Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2024; 16(10): 4157-4165
Published online Oct 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4157
Published online Oct 15, 2024. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4157
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data in the two groups
Characteristics | Control group, n = 36 | Joint group, n = 38 | χ2/t | P value | |
Sex | Male | 19 | 21 | 0.046 | 0.830 |
Female | 17 | 17 | |||
Age in years | - | 54.26 ± 6.18 | 53.99 ± 6.03 | 0.190 | 0.850 |
Number of tumors | 1 | 12 | 15 | 0.820 | 0.664 |
2 | 7 | 9 | |||
≥ 3 | 17 | 14 | |||
Maximum tumor diameter in cm | - | 8.13 ± 0.65 | 8.40 ± 0.72 | 1.690 | 0.095 |
HBV-DNA in IU/mL | ≤ 100 | 20 | 15 | 1.918 | 0.166 |
> 100 | 16 | 23 | |||
Child-Pugh grading[13] | A | 28 | 24 | 1.891 | 0.169 |
B | 8 | 14 | 1.921 | 0.383 | |
ECOG scores in points[14] | 0 | 15 | 20 | ||
1 | 16 | 11 | |||
2 | 5 | 7 | |||
PVTT | Presence | 9 | 12 | 0.394 | 0.530 |
Absence | 27 | 26 |
Table 2 Comparison of tumor response 1-month postoperatively between the two groups, n (%)
Efficacy | Control group, n = 36 | Joint group, n = 38 | χ2 | P value |
CR | 9 (25.00) | 19 (50.00) | 4.912 | 0.027 |
PR | 14 (38.89) | 13 (34.21) | 0.175 | 0.676 |
SD | 5 (13.89) | 4 (10.53) | 0.196 | 0.658 |
PD | 8 (22.22) | 2 (5.26) | 4.549 | 0.033 |
ORR | 23 (63.89) | 32 (81.58) | 4.000 | 0.045 |
DCR | 28 (77.78) | 36 (94.74) | 4.549 | 0.033 |
Table 3 Comparison of liver function and tumor markers between the two groups before and after treatment
Indicator | Treatment period | Control group, n = 36 | Joint group, n = 38 | χ2/t | P value |
ALT in U/L | Pre | 39.41 ± 4.28 | 38.89 ± 4.55 | 0.506 | 0.615 |
Post | 45.12 ± 5.37 | 49.63 ± 5.18 | 3.677 | 0.001 | |
AST in U/L | Pre | 52.76 ± 8.33 | 53.02 ± 6.74 | 0.148 | 0.883 |
Post | 58.35 ± 6.92 | 65.71 ± 7.04 | 7.532 | < 0.001 | |
TBIL in μmol/L | Pre | 20.01 ± 3.16 | 19.66 ± 2.25 | 0.551 | 0.583 |
Post | 25.41 ± 3.79 | 30.08 ± 4.11 | 5.073 | < 0.001 | |
ALB in g/L | Pre | 37.85 ± 4.01 | 37.99 ± 3.32 | 0.164 | 0.870 |
Post | 32.66 ± 3.45 | 28.73 ± 2.99 | 5.245 | < 0.001 | |
AFP in μg/L | Pre | 215.43 ± 20.77 | 218.96 ± 23.63 | 0.681 | 0.498 |
Post | 186.75 ± 15.46 | 114.65 ± 12.05 | 22.442 | < 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of adverse reaction occurrence between the two groups, n (%)
Adverse reaction | Control group, n = 36 | Joint group, n = 38 | χ2 | P value |
Embolism syndrome | 0 (0) | 2 (5.26) | ||
Fatigue | 1 (2.78) | 1 (2.63) | ||
Abnormal liver function | 2 (5.56) | 1 (2.63) | ||
Rash | 1 (2.78) | 2 (5.26) | ||
Bone marrow suppression | 0 (0) | 1 (2.63) | ||
Gastrointestinal reaction | 2 (5.56) | 2 (5.26) | ||
Hand-foot syndrome | 1 (2.78) | 2 (5.26) | ||
Total incidence | 7 (19.44) | 11 (28.95) | 0.907 | 0.341 |
- Citation: Qi JS, Zhao P, Zhao XB, Zhao YL, Guo YC. Small particle drug-eluting beads-transarterial chemoembolization combined with targeted therapy in the clinical treatment of unresectable liver cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(10): 4157-4165
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v16/i10/4157.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v16.i10.4157