Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2020; 12(1): 83-91
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.83
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.83
Table 1 Patient baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Value |
| Total, n | 98 |
| Age in yr, median (range) | 60 (22-86) |
| Gender, n (%) | |
| Female | 46 (47) |
| Male | 52 (53) |
| Institution, n (%) | |
| MD Anderson Cancer Center | 61 (62) |
| University of Michigan | 26 (27) |
| Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | 11 (11) |
| Stage at Treatment with FOLFIRI, n (%) | |
| Locally advanced | 24 (25) |
| Metastatic | 74 (75) |
| Subtype of BTC, n (%) | |
| Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | 10 (10) |
| Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | 71 (72) |
| Gallbladder carcinoma | 17 (17) |
| Line of Therapy, n (%) | |
| First | 8 (8) |
| Second | 50 (51) |
| Third | 36 (37) |
| Fourth or greater | 4 (4) |
| Irinotecan-based regimen, n (%) | |
| FOLFIRI | 77 (79) |
| FOLFIRI + bevacizumab | 13 (13) |
| FOLRIRI + anti-EGFR | 5 (5) |
| FOLFIRINOX | 2 (2) |
| FOLFIRI + nab-paclitaxel | 1 (1) |
| ECOG performance status, n (%) | |
| 0 | 11 (11) |
| 1 | 48 (49) |
| 2 | 3 (3) |
| 3 | 2 (2) |
| Not documented | 34 (35) |
Table 2 Subgroup analysis of median progression-free survival
| Variable | Median PFS (95%CI) | P value | Median OS (95%CI) | P value |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 2.4 (1.6–3.6) | 0.65 | 6.6 (4.5–9.9) | 0.65 |
| Male | 2.3 (1.5–3.4) | 6.9 (4.6–10.3) | ||
| Subtype of BTC | ||||
| Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | 3.7 (1.5–18.9) | 0.14 | 8.0 (1.8–22.3) | 0.61 |
| Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma | 2.3 (1.9-2.8) | 6.5 (4.5–9.7) | ||
| Gallbladder carcinoma | 2.1 (1.8–3.7) | 6.5 (5.2–10.1) | ||
| Stage at treatment with FOLFIRI | ||||
| Locally Advanced | 3.2 (2.0–5.2) | 0.16 | 9.3 (5.9–14.7) | 0.08 |
| Metastatic | 2.1 (1.3–3.3) | 5.6 (3.5–8.8) | ||
| Line of therapy | ||||
| First | 3.1 (1.4–4.8) | 0.24 | 12.3 (5.6–23.4) | 0.08 |
| Second | 2.4 (1.8–3.7) | 7.7 (4.9–10.5) | ||
| Third | 2.3 (1.5–3.1) | 5.0 (3.6–7.3) | ||
| Fourth or greater | 1.5 (0.9–2.0) | 7.5 (5.2–9.8) | ||
| ECOG performance status | ||||
| 0 or 1 | 2.5 (2.0–3.1) | 0.44 | 7.7 (5.6–11.9) | 0.03 |
| 2 or greater | 1.5 (0.8–4.9) | 2.9 (1.7–8.6) | ||
| Undocumented | 2.1 (1.6–3.4) | 5.3 (3.8–8.2) | ||
| Genomic analysis | ||||
| KRAS | ||||
| Wildtype | 2.4 (1.1–5.1) | 0.12 | 11.8 (5.5–25.4) | 0.06 |
| Mutant | 3.7 (1.7–8.0) | 7.5 (3.5–16.1) | ||
| FGFR | ||||
| Wildtype | 2.5 (1.0–6.0) | 0.29 | 8.0 (3.3–19.4) | 0.56 |
| Fusion | 4.3 (1.8–10.5) | 13.4 (5.5–32.2) | ||
| IDH1 | ||||
| Wildtype | 2.7 (1.2–6.0) | 0.02 | 10.8 (4.9–23.9) | 0.14 |
| Mutant | 2.1 (0.9–4.6) | 4.1 (2.3–11.1) |
Table 3 Genomic profiling by tumor type
| Total patients profiled, n = 34 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Gallbladder carcinoma, n = 2 (6%) | |
| Extrahepatic, n = 5 (15%) | Intrahepatic, n = 27 (79%) | ||
| Mutation | n (% of profiled) | n (% of profiled) | n (% of profiled) |
| TP53 | - | 10 (37) | 2 (100) |
| IDH1 | - | 8 (30) | - |
| KRAS | 1 (20) | 6 (22) | - |
| FGFR2 | 2 (40) | 4 (15) | - |
| IDH2 | - | 2 (7) | - |
| PBRM1 | - | 2 (7) | - |
| BAP1 | - | 2 (7) | - |
| NF1 | - | 1 (4) | 1 (50) |
| ARID1A | - | 1 (4) | 1 (50) |
| CDKN2A | - | - | 1 (50) |
| MET | - | 1 (4) | - |
| CCND1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| PBX1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| MYC | - | 1 (4) | - |
| RB1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| MAP3K1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| S76 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| SPTA1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| RET | - | 1 (4) | - |
| ALK | - | 1 (4) | - |
| ATM | - | 1 (4) | - |
| CCNE1 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| GNAS | - | 1 (4) | - |
| SMAD4 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| PIK3CA | - | 1 (4) | - |
| PIK3CB | - | 1 (4) | - |
| PTEN | - | 1 (4) | - |
| PALB2 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| ARID2 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| BRCA2 | - | 1 (4) | - |
| BRAF | - | 1 (4) | - |
| MDM2 | 1 (20) | - | - |
| FRS2 | 1 (20) | - | - |
- Citation: Mizrahi JD, Gunchick V, Mody K, Xiao L, Surapaneni P, Shroff RT, Sahai V. Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of FOLFIRI in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(1): 83-91
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i1/83.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.83
