Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Mar 15, 2024; 16(3): 833-843
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.833
Published online Mar 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.833
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of all patients, n (%)
| Variables | Values |
| Gender | |
| Male | 66 (89.2) |
| Female | 8 (10.8) |
| Age (yr) (mean ± SD, range) | 66.24 ± 9.057 (41-86) |
| Initial surgery | |
| Benign | 64 (86.5) |
| Malignant | 10 (13.5) |
| Interval (yr) (mean ± SD, range) | 29.32 ± 11.97 (5-55) |
| Reconstruction | |
| Billroth I | 20 (27.0) |
| Billroth II | 54 (73.0) |
| Lesion location | |
| Anastomosis site | 47 (63.5) |
| Non-anastomotic | 22 (29.7) |
| Total remnant stomach | 5 (6.8) |
| Histological types | |
| Differentiated | 22 (29.7) |
| Undifferentiated | 52 (70.3) |
| Borrmann | |
| Borrmann I | 7 (9.4) |
| Borrmann II | 13 (17.6) |
| Borrmann III | 46 (62.2) |
| Borrmann IV | 8 (10.8) |
| Vascular or nerve invasion | |
| Yes | 33 (44.6) |
| No | 41 (55.4) |
| Tumor diameter (cm) (mean ± SD, range) | 5.59 ± 2.61 (0.50-12.00) |
| Combine resection | |
| Yes | 26 (35.1) |
| No | 48 (64.9) |
| Hypoproteinemia | |
| Yes | 15 (20.3) |
| No | 59 (79.7) |
| Anemia | |
| Yes | 24 (32.4) |
| No | 50 (67.6) |
| Serum tumor biomarkers level | |
| Normal | 47 (63.5) |
| Abnormal | 27 (36.5) |
| Depth of tumor invasion | |
| T2/T3 | 13 (17.6) |
| T4 | 61 (82.4) |
| N stage | |
| N0 | 27 (36.5) |
| N1 | 13 (17.6) |
| N2 | 18 (24.3) |
| N3 | 16 (21.6) |
| LNR stage | |
| LNR0 | 27 (36.5) |
| LNR1 | 12 (16.2) |
| LNR2 | 16 (21.6) |
| LNR3 | 19 (25.7) |
| TNM stage | |
| IB-II | 26 (35.1) |
| III | 48 (64.9) |
Table 2 Factors correlated with lymph node stage
| Variables | N0 | N1 | N2 | N3 | F/χ2 | P value |
| Dissected lymph nodes | 9.85 ± 7.32 | 9.15 ± 5.89 | 9.83 ± 7.56 | 17.13 ± 8.22 | 4.294 | 0.008 |
| Metastatic lymph nodes | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.23 ± 0.44 | 4.06 ± 1.16 | 11.56 ± 4.77 | 91.523 | 0.000 |
| Tumor diameter | 3.96 ± 1.67 | 5.92 ± 2.56 | 6.83 ± 2.70 | 6.66 ± 2.64 | 7.363 | 0.000 |
| Borrmann | 17.450 | 0.042 | ||||
| Borrmann I | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Borrmann II | 9 | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||
| Borrmann III | 15 | 12 | 9 | 10 | ||
| Borrmann IV | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||
| Depth of tumor invasion | 11.152 | 0.011 | ||||
| T2/T3 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| T4 | 17 | 12 | 17 | 5 | ||
| Serum tumor biomarkers level | 9.019 | 0.029 | ||||
| Normal | 22 | 9 | 7 | 9 | ||
| Abnormal | 5 | 4 | 11 | 7 | ||
| TNM stage | 54.105 | 0.000 | ||||
| IB-II | 24 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| III | 3 | 12 | 17 | 16 | ||
| Combine resection | 8.917 | 0.030 | ||||
| Yes | 4 | 6 | 10 | 6 | ||
| No | 23 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
Table 3 Factors correlated with lymph node ratio stage
| Variables | LNR0 | LNR1 | LNR2 | LNR3 | F/χ2 | P value |
| Metastatic lymph nodes | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 1.75 ± 1.29 | 6.63 ± 5.51 | 7.74 ± 5.12 | 21.263 | 0.000 |
| Tumor diameter | 3.96 ± 1.67 | 5.38 ± 2.05 | 6.66 ± 2.32 | 7.13 ± 3.01 | 8.755 | 0.000 |
| Borrmann | 21.878 | 0.009 | ||||
| Borrmann I | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | ||
| Borrmann II | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | ||
| Borrmann III | 15 | 10 | 11 | 10 | ||
| Borrmann IV | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||
| Depth of tumor invasion | 12.470 | 0.006 | ||||
| T2/T3 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||
| T4 | 17 | 10 | 16 | 18 | ||
| Serum tumor biomarkers level | 8.654 | 0.034 | ||||
| Normal | 22 | 6 | 11 | 8 | ||
| Abnormal | 5 | 6 | 5 | 11 | ||
| TNM stage | 54.986 | 0.000 | ||||
| IB-II | 24 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
| III | 3 | 10 | 16 | 19 | ||
| Vascular or nerve invasion | 8.616 | 0.035 | ||||
| Yes | 8 | 8 | 5 | 2 | ||
| No | 19 | 4 | 11 | 7 |
Table 4 Prognostic factors of gastric remnant cancer based on univariate log-rank test
| Variable | n | Median survival time (months) | P value |
| Tumor diameter (cm) | 0.013 | ||
| < 5.5 | 35 | 48.0 | |
| ≥ 5.5 | 39 | 25.0 | |
| Anemia (HGB) < 90 g/L | 0.034 | ||
| Yes | 24 | 23.0 | |
| No | 50 | 37.0 | |
| Serum tumor biomarkers level | 0.014 | ||
| Normal | 47 | 37.0 | |
| Abnormal | 27 | 26.0 | |
| Vascular or nerve invasion | 0.020 | ||
| Yes | 33 | 25.0 | |
| No | 41 | 43.0 | |
| Combined resection | 0.021 | ||
| Yes | 26 | 25.0 | |
| No | 48 | 39.0 | |
| N stage | 0.000 | ||
| N0 | 27 | 61.0 | |
| N1 | 13 | 31.0 | |
| N2 | 18 | 19.0 | |
| N3 | 16 | 20.0 | |
| LNR stage | 0.000 | ||
| LNR0 | 27 | 61.0 | |
| LNR1 | 12 | 31.0 | |
| LNR2 | 16 | 23.0 | |
| LNR3 | 19 | 17.0 | |
| TMN stage | 0.000 | ||
| IB-II | 26 | 79.0 | |
| III | 48 | 25.0 |
Table 5 Prognostic factors of gastric remnant cancer based on COX proportional hazards model
| Variable | B | SE | Wald | df | P value | HR | 95%CI |
| LNR stage | 0.499 | 0.122 | 16.755 | 1 | 0.000 | 1.647 | 1.297-2.092 |
| Anemia | 0.656 | 0.287 | 5.216 | 1 | 0.022 | 1.926 | 1.097-3.381 |
| Serum tumor biomarkers level | 0.612 | 0.293 | 4.365 | 1 | 0.037 | 1.844 | 1.039-3.275 |
- Citation: Zhuo M, Tian L, Han T, Liu TF, Lin XL, Xiao XY. Predictive value of positive lymph node ratio in patients with locally advanced gastric remnant cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(3): 833-843
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i3/833.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i3.833
