Li C, Tian XJ, Qu GT, Teng YX, Li ZF, Nie XY, Liu DJ, Liu T, Li WD. Clinical value of regional lymph node sorting in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(12): 2393-2403 [PMID: 36568948 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i12.2393]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Wei-Dong Li, Doctor, MD, PhD, Surgical Oncologist, Department of General Surgery, Tianjin General Surgery Institute, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, No. 154 Anshan Road, Heping District, Tianjin 300000, China. tjmughgs_lwd@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Dec 15, 2022; 14(12): 2393-2403 Published online Dec 15, 2022. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i12.2393
Table 1 Baseline data of gastric cancer cases in the regional sorting group and non-sorting group
Regional sorting group (n = 324)
Non-sorting group (n = 337)
χ²
P value
Surgery
1.727
0.422
Proximal gastrectomy
19
27
Distal gastrectomy
177
189
Total gastrectomy
128
121
Tumor location
2.744
0.254
U
46
38
M
92
85
L
186
214
Immersion depth
2.071
0.558
T1
69
60
T2
42
38
T3
19
21
T4
194
218
Differentiation degree
2.891
0.089
DCA
181
166
UCA
143
171
Table 2 Comparison of the number of lymph nodes and the number of positive lymph nodes between the regional sorting group and non-sorting group
Pieces, median (interquartile range)
Z
P value
Regional sorting group
Non-sorting group
The number of lymph nodes detected
32.5 (24.0, 42.0)
21.0 (17.0, 28.0)
-10.775
< 0.001
Number of positive lymph nodes
2.0 (0.0, 9.0)
3.0 (0.0, 9.0)
-0.172
0.863
Table 3 Binary logistic regression analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the second dissection station (n = 123)
B
SE
Wald
df
P value
OR
95%CI
Upper
Lower
Tumor location
U
1.067
2
0.587
M
-0.087
0.460
0.036
1
0.850
0.917
0.372
2.258
L
-0.346
0.421
0.675
1
0.411
0.708
0.310
1.615
Immersion depth
T1
5.468
3
0.141
T2
1.872
0.829
5.092
1
0.024
6.500
1.279
33.034
T3
1.504
0.850
3.132
1
0.077
4.500
0.851
23.801
T4
1.464
0.865
4.567
1
0.033
4.324
1.129
16.557
Differentiation degree
DCA/UCA
0.415
0.282
2.201
1
0.138
1.515
0.875
2.621
The number of positive lymph nodes (pieces)
≤ 6/> 6
1.707
0.305
31.284
1
< 0.001
5.514
3.031
10.029
Table 4 Multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the second dissection station (n = 123)
B
SE
Wald
df
P value
OR
95%CI
Upper
Lower
Tumor location
U
0.601
2
0.741
M
-0.299
0.511
0.344
1
0.558
0.741
0.273
2.017
L
-0.358
0.463
0.599
1
0.439
0.699
0.282
1.732
Immersion depth
T1
4.710
3
0.194
T2
1.817
0.875
4.316
1
0.038
6.153
1.108
34.160
T3
0.956
0.922
1.075
0.300
2.601
0.427
15.852
T4
0.884
0.735
1.445
1
0.229
2.420
0.573
10.223
Differentiation degree
DCA/UCA
0.124
0.323
0.147
1
0.701
1.132
0.601
2.130
The number of positive lymph nodes (pieces)
≤ 6/> 6
1.718
0.322
28.541
1
< 0.001
5.576
2.968
10.473
Constant
-1197
0.829
2086
1
0.149
0.302
Citation: Li C, Tian XJ, Qu GT, Teng YX, Li ZF, Nie XY, Liu DJ, Liu T, Li WD. Clinical value of regional lymph node sorting in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14(12): 2393-2403