Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jul 15, 2023; 15(7): 1283-1294
Published online Jul 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1283
Published online Jul 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1283
Table 1 Infusion area in interventional approaches
Infusion area | Gastroesophageal junction obstruction, n | Pyloric obstruction, n | Anastomosis obstruction, n |
Left gastric artery | 13 | 5 | 1 |
Right gastric artery | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Right gastroepiploic artery | 0 | 13 | 2 |
Left gastric artery and right gastroepiploic artery | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Right gastric artery and right gastroepiploic artery | 0 | 23 | 0 |
Left gastric artery and right gastric artery | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Others | 71 | 62 | 12 |
Table 2 Tumor radiologic response evaluated by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria
After the first cGAIC, n (%) | After the second cGAIC, n (%) | After the third cGAIC, n (%) | After the fourth cGAIC, n (%) | After the fifth cGAIC, n (%) | After the sixth cGAIC, n (%) | |
CR | 0 (0) | 1 (3.7) | 4 (21.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
PR | 25 (86.2) | 23 (85.2) | 12 (63.2) | 3 (100) | 2 (100) | 2 (100) |
SD | 4 (13.8) | 3 (11.1) | 3 (15.8) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
PD | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Total | 29 | 27 | 19 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Table 3 Comparison of Stooler’s Dysphagia Score
Before cGAIC, n | After cGAIC, n | P value | |
Stooler’s Dysphagia Score | < 0.001 | ||
I | 0 | 6 | |
II | 0 | 14 | |
III | 22 | 8 | |
IV | 7 | 1 |
Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate survival analysis for overall survival
Variables | n (%) | Univariate survival analysis | Multivariate survival analysis | ||||
HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | ||
Gender | |||||||
Male | 20 (69) | 1.53 | 0.49-4.85 | 0.466 | |||
Female | 9 (31) | 1 | |||||
Intravenous chemotherapy history | |||||||
No | 22 (76) | 0.30 | 0.11-0.83 | 0.020 | |||
Yes | 7 (24) | 1 | |||||
Gastric cancer surgery history | |||||||
No | 27 (93) | 0.51 | 0.12-2.29 | 0.381 | |||
Yes | 2 (7) | 1 | |||||
Pathology | |||||||
Squamous cell carcinoma | 2 (7) | 9.24 | 1.62-52.69 | 0.012 | |||
Signet ring cell carcinoma | 8 (27) | 0.66 | 0.18-2.44 | 0.535 | |||
Adenocarcinoma | 19 (66) | 1 | |||||
Tumor invasion | |||||||
≤ T4a | 19 (66) | 0.48 | 0.17-1.32 | 0.153 | |||
T4b | 10 (34) | 1 | |||||
Metastasis | |||||||
No | 9 (31) | 0.63 | 0.20-1.98 | 0.425 | |||
Yes | 20 (69) | ||||||
Obstructive location | |||||||
Gastroesophageal junction | 6 (21) | 1.21 | 2.24-6.10 | 0.816 | |||
Pylorus | 21 (72) | 0.35 | 0.07-1.68 | 0.188 | |||
Anastomosis | 2 (7) | 1 | |||||
Stooler’s Dysphagia Score | |||||||
III | 22 (76) | 0.34 | 0.11-1.02 | 0.055 | |||
IV | 7 (24) | 1 | |||||
Relieve digestive obstruction | |||||||
No | 7 (24) | 2.55 | 0.84-7.72 | 0.098 | |||
Yes | 22 (76) | ||||||
Radical resection after cGAIC | |||||||
No | 16 (55) | 9.56 | 2.11-43.44 | 0.003 | 8.48 | 1.27-56.51 | 0.027 |
Yes | 13 (45) | ||||||
Intravenous chemotherapy after cGAIC | |||||||
No | 10(34) | 6.20 | 2.14-18.00 | 0.001 | 8.61 | 1.42-52.17 | 0.019 |
Yes | 19(66) | ||||||
Immunotherapy after cGAIC | |||||||
No | 18(62) | 4.12 | 0.93-18.28 | 0.063 | 13.09 | 1.64-104-12 | 0.015 |
Yes | 11(38) |
Table 5 Adverse events after constant gastric artery infusion chemotherapy
Adverse events | Grade 1, n (%) | Grade 2, n (%) |
Nausea and vomiting | 4 (13.8) | 2 (6.9) |
Abdominal pain | 3 (10.3) | 1 (3.4) |
Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Neutropenia | 2 (6.9) | 2 (6.9) |
Anemia | 1 (3.4) | 0 (0) |
Thrombocytopenia | 2 (6.9) | 2 (6.9) |
Paresthesia | 1 (3.4) | 1 (4.3) |
Liver enzyme increased | 1 (3.4) | 3 (10.3) |
- Citation: Tang R, Chen GF, Jin K, Zhang GQ, Wu JJ, Han SG, Li B, Chao M. Efficacy of continuous gastric artery infusion chemotherapy in relieving digestive obstruction in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15(7): 1283-1294
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v15/i7/1283.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v15.i7.1283