Coagulation status is closely related to the progression of malignant tumors. In the era of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT), the prognostic utility of coagulation indicators in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) undergoing new treatments remains to be determined.

To determine whether hypercoagulation is an effective prognostic indicator in patients with LAGC who underwent radical resection after NICT.

A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 104 patients with LAGC, who underwent radical resection after NICT between 2020 and 2023, was performed. D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations were measured one week before NICT, and again one week before surgery, to analyze the association between these two indicators and their combined indices [non-hypercoagulation (D-dimer and fibrinogen concentrations within the upper limit of normal) vs hypercoagulation (D-dimer or fibrinogen concentrations above the upper limit of normal)] with prognosis. After radical resection, patients were followed-up periodically. The median follow-up duration was 21 months.

Data collected after NICT revealed that the three-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates the non-hypercoagulation group were significantly better than those in the hypercoagulation group [94.4% vs 78.0% (P = 0.019) and 87.0% vs 68.0% (P = 0.027), respectively]. Multivariate analysis indicated that hypercoagulation after NICT was an independent factor for poor postoperative OS [hazard ratio (HR) 4.436, P = 0.023] and DFS (HR 2.551, P = 0.039). Pre-NICT data demonstrated no statistically significant difference in three-year OS between the non-hypercoagulation and hypercoagulation groups (88.3% vs 84.1%, respectively; P = 0.443).

Hypercoagulation after NICT is an effective prognostic indicator in patients with LAGC undergoing radical gastrectomy.

Esophageal cancer, particularly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), is a major health concern worldwide, particularly in China. Surgical resection is still considered the primary curative treatment for this disease. However, the effect of different surgical methods-traditional hand-sewn anastomosis and modern mechanical anastomosis-remains controversial. A retrospective study was thus performed to elucidate how these two techniques affected the clinical prognosis of patients. Data were retrospectively collected from the comprehensive Esophageal Cancer Case Management Database of Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute (Chengdu, China), covering the period from 2010 to 2017. The cohort consisted of patients who underwent esophagectomy for ESCC, divided into two groups based on the suturing technique used: Manual suturing (MS) and mechanical suturing (MeS). A total of four causal inference methods for retrospective studies, namely inverse probability of treatment weighting, standardized mortality ratio weighting, overlap weighting and propensity score matching analysis, were used to minimize potential selection bias. The primary outcome evaluated was overall survival (OS), allowing for a direct comparison of the long-term efficacy of the two suturing methods. In a retrospective analysis of 2,510 patients undergoing esophagectomy, significant differences in OS were observed between the MeS group and the MS group (hazard ratio: 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.75-0.95; P=0.004). However, after matching or weighting based on causal inference analyses, no significant differences in survival outcomes between groups were obtained. The equivalence in outcomes suggests that either suturing method may be equally viable in clinical practice, offering flexibility in surgical decision-making without compromising OS.

Patients with malignant tumors are prone to present hypercoagulability of blood and form thrombosis, and its pathogenesis is complex involving various factors from clinical and histopathological to genetic influences. Current studies on the potential mechanism of blood hypercoagulability in patients with malignant tumors focus on the following aspects but are not limited: (1) tumor cells release coagulant-promoting substances, (2) tumor cells interact with the fibrinolytic system, (3) tumor cell-mediated platelet activation, (4) tumor-associated complement activation, and (5) genetic factors and clinical factors. Especially, the pathogenesis of blood hypercoagulability is in-depth analyzed covering tumor cells' release of procoagulant substances, the interplay of cancer cells and fibrinolytic system, platelet activation mediated by cancer cells, cancer-associated complement activation, and the action of genetic and clinical factors. We review the pathogenesis of blood hypercoagulability in patients with malignant tumors, which will assist in the research and development of new drugs and providing theoretical support for the formulation of the best treatment plan for patients, to prolong the survival of patients.