Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2022; 14(4): 833-841
Published online Apr 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.833
Published online Apr 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.833
Surgical procedure | Indications | Benefits | Pitfalls |
Ileo-rectal anastomosis | < 20 rectal, adenomas; < 1000 colonic, adenomas | Controls colonic polyposis. Better bowel function & good quality of life. Reduced risk of desmoid disease. Avoids stoma. Quicker recovery, especially useful in active teenagers | Risk of rectal cancer. Annual surveillance with proctoscopy & flexible sigmoidoscopy is required |
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis | < 20 rectal, adenomas; < 1000 colonic, adenomas | Removes nearly all polyps in colon & rectum. No need of permanent ileostomy. Quality of life is satisfactory | Increased complications. Unpredictable bowel function. Unpredictable quality of life. Possible need for ileostomy. Pouch complications: (1) Risk of pouch polyposis; and (2) Risk of cancer in anal transition zone. Surveillance is difficult |
Proctocolectomy & end ileostomy | Low rectal cancer. When Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is not indicated. Poor anal sphincter. Function | Complete removal of cancer risk in lower gastrointestinal tract | Permanent ileostomy. Sexual and fertility consequences such as dyspareunia, decrease in fertility, vaginal discharge in females and reduced libido, sexual satisfaction in males |
- Citation: Kudchadkar S, Ahmed S, Mukherjee T, Sagar J. Current guidelines in the surgical management of hereditary colorectal cancers. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(4): 833-841
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v14/i4/833.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v14.i4.833