Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2020; 12(4): 424-434
Published online Apr 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.424
Table 1 Patient's clinicopathological features in the robotic assisted proctectomy and laparoscopic assisted proctectomy groups for locally advanced rectal cancer
FeaturesRAP (n = 293)LAP (n = 293)P value
Gender0.8671
Male168 (57.3)170 (58.0)
Female125 (42.7)123 (42.0)
Age, yr60 ± 12, 61 (26-89)60 ± 11, 60 (29-86)0.9693
Body mass index, kg/m223.16 ± 2.5123.23 ± 2.480.7212
Serum CEA level, ng/mL14.3 ± 46.7, 4.9 (0.8-760.3)14.5 ± 30.9, 5.8 (0.2-412.8)0.4293
Type of resection0.2641
Dixon240 (81.9)250 (85.3)
Miles53 (18.1)43 (14.7)
pTNM0.6861
II64 (21.8)60 (20.5)
III229 (78.2)233 (79.5)
ASA classification0.5601
1144 (49.1)149 (50.9)
2104 (35.5)106 (36.9)
345 (15.4)36 (12.3)
Diameter of neoplasm, cm4.2 ± 1.5, 4.0 (0.2-10.0)4.3 ± 1.3, 4.3 (0.3-9.0)0.5543
Distance of tumor and anal, cm46.7 ± 2.8, 7.0 (2.0-14.0)6.8 ± 2.8, 7.0 (2.0-14.0)0.5753
Table 2 Operative outcomes between the robotic assisted proctectomy group and laparoscopic assisted proctectomy group
Operative outcomesRAP (n = 293)LAP (n = 293)P value
Operative time, min171 ± 42, 160 (120-385)145 ± 42, 133 (80-350)0.0003
Operative blood loss, mL106 ± 114, 80 (30-1500)138 ± 111, 100 (40-1200)0.0003
Median time to first flatus, h57 ± 11, 56 (28-98)56 ± 9, 56 (28-100)0.5343
Median time to liquid diet, h69 ± 10, 67 (38-108)69 ± 9, 69 (38-110)0.3963
Median time to semi-liquid diet, h83 ± 10, 82 (51-122)83 ± 9, 83 (53-123)0.1943
Median volume of pelvic drainage, mL362 ± 457, 290 (80-4020)465 ± 564, 310 (100-3820)0.000 3
Median time to remove pelvic drainage tube, d7.1 ± 4.2, 6.0 (4.0-29.0)7.8 ± 4.9, 7.0 (4.0-28.0)0.0003
Median time to remove urinary catheter, d3.2 ± 1.0, 3.0 (2.0-7.0)3.8 ± 1.2, 4.0 (2.0-14.0)0.0003
Numbers of retrieved lymph nodes16.0 ± 3.815.7 ± 3.70.3492
Perineural invasion0.5571
Yes124 (42.3)117 (39.9)
No169 (57.7)176 (60.1)
Vascular invasion0.3341
Yes91 (31.1)102 (34.8)
No202 (68.9)191 (65.2)
Distal resection margin, cm2.7 ± 0.6, 2.7 (1.8-7.1)2.5 ± 0.5, 2.5 (1.6-6.8)0.0003
Conversion to open laparotomy7 (2.4)17 (5.8)0.0371
Postoperative length of stay, d9.1 ± 4.9, 8.0 (5.0-32.0)9.2 ± 5.0, 8.0 (5.0-30.0)0.4613
Table 3 Complications in the robotic assisted proctectomy group and laparoscopic assisted proctectomy group, n (%)
ComplicationsRAP (n = 293)LAP (n = 293)P value
Patients with complications39 (13.3)46 (15.7)0.4121
Single complication31 (10.6)35 (11.9)0.6011
Multiple complications8 (2.7)11 (3.8)0.4841
Overall complications47 (16.0)57 (19.5)0.280 1
Wound infection8 (27)6 (2.0)0.5881
Delayed gastric emptying0 (0.0)1 (0.3)1.0003
Intestinal obstruction2 (0.7)3 (1.0)1.0002
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage1 (0.3)2 (0.7)1.0002
Anastomotic leakage13 (4.4)14 (4.8)0.8441
Anastomotic bleeding1 (0.3)1 (0.3)1.0002
Pneumonia4 (1.4)5 (1.7)1.0002
Pleural effusion1 (0.3)1 (0.3)1.0002
Infection of presacral space1 (0.3)5 (1.7)0.2182
Intra-abdominal infections1 (0.3)2 (0.7)1.000 2
Infection of incision in perineum6 (2.0)5 (1.7)0.7611
Small intestinal fistula1 (0.3)1 (0.3)1.0002
Peristomal wound infection1 (0.3)0 (0.0)1.0003
Necrosis of enterostomy1 (0.3)0 (0.0)1.0003
Urinary retention6 (2.0)10 (3.4)0.3111
Cerebral infarction0 (0.0)1 (0.3)1.0003
Clavien-Dindo classification
I15 (5.1)16 (5.5)0.8541
II13 (4.4)20 (6.8)0.2101
IIIa14 (4.8)16 (5.5)0.7081
IIIb4 (1.4)3 (1.0)1.0002
V1 (0.3)2 (0.7)1.0002
≥ III19 (6.5)21 (7.2)0.7431
Reoperation4 (1.4)3 (1.0)1.0002
Mortality1 (0.3)2 (0.7)1.0002
Unplanned readmission within 30 d after operation2 (0.7)5 (1.7)0.4472