Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2020; 12(10): 1133-1145
Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1133
Published online Oct 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1133
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of resected nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Variable | Finding |
Age in yr, median (range) | 56.0 (46.0–63.0) |
Male, n (%) | 51 (46.4) |
BMI in kg/m², median (range) | 24.1 (22.1–26.3) |
ASA, grade, n (%) | |
I | 30 (27.3) |
II | 59 (53.6) |
III | 21 (19.1) |
Diabetes, preoperative, n (%) | 20 (18.2) |
Pancreatic tumor location, n (%) | |
Head | 41 (35.7) |
Neck | 6 (5.2) |
Body | 26 (22.6) |
Tail | 42 (36.5) |
Type of surgery, n (%) | |
Distal pancreatectomy | 51 (46.4) |
Enucleation | 22 (20.0) |
Central pancreatectomy | 7 (6.4) |
Pylorus-preservingpancreaticoduodenectomy | 21 (19.1) |
Total pancreatectomy | 9 (8.2) |
MIS or open, n (%) | |
MIS | 62 (56.4) |
Open | 48 (43.6) |
Post-operative length of stay in d, median (range) | 11.5 (8.0–17.0) |
Clavien-Dindo grade, n (%) | |
0: no complications | 58 (52.7) |
I | 35 (31.8) |
II | 8 (7.3) |
IIIa | 5 (4.5) |
IIIb | 3 (2.7) |
IVa | 1 (0.9) |
IVb | 0 (0) |
POPF by ISGPF | |
Grade A | 47 (40.9%) |
Grade B | 6 (5.2%) |
Grade C | 0 (0%) |
DGE by ISGPS | |
Grade A | 18 (15.7%) |
Grade B | 1 (0.9%) |
Grade C | 0 (0%) |
Resection margin status, n (%) | |
R0 | 97 (88.2) |
R1 | 5 (4.5) |
R2 | 8 (7.3) |
Pathological tumor size in cm, median (range) | 1.8 (1.2–3.2) |
T stage by ENETS classification | |
T1 | 56 (50.9%) |
T2 | 18 (16.4%) |
T3 | 36 (32.7%) |
T4 | 0 (0.0%) |
N status | |
Negative | 57 (51.9%) |
Positive | 9 (8.1%) |
No lymphadenectomy | 44 (40.0%) |
Metastasis present, n (%) | 5 (4.5) |
2010 WHO classification grade, n (%) | |
G1 | 78 (70.9) |
G2 | 27 (24.54) |
G3 | 4 (3.63) |
Unknown | 1 (0.9) |
Table 2 Clinicopathological characteristics of minimally invasive and open approaches in terms of the distal location of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Variable | Open approach, n = 12 | MIS, n = 39 | P value |
Male | 7 (58.3%) | 19 (48.7%) | 0.801 |
Age in yr, median (range) | 58.5 (51.0-64.5) | 56.0 (47.0-64.5) | 0.617 |
BMI in kg/m², median (range) | 24.6 (22.1-25.5) | 24.8 (22.9-27.3) | 0.418 |
ASA grade, n (%) | 0.243 | ||
I | 5 (41.7) | 7 (17.9) | |
II | 5 (41.7) | 23 (59.0) | |
Ш | 2 (16.7) | 9 (23.1) | |
Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy | 5 (41.7%) | 26 (66.6%) | |
Conversion, n (%) | - | 4 (10.2) | |
Robot-assisted | - | 8 (20.5%) | |
Operative time as minimum, median (range) | 179.0 (159.5–251.5) | 216.0 (185.5–276.0) | 0.105 |
Blood loss in cc, median (range) | 175.0 (65.0–450.0) | 100 (45.0–275.0) | 0.093 |
Clavien-Dindo grade | 0.729 | ||
0: no complications | 7 (58.3%) | 26 (66.7%) | |
I | 4 (33.3%) | 10 (25.6%) | |
II | 1 (8.3%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
IIIa | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.6%) | |
DGE by ISGPS | 0.561 | ||
Grade A | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (10.3%) | |
Grade B | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Grade C | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
POPF by ISGPF | 0.805 | ||
Grade A | 7 (58.3%) | 20 (51.3%) | |
Grade B | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.6%) | |
Grade C | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Post-operative length of stay in d, median (range) | 14.0 (11.5-16.0) | 8.0 (7.0-10.5) | < 0.001 |
Resection margin status | 0.612 | ||
R0 | 12 (100.0%) | 36 (92.3%) | |
R1 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (5.1%) | |
R2 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (2.6%) | |
Pathological tumor size in cm, median (range) | 2.5 (1.4-3.9) | 2.0 (1.5-3.2) | 0.548 |
T stage by ENETS classification | 0.563 | ||
T1 | 5 (41.7%) | 20 (51.3%) | |
T2 | 2 (16.7%) | 9 (23.1%) | |
