Review
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2022; 14(8): 1406-1428
Published online Aug 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1406
Table 1 Subcategories of poorly cohesive cell carcinoma as proposed by the Verona consensus[
16 ] in two recent clinical studies[
47 ,
48 ]
Ref. Category of PCC SRC type: > 90% of Signet Ring cells PCC with SRC component: < 90% but > 10% of SRC PCC-NOS: < 10% of SRC Bencivenga et al [47 ] 32 (18.5) 98 (56.6) 43 (24.9) Roviello et al [48 ] 0 (0) 87 (60.8) 56 (39.2)
Table 2 Concordance rates between World Health Organization and Laurén classification systems
Ref. Reclassification of SRC and PCC-GC according to Laurén classification n % Intestinal % Diffuse % Mixed Pyo et al [7 ], 2016 3170 0.6 96.3 3.1 Pyo et al [173 ], 2017 5309 0.0 96.1 3.9 Wanebo et al [174 ],1993 187 2 87 11 Hass et al [175 ], 2011 160 7.6 66.2 26.2 Lee et al [176 ], 2012 320 0.0 90.6 9.4 Heger et al [58 ], 2014 235 0.0 75.3 20.0 Chon et al [53 ], 2017 1646 1.2 96.4 2.4
Table 3 Summary of studies reporting the all-stage prognostic value of signet ring cell- and poorly cohesive cell-gastric cancer
Ref. n n SRC-CG (%) % LNM 5-yr survival rate %, SR-CGC vs other Univariate Multivariate Compared to Eastern studies Maehara et al [49 ], 1992 1500 51 (3.4) 33.3 74.5 vs 52.4 P < 0.01- Non SRC-GC Kim et al [177 ], 1994 3702 450 (12.2) 50.6 59.7 vs 57.7/48.6/43.1 NS - WD/MD/PD Otsuji et al [178 ], 1998 1498 154 (10.3) 27.9 68.2 vs 43.9 (10-yr survival rate) P < 0.05- Non SRC-GC Yokota et al [179 ], 1998 923 93 (10.1) 43 Worse NS - Non SRC-GC Kim et al [180 ], 2004 2358 204 (8.7) 26.5 60.2 vs 48.9 P < 0.01NS Non SRC-GC Park et al [181 ], 2008 2275 251 (11.0) 46.2 66.2 vs 66.7/54.5/51.0 WD: NS; PD/MC: P < 0.001 P = 0.002a WD/PD/MC Zhang et al [45 ], 2010 1439 218 (15.1) 76.1 44.9 vs 36 P = 0.013NS Non SRC-GC Chiu et al [182 ], 2011 2439 505 (20.7) 53.7 57.6 vs 56 NS - Non SRC-GC Jiang et al [55 ], 2011 1439 211 (14.7) 52,0 49.8 vs 41.4 P = 0.001- Non SRC-GC Lee et al [176 ], 2012 1002 320 (31.9) 37.2 84.8 vs 71.9/57.8 P < 0.001NS PD/MC Kwon et al [50 ], 2014 769 108 (14.0) 43.5 55.4 vs 64.5/46.2 (10-yr survival rate) P < 0.001NS WD-MD/PD-MC Liu et al [162 ], 2015 1464 138 (9.4) 30.4 36.2 vs 49.5 P < 0.001P < 0.001Non SRC-GC Chon et al [53 ], 2017 7667 1646 (21.5) 25.8 80.0 vs 70.0 (10-y survival rate) P < 0.001NS WMD/PD Lu et al [183 ], 2016 2199 354 (16.1) - 15.9 mo vs 22.1 mo P = 0.002< 0.001 Non SRC-GC Western studies Theuer et al [184 ], 1999 3020 453 (15.0) NR Similar NS NS Non SRC-GC Piessen et al [35 ], 2009 180 59 (32.8) 83.1 28 vs 46 P = 0.004P = 0.004Non SRC-GC Taghavi et al [44 ], 2012 10246 2666 (26) 59.7 Similar (Disease-specific survival) NS P = 0.15Non SRC-GC Bamboat et al [51 ], 2014 569 210 (36.9) 61.0 49 vs 24/43 (5-y cumulative-mortality) P < 0.0001- WMD/PD Postlewait et al [6 ], 2015 768 312 (40.6) 66.3 33.7 mo vs 46.6 mo (OS) P = 0.011NS Non SRC-GC Voron et al [8 ], 2016 1799 899 (50) 73.2 26 mo vs 51 mo (median survival) P < 0.001P < 0.041Non SRC-GC
