Liu YL, Liu J, Wang YT. Risk of progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and gastric cancer: A multi-center prospective study in Anhui Province, China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(3): 103296 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i3.103296]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Ye-Tao Wang, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei 230001, Anhui Province, China. wangyt96@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Ying-Ling Liu, Jie Liu, Ye-Tao Wang, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230001, Anhui Province, China
Author contributions: Liu YL and Wang YT contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology; Liu J contributed to data curation, formal analysis; Wang YT contributed to supervision, visualization, review and editing.
Supported by the Research Project of the Chinese Digestive Early Cancer Physicians’ Joint Growth Program, No. GTCZ-2021-AH-34-0012.
Institutional review board statement: This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Anhui Provincial Hospital (No. 2024-KY-372).
Clinical trial registration statement: This study is not registered.
Informed consent statement: All study participants provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
CONSORT 2010 statement: The authors have read the CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CONSORT 2010 Statement.
Data sharing statement: Data, analytic methods, and study materials are available to other researchers upon request to the corresponding author.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ye-Tao Wang, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Hefei 230001, Anhui Province, China. wangyt96@163.com
Received: November 15, 2024 Revised: December 18, 2024 Accepted: January 2, 2025 Published online: March 15, 2025 Processing time: 92 Days and 5.7 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, especially in East Asia.
AIM
To explore the clinical outcomes and progression-related factors of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) in the gastric mucosa and provide valuable guidance for improving treatment efficacy.
METHODS
A total of 357 patients diagnosed with LGIN based on initial pathological examination in Anhui Provincial Hospital or three other medical consortium units between January 2022 and June 2024 were included. Among them, 296 patients were followed up with endoscopic and biopsy pathology. Logistic regression was utilized to analyze the relevant risk factors for LGIN progression in the gastric mucosa.
RESULTS
The distribution sites of LGIN among the 357 patients were as follows: Gastric antrum (54.6%), gastric cardia (24.1%), gastric angulus (8.7%), gastric body (4.8%), gastric fundus (4.8%), and multiple sites (3.1%). Additionally, of the 357 patients with LGIN, 112 (31.4%) developed ulceration and 59 (16.5%) experienced gastric polyps. Furthermore, 231 of the 357 (64.71%) patients with LGIN tested positive for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The H. pylori infection rates of the patients with LGIN with accompanying atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric ulcer were 51.95%, 59.31%, and 28.57%, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years [odds ratio (OR) = 3.063, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.351-6.945, P = 0.007], H. pylori infection (OR = 3.560, 95%CI: 1.158-10.949, P = 0.027), multiple locations (OR = 10.136, 95%CI: 2.045-50.237, P = 0.005), lesion size ≥ 2 cm (OR = 3.921, 95%CI: 1.664-9.237, P = 0.002), and gastric ulcer (OR = 2.730, 95%CI: 1.197-6.223, P = 0.017) were predictive factors for LGIN progression.
CONCLUSION
LGIN progression is closely related to age, H. pylori positivity, multiple locations, lesion size ≥ 2 cm, and gastric ulcer. Thus, actively identifying these risk factors in patients with LGIN may have certain clinical significance in preventing further tumor progression.
Core Tip: Excessive endoscopic follow-up may increase the examination-related risks and treatment costs for patients at a low-risk stage. Therefore, identifying risk factors is necessary and provides practical clinical value in predicting and evaluating the likelihood of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) progression. Here, we conducted a multi-center prospective study to investigate the risk factors associated with LGIN progression and to predict the prognosis of patients with LGIN for effectively identifying high-risk groups that may progress to gastric cancer.
Citation: Liu YL, Liu J, Wang YT. Risk of progression to high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and gastric cancer: A multi-center prospective study in Anhui Province, China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(3): 103296
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, especially in East Asia[1]. Early diagnosis of this cancer is essential to improve patient survival rate. Gastric cancer development is a complex process[2]. Gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN) is classified into low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN). Based on the new 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors, LGIN is one of the precancerous lesions of gastric cancer, demonstrating a close association with gastric cancer[3].
