Wang W, Wang J, Ren XX, Yue HL, Li Z. Effects of invigorating-spleen and anticancer prescription on extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in colon cancer mice model. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16(11): 4468-4476 [PMID: 39554742 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i11.4468]
Reader's ID:
05754263
Submitted on:
October 28, 2024, 12:54
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
This paper conducts an in-depth study on the effects of invigorating-spleen and anticancer prescription (ISAP) in a mice model of colon cancer, providing valuable experimental data and analysis. Here are some of my comments on the paper:
1. Clear research background: The paper begins with a detailed introduction to the epidemiological data of colon cancer, emphasizing the severity of the disease and the limitations of existing treatment methods, providing a good background for the necessity of the study.
2. Reasonable experimental design: The study established a mice model of colon cancer and divided it into several experimental groups (including a control group and groups with different doses of ISAP), a design that effectively compares the effects of different doses of ISAP on tumor suppression.
3. Detailed data analysis: The paper provides detailed data on the measurement of mice weight, tumor inhibition rate, and related protein expression levels, with clear and understandable results. These data provide empirical support for the anti-tumor mechanism of ISAP.
4. In-depth mechanism exploration: By analyzing key proteins in the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway, the paper explores the potential mechanism of action of ISAP, providing new ideas for subsequent research.
5. Clinical significance: Although the study has achieved positive results in the mice model, the effectiveness and safety of ISAP still need to be verified in clinical trials. This point can be further emphasized in the discussion section.
6. Language and structure: The language of the paper is relatively fluent, with a clear structure, making it easy for readers to understand. However, the explanation of some professional terms could be more detailed, for the understanding of non-professional readers.
Overall, this paper provides strong support for the potential of ISAP in the treatment of colon cancer, looking forward to seeing more clinical research results in the future.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
First, thank you very much for your professional comments on the article published in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.
Second, we read your comments with great interest. You are welcome to format your valuable comments into a Letter to the Editor and submit it online to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology at https://www.f6publishing.com. There are no restrictions on the number of words, figures (color, B/W) or authors for a Letter to the Editor. In addition, the article processing charge will be exempted for this Letter to the Editor. As with all articles published by the Baishideng Publishing Group, the Letter to the Editor will be published online after completing peer review. The guidelines for a Letter to the Editor can be found at: https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/219.
Finally, we look forward to receiving your high-quality Letter to the Editor, which will promote academic communication and lead the development of this discipline.