Background: Microsatellite-stable (MSS) and microsatellite-instable (MSI) colon cancer (CC) cases have different characteristics. These characteristics may impact the accuracy of abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan examinations in MSI CC. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted to examine the effects of MSI CC on patients' clinical and tumor characteristics. We determined the accuracy of radiological T and N staging compared to pathological T and N staging in CC patients and evaluated the influence of tumor- and patient-related factors on this accuracy. Results: A total of 131 CC patients who had undergone surgical resection were analyzed. Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) CC was predominantly found in the right hemicolon (p = 0.023); it was more likely to exhibit moderate (80.8%) or low-grade differentiation (p = 0.01) and had higher rates of mucinous differentiation (p = 0.001). The median neutrophil and platelet counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at diagnosis were significantly higher in patients with dMMR CC (p = 0.022, p = 0.022, and p = 0.018). The depth of invasion influenced the CRP levels in dMMR CC cases (p = 0.015). The abdominal CT exam was accurate regarding the depth of colonic wall invasion in 58.1% and 38.5% of patients with mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR) and dMMR CC, respectively. The assessment of lymph node invasion was accurate in 44.8% of those with pMMR and 50.0% of those with dMMR CC. There was no significant difference in the accuracy in predicting the T and N statuses between the two groups. The accuracy in the determination of the T and N statuses was not affected by the parameters examined. Conclusions: dMMR CC has specific characteristic features. MSI does not affect the accuracy of preoperative abdominal CT.

Colon cancer (CC) is a public health concern with increasing incidence in younger populations. Treatment for locally advanced CC (LACC) involves oncological surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to reduce recurrence and improve overall survival (OS). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a novel approach for the treatment of LACC, and research is underway to explore its potential benefit in terms of survival. This trial will assess the efficacy of NAC in LACC.

This is a multicentre randomised, parallel-group, open label controlled clinical trial. Participants will be selected based on homogenous inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two treatment groups: NAC, surgery, and AC or surgery followed by AC. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary outcomes including 5-year PFS, 2- and 5-year OS, toxicity, radiological and pathological response, morbidity, and mortality.

The results of this study will determine whether NAC induces a clinical and histological tumour response in patients with CCLA and if this treatment sequence improves survival without increasing morbidity and mortality.

NCT04188158.

The impact of computed tomography (CT)-detected extramural venous invasion on the recurrence of colon cancer is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of extramural venous invasion diagnosed before surgery by contrast-enhanced CT colonography using three-dimensional multiplanar reconstruction images.

Patients with colon cancer staged greater than or equal to T2 and/or stage I-III who underwent contrast-enhanced CT colonography between 2013 and 2018 at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan were retrospectively investigated for CT-detected extramural venous invasion. Inter-observer agreement for the detection of CT-detected extramural venous invasion was evaluated and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for recurrence-free survival using CT-TNM staging and CT-detected extramural venous invasion. Preoperative clinical variables were analysed using Cox regression for recurrence-free survival.

Out of 922 eligible patients, 544 cases were analysed (50 (9.2 per cent) were diagnosed as positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion and 494 (90.8 per cent) were diagnosed as negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion). The inter-observer agreement for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a κ coefficient of 0.830. The group positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a median follow-up of 62.1 months, whereas the group negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion had a median follow-up of 60.7 months. When CT-TNM stage was stratified according to CT-detected extramural venous invasion status, CT-T3 N(-)extramural venous invasion(+) had a poor prognosis compared with CT-T3 N(-)extramural venous invasion(-) and CT-stage I (5-year recurrence-free survival of 50.6 versus 89.3 and 90.1 per cent respectively; P < 0.001). In CT-stage III, the group positive for CT-detected extramural venous invasion also had a poor prognosis compared with the group negative for CT-detected extramural venous invasion (5-year recurrence-free survival of 52.0 versus 78.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis revealed that recurrence was associated with CT-T4 (HR 3.10, 95 per cent c.i. 1.85 to 5.20; P < 0.001) and CT-detected extramural venous invasion (HR 3.08, 95 per cent c.i. 1.90 to 5.00; P < 0.001).

CT-detected extramural venous invasion was found to be an independent predictor of recurrence and could be used in combination with preoperative TNM staging to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.

By analyzing the distribution of existing and newly proposed staging imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, we searched for a salient feature and validated its diagnostic performance.

Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the training cohort were retrospectively collected at three centers from January 2016 to December 2017. We used the chi-square test to analyze the distribution of several stage-related imaging features in pT1-3 and pT4a tumors, including small arteriole sign (SAS), outer edge of the intestine, tumor invasion range, and peritumoral adipose tissue. Preoperative multiphase contrast-enhanced CT images of the validation cohort were retrospectively collected at Beijing Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to December 2018. The diagnostic performance of the selected imaging feature, including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, was validated and compared with the conventional clinical tumor stage (cT) by the McNemar test.

In the training cohort, a total of 268 patients were enrolled, and only SAS was significantly different between pT1-3 and pT4a tumors. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and conventional cT in differentiating T1-3 and T4a tumors were 94.4%, 81.6%, and 97.3% and 53.7%, 32.7%, and 58.4%, respectively (all p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, a total of 135 patients were collected. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the SAS and the conventional cT were 93.3%, 76.2%, and 96.5% and 62.2%, 38.1%, and 66.7%, respectively (p < 0.001, p = 0.021, p < 0.001).

Small arteriole sign positivity, an indirect imaging feature of serosa invasion, may improve the accuracy of identifying T4a colon cancer.

Small arteriole sign helps to distinguish T1-3 and T4a colon cancer and further improves the accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer.

• The accuracy of preoperative CT staging of colon cancer is not ideal, especially for T4a tumors. • Small arteriole sign (SAS) is a newly defined imaging feature that shows the appearance of tumor-supplying arterioles at the site where they penetrate the intestine wall. • SAS is an indirect imaging marker of tumor invasion into the serosa with a great value in distinguishing between T1-3 and T4a colon cancer.

Owing to the special features of biologics, deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) in patients with colon cancer has achieved little treatment efficacy from chemoradiotherapy. Immunotherapy has shown promising results for the treatment of colon cancer. The high response rate observed suggests a great option for patients presenting with unresectable tumors, as it allows for better oncological resection. Here, we aimed to highlight the significant effects of immunotherapy on dMMR in colon cancer.

A 54-year-old man diagnosed with locally unresectable dMMR colon cancer received preoperative immunotherapy (three cycles of pembrolizumab) and achieved a pathological complete response after surgery.

Immunotherapy can be used as a conversion treatment for locally unresectable colon cancer with dMMR.

Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced colon cancer (LACC) remains controversial. An integrated analysis of data from high-quality studies may inform the long-term safety of NAC for this cohort. Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies to assess the oncological safety of NAC in patients with LACC.

A systematic review was performed as per preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Survival was expressed as hazard ratios using time-to-effect generic inverse variance methodology, while surgical outcomes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Data analysis was performed using Review Manager version 5.4.

Eight studies (4 RCTs and 4 retrospective studies) including 31,047 patients with LACC were included. Mean age was 61.0 years (range: 19-93 years) and mean follow-up was 47.6 months (range: 2-133 months). Of those receiving NAC, 4.6% achieved a pathological complete response and 90.6% achieved R0 resection (versus 85.9%, P < 0.001). At 3 years, patients receiving NAC had improved disease-free survival (DFS) (OR: 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-1.60, P = 0.030) and overall survival (OS) (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.10-2.81, P = 0.020). When using time-to-effect modelling, a non-significant difference was observed for DFS (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.57-1.09, P = 0.150) while a significant difference in favour of NAC was observed for OS (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.58-0.98, P = 0.030).

This study highlights the oncological safety of NAC for patients being treated with curative intent for LACC using RCT and propensity-matched studies only. These results refute current management guidelines which do not advocate for NAC to improve surgical and oncological outcomes in patients with LACC.

International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) registration: CRD4202341723.

Controversy persists about neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) within the field of locally advanced colon cancer (LACC). The purpose of this study was to assess the existing and latest literature with high quality to determine the role of NAC in various aspects.

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 2022. Review Manager 5.3 was applied for meta-analyses with a random-effects model whenever possible.

Overall, 8 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis, comprising 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 retrospective studies involving 40,136 participants. The 3-year overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.66-1.23, P = 0.51) and 5-year OS (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.53-1.03, P = 0.53) were comparable between two groups. Mortality in 30 days was found less frequent in the NAC group (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas no significant differences were detected concerning other perioperative complications, R0 resection, or adverse events. In terms of subgroup analyses for RCTs, less anastomotic leak (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.31-0.86, P = 0.01) and higher R0 resection rate (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.04-5.32, P = 0.04) were observed in the NAC group.

NAC is safe and feasible for patients with LACC, but no significant survival benefit could be demonstrated. The application of NAC still needs to be prudent until significant evidence supporting the oncological outcomes is presented.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier (CRD42022333306).