T3 | 5 (41.7%) | 10 (25.6%) | |
N stage | 0.056 | ||
Negative | 9 (75.0%) | 38 (97.4%) | |
Positive | 3 (25.0%) | 1 (2.6%) | |
M stage | |||
0 | 12 (100.0%) | 39 (100.0%) | |
Nodal harvest, median (range) | 0.0 (0.0-5.5) | 1.0 (0.0-3.5) | 0.767 |
2010 WHO grade | 0.365 | ||
G1 | 7 (57.1%) | 25 (64.1%) | |
G2 | 4 (42.9%) | 14 (35.9%) | |
G3 | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) |
Table 3 Clinicopathological characteristics of the minimally invasive surgery and open groups in terms of the proximal location of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Variable | Open, n = 22 | MIS, n = 15 | P value |
Male | 11 (50.0%) | 5 (33.3%) | 0.505 |
Age in yr, median (range) | 53.5 (40.0–65.0) | 53.0 (43.0–65.5) | 0.631 |
BMI in kg/m², median (range) | 24.6 (22.7–27.3) | 21.9 (21.1–23.4) | 0.006 |
ASA grade, n (%) | 0.069 | ||
I | 6 (27.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
II | 14 (63.6) | 12 (80.0) | |
III | 2 (9.1) | 3 (20.0) | |
Type of surgery | 0.541 | ||
Central pancreatectomy | 3 (13.6%) | 4 (26.7%) | |
PPPD | 14 (63.6%) | 7 (46.7%) | |
Total pancreatectomy | 5 (22.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | |
Operative time in min, median (range) | 346.0 (295.0-400.0) | 512.0 (462.5-530.0) | < 0.001 |
Blood loss in cc, median (range) | 450.0 (100.0-1020.0) | 400. (175.0-450.0) | 0.515 |
Clavien-Dindo grade | 0.489 | ||
0: no complications | 10 (45.5%) | 4 (26.7%) | |
I | 8 (36.4%) | 5 (33.3%) | |
II | 1 (4.5%) | 3 (20.0%) | |
IIIa | 1 (4.5%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
IIIb | 2 (9.1%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
IV | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
DGEby ISGPS | 0.457 | ||
Grade A | 7 (31.8%) | 5 (33.3%) | |
Grade B | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
Grade C | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
POPF by ISGPF | 0.571 | ||
Grade A | 5 (22.7%) | 4 (26.7%) | |
Grade B | 1 (4.5%) | 2 (13.3%) | |
Grade C | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Post-operative length of stay in d, median (range) | 20.0 (14.0–30.0) | 13.0 (10.5–24.5) | 0.210 |
Resection margin status | 0.505 | ||
R0 | 20 (90.9%) | 15 (100.0%) | |
R1 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
R2 | 2 (9.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Pathological tumor size incm, median (range) | 2.6 (1.5-4.5) | 1.5 (1.3-2.2) | 0.041 |
T stage by ENETs classification | 0.081 | ||
T1 | 6 (27.3%) | 8 (53.3%) | |
T2 | 5 (22.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
T3 | 11 (50.0%) | 7 (46.7%) | |
N stage | 1.000 | ||
0 | 20 (90.9%) | 13 (86.7%) | |
1 | 2 (9.1%) | 2 (13.3%) | |
M stage | 1.000 | ||
0 | 19 (86.4%) | 13 (86.7%) | |
1 | 3 (13.6%) | 2 (13.3%) | |
Nodal harvest, median (range) | 7.5 (5-12) | 6.0 (2.5-12.5) | 0.804 |
2010 WHO grade | 0.848 | ||
G1 | 16 (72.7%) | 10 (66.7%) | |
G2 | 3 (13.6%) | ||
G3 | 2 (9.1%) | 1 (6.7%) | |
Unknown | 1 (4.5%) | 0 (0%) |
Table 4 Factors associated with tumor recurrence after curative resection of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
HR | 95%CI | P value | HR | 95%CI | P value | |
Age > 60 yr | 0.40 | 0.09-1.83 | 0.239 | |||
Male | 1.95 | 0.62-6.16 | 0.254 | |||
Minimally invasive surgery | 0.61 | 0.18-2.09 | 0.432 | 1.062 | 0.28-4.03 | 0.929 |
Tumor size > 2.5 cm | 22.21 | 2.86-172.69 | 0.003 | 16.21 | 1.99-128.8 | 0.009 |
Positive resection margin | 1.52 | 0.33–6.99 | 0.589 | |||
Poor differentiation, G3 | 71.55 | 6.43-795.75 | 0.001 | 24.429 | 1.99-277.95 | 0.017 |
Positive lymph node | 1.93 | 0.42–8.83 | 0.398 | |||
Lympho-vascular invasion | 8.77 | 2.75-27.93 | < 0.001 | 3.56 | 0.96-13.2 | 0.058 |
- Citation: Kim J, Hwang HK, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(10): 1133-1145
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i10/1133.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1133