Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2025; 17(8): 109544
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.109544
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.109544
Table 1 Key input parameter for the model
Value (SD) | One way sensitivity analysis (%) | PSA distribution | Ref. | |
Survival (HR) | ||||
Scenario 1 | 0.69 (0.14) | +/- 25 | Lognormal | Iglesia et al[14] |
Scenario 2 | 0.57 (0.06) | +/- 25 | Lognormal | Roberts et al[27] |
Scenario 3 | 0.48 (0.20) | +/- 25 | Lognormal | Winny et al[23] |
Clinical efficacy | ||||
Scenario 1 | 0.53 (0.05) | +/- 25 | Beta | Iglesia et al[14] |
Scenario 2 | 0.58 (0.06) | +/- 25 | Beta | Seiler et al[28] |
Scenario 3 | 0.81 (0.08) | +/- 25 | Beta | Seiler et al[28] |
Utilities | ||||
Scenario 1 | 0.78 (0.13) | +/- 25 | Beta | Romanus et al[29] |
Scenario 2 | 0.78 (NR) | +/- 25 | Beta | Hagiwara et al[30] |
Scenario 3 | 0.79 (0.052) | +/- 25 | Beta | Laramée et al[31] |
Disutilities | ||||
Abdominal pain | -0.051 (NR) | +/- 25 | Beta | NICE 2017[33] |
Diarrhoea/decreased appetite/fatigue | -0.204 (NR) | +/- 25 | Beta | NICE 2017[33] |
Costs | ||||
PERT | ||||
Scenario 1 | 7.93 dollars/day (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Dominguez-Muñoz[35] |
Scenario 2 | 7.93 dollars/day (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Clinical expert survey (data on file) |
Scenario 3 | 3.10 dollars/day (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Clinical expert survey (data on file) |
Ongoing care | ||||
Scenario 1 | 4503.22 dollars/year (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Clinical expert survey (data on file) |
Scenario 2 | 4503.22 dollars/year (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Clinical expert survey (data on file) |
Scenario 3 | 2248 dollars/year (NA) | +/- 25 | Gamma | Clinical expert survey (data on file) |
Other inputs | ||||
Cycle length | 1 month | Not varied | Not varied | |
Discounting | 5% | Not varied | Not varied | |
Time horizon | ||||
Scenario 1 | 5 years | Not varied | Not varied | |
Scenario 2 | 10 years | Not varied | Not varied | |
Scenario 3 | 15 years | Not varied | Not varied |
Table 2 Results of the cost-effectiveness analyses
Scenario 1 (unresectable pancreatic cancer) | Scenario 2 (pancreatic cancer post-surgery) | Scenario 3 (chronic pancreatitis after endoscopic treatment) | ||||
PERT | No PERT | PERT | No PERT | PERT | No PERT | |
LYs | 1.33 | 0.94 | 4.41 | 3.12 | 9.79 | 8.76 |
QALYs | 0.94 | 0.49 | 3.22 | 1.64 | 7.65 | 4.72 |
Costs (dollar) | 4960 | 645 | 15677 | 1743 | 17846 | 2653 |
ICER (LY/dollar) | 10996 | 10763 | 14829 | |||
ICER (QALY/dollar) | 9533 | 8813 | 5178 |
- Citation: Kim H, Byrnes J, Jiang KR, Liao Z, Jones A, Kim K, Fragkogianni D, Roberts KJ. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(8): 109544
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i8/109544.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.109544