Drug therapy and endoscopic treatment are recommended by WHO/Vienna for GIN[4]. The European guidelines[5] suggest that detected gastric LGINs should be resected, and the resected samples should undergo a more accurate pathological examination. Endoscopic resection is recommended regardless of the adenoma size or concurrent dysplasia[6,7]. Furthermore, experts[6] recommend that LGIN lesions present even after a 1-year follow-up should be treated with endoscopic resection. Thus, the treatment principles are varied, highlighting the lack of a currently available universal strategy to evaluate and manage LGIN worldwide.
In China, endoscopic treatment might not be necessary for certain patients with LGIN. Conversely, disregarding the risk of LGIN may result in its missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis[8]. Moreover, excessive endoscopic follow-up may increase the examination-related risks and treatment costs for patients at a low-risk stage. Therefore, identifying risk factors is necessary and provides practical clinical value in predicting and evaluating the likelihood of LGIN progression. Here, we conducted a multi-center prospective study to investigate the risk factors associated with LGIN progression and to predict the prognosis of patients with LGIN for effectively identifying high-risk groups that may progress to gastric cancer. Our study outcomes may aid in strengthening the monitoring and active treatment of patients with LGIN, ultimately contributing to reducing gastric cancer incidence and avoiding excessive examination and wastage of medical resources.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Demographic characteristics
This prospective review initially enrolled 442 patients > 18 years of age who underwent gastroscopy in the endoscopy centers of Anhui Provincial Hospital or three other medical consortium units (Fuyang People’s Hospital, Bozhou People’s Hospital, and Taihe County People’s Hospital) between January 2022 and June 2024 and were diagnosed with LGIN on pathological examination (Figure 1). The diagnostic criteria for LGIN were based on the WHO pathological diagnostic criteria for digestive system tumors[3]. A total of 85 patients were excluded because the endoscopic treatment and surgical procedure that they underwent did not allow the observation of the natural course of LGIN. Consequently, 357 patients were finally included in this study, from which 61 were lost to follow-up for at least 1 year of the study follow-up period.
The observation indicators encompassed fundamental clinical and pathological data, including age, gender, outpatient or hospital identification number, duration of the disease, history of gastric surgery, endoscopic findings related to lesions (such as their location and size), postoperative histopathological diagnoses, and subsequent disease progression. The primary endpoint of the observation was the pathological examination results indicating either the regression or progression of LGIN. Furthermore, the risk factors evaluated for long-term progression included the temporal course, age, gender, lesion location, presence of multiple lesions, lesion size, and lesion morphology. This study received approval from the Ethics Committee of Anhui Provincial Hospital (No. 2024-KY-372).
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed and processed using statistical product and service solutions 22.0 software. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and compared using the t test. Count data were presented as percentages and compared by performing the χ2 test. Progressive factor analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A P value of < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences.
RESULTS
Demographic characteristics
We initially selected data from 442 patients from the four institutions described above. However, 85 patients were excluded because they had undergone endoscopic treatment and surgery. Ultimately, 357 patients (mean age: 54.66 ± 14.48 years) were included in this study. Additionally, 61 patients were lost to follow-up for at least 1 year of the study follow-up period. A flowchart of the patient screening process in this study is illustrated in Figure 1.
Clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients with LGIN
The 357 patients with LGIN selected in this study showed varying lesion shapes during endoscopy. The distribution sites of LGIN were as follows: Gastric antrum (54.6%), gastric cardia (24.1%), gastric angulus (8.7%), gastric body (4.8%), gastric fundus (4.8%), and multiple sites (3.1%). Moreover, of the 357 patients with LGIN, 112 (31.4%) had ulceration and 59 (16.5%) had gastric polyps. Furthermore, most patients [291 (81.5%)] had a lesion size < 2 cm, with protuberant lesions being the most common form of LGIN [165 (46.2%)]. Table 1 provides the complete details of the clinical and pathological characteristics of the study patients.
Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia patients, n (%).
Characteristic
Overall patients (n = 357)
Patients follow up (n = 296)
Age, mean ± SD
54.66 ± 14.48
54.34 ± 14.40
Gender
Male
198 (55.5)
163 (55.1)
Female
159 (44.5)
133 (44.9)
Lesion location
Antrum
195 (54.6)
161 (54.4)
Angulus
31 (8.7)
25 (8.4)
Body
17 (4.8)
14 (4.7)
Fundus
17 (4.8)
14 (4.7)
Cardia
86 (24.1)
72 (24.3)
Multiple location
11 (3.1)
10 (3.4)
Lesion size
< 2 cm
291 (81.5)
241 (81.4)
≥ 2 cm
66 (18.5)
55 (18.6)
Congestion
Yes
250 (70.0)
207 (69.9)
No
107 (30.0)
89 (30.1)
Form
Protuberant
165 (46.2)
135 (45.6)
Flat
139 (38.9)
118 (39.9)
Central depression
53 (14.8)
43 (14.5)
Comorbidities
Ulceration
112 (31.4)
90 (30.4)
Gastric polyps
59 (16.5)
52 (17.6)
None
186 (52.1)
154 (52.0)
Prognosis
Progress
33 (11.1)
Retrogress
200 (67.6)
Unchanged
63 (31.3)
Relationship of Helicobacter pylori infection with atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric ulcer in patients with LGIN
Of the 357 patients with LGIN, 231 (64.71%) tested positive for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. The H. pylori infection rates of patients with LGIN combined with atrophy, intestinal metaplasia, and gastric ulcer were 51.95%, 59.31%, and 28.57%, respectively. Further information on these associations is presented in Table 2.
Table 2 Relationship between Helicobacter pylori infection and intestinal metaplasia, atrophy, and gastric ulcer in low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia patients.
H. pylori infection
P value
Positive (n = 231)
Negative (n = 126)
Atrophy
Yes
120
64
0.740
No
111
62
Intestinal metaplasia
Yes
137
77
0.835
No
94
49
Ulceration
Yes
66
46
0.122
No
165
80
Follow-up and outcome of the patients with LGIN
Given that 61 patients were lost to follow-up for at least 1 year of the study follow-up period, follow-up data was obtained from the remaining 296. The patients included 163 men and 133 women, with an average age of 54.34 ± 14.40 years. The average follow-up time was 2.53 ± 0.84 years. Gastric ulcer was the primary comorbidity in 90 (30.4%) patients. Furthermore, disease progression occurred in 33 of the 296 patients, leading to an LGIN development rate of 11.1%. Among them, LGIN reversal accounted for 67.6%, maintenance for 29.3%, and progression for 14.0% (see Table 1). Of the 33 patients who experienced LGIN progression, 21 had advanced to HGIN and 12 to gastric cancer, with an average progression time of 18.13 months.
Univariate logistic regression analysis
The differences between patients with LGIN progression and non-progression were assessed by performing univariate logistic regression analysis. The results showed that age ≥ 60 years, multiple locations, lesion size ≥ 2 cm, concurrent gastric ulcer, and H. pylori infection were risk factors for LGIN progression (all P < 0.05), whereas the other evaluated risk factors did not exhibit any such association (see Table 3).
Table 3 Univariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors on low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia progression.
Characteristic
Progress
Non-progress
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age
≥ 60
21
92
3.114 (1.356-7.153)
0.007
< 60
12
171
Ref.
Gender
Male
13
150
1.795 (0.785-4.105)
0.166
Female
20
113
Ref.
Multiple location
Yes
5
5
10.838 (2.023-58.076)
0.005
No
28
258
Ref.
Lesion size
≥ 2 cm
15
40
4.189 (1.751-10.018)
0.001
< 2 cm
18
223
Ref.
