Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2024; 16(4): 1256-1267
Published online Apr 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1256
Published online Apr 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1256
Table 1 Demographic characteristics of patients with early-stage and late-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
| Characteristic | Clinical stage classification | P value | |
| Early-stage PDAC (n = 31) | Late-stage PDAC (n = 40) | ||
| Age (yr) | 61.45 ± 8.93 | 61.63 ± 8.31 | 0.933 |
| Sex | 0.153 | ||
| Male | 20 (64.5%) | 19 (47.5%) | |
| Female | 11 (35.5%) | 21 (52.5%) | |
| Abdominal pain | 14 (45.2%) | 20 (50%) | 0.686 |
| Abdominal bloating | 8 (25.8%) | 11 (27.5) | 0.873 |
| Abdominal discomfort | 16 (51.6%) | 21 (52.5%) | 0.941 |
| Body weight loss | 11 (35.5%) | 14 (35.0%) | 0.966 |
| Jaundice | 7 (22.6%) | 9 (22.5) | 0.994 |
| AJCC staging | - | ||
| IA | 4 (12.9%) | ||
| IB | 8 (25.8%) | ||
| IIA | 3 (9.7%) | ||
| IIB | 16 (51.6%) | ||
| III | 0 | 16 (40%) | |
| IV | 0 | 24 (60%) | |
Table 2 Computed tomography findings of patients with early-stage and late-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
| Characteristic | Clinical stage classification | P value | |
| Early-stage PDAC (n = 31) | Late-stage PDAC (n = 40) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 4.03 ± 1.25 | 3.05 ± 0.54 | < 0.001 |
| Tumor location | 0.869 | ||
| Head & neck | 18 (58.1%) | 24 (60.0%) | |
| Body & tail | 13 (41.9%) | 16 (40.0%) | |
| Tumor margin | 0.722 | ||
| Well-defined | 4 (12.9%) | 3 (7.5%) | |
| Ill-defined | 27 (87.1%) | 37 (92.5%) | |
| Calcification | 1.0 | ||
| Y | 1 (3.2%) | 1 (2.5%) | |
| N | 30 (96.8%) | 39 (97.5%) | |
| Cystic degeneration | 0.757 | ||
| Y | 3 (9.7%) | 6 (15.0%) | |
| N | 28 (90.3%) | 34 (85.0%) | |
| MPD | 0.861 | ||
| Y | 20 (64.5) | 25 (62.5%) | |
| N | 11 (35.5) | 15 (37.5%) | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.302 | ||
| Y | 14 (45.2%) | 23 (57.5%) | |
| N | 17 (54.8%) | 17 (42.5%) | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.480 | ||
| Y | 16 (51.6%) | 24 (60.0%) | |
| N | 15 (48.4%) | 16 (40.0%) | |
| Distal metastasis | < 0.001 | ||
| Y | 0 (0%) | 24 (60%) | |
| N | 31 (100%) | 16 (40%) | |
Table 3 The differential diagnostic ability of the selected radiomics features
| Features | AUC | SEN | SPE | ACC |
| a_Compactness2 | 0.754 | 67.5% | 77.42% | 71.83% |
| a_GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset7_SD | 0.698 | 82.5% | 58.06% | 71.83% |
| p_Correlation_angle90_offset7 | 0.683 | 60.0% | 70.97% | 64.79% |
| p_HighGreyLevelRunEmphasis_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.661 | 77.5% | 51.61% | 66.20% |
| a_GLCMEntropy_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.665 | 87.5% | 54.84% | 73.24% |
| a_Correlation_angle45_offset7 | 0.639 | 50.0% | 77.42% | 61.97% |
| p_Compactness2 | 0.66 | 80.0% | 54.84% | 69.01% |
| a_InverseDifferenceMoment_AllDirection_offset4_SD | 0.638 | 75.0% | 64.52% | 70.42% |
| a_Correlation_angle135_offset4 | 0.677 | 75.0% | 58.06% | 67.61% |
- Citation: Ren S, Qian LC, Cao YY, Daniels MJ, Song LN, Tian Y, Wang ZQ. Computed tomography-based radiomics diagnostic approach for differential diagnosis between early- and late-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(4): 1256-1267
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i4/1256.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1256
