Meta-Analysis
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2019; 11(10): 909-924
Published online Oct 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.909
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies for diagnosis and clinicopathologic features
Study Ethnicity Patient size Control size Control source Sample type CircRNA Name Expression status Method Cut-Off value Control gene AUC QUADAS score Fu et al [12 ], 2017 Chinese 107 107 CH & LC Tissue hsa_circ_0003570 Decreased qRT-PCR 12.24 GAPDH 0.70 4 Yao et al [25 ], 2017 Chinese 102 102 Adjacent non-cancerous liver tissue Tissue circZKSCAN1 Decreased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.834 4 Shang et al [21 ], 2016 Chinese 30 30 Adjacent nontumorous tissue Tissue hsa_circ_0005075 Increased qRT-PCR 0.000586 GAPDH 0.94 6 Qin et al [20 ], 2016 Chinese 89 89 Paired adjacent liver tissues Tissue Hsa_circ_0001649 Decreased qRT-PCR 0.00079 β -actin0.63 6 Chen et al [11 ], 2018 Chinese 30 30 Para-tumorous tissues Tissue hsa_circ_0091582 Increased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.679 5 Chen et al [11 ], 2018 Chinese 30 30 Para-tumorous tissues Tissue hsa_circ_0128298 Increased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.664 5 Chen et al [11 ], 2018 Chinese 48 48 Para-tumorous tissues Tissue hsa_circ_0128298 Increased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.668 5 Huang et al [17 ], 2017 Chinese 102 129 Para-tumorous and CH tissues Tissue hsa_circ_0004018 Decreased qRT-PCR 0.531 GAPDH 0.848 5 Zhang et al [28 ],2018 Chinese 104 52 Healthy control Plasma hsa_circ_0001445 Decreased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.862 5 Zhang et al [29 ], 2018 Chinese 104 57 LC Plasma hsa_circ_0001445 Decreased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.672 5 Zhang et al [29 ], 2018 Chinese 104 44 CH Plasma hsa_circ_0001445 Decreased qRT-PCR Unclear GAPDH 0.764 5 Han et al [16 ], 2017 Chinese 80 80 Non-cancer tissue Tissue CircRNA pattern / qRT-PCR Unclear Unclear 0.988 3 Han et al [16 ], 2017 Chinese 20 20 Non-cancer tissue Tissue CircRNA pattern / qRT-PCR Unclear Unclear 0.976 3
Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies for prognosis and clinicopathologic features
Study Locale Patient size TNM stage (I/II/III/IV) Sample type CircRNA signature Expression status Survival indicator Follow-up time HR and 95%CI extraction P -value (survival)NOS scores Cai et al [10 ], 2018 China 78 Unclear Tissue hsa_circ_0103809 Increased OS Unclear Indirectly 0.001 6 Zhong et al [30 ], 2018 China 47 7, 15, 16, 9 Tissue circC3P1 Decreased OS Unclear Indirectly 0.030 6 Li et al [18 ], 2018 China 51 I–II: 24, III–IV: 27 Tissue circRNA101368 Increased OS Unclear Directly 0.001, 0.033 7 Weng et al [22 ], 2018 China 120 I–III: 60, 14, 46 Tissue hsa_circ_0064428 Increased OS Unclear Indirectly 0.033 7 Chen et al [11 ], 2018 China 78 Unclear Tissue hsa_circ_0128298 Increased OS Median: 37 months Directly 0.009, 0.014 8 Gong et al [14 ], 2018 China 64 12, 22, 17, 13 Tissue circ-ZEB1.33 Increased OS Unclear Indirectly 0.015, 0.019 7 Yu et al [26 ], 2018 China 208 I: 62, II–III: 101 Tissue cSMARCA5 Decreased OS Unclear Directly 0.001, 0.021 7 Huang et al [17 ], 2017 China 80 I–II: 43, III–IV: 37 Tissue hsa_circRNA_100338 Increased OS 5 years Indirectly <0.01 8 Han et al [16 ], 2017 China 116 Unclear Tissue circMTO1 Decreased OS Unclear Indirectly 0.0023 7 Guo et al [15 ], 2017 China 1800 Unclear Tissue circ-ITCH Decreased OS Unclear Directly <0.001 6 Zhang et al [27 ], 2018 China 77 I–II: 34, III–IV: 43 Tissue hsa_circ_0001649 Decreased OS Unclear Directly 0.015, 0.011 6 Xu et al [23 ], 2018 China 76 I–II: 23, III–IV: 53 Tissue hsa_circ_0001649 Decreased / / / / / Zhang et al [28 ], 2018 China 86 Early: 38, Late: 48 Tissue circsMaD2 Decreased / / / / /