Congestion
Yes
10
79
1.208 (0.474-3.078)
0.157
No
23
187
Ref.
Form
Protuberant
11
107
0.757 (0.413-1.387)
0.367
Flat
18
117
0.966 (0.587-2.236)
0.438
Central depression
4
39
Ref.
Ulceration
Yes
16
74
2.685 (1.161-6.207)
0.021
No
17
189
Ref.
Atrophy
Yes
18
125
1.107 (0.482-2.542)
0.811
No
15
1381
Ref.
Intestinal metaplasia
Yes
159
104
0.815 (0.346-1.922)
0.640
No
20
13
Ref.
H. pylori infection
Yes
29
163
4.448 (1.159-13.027)
0.006
No
4
100
Ref.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis
The factors influencing LGIN progression were explored by conducting a multivariate logistic regression analysis of the statistically significant risk factors detected in the univariate logistic regression analysis. Our findings demonstrated that age ≥ 60 years [odds ratio (OR) = 3.063, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.351-6.945, P = 0.007], H. pylori infection (OR = 3.560, 95%CI: 1.158-10.949, P = 0.027), multiple locations (OR = 10.136, 95%CI: 2.045-50.237, P = 0.005), lesion size ≥ 2 cm (OR = 3.921, 95%CI: 1.664-9.237, P = 0.002), and gastric ulcer (OR = 2.730, 95%CI: 1.197-6.223, P = 0.017) were predictive factors for LGIN progression. Table 4 provides complete information on the multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of risk factors on low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia progression.
Characteristic
Progress
Non-progress
OR (95%CI)
P value
Age
≥ 60
21
92
3.063 (1.351-6.945)
0.007
< 60
12
171
Ref.
Multiple location
Yes
5
5
10.136 (2.045-50.237)
0.005
No
28
258
Ref.
Lesion size
≥ 2 cm
15
40
3.921 (1.664-9.237)
0.002
< 2 cm
18
223
Ref.
Ulceration
Yes
16
74
2.730 (1.197-6.223)
0.017
No
17
189
Ref.
H. pylori infection
Yes
29
163
3.560 (1.158-10.949)
0.027
No
4
100
Ref.
DISCUSSION
Various domestic and international guidelines recommend endoscopic submucosal dissection therapy for all pathologically diagnosed HGIN cases without exception. However, the principle of LGIN treatment remains controversial. Although LGIN is a known precancerous lesion that has a low likelihood of progressing to cancer, its progression rate to HGIN has been reported to be 0%-23%. Moreover, the annual progression rate from LGIN to gastric cancer is approximately 0.6%[9]. A previous study showed that 12 of 98 (12.2%) patients with LGIN progressed during a 33-month median follow-up period[10]. Another single-center follow-up study found that progression occurred in 42 of 449 patients, resulting in a cancer development rate of 9.4%. The investigation also revealed that foci > 10 mm, ulcerative lesions, and H. pylori positivity were factors significantly affecting LGIN outcomes (P < 0.05)[11]. LGIN progression has been shown to be slow, with the average time for progression to cancer ranging from 10 months to 4 years[12,13]. Although the treatment strategies for LGIN are inconsistent, long-term follow-up is recommended by most guidelines. However, follow-up examinations can exacerbate the financial burden on patients and increase medical risks. Therefore, exploring the risk factors of LGIN progression is extremely crucial. In this study, we identified the LGIN population with a low cancer risk (not needing regular checkups), moderate cancer risk (requiring regular checkups), and high cancer risk (necessitating short-term treatment).
