Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jun 15, 2026; 18(6): 117694
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117694
Published online Jun 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117694
Table 1 Clinical and magnetic resonance image characteristics of non-sarcopenic and sarcopenic patients evaluated before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, n (%)/median (interquartile range)
| Characteristics | Total (n = 133) | Non-sarcopenia (n = 98) | Sarcopenia (n = 35) | P value |
| Age (years) | 56 (50, 64) | 57 (50, 64) | 56 (49, 66) | 0.829 |
| Maximum diameter of the tumor (mm) | 37 (33, 45) | 36 (33, 44) | 40 (33.5, 46.5) | 0.357 |
| Length (mm) | 56 (44, 68) | 56 (44, 67.8) | 57 (45, 69) | 0.424 |
| Short diameter of the largest lymph node (mm) | 7 (5, 10) | 7 (5, 10) | 8 (5, 13) | 0.718 |
| Maximum diameter perpendicular to the intestinal wall on T2WI (mm2) | 20 (15, 24) | 20 (15, 24) | 21 (15.5, 24.5) | 0.272 |
| Maximum cross-sectional area of the tumor on T2WI (mm2) | 1064 (756, 1462) | 962 (759, 1379) | 1258 (789, 1720) | 0.118 |
| Distance of the tumor from the anal verge (mm) | 51 (37, 72) | 51.5 (36.2, 70.8) | 50 (38.5, 73.5) | 0.675 |
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | 3.77 (1.91, 13.05) | 3.39 (1.78, 10.3) | 5.05 (2.68, 20.2) | 0.094 |
| Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 | 12.23 (5.98, 27.80) | 12.6 (6.46, 25.8) | 9.92 (3.56, 32.5) | 0.565 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.87 (21.22, 25.10) | 22.9 (21.3, 25.3) | 22.9 (21.1, 24.1) | 0.823 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 93 (69.92) | 60 (61.22) | 33 (94.29) | < 0.01 |
| Female | 40 (30.08) | 38 (38.78) | 2 (5.71) | |
| Circle | ||||
| 2 | 10 (7.52) | 10 (10.20) | 0 (0.00) | 0.019 |
| 3 | 37 (27.82) | 31 (31.63) | 6 (17.14) | |
| 4 | 86 (64.66) | 57 (58.16) | 29 (82.86) | |
| Signal | ||||
| 1 | 55 (41.35) | 37 (37.76) | 18 (51.43) | 0.226 |
| 2 | 78 (58.65) | 61 (62.24) | 17 (48.57) | |
| Spiculation | ||||
| 0 | 61 (45.86) | 43 (43.88) | 18 (51.43) | 0.567 |
| 1 | 72 (54.14) | 55 (56.12) | 17 (48.57) | |
| Node | ||||
| 0 | 94 (70.68) | 72 (73.47) | 22 (62.86) | 0.333 |
| 1 | 39 (29.32) | 26 (26.53) | 13 (37.14) | |
| Stratification | ||||
| 0 | 50 (37.59) | 35 (35.71) | 15 (42.86) | 0.585 |
| 1 | 83 (62.41) | 63 (64.29) | 20 (57.14) | |
| MRF status | ||||
| 0 | 63 (47.37) | 51 (52.04) | 12 (34.29) | 0.108 |
| 1 | 70 (52.63) | 47 (47.96) | 23 (65.71) | |
| Extramural vascular invasion status | ||||
| 0 | 55 (41.35) | 39 (39.80) | 16 (45.71) | 0.682 |
| 1 | 78 (58.65) | 59 (60.20) | 19 (54.29) | |
| ExtraMRF | ||||
| 0 | 86 (64.66) | 65 (66.33) | 21 (60.00) | 0.641 |
| 1 | 47 (35.34) | 33 (33.67) | 14 (40.00) | |
| Clinical T stage | ||||
| 2 | 2 (1.50) | 2 (2.04) | 0 (0.00) | 0.696 |
| 3 | 60 (45.11) | 44 (44.90) | 16 (45.71) | |
| 4 | 71 (53.38) | 52 (53.06) | 19 (54.29) | |
| Clinical N stage | ||||
| 0 | 29 (21.80) | 22 (22.45) | 7 (20.00) | 0.971 |
| 1 | 51 (38.35) | 38 (38.78) | 13 (37.14) | |
| 2 | 50 (37.59) | 36 (36.73) | 14 (40.00) | |
| 3 | 3 (2.26) | 2 (2.04) | 1 (2.86) | |
Table 2 Univariate analysis of sarcopenia for tumor regression grades, T downstaging, and overall survival
| Prognostic indicators | Odds ratio | 95%CI | P value |
| Tumor regression grade | 2.328 | 0.9948-2.960 | 0.062 |
| dT | 1.035 | 0.425-2.716 | 0.941 |
| Overall survival | 1.269 | 0.577-2.790 | 0.554 |
Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic variables for tumor regression grades
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Age | 0.987 | 0.955-1.018 | 0.402 | |||
| Maximum diameter of the tumor | 1.018 | 0.986-1.053 | 0.282 | |||
| Length | 1.033 | 1.011-1.056 | 0.004 | 1.029 | 0.075-0.900 | 0.012 |
| Short diameter of the largest lymph node | 1.069 | 0.990-1.166 | 0.108 | |||
| Maximum diameter perpendicular to the intestinal wall on T2WI | 0.995 | 0.951-1.042 | 0.824 | |||
| Maximum cross-sectional area of the tumor on T2WI | 1.000 | 0.999-1.001 | 0.224 | |||
| Distance of the tumor from the anal verge | 1.011 | 0.998-1.026 | 0.118 | |||
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | 1.000 | 1.000-1.003 | 0.862 | |||
| Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 | 1.000 | 0.999-1.002 | 0.616 | |||
| Body mass index | 1.044 | 0.919-1.188 | 0.511 | |||
| Sex | 0.676 | 0.316-1.458 | 0.314 | |||
| Circle | 0.877 | 0.485-1.537 | 0.652 | |||
| Signal | 1.524 | 0.743-3.131 | 0.249 | |||
| Spiculation | 0.998 | 0.488-2.031 | 0.996 | |||
| Node | 1.968 | 0.880-4.679 | 0.109 | |||
| Stratification | 0.560 | 0.258-1.179 | 0.134 | |||
| MRF status | 2.289 | 1.119-4.777 | 0.025 | 1.853 | 0.873-3.970 | 0.109 |
| Extramural vascular invasion status | 1.333 | 0.650-2.734 | 0.431 | |||
| ExtraMRF | 1.328 | 0.632-2.864 | 0.459 | |||
| Clinical T stage | 1.400 | 0.718-2.748 | 0.323 | |||
| Clinical N stage | 1.209 | 0.777-1.893 | 0.400 | |||
| Sarcopenia | 2.328 | 0.994-2.960 | 0.062 | |||
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic variables for T downstaging
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Age | 1.011 | 0.975-1.047 | 0.553 | |||
| Maximum diameter of the tumor | 0.986 | 0.953-1.021 | 0.417 | |||
| Length | 0.990 | 0.970-1.011 | 0.333 | |||
| Short diameter of the largest lymph node | 0.947 | 0.876-1.023 | 0.158 | |||
| Maximum diameter perpendicular to the intestinal wall on T2WI | 1.034 | 0.980-1.099 | 0.252 | |||
| Maximum cross-sectional area of the tumor on T2WI | 1.000 | 0.999-1.000 | 0.27 | |||
| Distance of the tumor from the anal verge | 0.994 | 0.982-1.006 | 0.289 | |||
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | 0.998 | 0.994-1.001 | 0.245 | |||
| Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 | 1.000 | 1.000-1.001 | 0.828 | |||
| Body mass index | 1.077 | 0.931-1.249 | 0.32 | |||
| Sex | 2.083 | 0.822-6.036 | 0.143 | |||
| Circle | 1.451 | 0.778-2.653 | 0.229 | |||
| Signal | 0.603 | 0.250-1.382 | 0.243 | |||
| Spiculation | 1.141 | 0.507-2.562 | 0.748 | |||
| Node | 1.019 | 0.430-2.565 | 0.968 | |||
| Stratification | 1.269 | 0.551-2.870 | 0.569 | |||
| MRF status | 4.456 | 1.881-11.532 | 0.001 | 3.409 | 1.038-12.369 | 0.049 |
| Extramural vascular invasion status | 1.225 | 0.539-2.756 | 0.623 | |||
| ExtraMRF | 1.451 | 0.621-3.621 | 0.403 | |||
| Clinical T stage | 4.928 | 2.170-12.340 | 0.000 | 1.705 | 0.461-6.369 | 0.421 |
| Clinical N stage | 0.782 | 0.464-1.295 | 0.345 | |||
| Sarcopenia | 1.035 | 0.425-2.716 | 0.941 | |||
Table 5 Univariate analysis of prognostic variables for overall survival
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
| Age | 1.019 | 0.983-1.056 | 0.312 | |||
| Maximum diameter of the tumor | 1.015 | 0.983-1.049 | 0.365 | |||
| Length | 1.009 | 0.991-1.028 | 0.317 | |||
| Short diameter of the largest lymph node | 1.013 | 0.950-1.081 | 0.696 | |||
| Maximum diameter perpendicular to the intestinal wall on T2WI | 0.997 | 0.952-1.044 | 0.89 | |||
| Maximum cross-sectional area of the tumor on T2WI | 1.000 | 0.999-1.000 | 0.952 | |||
| Distance of the tumor from the anal verge | 1.001 | 0.989-1.014 | 0.832 | |||
| Carcinoembryonic antigen | 0.999 | 0.993-1.004 | 0.566 | |||
| Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 | 1.000 | 0.998-1.002 | 0.938 | |||
| Body mass index | 0.990 | 0.877-1.117 | 0.871 | |||
| Sex | 0.697 | 0.297-1.632 | 0.406 | |||
| Circle | 1.120 | 0.632-1.989 | 0.696 | |||
| Signal | 2.046 | 0.931-4.499 | 0.075 | |||
| Spiculation | 1.008 | 0.480-2.114 | 0.984 | |||
| Node | 2.655 | 1.281-5.503 | 0.009 | 2.199 | 0.965-5.014 | 0.061 |
| Stratification | 0.918 | 0.425-1.983 | 0.828 | |||
| MRF status | 2.149 | 1.005-4.596 | 0.049 | 1.5013 | 0.636-3.543 | 0.354 |
| Extramural vascular invasion status | 1.955 | 0.900-4.245 | 0.090 | |||
| ExtraMRF | 1.936 | 0.931-4.029 | 0.077 | |||
| Clinical T stage | 1.797 | 0.865-3.734 | 0.116 | |||
| Clinical N stage | 1.592 | 0.993-2.552 | 0.053 | |||
| Sarcopenia | 1.269 | 0.577-2.790 | 0.554 | |||
- Citation: Nie TT, Li YX, Yang X, Liu T, Niu XH, Guo XF, Liu YL. Tumor-related imaging parameters predict response and survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(6): 117694
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v18/i6/117694.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v18.i6.117694