BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2025; 17(10): 110503
Published online Oct 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i10.110503
Table 1 Impacts of different types of sleep disorders on liver cancer
Ref.
Country
Type of sleep disorders
Type of cancer
Outcomes
[13]United KingdomInsomniaHCCHR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.15-1.85
[14]United StatesInsomniaHCCHR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.22-3.26
Long sleep durationsHCCHR: 1.63, 95%CI: 1.04-2.65
Daytime nappingHCCHR: 1.46, 95%CI: 1.04-2.06
[4]ChinaObstructive sleep apneaLiver cancerRR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.10-1.29
[26]United StatesCircadian rhythm disruptionHCCIRR: 1.07; 95%CI: 1.01-1.14
Table 2 Comparison of common sleep disorders medications
Ref.
Category
Advantages
Limitations
Target population
[102,103]Non-benzodiazepinesRapid onset, lower risk of dependence, minimal next-day residual effectsNo anxiolytic efficacy; sleepwalking riskShort-term insomnia, elderly patients
[99-101]BenzodiazepinesPotent anxiolytic effects; well-established efficacyHigh dependence risk; cognitive impairment; fall riskAnxiety-related insomnia (short-term use)
[106,107]Melatonin receptor agonistsNo dependence risk; favorable safetyLimited efficacy in primary insomniaCircadian rhythm disorders; comorbid respiratory conditions
[104,105]AntidepressantsEffective for mood-related insomniaDiverse side effects (e.g., weight gain, hypotension)Chronic insomnia with depression/anxiety
[108,109]Orexin receptor antagonistsNovel mechanism; fewer adverse effectsLimited long-term efficacy dataTreatment-resistant insomnia; patients requiring prolonged therapy