Our study found a significant association between LGIN progression and age, consistent with the results from previous studies[14,15]. Furthermore, onset at multiple sites was demonstrated to be an independent risk factor for LGIN progression, which was contradictory to the prevalent conclusions about single lesions in gastric cancer. In earlier studies, the similar factors were shown to be independent risk factors for postoperative pathological progression in patients with gastric LGIN[14]. Similarly, Liu et al[15] indicated that age, H. pylori infection, a history of antibiotic misuse, and spicy and high-fat diets (all P < 0.05) were independent risk factors of gastric LGIN in asymptomatic patients undergoing physical examination. However, prior studies have also reported contrasting results, such as no correlation between age and LGIN progression[16,17]. Another research suggested that male sex was an independent risk factor for the prolongation or progression of LGIN, which was in line with the higher incidence of gastric cancer in men[18]. A previous study[19] also confirmed that the gastric mucosa undergoes structural changes as LGIN lesions progress, with central depression or nodular surface being associated with the progression of LGIN lesions. In this study, the multivariate logistic regression analysis results indicated a correlation between the prolongation or progression of LGIN and ulceration. However, no significant association was observed between the prolongation or progression of LGIN and lesion morphology (flat, protuberant, or central depression).
Extensive data indicate that the diagnosis of LGIN via gastroscopic biopsy produces results that differ from those obtained through larger biopsy specimens. For instance, previous research has identified a pathological discrepancy of 20.1% between endoscopic forceps biopsy and surgical resection[20]. Notable risk factors include a lesion surface diameter exceeding 1 cm, surface erythema, and a nodular surface. Investigations conducted by Ryu et al[21] have established a significant association between central depression, nodular surface characteristics, and surface redness with early gastric cancer (EGC) and low-grade dysplastic lesions. Consequently, the observed decline in LGIN cases may be attributed to diagnostic inconsistencies. Lesion size is recognized as a common characteristic of malignant tumors, aligning with the findings of our study[22]. An increase in lesion size correlates with an elevated risk of LGIN progression. The Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastritis Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging systems are currently utilized to evaluate the accuracy of gastric mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia. According to these systems, patients classified as OLGA/OLGIM stages III and IV are deemed at high risk for gastric cancer[23]. The OLGIM staging system demonstrates a higher rate of interdisciplinary diagnostic agreement compared to the OLGA system, albeit with lower sensitivity[24]. A prior case-control study indicated that OLGA and OLGIM stages II, III, and IV were more prevalent among patients with EGC compared to control subjects. Furthermore, multivariable analysis identified a family history of gastric cancer, previous H. pylori infection, and OLGA stages II and III-IV, as well as OLGIM stages II and III-IV, as independent risk factors for EGC (ORs: 4.04, 1.87, 2.52, 6.79, 4.11, and 10.78, respectively)[25]. In the current study, we found that intestinal metaplasia did not serve as an independent risk factor for the progression of LGIN, which may be attributable to the methodology employed in assessing intestinal metaplasia.
The development of gastric cancer is a stepwise process[2], with LGIN representing a stage in this transformation process. However, the current multi-center prospective study aimed to review patients with LGIN who were followed up in the endoscopy centers at one of four institutions in Anhui Province between January 2022 and June 2024. The follow-up time of this study was at least 1 year. A previous study reported that 12 of 98 (12.2%) patients with LGIN progressed during the 33-month median follow-up period[10], which was similar to our study finding (11.1%).
Endoscopic resection techniques, specifically endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection, are widely recognized as the standard therapeutic approach for EGC[26,27]. Moreover, recent advancements in endoscopic methodologies have resulted in a 5-year overall survival rate of > 90% in patients with EGC who meet the absolute or expanded criteria for endoscopic intervention[28,29]. This treatment strategy has not only gained notable traction in Asian nations but has also started to attract the interest of endoscopists in Western countries[30]. The successful endoscopic management of EGC necessitates a standardized treatment protocol, encompassing thorough preoperative evaluation and careful interpretation of postoperative pathology. This procedure is particularly critical in determining the requirement for additional surgical intervention following a non-curative resection of the malignancy. Among the various risk factors, H. pylori infection is associated with inflammatory cell infiltration in the mucosal layer and increased intercrop distance[31]. Furthermore, implementing H. pylori eradication therapy can potentially reverse these morphological changes in the short term[32,33]. Nevertheless, regular follow-up and gastroscopy biopsy combined with magnifying staining endoscopy should be strengthened to assist in discrimination.
