Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Apr 15, 2020; 12(4): 424-434
Published online Apr 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.424
Published online Apr 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.424
Features | RAP (n = 293) | LAP (n = 293) | P value |
Gender | 0.8671 | ||
Male | 168 (57.3) | 170 (58.0) | |
Female | 125 (42.7) | 123 (42.0) | |
Age, yr | 60 ± 12, 61 (26-89) | 60 ± 11, 60 (29-86) | 0.9693 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.16 ± 2.51 | 23.23 ± 2.48 | 0.7212 |
Serum CEA level, ng/mL | 14.3 ± 46.7, 4.9 (0.8-760.3) | 14.5 ± 30.9, 5.8 (0.2-412.8) | 0.4293 |
Type of resection | 0.2641 | ||
Dixon | 240 (81.9) | 250 (85.3) | |
Miles | 53 (18.1) | 43 (14.7) | |
pTNM | 0.6861 | ||
II | 64 (21.8) | 60 (20.5) | |
III | 229 (78.2) | 233 (79.5) | |
ASA classification | 0.5601 | ||
1 | 144 (49.1) | 149 (50.9) | |
2 | 104 (35.5) | 106 (36.9) | |
3 | 45 (15.4) | 36 (12.3) | |
Diameter of neoplasm, cm | 4.2 ± 1.5, 4.0 (0.2-10.0) | 4.3 ± 1.3, 4.3 (0.3-9.0) | 0.5543 |
Distance of tumor and anal, cm4 | 6.7 ± 2.8, 7.0 (2.0-14.0) | 6.8 ± 2.8, 7.0 (2.0-14.0) | 0.5753 |
Operative outcomes | RAP (n = 293) | LAP (n = 293) | P value |
Operative time, min | 171 ± 42, 160 (120-385) | 145 ± 42, 133 (80-350) | 0.0003 |
Operative blood loss, mL | 106 ± 114, 80 (30-1500) | 138 ± 111, 100 (40-1200) | 0.0003 |
Median time to first flatus, h | 57 ± 11, 56 (28-98) | 56 ± 9, 56 (28-100) | 0.5343 |
Median time to liquid diet, h | 69 ± 10, 67 (38-108) | 69 ± 9, 69 (38-110) | 0.3963 |
Median time to semi-liquid diet, h | 83 ± 10, 82 (51-122) | 83 ± 9, 83 (53-123) | 0.1943 |
Median volume of pelvic drainage, mL | 362 ± 457, 290 (80-4020) | 465 ± 564, 310 (100-3820) | 0.000 3 |
Median time to remove pelvic drainage tube, d | 7.1 ± 4.2, 6.0 (4.0-29.0) | 7.8 ± 4.9, 7.0 (4.0-28.0) | 0.0003 |
Median time to remove urinary catheter, d | 3.2 ± 1.0, 3.0 (2.0-7.0) | 3.8 ± 1.2, 4.0 (2.0-14.0) | 0.0003 |
Numbers of retrieved lymph nodes | 16.0 ± 3.8 | 15.7 ± 3.7 | 0.3492 |
Perineural invasion | 0.5571 | ||
Yes | 124 (42.3) | 117 (39.9) | |
No | 169 (57.7) | 176 (60.1) | |
Vascular invasion | 0.3341 | ||
Yes | 91 (31.1) | 102 (34.8) | |
No | 202 (68.9) | 191 (65.2) | |
Distal resection margin, cm | 2.7 ± 0.6, 2.7 (1.8-7.1) | 2.5 ± 0.5, 2.5 (1.6-6.8) | 0.0003 |
Conversion to open laparotomy | 7 (2.4) | 17 (5.8) | 0.0371 |
Postoperative length of stay, d | 9.1 ± 4.9, 8.0 (5.0-32.0) | 9.2 ± 5.0, 8.0 (5.0-30.0) | 0.4613 |
Complications | RAP (n = 293) | LAP (n = 293) | P value |
Patients with complications | 39 (13.3) | 46 (15.7) | 0.4121 |
Single complication | 31 (10.6) | 35 (11.9) | 0.6011 |
Multiple complications | 8 (2.7) | 11 (3.8) | 0.4841 |
Overall complications | 47 (16.0) | 57 (19.5) | 0.280 1 |
Wound infection | 8 (27) | 6 (2.0) | 0.5881 |
Delayed gastric emptying | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | 1.0003 |
Intestinal obstruction | 2 (0.7) | 3 (1.0) | 1.0002 |
Intra-abdominal hemorrhage | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.7) | 1.0002 |
Anastomotic leakage | 13 (4.4) | 14 (4.8) | 0.8441 |
Anastomotic bleeding | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 1.0002 |
Pneumonia | 4 (1.4) | 5 (1.7) | 1.0002 |
Pleural effusion | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 1.0002 |
Infection of presacral space | 1 (0.3) | 5 (1.7) | 0.2182 |
Intra-abdominal infections | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.7) | 1.000 2 |
Infection of incision in perineum | 6 (2.0) | 5 (1.7) | 0.7611 |
Small intestinal fistula | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 1.0002 |
Peristomal wound infection | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1.0003 |
Necrosis of enterostomy | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1.0003 |
Urinary retention | 6 (2.0) | 10 (3.4) | 0.3111 |
Cerebral infarction | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.3) | 1.0003 |
Clavien-Dindo classification | |||
I | 15 (5.1) | 16 (5.5) | 0.8541 |
II | 13 (4.4) | 20 (6.8) | 0.2101 |
IIIa | 14 (4.8) | 16 (5.5) | 0.7081 |
IIIb | 4 (1.4) | 3 (1.0) | 1.0002 |
V | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.7) | 1.0002 |
≥ III | 19 (6.5) | 21 (7.2) | 0.7431 |
Reoperation | 4 (1.4) | 3 (1.0) | 1.0002 |
Mortality | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.7) | 1.0002 |
Unplanned readmission within 30 d after operation | 2 (0.7) | 5 (1.7) | 0.4472 |
- Citation: Ye SP, Zhu WQ, Liu DN, Lei X, Jiang QG, Hu HM, Tang B, He PH, Gao GM, Tang HC, Shi J, Li TY. Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(4): 424-434
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i4/424.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.424