Table 4 Summary of studies reporting prognostic value of signet ring cell- and poorly cohesive cell-early gastric cancer
Ref. n n SRC-GC (%) % LNM 5-yr survival rate %, SRC-GC vs other Univariate Multivariate Compared to Eastern studies Maehara et al [49 ], 1992 384 28 (7.3) 10.7 100 vs 94.8 NS - Non SRC-GC Kim et al [177 ], 1994 785 185 (23.6) 7.6 92.9 vs 83.9/87.3/93.6 NS - WD/MD/PD Otsuji et al [178 ], 1998 568 94 (16.5) 5.3 93 vs 76.3 P < 0.05- Non SRC-GC Yokota et al [179 ], 1998 253 41 (16.2) - Similar NS - Non SRC-GC Hyung et al [80 ], 2002 933 263 (28.2) 5.7 94.2 vs 91.6 P = 0.01- Non SRC-GC Kim et al [180 ], 2004 561 94 (16.8) 2.1 96.3 vs 90.8 NS NS Non SRC-GC Kunisaki et al [185 ], 2004 513 120 (23.4) 9.2 Better P = 0.033P = 0.036Non SRC-GC Ha et al [186 ], 2008 1520 388 (25.5) 9.5 99.7 vs 99.1/97.2 NS/P = 0.019 - WMD-PA/PD-MC Zhang et al [45 ], 2010 138 49 (35.5) - Similar NS - Non SRC-GC Chiu et al [182 ], 2011 579 149 (25.7) 10.7 96.1 vs 89.6 P = 0.01- Non SRC-GC Jiang et al [55 ], 2011 269 54 (20.1) 16.7 94.3 vs 90.6 P = 0.007P = 0.011Non SRC-GC Kwon et al [50 ], 2014 326 51 (15.6) 9.8 84.0 vs 76.0/65.7 (10-yr survival rate) NS - WD-MD/PD-MC Kim et al [52 ], 2014 2085 345 (16.5) 9.0% Similar (disease-related survival) NS - WD/MD/PD Wang et al [187 ], 2015 334 115 (34.4) 8.5 93.9 vs 85.8 P = 0.0270.001 UD Chon et al [53 ], 2017 3272 1091 (33.3) - 95 vs 85 (10-yr survival rate) P < 0.001P = 0.041 (WMD)WMD-PD Imamura et al [188 ], 2016 746 152 (20.4) 2.0 97.4 vs 89.9 P = 0.012P = 0.038Non SRC-GC Western studies Gronnier et al [54 ], 2013 421 104 (24.7) 24,0 85 vs 76 P = 0.035NS Non SRC-GC Bamboat et al [51 ], 2014 437 174 (39.8) - 0 vs 8/24 (5-disease-specific mortality) P = 0.001- WMD/PD
Table 5 Summary of studies reporting prognostic value of signet ring cell- and poorly cohesive cell-gastric cancer
Studies n n SRC (%) % LNM 5-yr survival rate % (PCC-GC vs other) Univariate Multivariate Compared to Eastern studies Maehara et al [49 ], 1992 1116 23 (2.1) 60.8 42.5 vs 37.6 NS - Non SRC-GC Kim et al [177 ], 1994 2917 265 (9.1) 80.8 33 vs 45.4/38.8/35.3 P < 0.05- WD/MD/PD Otsuji et al [178 ], 1998 930 60 (6.4) 63.3 44.4 vs 27.5 (10-yr survival rate) NS - Non SRC-GC Yokota et al [179 ], 1998 430 52 (12.1) - Worse NS - Non SRC-GC Kunisaki et al [185 ], 2004 600 54 (9.0) 57.4 Similar NS - Non SRC-GC Kim et al [180 ], 2004 1797 110 (6.1) 47.3 35.1 vs 39.5 NS - Non SRC-GC Li et al [56 ], 2007 4759 662 (13.9) 75.7 42.4 vs 50.1 0.009 NS Non SRC-GC Chiu et al [182 ], 2011 1860 356 (19.1) 71.6 41.5 vs 46.3 P = 0.018- Non SRC-GC Jiang et al [55 ], 2011 2046 157 (7.7) 64.3 31.5 vs 35.7 NS NS Non SRC-GC Zu et al [57 ], 2014 741 44 (5.9) 56.8 43.4 vs 87.1/57.1/50.6/62.7 P = 0.0120.028 WD/MD/PD/MC Kwon et al [50 ], 2014 443 57 (12.9) 73.7 26.0 vs 50.5/38.4 (10-yr survival rate) P = 0.044NS WD-MD/PD-MC Chon et al [53 ], 2017 1777 555 (31.2) - 53 vs 58/52 (10-yr survival rate) P < 0.001P < 0.001WMD/PD Western studies Heger et al [58 ], 2014 723 235 (32.5) 63.0 26.3 vs 46.6 mo (median survival) P < 0.001P = 0.02 (backward analysis)Non SRC-GC