Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2025; 17(8): 107526
Published online Aug 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i8.107526
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupnGender (n)
Age (years)Body mass index (kg/m2)Number of liver metastases
Primary tumor location
Male
Female
Single
Multiple
Rectal cancer
Colon cancer
Control150747659.60 ± 2.1519.52 ± 0.7781697971
Observation150777359.98 ± 2.7419.49 ± 0.8383677674
t/χ²0.1201.3360.3250.0540.120
P value0.7290.1830.7460.8170.729
Table 2 Comparison of therapeutic effects between two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Complete response
Partial response
Stable disease
Progressive disease
Overall response rate
Control15015 (10.00) 61 (40.67) 35 (23.33) 39 (26.00) 76 (50.67)
Observation15017 (11.33) 89 (59.33) 31 (20.67) 13 (8.67) 106 (70.67)
χ²12.572
P value0.000
Table 3 Comparison of adverse reactions between two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Hepatic dysfunction
Anemia
Gastrointestinal reactions
Neurotoxicity
Incidence (%)
Control15027 (18.00) 10 (6.67) 13 (8.67) 11 (7.33) 61 (40.67)
Observation15013 (8.67) 5 (3.33) 3 (2.00) 3 (2.00) 24 (16.00)
χ²22.473
P value0.000
Table 4 Comparison of Karnofsky Performance Status scores between two groups (mean ± SD)
GroupnKarnofsky Performance Status points
Before treatment
After treatment
Control15066.29 ± 6.5177.26 ± 7.16a
Observation15066.87 ± 6.5784.13 ± 8.15a
t0.7687.756
P value0.4430.000
Table 5 Univariate regression analysis
Factor
n
3-year overall survival (%)
95%CI
χ²
P value
Gender0.0770.898
Male15134.4527.31-38.92
Female14942.2727.12-41.13
Age0.3270.7420.393
≤ 60 years16239.8729.51-41.77
> 60 years13831.6524.31-37.65
American Society of Anesthesiologists grade0.0430.992
15647.9222.17-44.91
221334.6328.21-38.94
33125.1818.81-41.56
Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid0.7980.000
Yes15054.8719.46-41.17
No15033.2728.32-37.91
Postoperative T stage0.4630.521
T2-T322943.3129.69-40.28
T47121.2421.36-38.77
Postoperative N stage7.9540.020
N011454.3133.22-47.51
N111826.4225.47-39.69
N26826.3814.78-32.91
Number of liver mets5.2690.033
≤ 318249.1231.92-44.93
>311824.6322.31-34.17
Tumor differentiation6.1990.024
Low14252.3733.12-45.64
Moderate/high15822.6521.42-33.57
Table 6 Multivariate Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors
Factor
Coding
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Intraoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid applicationNo = 0; yes = 12.1341.162-3.9290.017
Postoperative N stageN0 = 0; N1 = 1; N2 = 21.4590.995-2.1690.176
Number of liver metastases≤ 3 = 0; > 3 = 11.4800.913-2.5240.251
Differentiation of primary tumorLow = 0; moderate/high = 10.5210.312-0.9140.017