Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2020; 12(1): 113-123
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.113
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.113
Table 1 Summary of the three analysed studies
| Study (year) | Boonstra et al[16] | MRC Allum et al[17] | Ychou et al[15] |
| Number of included patients (intervention vs control) | 85 vs 84 | 400 vs 402 | 113 vs 111 |
| Inclusion criteria | 100% squamous-cell cancer of thoracic oesophagus (upper, middle and lower third), T1-3, any N, M0 (M1a eligible if distal oesophageal cancer and suspected celiac nodes) < 80 yr of age, Karnofsky > 70 | Squamous-cell cancer, adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated, upper, middle and lower thirds of oesophagus, as well as the gastric cardia | Resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction or stomach 18-75 years of age, WHO performance status 0 or 1, adequate renal (Cr < 120 mol/L) and hematologic functions |
| Intervention group | Preop. CTxa: Cisplatin, Etoposid iv. po. + surgery | Preop.CTx: Cisplatin, 5-FU + preop.radiotherapy + surgery | Preop.CTx: 5-FU, Cisplatin + surgery |
| Control group | Surgery | Preop. radiotherapy + surgery | Surgery |
| Outcome (intervention vs control) | Median overall survival 16 mo vs 12 mo, P = 0.03, by the log-rank test, HRb: 0.71; (95%CIc: 0.51-0.98) | Overall survival is significantly greater in CS group (HR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.98, P = 0.03) | Overall survival significantly higher in CS group (HR for death 0.69, 95%CI: 0.50-0.95, P = 0.02) 5-year survival: 38% (95%CI: 29%-47%) in the CS group vs 24% (95%CI: 26%-44%) in the S group |
| Weight assigned in the Cochrane review (%) | 24.1 | 20.5 | 24.5 |
Table 2 Assessment of validity of the three analysed studies according to the CONSORT checklist (REF)
| Section/Topic | Item number | Boonstra et al[16] | MRC Allum et al[17] | Ychou et al[15] |
| Title and Abstract | 1a | Yes | Yes | No |
| 1b | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Introduction | ||||
| Background and objectives | 2a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 2b | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Methods | ||||
| Trial design | 3a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3b | Not applicable | Not applicable | Yes | |
| Participants | 4a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 4b | Yes | No | No | |
| Interventions | 5 | Yes | No | Yes |
| Outcomes | 6a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 6b | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | |
| Sample size | 7a | Yes | No | Yes |
| 7b | Not applicable | Not applicable | Yes | |
| Randomisation | ||||
| -Sequence generation | 8a | No | Yes | Yes |
| 8b | No | No | No | |
| -Allocation concealment mechanism | 9 | No | No | No |
| - Implementation | 10 | No | No | No |
| Blinding | 11a | No | Yes | No |
| 11b | Yes | No | No | |
| Statistical methods | 12a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 12b | Yes | Yes | Not applicable | |
| Results | ||||
| Participant flow | 13a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 13b | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Recruitment | 14a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 14b | Not applicable | Not applicable | Nes | |
| Baseline data | 15 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Numbers analysed | 16 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Outcomes and estimation | 17a | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 17b | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
| Ancillary analysis | 18 | Yes | Yes | Not applicable |
| Harms | 19 | Yes | No | Yes |
| Discussion | ||||
| Limitations | 20 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Generalisability | 21 | No | No | No |
| Interpretation | 22 | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Other information | ||||
| Registration | 23 | No | No | No |
| Protocol | 24 | No | No | No |
| Funding | 25 | Yes | Yes | No |
- Citation: Manzini G, Klotz U, Henne-Bruns D, Kremer M. Validity of studies suggesting preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer: A critical appraisal of randomized trials. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(1): 113-123
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i1/113.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.113
