Ma KP, Fu JX, Duan F, Wang MQ. Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(4): 1236-1247 [PMID: 38660650 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1236]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Mao-Qiang Wang, MD, PhD, Deputy Director, Department of Interventional Radiology, The Fifth Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, No. 28 Fuxin Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China. wangmaoqiang301@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2024; 16(4): 1236-1247 Published online Apr 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1236
Table 1 Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients
Variables
Total (n = 102)
Age, mean ± SD (range), yr
57.64 ± 10.37 (34-91)
Male, n (%)
89 (87.25)
ECOG PS, n (%)
0
53 (51.96)
1
49 (48.04)
Etiology, HBV/others, n (%)
80/22 (78.43/21.57)
BCLC stage, B/C, n (%)
48/54 (47.06/52.94)
Maximum tumor diameter, mean ± SD, cm
6.80 ± 3.74
Number of tumors > 3, n (%)
51 (50.00)
Portal vein invasion, n (%)
Yes
29 (28.43)
Extrahepatic metastasis, n (%)
Yes
42 (41.18)
Extrahepatic metastatic sites, n (%)
Lung
27 (26.47)
Bone
7 (6.86)
Lymph nodes
13 (12.75)
Abdominal cavity
7 (6.86)
PD-1 antibody class, n (%)
Sintilimab
52 (50.98)
Nivolumab
20 (19.61)
Camrelizumab
17 (16.67)
Pembrolizumab
7 (6.86)
Toripalimab
6 (5.88)
Child-Pugh class, n (%)
A
93 (91.18)
B
9 (8.82)
AFP level, n (%)
> 400 ng/mL
49 (48.04)
≤ 400 ng/mL
53 (51.96)
DCP level, n (%)
> 40 mAU/mL
89 (87.25)
≤ 40 mAU/mL
13 (12.75)
NLR, mean ± SD
2.46 ± 1.59
LDH, mean ± SD, U/L
198.52 ± 102.05
Table 2 Clinical outcomes
Variables
Total (n = 102)
Best overall response
CR
10
PR
53
SD
20
PD
19
Objective response rate
61.76%
Disease control rate
81.37%
Median PFS
10.07 months (95%CI: 8.50-11.65)
6-month tumor PFS
70.82% (95%CI: 60.80-78.72)
12-month tumor PFS
36.11% (95%CI: 26.49-45.79)
Median OS
26.43 months (95%CI: 17.00-35.87)
6-month survival
92.63% (95%CI: 85.14-96.42)
12-month survival
84.15% (95%CI: 74.05-90.56)
Table 3 Multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (≤ 58 yr vs > 58 yr)
0.65 (0.29-1.48)
0.2900
Gender (male vs female)
0.40 (0.11-1.38)
0.0412
ECOG PS (0 vs 1)
0.44 (0.20-0.98)
0.0392
Etiology (HBV vs others)
0.61 (0.21-1.78)
0.2843
BCLC stage (C vs B)
3.11 (1.36-7.11)
0.0068
3.10 (1.18-8.13)
0.021
Maximum tumor diameter (≤ 6.8 vs > 6.8)
0.66 (0.29-1.49)
0.3100
Number of tumors (≤ 3 vs > 3)
0.67 (0.26-1.40)
0.2131
Portal vein invasion (absent vs presence)
0.56 (0.22-1.41)
0.1545
Extrahepatic metastasis (absent vs presence)
0.69 (0.30-1.59)
0.3531
Child-Pugh class (A vs B)
1.29 (0.35-4.78)
0.7266
Baseline AFP (≤ 400 vs > 400)
0.90 (0.39-2.03)
0.7799
Baseline DCP (≤ 40 vs > 40)
1.78 (0.47-6.67)
0.2890
NLR (≤ 3 vs > 3)
0.42 (0.16-1.09)
0.0306
LDH (≤ 198.52 vs > 198.52)
0.43 (0.17-1.06)
0.0347
0.22 (0.08-0.56)
0.002
Early NLR response (decrease vs increase)
0.37 (0.16-0.89)
0.0100
0.31 (0.11-0.89)
0.030
Early AFP response (decrease ≤ 20% vs > 20%)
3.11 (1.31-7.39)
0.0043
3.90 (1.42-10.69)
0.008
Early DCP response (decrease ≤ 20% vs > 20%)
2.42 (0.78-7.51)
0.0407
Table 4 Multivariate Cox regression analysis of progression-free survival
Variables
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (≤ 58 vs > 58 yr)
0.98 (0.64-1.49)
0.9279
Gender (male vs female)
0.64 (0.31-1.32)
0.1413
ECOG PS (0 vs 1)
0.90 (0.59-1.37)
0.6087
Etiology (HBV vs others)
0.78 (0.45-1.36)
0.3417
BCLC stage (C vs B)
1.82 (1.18-2.80)
0.0036
1.75 (1.12-2.74)
0.014
Maximum tumor diameter (≤ 6.8 vs > 6.8)
0.99 (0.65-1.52)
0.9933
Number of tumors (≤ 3 vs > 3)
0.81 (0.53-1.23)
0.3099
Portal vein invasion (absent vs presence)
0.77 (0.47-1.26)
0.2597
Extrahepatic metastasis (absent vs presence)
0.73 (0.47-1.14)
0.1408
Child-Pugh class (A vs B)
1.26 (0.67-2.36)
0.5094
Baseline AFP (≤ 400 vs > 400)
1.00 (0.65-1.53)
0.9992
Baseline DCP (≤ 40 vs > 40)
1.27 (0.64-2.55)
0.4486
NLR (≤ 3 vs > 3)
0.93 (0.56-1.54)
0.7707
LDH (≤ 198.52 vs > 198.52)
0.85 (0.53-1.35)
0.4605
Early NLR response (decrease vs increase)
0.54 (0.34-0.86)
0.0025
0.56 (0.35-0.90)
0.016
Early AFP response (decrease ≤ 20% vs > 20%)
1.70 (1.08-2.66)
0.0116
1.73 (1.12-2.66)
0.013
Early DCP response (decrease ≤ 20% vs > 20%)
1.73 (0.97-3.09)
0.0250
Citation: Ma KP, Fu JX, Duan F, Wang MQ. Efficacy and predictive factors of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibition for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(4): 1236-1247