Our study has several limitations that should be considered. First, the relatively small sample size (296 patients with sufficient follow-up data) and the study focus on a single geographic region may have limited the generalizability of our findings. Second, the short follow-up duration may not have fully captured the long-term progression dynamics of LGIN. Thus, a long-term perspective of LGIN progression should be provided by performing longitudinal follow-up studies. Finally, some unexplored variables, such as dietary factors, genetic predisposition, or a family history of gastric cancer, could have also influenced LGIN progression. Therefore, future studies exploring these uninvestigated factors in larger and more diverse populations should be conducted to validate our results.
CONCLUSION
The present study found that age, H. pylori positivity, multiple locations, lesion size ≥ 2 cm, and gastric ulcer are closely related to LGIN progression based on the preliminary analysis of potential factors linked to the prognosis of patients with LGIN who had a clear diagnosis and regular follow-up. Our findings indicate that clinical physicians should comprehensively evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients with LGIN, especially those with the risk factors mentioned above. In conclusion, LGIN progression is closely associated with age, H. pylori positivity, multiple locations, lesion size ≥ 2 cm, and gastric ulcer. Furthermore, actively identifying such relevant risk factors in patients with LGIN is essential, providing certain clinical significance in preventing further tumor progression.
Footnotes
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology
Country of origin: China
Peer-review report’s classification
Scientific Quality: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B
Novelty: Grade B, Grade B, Grade B, Grade B
Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade B, Grade B, Grade C
Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade A, Grade B, Grade B
P-Reviewer: da Silva LFL; Fan ZN; Wang Y S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang L
López MJ, Carbajal J, Alfaro AL, Saravia LG, Zanabria D, Araujo JM, Quispe L, Zevallos A, Buleje JL, Cho CE, Sarmiento M, Pinto JA, Fajardo W. Characteristics of gastric cancer around the world.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2023;181:103841.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in RCA: 96][Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
Nagtegaal ID, Odze RD, Klimstra D, Paradis V, Rugge M, Schirmacher P, Washington KM, Carneiro F, Cree IA; WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.Histopathology. 2020;76:182-188.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 1833][Cited by in RCA: 2145][Article Influence: 429.0][Reference Citation Analysis (3)]
Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Marcos-Pinto R, Areia M, Leja M, Esposito G, Garrido M, Kikuste I, Megraud F, Matysiak-Budnik T, Annibale B, Dumonceau JM, Barros R, Fléjou JF, Carneiro F, van Hooft JE, Kuipers EJ, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019.Endoscopy. 2019;51:365-388.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 432][Cited by in RCA: 610][Article Influence: 101.7][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Evans JA, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Decker GA, Early DS, Fisher DA, Foley K, Hwang JH, Jue TL, Lightdale JR, Pasha SF, Sharaf R, Shergill AK, Cash BD, DeWitt JM. The role of endoscopy in the management of premalignant and malignant conditions of the stomach.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:1-8.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 162][Cited by in RCA: 193][Article Influence: 19.3][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Zhou X, Liu G, Fan S, Lan Y. Risk factors for postoperative pathological upgrading of low-grade intraepithelial colorectal adenoma after endoscopic treatment: A single-center, retrospective study.Asian J Surg. 2024;47:5217-5218.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Zou L, Jiang Q, Guo T, Wu X, Wang Q, Feng Y, Zhang S, Fang W, Zhou W, Yang A. Endoscopic characteristics in predicting prognosis of biopsy-diagnosed gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135:26-35.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Jin XX, Xie XL, Niu F, Yin KG, Ji CG, Cui JF, Liu L, Feng ZJ. A Single-Center Follow-Up Study of Low-Grade Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia and the Screening of Key Genes of Precancerous Lesions.Front Oncol. 2022;12:899055.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 1][Cited by in RCA: 1][Article Influence: 0.3][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Kokkola A, Haapiainen R, Laxén F, Puolakkainen P, Kivilaakso E, Virtamo J, Sipponen P. Risk of gastric carcinoma in patients with mucosal dysplasia associated with atrophic gastritis: a follow up study.J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:979-984.