Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2025; 17(1): 99153
Published online Jan 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i1.99153
Published online Jan 15, 2025. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i1.99153
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study population
Characteristic | Value |
Age (years), mean ± SD | 62.7 ± 11.3 |
Gender, n (%) | |
Male | 270 (54) |
Female | 230 (46) |
Presenting symptoms, n (%) | |
Abdominal pain | 340 (68) |
Weight loss | 260 (52) |
Jaundice | 175 (35) |
Nausea/vomiting | 125 (25) |
Diabetes mellitus (new onset) | 75 (15) |
Table 2 Distribution of pathological types
Pathological type | Cases | Percentage |
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma | 320 | 64% |
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms | 75 | 15% |
Neuroendocrine tumors | 50 | 10% |
Other rare types | 55 | 11% |
Acinar cell carcinoma | 20 | 4% |
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm | 15 | 3% |
Mucinous cystic neoplasm | 12 | 2.4% |
Pancreatoblastoma | 5 | 1% |
Miscellaneous | 3 | 0.6% |
Table 3 Imaging features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Imaging feature | Percentage | Number of cases |
Hypodense mass on CT | 92% | 294 |
Hypointense on T1-weighted MRI | 95% | 304 |
Ill-defined borders | 85% | 272 |
Pancreatic duct dilatation | 78% | 250 |
Hypoenhancement in all phases | 88% | 282 |
Vascular invasion | 45% | 144 |
Lymph node involvement | 60% | 192 |
Hypoechoic mass with irregular margins on EUS | 90% | 288 |
Table 4 Imaging features of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
Imaging feature | Percentage | Number of cases |
Cystic lesions communicating with pancreatic duct | 100% | 75 |
Mural nodules | 60% | 45 |
Main pancreatic duct dilatation | 65% | 49 |
Enhancement of mural nodules on contrast-enhanced CT/MRI | 55% | 41 |
Table 5 Imaging features of neuroendocrine tumors
Imaging feature | Percentage | Number of cases |
Hyperenhancement in the arterial phase | 80% | 40 |
Well-defined borders | 90% | 45 |
Heterogeneous enhancement in larger tumors (> 2 cm) | 60% | 30 |
Calcifications | 25% | 12 |
Hyperintense on T2-weighted MRI | 85% | 42 |
Restricted diffusion on MRI | 90% | 45 |
Table 6 Association between imaging features and pathological types
Imaging feature | PDAC | IPMN | NET | P value |
Ill-defined borders | 85% | 10% | 10% | < 0.001 |
Hypoenhancement | 88% | 5% | 15% | < 0.001 |
Cystic components | 15% | 100% | 10% | < 0.001 |
Arterial hyperenhancement | 5% | 15% | 80% | < 0.001 |
Pancreatic duct dilatation | 78% | 65% | 15% | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Interobserver agreement for imaging features
Imaging feature | Agreement measure | Value | 95%CI |
Tumor size | ICC | 0.92 | 0.90-0.94 |
Tumor margin | κ | 0.85 | 0.81-0.89 |
Enhancement pattern | κ | 0.79 | 0.75-0.83 |
Vascular invasion | κ | 0.88 | 0.84-0.92 |
Lymph node involvement | κ | 0.82 | 0.78-0.86 |
- Citation: Luo YG, Wu M, Chen HG. Retrospective analysis of pathological types and imaging features in pancreatic cancer: A comprehensive study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(1): 99153
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v17/i1/99153.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v17.i1.99153