Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Oct 15, 2019; 11(10): 909-924
Published online Oct 15, 2019. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.909
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies for diagnosis and clinicopathologic features
StudyEthnicityPatient sizeControl sizeControl sourceSample typeCircRNA NameExpression statusMethodCut-Off valueControl geneAUCQUADAS score
Fu et al[12], 2017Chinese107107CH & LCTissuehsa_circ_0003570DecreasedqRT-PCR12.24GAPDH0.704
Yao et al[25], 2017Chinese102102Adjacent non-cancerous liver tissueTissuecircZKSCAN1DecreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.8344
Shang et al[21], 2016Chinese3030Adjacent nontumorous tissueTissuehsa_circ_0005075IncreasedqRT-PCR0.000586GAPDH0.946
Qin et al[20], 2016Chinese8989Paired adjacent liver tissuesTissueHsa_circ_0001649DecreasedqRT-PCR0.00079β-actin0.636
Chen et al[11], 2018Chinese3030Para-tumorous tissuesTissuehsa_circ_0091582IncreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.6795
Chen et al[11], 2018Chinese3030Para-tumorous tissuesTissuehsa_circ_0128298IncreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.6645
Chen et al[11], 2018Chinese4848Para-tumorous tissuesTissuehsa_circ_0128298IncreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.6685
Huang et al[17], 2017Chinese102129Para-tumorous and CH tissuesTissuehsa_circ_0004018DecreasedqRT-PCR0.531GAPDH0.8485
Zhang et al[28],2018Chinese10452Healthy controlPlasmahsa_circ_0001445DecreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.8625
Zhang et al[29], 2018Chinese10457LCPlasmahsa_circ_0001445DecreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.6725
Zhang et al[29], 2018Chinese10444CHPlasmahsa_circ_0001445DecreasedqRT-PCRUnclearGAPDH0.7645
Han et al[16], 2017Chinese8080Non-cancer tissueTissueCircRNA pattern/qRT-PCRUnclearUnclear0.9883
Han et al[16], 2017Chinese2020Non-cancer tissueTissueCircRNA pattern/qRT-PCRUnclearUnclear0.9763
Table 2 Characteristics of the included studies for prognosis and clinicopathologic features
StudyLocalePatient sizeTNM stage (I/II/III/IV)Sample typeCircRNA signatureExpression statusSurvival indicatorFollow-up timeHR and 95%CI extractionP-value (survival)NOS scores
Cai et al[10], 2018China78UnclearTissuehsa_circ_0103809IncreasedOSUnclearIndirectly0.0016
Zhong et al[30], 2018China477, 15, 16, 9TissuecircC3P1DecreasedOSUnclearIndirectly0.0306
Li et al[18], 2018China51I–II: 24, III–IV: 27TissuecircRNA101368IncreasedOSUnclearDirectly0.001, 0.0337
Weng et al[22], 2018China120I–III: 60, 14, 46Tissuehsa_circ_0064428IncreasedOSUnclearIndirectly0.0337
Chen et al[11], 2018China78UnclearTissuehsa_circ_0128298IncreasedOSMedian: 37 monthsDirectly0.009, 0.0148
Gong et al[14], 2018China6412, 22, 17, 13Tissuecirc-ZEB1.33IncreasedOSUnclearIndirectly0.015, 0.0197
Yu et al[26], 2018China208I: 62, II–III: 101TissuecSMARCA5DecreasedOSUnclearDirectly0.001, 0.0217
Huang et al[17], 2017China80I–II: 43, III–IV: 37Tissuehsa_circRNA_100338IncreasedOS5 yearsIndirectly<0.018
Han et al[16], 2017China116UnclearTissuecircMTO1DecreasedOSUnclearIndirectly0.00237
Guo et al[15], 2017China1800UnclearTissuecirc-ITCHDecreasedOSUnclearDirectly<0.0016
Zhang et al[27], 2018China77I–II: 34, III–IV: 43Tissuehsa_circ_0001649DecreasedOSUnclearDirectly0.015, 0.0116
Xu et al[23], 2018China76I–II: 23, III–IV: 53Tissuehsa_circ_0001649Decreased/////
Zhang et al[28], 2018China86Early: 38, Late: 48TissuecircsMaD2Decreased/////
Table 3 Study quality and bias in the retrospective cohort studies assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale checklist
StudyCohort selection
Comparability
Outcome ascertainment
Representativeness of the exposed cohortSelection of the non-exposed cohortAscertain-ment of exposureDemonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of studyComparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysisAssessment of outcomeWas follow-up long enough for outcomes to occurAdequacy of follow up of cohorts
Cai et al[10], 201811111100
Zhong et al[30], 201811111100
Li et al[18], 201811112100
Weng et al[22], 201811112100
Chen et al[11], 201811111111
Gong et al[14], 201811112100
Yu et al[26], 201811112100
Huang et al[17], 201711111111
Han et al[16], 201711112100
Guo et al[15], 201711111100
Zhang et al[27], 201811111100
Table 4 Associations between circular RNA expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
ClassIncluded studiesχ2Pooled P-value
Gender1836.4260.4487
Age1832.5170.635
Smoking (yes vs no)58.5970.5707
Alcoholism519.6840.0323
Tumor size1357.9790.00012
Tumor number (single vs multiple)714.36140.4231
Encapsulation (incomplete/complete)33.80780.7026
Differentiation grade (well/moderate/poor)1166.96981.97 × 10−6
Microvascular invasion319.2610.003744
TNM stage1376.10662.51 × 10−7
HBsAg714.42840.418306
Serum AFP1242.42490.0115
Metastasis1279.88526.35 × 10−8
ALT35.48960.4827
AST412.35450.1361
GGT314.36140.4231
Cirrhosis (yes/no)55.82360.8298
Table 5 Subgroup analysis conducted based on sample type, control type, and expression status among the diagnostic studies
AnalysisIncluded individual studiesSensitivity 95%CISpecificity 95%CIPLR 95%CINLR 95%CIDOR 95%CIAUCHeterogeneity
Sample type
Tissue100.73 (0.70–0.77)0.82 (0.78–0.84)4.03 (2.98–5.46)0.29 (0.19–0.43)15.17 (8.42–27.34)0.88I2 = 73.9%, P = 0.0001
Plasma30.79 (0.74–0.84)0.65 (0.57–0.73)2.33 (1.47–3.7)0.28 (0.12–0.63)8.93 (2.37–33.64)0.72I2 = 87.3%, P = 0.0004
Expression status
Up-regulated circRNAs40.70 (0.62–0.78)0.83 (0.76–0.89)4.00 (2.71–5.91)0.37 (0.28–0.50)11.48 (5.90–22.33)0.97I2 = 21.2%, P = 0.2832
Down-regulated circRNAs70.74 (0.70–0.77)0.75 (0.71–0.78)2.75 (2.16–3.5)0.33 (0.22–0.49)8.75 (5.31–14.43)0.81I2 = 70.4%, P = 0.0025
Control type
Chronic hepatitis/cirrhosis vs HCC30.77 (0.72–0.81)0.76 (0.71–0.81)3.08 (2.49–3.80)0.32 (0.25–0.41)10.89 (7.51–15.78)0.84I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.5262
Adjacent non-cancerous liver tissue vs HCC60.63 (0.57–0.68)0.75 (0.69–0.81)2.33 (1.44–3.75)0.52 (0.40–0.69)4.7 (3.12–7.08)0.73I2 = 0.0%, P = 0.4953