmediateHE NADH-diaphorase1 skin burn
Table 5 Studies involving survival after radiofrequency ablation for solid renal tumors
Ref.Patients (tumors) nMethodMean tumor size (cm)RCCComplete first ablationRecurrence free survivalOverall survival (yr)
Cancer specific survival (yr)
Complications
13535
Tracy et al[69]208 (243)P, L, O2.479%97%90% at 3 yr299%193%185%95% for RCC99% for RCCNR
Levinson et al[70]31 (34)P, L2.158%91%80% at 5 yr2NRNR63% for all358% for RCC4NR100% for all 100% for RCC4 for perinephric hematoma ; 1 for liver burn; 1 for death from pneumonia
Zagoria et al[71]41 (48)P2.6100%NR88% at 5 yrNRNR66%NRNR2 for pneumothorax no drainage; 2 for ureteral strictures
Stern et al[72]40P, L2.481%97%91% at 3 yr2NRNRNR100% for RCCNR2 for minor; 3 for major