Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2023; 15(10): 1771-1783
Published online Oct 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1771
Published online Oct 15, 2023. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1771
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy, n (%)
Variables | Total, n = 83 | mALBI 1+2a, n = 42 | mALBI 2b+3, n = 41 | P value |
Age in yr, mean ± SD | 60.6 ± 12.8 | 59.8 ± 14.0 | 61.5 ± 11.5 | 0.560 |
Male | 67 (80.7) | 34 (81.0) | 33 (80.5) | 0.960 |
ECOG-PS | 0.680 | |||
0 | 78 (94.0) | 40 (95.2) | 38 (92.7) | |
1 | 5 (6.0) | 2 (4.8) | 3 (7.3) | |
Presence of cirrhosis | 76 (91.6) | 35 (83.3) | 41 (100) | < 0.001 |
CTP A | 58 (69.9) | 35 (83.3) | 23 (56.1) | |
CTP B | 18 (21.7) | 0 (0) | 18 (43.9) | |
Etiology of disease | ||||
Viral hepatitis | 53 (63.9) | 27 (64.3) | 26 (63.4) | 0.930 |
NASH | 23 (27.7) | 11 (26.2) | 12 (29.3) | 0.750 |
Alcohol related | 7 (8.4) | 1 (2.4) | 6 (14.6) | 0.060 |
Others | 1 (1.2) | 1 (2.4) | 0 (0) | 1.000 |
BCLC staging | ||||
BCLC B | 22 (26.5) | 6 (14.3) | 16 (39.0) | 0.010 |
BCLC C | 61 (73.5) | 36 (85.7) | 25 (61.0) | |
Macrovascular invasion | 30 (36.1) | 15 (35.7) | 15 (36.6) | 0.930 |
Extrahepatic metastasis | 40 (48.2) | 25 (59.5) | 15 (36.6) | 0.040 |
AFP in ng/mL, median (IQR) | 339.0 (10.7, 6300.0) | 581.5 (11.5, 6869.5) | 339.0 (10.5, 9144.5) | 0.880 |
Tumor size in cm, median (IQR) | 5.3 (1.7, 12.0) | 4.8 (1.7, 11.0) | 5.6 (1.7, 14.3) | 0.730 |
Portal vein invasion grade of 2/3/4 | 8 (26.7)/13 (43.3)/9 (30.0) | 4 (26.7)/7 (46.7)/4 (26.7) | 4 (26.7)/6 (40.0)/5 (33.3) | 1.000 |
EHM bone/lymph node/lung/peritoneum | 11 (27.5)/14 (35.0)/21 (52.5)/9 (22.5) | 8 (32.0)/7 (28.0)/13 (52.0)/3 (12.0) | 3 (20.0)/7 (46.7)/8 (53.3)/6 (40.0) | 0.350 |
ALBI score, median (IQR) | -2.270 (-2.628 to -1.826) | -2.622 (-2.836 to -2.398) | -1.826 (-2.067 to -1.434) | < 0.001 |
mALBI grade | < 0.001 | |||
1: ≤ -2.60 | 23 (27.7) | 23 (54.8) | 0 (0) | |
2a: > -2.60 to ≤ -2.27 | 19 (22.9) | 19 (45.2) | 0 (0) | |
2b: > -2.27 to ≤ -1.39 | 32 (38.6) | 0 (0) | 32 (78.0) | |
3: > -1.39 | 9 (10.8) | 0 (0) | 9 (22.0) | |
Prior local therapy for HCC | 62 (74.7) | 33 (78.6) | 29 (70.7) | 0.410 |
Resection | 22 (35.5) | 17 (51.5) | 5 (17.2) | 0.005 |
Ablation | 17 (27.4) | 9 (27.3) | 8 (27.6) | 0.980 |
TACE | 48 (77.4) | 23 (69.7) | 25 (86.2) | 0.120 |
TARE | 9 (14.5) | 5 (15.2) | 4 (13.8) | 1.000 |
EBRT | 19 (30.6) | 11 (33.3) | 8 (27.6) | 0.620 |
Prior systemic therapy for HCC | 10 (12.0) | 4 (9.5) | 6 (14.6) | 0.460 |
Sorafenib | 5 (50.0) | 1 (25.0) | 4 (66.7) | 0.530 |
Lenvatinib | 4 (40.0) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (33.3) | 1.000 |
> 2 lines of systemic therapy | 2 (20.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (16.7) | 1.000 |
AB as first-line treatment | 20 (24.1) | 9 (21.4) | 11 (26.8) | 0.570 |
Combination of AB and other local therapy as first-line treatment | 3 (3.6) | 3 (7.1) | 0 (0) | 0.240 |
Resection/TACE/TARE/EBRT | 0 (0)/0 (0)/0 (0)/3 (100) | 0 (0)/0 (0)/0 (0)/3 (100.0) | 0 (0)/0 (0)/0 (0)/0 (0) | 0.240 |
Number of AB cycle, median (IQR) | 4.0 (2.0, 9.0) | 5.0 (4.0, 11.3) | 3.0 (1.0, 4.5) | < 0.001 |
Table 2 Efficacy outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab1, n (%)
Variables | Total, n = 61 | mALBI 1 + 2a, n = 39 | mALBI 2b + 3, n = 22 | P value |
Complete response | 4 (6.6) | 3 (7.7) | 1 (4.5) | 1.000 |
Partial response | 13 (21.3) | 11 (28.2) | 2 (9.1) | 0.110 |
Stable disease | 21 (34.4) | 12 (30.8) | 9 (40.9) | 0.420 |
Objective response rate | 17 (27.9) | 14 (35.9) | 3 (13.6) | 0.060 |
Disease control rate | 38 (62.3) | 26 (66.7) | 12 (54.5) | 0.350 |
Progressive disease | 23 (37.7) | 13 (33.3) | 10 (45.5) | 0.350 |
Table 3 Median overall survival and progression-free survival of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy stratified by liver function, tumor size, and tumor stage
Variables | No. of events/No. of patients | Median OS (95%CI), mo | P value | No. of events/No. of patients | Median OS (95%CI), mo | P value |