Table 3 Study quality and bias in the retrospective cohort studies assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist
Study Cohort selection Comparability Outcome ascertainment Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non-exposed cohort Ascertain-ment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis Assessment of outcome Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur Adequacy of follow up of cohorts Cai et al [10 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Zhong et al [30 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Li et al [18 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 Weng et al [22 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 Chen et al [11 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Gong et al [14 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 Yu et al [26 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 Huang et al [17 ], 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Han et al [16 ], 2017 1 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 Guo et al [15 ], 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 Zhang et al [27 ], 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
Table 4 Associations between circular RNA expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
Class Included studies χ 2 Pooled P -value Gender 18 36.426 0.4487 Age 18 32.517 0.635 Smoking (yes vs no) 5 8.597 0.5707 Alcoholism 5 19.684 0.0323 Tumor size 13 57.979 0.00012 Tumor number (single vs multiple) 7 14.3614 0.4231 Encapsulation (incomplete/complete) 3 3.8078 0.7026 Differentiation grade (well/moderate/poor) 11 66.9698 1.97 × 10−6 Microvascular invasion 3 19.261 0.003744 TNM stage 13 76.1066 2.51 × 10−7 HBsAg 7 14.4284 0.418306 Serum AFP 12 42.4249 0.0115 Metastasis 12 79.8852 6.35 × 10−8 ALT 3 5.4896 0.4827 AST 4 12.3545 0.1361 GGT 3 14.3614 0.4231 Cirrhosis (yes/no) 5 5.8236 0.8298
Table 5 Subgroup analysis conducted based on sample type, control type, and expression status among the diagnostic studies
Analysis Included individual studies Sensitivity 95%CI Specificity 95%CI PLR 95%CI NLR 95%CI DOR 95%CI AUC Heterogeneity Sample type Tissue 10 0.73 (0.70–0.77) 0.82 (0.78–0.84) 4.03 (2.98–5.46) 0.29 (0.19–0.43) 15.17 (8.42–27.34) 0.88 I 2 = 73.9%, P = 0.0001Plasma 3 0.79 (0.74–0.84) 0.65 (0.57–0.73) 2.33 (1.47–3.7) 0.28 (0.12–0.63) 8.93 (2.37–33.64) 0.72 I 2 = 87.3%, P = 0.0004Expression status Up-regulated circRNAs 4 0.70 (0.62–0.78) 0.83 (0.76–0.89) 4.00 (2.71–5.91) 0.37 (0.28–0.50) 11.48 (5.90–22.33) 0.97 I 2 = 21.2%, P = 0.2832Down-regulated circRNAs 7 0.74 (0.70–0.77) 0.75 (0.71–0.78) 2.75 (2.16–3.5) 0.33 (0.22–0.49) 8.75 (5.31–14.43) 0.81 I 2 = 70.4%, P = 0.0025Control type Chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis vs HCC 3 0.77 (0.72–0.81) 0.76 (0.71–0.81) 3.08 (2.49–3.80) 0.32 (0.25–0.41) 10.89 (7.51–15.78) 0.84 I 2 = 0.0%, P = 0.5262Adjacent non-cancerous liver tissue vs HCC 6 0.63 (0.57–0.68) 0.75 (0.69–0.81) 2.33 (1.44–3.75) 0.52 (0.40–0.69) 4.7 (3.12–7.08) 0.73 I 2 = 0.0%, P = 0.4953