BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Aug 15, 2026; 18(8): 120791
Published online Aug 15, 2026. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.120791
Figure 1
Figure 1 Endoscopic and computed tomography-related images. A: Gastroscopy showing a hemispherical mucosal elevation on the posterior wall at the junction of the gastric body and antrum; B: Endoscopic ultrasound showing a submucosal elevation with ulceration at the apex on the posterior wall at the junction of the gastric body and antrum; C: Intraluminal water-injection-assisted endoscopic ultrasound imaging showing mucosal layer loss at the elevation site; D: Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography showing gastric wall thickening on the posterior wall near the junction of the gastric body and antrum.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Diagnostic endoscopic submucosal dissection biopsy pathology. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the biopsy specimen from the posterior wall at the junction of the gastric body and antrum, showing a spindle cell-rich lesion (× 100); B: Higher-power hematoxylin and eosin view showing spindle cell-like morphology with elongated tumor cells (× 200).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Surgical specimens. A: Gross view of the resected stomach showing a lesion measuring approximately 2.5 cm × 1.2 cm × 1 cm; B: Opened gastrectomy specimen showing an ulcerative carcinoma located on the posterior wall at the junction of the gastric body and antrum, with clear anatomical orientation.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Surgical histopathology. A: Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining showing infiltrative tumor growth in the gastric wall (× 100); B: Higher-power PAS staining showing PAS-positive mucin in tumor cells and glandular lumina (× 200).


Write to the Help Desk