A. Entire cohort, n = 83 | ||||||
CTP class | < 0.001 | NE | ||||
CTP A | 25/65 | 17 (-) | 34/65 | 9.0 (5.1-12.9) | ||
CTP B | 14/18 | 2.0 (1.1-2.9) | 3/18 | NE | ||
Tumor size in cm | 0.790 | 0.130 | ||||
≤ 5.0 | 21/41 | 12.0 (4.8-19.2) | 21/41 | 7.0 (2.8-11.2) | ||
> 5.0 | 18/42 | NE | 16/42 | 16.0 (6.5-25.5) | ||
B. BCLC C group, n = 61 | 27/61 | 14.0 (-) | 28/61 | 10.0 (0.5-19.5) | ||
CTP class | < 0.001 | 0.810 | ||||
CTP A | 18/49 | NE | 26/49 | 10.0 (0.3-19.7) | ||
CTP B | 9/12 | 1.0 (0.1-2.5) | 2/12 | NE | ||
Tumor size in cm | 0.850 | 0.060 | ||||
≤ 5.0 | 13/26 | 12.0 (3.4-20.6) | 15/26 | 6.0 (2.5-9.5) | ||
> 5.0 | 14/35 | NE | 13/35 | 24.0 (9.4-38.6) | ||
With PV invasion, n = 30 | 0.140 | 0.030 | ||||
No | 12/31 | NE | 20/31 | 6.0 (3.2-8.8) | ||
Yes | 15/30 | 13.0 (2.0-24.0) | 8/30 | 24.0 (-) | ||
With EHM metastasis, n = 40 | 0.540 | 0.170 | ||||
No | 10/21 | 13.0 (0.1-27.3) | 7/21 | 24 (-) | ||
Yes | 17/40 | NE | 21/40 | 6.0 (1.1-10.9) | ||
C. BCLC B group, n = 22 | 12/22 | 11.0 (2.7-19.3) | 9/22 | 8.0 (1.3-14.7) | ||
CTP class | 0.020 | 0.660 | ||||
CTP A | 7/16 | 11.0 (5.6-16.4) | 8/16 | 8.0 (1.5-14.5) | ||
CTP B | 5/6 | 2.0 (0.8-3.2) | 1/6 | 5.0 (-) | ||
Tumor size in cm | 0.490 | 0.140 | ||||
≤ 5.0 | 8/15 | 11.0 (0.1-24.1) | 6/15 | 9.0 (6.9-11.1) | ||
> 5.0 | 4/7 | 7.0 (0.1-17.3) | 3/7 | 5.0 (-) |
Table 4 Treatment after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy1, n (%)
Treatment | Total, n = 37 | mALBI 1 + 2a, n = 24 | mALBI 2b + 3, n = 13 | P value |
Systemic therapy | 32 (86.5) | 22 (91.7) | 10 (76.9) | 0.320 |
TACE | 4 (10.8) | 4 (16.7) | 0 (0) | 0.280 |
EBRT | 8 (21.6) | 6 (25.0) | 2 (15.4) | 0.690 |
Best supportive care | 4 (10.8) | 1 (4.2) | 3 (23.1) | 0.120 |
Table 5 Predictors of overall survival in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy
Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value | Adjusted hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value | |
Age | 1.00 (0.97-1.02) | 0.970 | 0.99 (0.96-1.02) | 0.540 |
Male sex | 1.15 (0.51-2.60) | 0.740 | 0.97 (0.41-2.28) | 0.940 |
ECOG-PS | ||||
0 | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
1 | 2.03 (0.62-6.66) | 0.240 | ||
Presence of cirrhosis | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 2.19 (0.53-9.13) | 0.280 | ||
Etiology of disease | ||||
NASH | 0.70 (0.32-1.52) | 0.360 | ||
Viral hepatitis | 1.48 (0.73-2.97) | 0.280 | ||
Alcohol | 2.09 (0.81-5.39) | 0.130 | ||
BCLC stage | ||||
B | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
C | 0.66 (0.33-1.31) | 0.230 | ||
Extrahepatic metastasis | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 0.70 (0.37-1.32) | 0.270 | ||
Portal invasion | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 1.29 (0.68-2.47) | 0.440 | ||
AFP > 500 ng/mL | 1.26 (0.67-2.36) | 0.480 | ||
CTP class | ||||
A | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
B | 5.38 (2.66-10.89) | < 0.001 | 2.63 (1.19-5.78) | 0.020 |
mALBI grade | ||||
1 + 2a | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
2b + 3 | 5.20 (2.52-10.76) | < 0.001 | 3.90 (1.71-8.90) | 0.001 |
Prior treatment for HCC | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 0.87 (0.42-1.78) | 0.700 | ||
Prior local therapy for HCC | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 0.79 (0.39-1.58) | 0.500 | ||
Prior systemic therapy for HCC | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 1.80 (0.79-4.11) | 0.160 | ||
Combination of AB and local treatment as first-line treatment | ||||
No | 1.00 (Reference) | |||
Yes | 0.05 (0.01-27.12) | 0.340 |
- Citation: Navadurong H, Prasoppokakorn T, Siriwong N, Phathong C, Teeyapun N, Tanasanvimon S, Thanapirom K, Komolmit P, Tangkijvanich P, Treeprasertsuk S, Chaiteerakij R. Modified albumin-bilirubin predicted survival of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15(10): 1771-1783
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v15/i10/1771.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1771