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 68][Cited by in RCA: 62][Article Influence: 2.1][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Lan S, Lai F, Fang X, Li X, Zhong C, Cao T. Establishment and Evaluation of a Risk Prediction Model for Pathological Escalation of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia.J Vis Exp. 2024;.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Chen Y, Dang Y, Sang H, Wang X, Chen M, Lu D, Zhang G. Establishment and validation of a model to determine the progression risk of low grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Surg Endosc. 2021;35:1551-1557.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Sun T, Ke XQ, Wang M, Wang QZ. Establishment and validation of a clinical diagnostic model for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023;102:e35515.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Park DI, Rhee PL, Kim JE, Hyun JG, Kim YH, Son HJ, Kim JJ, Paik SW, Rhee JC, Choi KW, Oh YL. Risk factors suggesting malignant transformation of gastric adenoma: univariate and multivariate analysis.Endoscopy. 2001;33:501-506.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 67][Cited by in RCA: 73][Article Influence: 3.0][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Choi CW, Kim HW, Shin DH, Kang DH, Hong YM, Park JH, Park SB, Cho M, Lee JH. The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia).Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:421-427.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 40][Cited by in RCA: 43][Article Influence: 3.9][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Huang Y, Chen J, Guo Y, Ding Z, Liang X, Zhang W, Xue H, Zhao Y, Li X, Lu H. Staging of operative link on gastritis assessment and operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia systems for risk assessment of early gastric cancer: a case-control study.J Clin Pathol. 2023;.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, Oda I, Nimura S, Yahagi N, Iishi H, Oka M, Ajioka Y, Ichinose M, Matsui T. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer.Dig Endosc. 2016;28:3-15.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 354][Cited by in RCA: 392][Article Influence: 43.6][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Tanabe S, Hirabayashi S, Oda I, Ono H, Nashimoto A, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Tsujitani S, Seto Y, Fukagawa T, Nunobe S, Furukawa H, Kodera Y, Kaminishi M, Katai H. Gastric cancer treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection or endoscopic mucosal resection in Japan from 2004 through 2006: JGCA nationwide registry conducted in 2013.Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:834-842.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 40][Cited by in RCA: 41][Article Influence: 5.1][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Tanabe S, Ishido K, Matsumoto T, Kosaka T, Oda I, Suzuki H, Fujisaki J, Ono H, Kawata N, Oyama T, Takahashi A, Doyama H, Kobayashi M, Uedo N, Hamada K, Toyonaga T, Kawara F, Tanaka S, Yoshifuku Y. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a multicenter collaborative study.Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:45-52.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 62][Cited by in RCA: 82][Article Influence: 10.3][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Bastiaansen BAJ, Bhandari P, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, van Hooft JE, Deprez PH, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal lesions: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022.Endoscopy. 2022;54:591-622.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 36][Cited by in RCA: 288][Article Influence: 96.0][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Horiuchi Y, Fujisaki J, Yamamoto N, Omae M, Ishiyama A, Yoshio T, Hirasawa T, Yamamoto Y, Tsuchida T, Takahashi H. Diagnostic accuracy of demarcation of undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication.J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:1023-1030.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 2][Cited by in RCA: 4][Article Influence: 0.5][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
Horiuchi Y, Fujisaki J, Yamamoto N, Yoshimizu S, Ishiyama A, Yoshio T, Hirasawa T, Yamamoto Y, Nagahama M, Takahashi H, Tsuchida T. Diagnostic accuracy of demarcation using magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging for Helicobacter pylori-uninfected undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer.Gastric Cancer. 2018;21:988-997.
[PubMed] [DOI][Cited in This Article: ][Cited by in Crossref: 4][Cited by in RCA: 7][Article Influence: 1.0][Reference Citation Analysis (0)]