Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. Jan 15, 2020; 12(1): 101-112
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.101
Published online Jan 15, 2020. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.101
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves by histology before propensity score matching.
A: Cancer-specific Survival (P > 0.05); B: Overall Survival (P > 0.05). ASC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; SRC: Signet ring cell carcinoma.
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves by histology after propensity score matching.
A: Cancer-specific Survival (P < 0.05); B: Overall Survival (P < 0.05). ASC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; SRC: Signet ring cell carcinoma.
Figure 3 Kaplan-Meier plots of adenosquamous carcinoma vs signet ring cell carcinoma stratified by TNM stage.
A: Stage I (P < 0.05); B: Stage II (P < 0.05); C: Stage III (P > 0.05); D: Stage IV (P > 0.05). ASC: Adenosquamous carcinoma; SRC: Signet ring cell carcinoma.
- Citation: Chu YX, Gong HY, Hu QY, Song QB. Adenosquamous carcinoma may have an inferior prognosis to signet ring cell carcinoma in patients with stages I and II gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(1): 101-112
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i1/101.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i1.101